No Help from Islamic Nations.

[Tyrantt]

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

You do not understand. Do you see how immigrants behave in France, Germany, Swe, etc.. The problem is that they don't want to adapt to western way of life, and are mostly here for free money. Take a look at how they're crossing borders, they aren't waiting in line and following the procedure. America is a country of Legal immigrants.

@Casanova18 He dosen't like his people getting raped and giving money to money leeches.

[Idrisu]

I dont see any Islamic nations taking in the refugees. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are more than capable to take in and feed these refugees. Is it mandatory that the USA should take them in, why dont they want to go to other Islamic States?

I even though countries like Iraq chad and Dubai could  provide help for their fellow muslim. Just like a story told by our lord Jesus Christ about a question ask " who is my neighbour"? Muslim are not neighbours to each others but they expect united states of America to take them in. We should help them any way! And by doing so is a sign that we have the spirit of God inside us who gives both rain to the evil and good.

[Sithara007]

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals.

[StefanReed]

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals.

I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases.

[Flamma]

I just think that these countries had been helping out and it's just not covered by the media. I also think because Islamic countries have Muslim religionas their main one, a lot of people would think that they may not be capable of helpinh out. It's just amazing that they have the capability but not everyone welcomes the idea that they "can". U

[Sithara007]

I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases.

In that case, these people might have migrated using the family chain migration options. It is the responsibility of the immigration authorities to deny visas to such people, who can drain the resources.

[Flamma]

Most of us consider muslims as terrorists. But we must consider that not all hates muslims. Some are afraid of being accused as being terrorist. But we must consider the goodnessnof every person. Everyone of us doesnt consider war as a resolution of the problem we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

[Spendulus]

...we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

As an athiest, I will pass on your offer.

But I will be happy to buy the beer, anytime.

[Sithara007]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

[Lieldoryn]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

On the one hand you are right, but on the other hand religion is largely supersedes the criminal code for believers. If you do not take into account Islam. In fact, religions seek to subjugate the people, and thus contribute to the reduction of crime

[Spendulus]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

[bitcoinboy12]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone.

[Spendulus]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone.

The control freaks in the populations would just find another avenue to oppress people with.

[DeanShow]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone.

The control freaks in the populations would just find another avenue to oppress people with.

I do not see any methods of control over man. It seems to me that under the pretext of combating terrorism will soon be asked to put the chip to all migrants. Then this rule will apply to other people.

[bitbunnni]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone.

The control freaks in the populations would just find another avenue to oppress people with.

I do not see any methods of control over man. It seems to me that under the pretext of combating terrorism will soon be asked to put the chip to all migrants. Then this rule will apply to other people.

Actually before the migration was a very positive thing and not even particularly could be resent. Of course America has long been faced with migrants from South America, and this adds to the problems even crime. But what is happening today in Europe, then it is beyond normal understanding. It's chaos. In this way it will destroy Europe.

[Mometaskers]

From what I've read, they seem to be sending money but they don't want those people in their countries. Probably afraid that they would also cause problems there. The Middle East already have a booming population and it's easy to see why they don't want more people in (three words: BREED LIKE RABBITS). Their way of living is starting to become unsustainable, the drop in oil price last year made that painfully clear to them. The monarchs are probably fearing that having their population see these people living on welfare would make them more resentment of the privileges of the royals.

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals.

I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases.

Image of man living of the welfare his wives and children are receiving is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw your comment.

[Alexzap]

we must join hands to promote unity for every religion

What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans.

It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also.

Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone.

The control freaks in the populations would just find another avenue to oppress people with.

I do not see any methods of control over man. It seems to me that under the pretext of combating terrorism will soon be asked to put the chip to all migrants. Then this rule will apply to other people.

Actually before the migration was a very positive thing and not even particularly could be resent. Of course America has long been faced with migrants from South America, and this adds to the problems even crime. But what is happening today in Europe, then it is beyond normal understanding. It's chaos. In this way it will destroy Europe.

I agree with you. The Germans did not appreciate the consequences of the fact that the majority of migrants cannot and does not want to work. They go to Europe to sit on the Dole and not work. Even if they receive a third of the benefits they will earn more than in their own country. This could weaken the EU economy.

[Spirit2016]

From what I've read, they seem to be sending money but they don't want those people in their countries. Probably afraid that they would also cause problems there. The Middle East already have a booming population and it's easy to see why they don't want more people in (three words: BREED LIKE RABBITS). Their way of living is starting to become unsustainable, the drop in oil price last year made that painfully clear to them. The monarchs are probably fearing that having their population see these people living on welfare would make them more resentment of the privileges of the royals.

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals.

I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases.

Image of man living of the welfare his wives and children are receiving is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw your comment.

If we take the situation with Europe, the current migrants hope for the benefit and at the expense of this they want to live. If truth be told, then in Europe such a benefit that in some countries, wages are lower.
And the charitable  organizations help with everything necessary, so nobody really intends to work there. But this is a boring exception to the rules. Most people go to another country for a better life and work there to live, not to beg from the state or engage in crime.

[Alexzap]

From what I've read, they seem to be sending money but they don't want those people in their countries. Probably afraid that they would also cause problems there. The Middle East already have a booming population and it's easy to see why they don't want more people in (three words: BREED LIKE RABBITS). Their way of living is starting to become unsustainable, the drop in oil price last year made that painfully clear to them. The monarchs are probably fearing that having their population see these people living on welfare would make them more resentment of the privileges of the royals.

the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo

What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand.

First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals.

I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases.

Image of man living of the welfare his wives and children are receiving is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw your comment.

If we take the situation with Europe, the current migrants hope for the benefit and at the expense of this they want to live. If truth be told, then in Europe such a benefit that in some countries, wages are lower.
And the charitable  organizations help with everything necessary, so nobody really intends to work there. But this is a boring exception to the rules. Most people go to another country for a better life and work there to live, not to beg from the state or engage in crime.

This does not apply to immigrants from poor Muslim countries. To live at the expense of people with other religion in Islam is considered to be good because they don't consider infidels for the people.

[RJX]

I dont see any Islamic nations taking in the refugees. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are more than capable to take in and feed these refugees. Is it mandatory that the USA should take them in, why dont they want to go to other Islamic States?

Outside Mecca lies a  camp for pilgrims. It houses a million people in airconditioned tents and had all amenities anyone away from home could ask for.

This camp remains unoccupied for the greater part of the year.