Bitcoin Forum
February 21, 2020, 10:15:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
  Print  
Author Topic: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm NVIDIA GPU miner [1.5.6a]  (Read 178651 times)
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1003


View Profile
June 14, 2017, 08:01:59 PM
 #601

2 zawawa
Can you test your dagger-hashimoto miner on hi epoch like 150 and 200. What will you get on Polaris? Claymore's is falling from 31 to 17 mhs ))
1582280106
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582280106

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582280106
Reply with quote  #2

1582280106
Report to moderator
1582280106
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582280106

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582280106
Reply with quote  #2

1582280106
Report to moderator
1582280106
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582280106

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582280106
Reply with quote  #2

1582280106
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1582280106
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582280106

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582280106
Reply with quote  #2

1582280106
Report to moderator
djeZo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 07:13:17 AM
 #602

Can anyone report any kind of issues with lbry on NVIDIA? You should be getting around 400 MHs on 1080 and 300 MHs on 1070.

joaocha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 255
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 12:48:35 PM
Last edit: June 15, 2017, 01:02:32 PM by joaocha
 #603

Zawawa why hashing speed start something like 3 mhs, and start growing slow until arrives something like 29 mhs on eth?
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1021


Now the money is free, and so the people will be


View Profile WWW
June 15, 2017, 12:50:47 PM
Last edit: June 15, 2017, 01:03:28 PM by fr4nkthetank
 #604

Can anyone report any kind of issues with lbry on NVIDIA? You should be getting around 400 MHs on 1080 and 300 MHs on 1070.

Reporting in with EVGA 1070, I am getting somewhat improved speeds on ccminerx64 for lbry. 280-285 speeds @ 75 power limit and core +125, mem -502.  some problemos, of course with the web page open gpu 0 is less (power % fluctuates) so I had to close it, but its useful. I am getting about 5-10% rejects, sometimes when pool (coinmine.pl) sends new work there is a reject.  all excavator settings are default.  Seems stable.  the rejects have got me worried a bit, ill leave it running and see what kind of efficiency I get.  Also, Power usage seems in line with ccminer x64, maybe 5w more.

edit:  rejects seemed to have calmed down.  still stable.  Great job guys.

reb0rn21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1821
Merit: 1020


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 06:28:25 PM
 #605

Can anyone report any kind of issues with lbry on NVIDIA? You should be getting around 400 MHs on 1080 and 300 MHs on 1070.

same speed as alexis which is logical  Grin
if used 2 threads per GPU on 5 card system 3,4 and 5th card need some time to initialize

Dual mine Zilliqa pool with any other POW coin: http://rudnik.hopto.org:5000/
wacko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1014


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 07:47:37 PM
 #606

I'm still not 100% clear how to mine with multiple GPUs. Cheesy Is this correct for a 4 GPU rig?

[
   {"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["lbry","lbry.suprnova.cc:6256","account.worker"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]}
   ]},
   {"time":10,"loop":10,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["2"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["3"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
   ]}
]

Why is there 2 identical lines in the default .json file?
{"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]}
   ]},

Does this mean that the miner will use 2 threads per each GPU? Is it faster (higher hashrate) than 1 thread per GPU? The miner keeps crashing for me after 10-30 seconds of running and the window disappears too quickly so I can't even see the crash reason (I think it's "cuda error something"). Sorry for noobish questions, it's just most mining software out there has simple readme files explaining each parameter in detail, and this one has too many things that aren't obvious (like all those "id:1" things in the .json, it's probably all perfectly clear to those familiar with json files, but for those of us that aren't... well, the whole syntax is a bit confusing).

By the way, regarding those rejected "low difficulty" shares on suprnova — there's now a note on top of the page, saying "Nicehash: lbry.suprnova.cc:6257". Kinda cryptic, does it mean that if I'm using excavator with suprnova lbry pool, I'm supposed to connect to 6257 port, instead of 6256? Or is for nicehash users only?
Adevill20
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 09:06:21 PM
 #607

I get the following error when trying to run with 6 x RX480 on Win 10. I have disabled the driver sig. Any help ??

=============================
Running Admin shell
=============================

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

======================= www.nicehash.com =====================
            Excavator v1.2.5a GPU Miner for NiceHash.
       Copyright (C) 2017 NiceHash. All rights reserved.
Developed by djeZo and zawawa with help and contributions from
         pallas, Vorksholk, bitbandi, ocminer, Genoil
======================= www.nicehash.com =====================

Build time: 2017-06-14 00:49:03
Build number: 388
Provided startup commandline:
        ..\excavator  -c ..\default_command_file.json

[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] Log started
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] opencl | Loaded phymem for direct PCIe access.
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][error] OpenCL error 'Out of resources' in func 'openclhelp::init' line 262
flisko
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 09:26:54 PM
 #608

[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] Log started
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to load AMD Display Library.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to initialize AMD Display Library.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] Unable to access PCIe buses. Run miner as administrator instead.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to load phymem.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Please disable driver signature enforcement and run miner as administrator.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] core | Found CUDA device: GeForce GTX 1070
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] http | Listening on 127.0.0.1:38080
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] core | Initialized!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connecting to 37.58.117.214:3356 (lbry.eu.nicehash.com)
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connecting to 37.58.117.214:3353 (daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com)
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connected!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connected!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Authorized as 16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test2
[23:24:55][0x00000334][info] algo-daggerhashimoto | New job '00000008504fbedc', diff=1
[23:24:56][0x00000334][info] net | Authorized as 16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test1
[23:24:56][0x00000334][info] algo-lbry | New job '0000000913b5e0e5', diff=128
[23:24:58][0x00000334][info] algo-lbry | New job '0000000913b5edaa', diff=128
[23:24:59][0x00000fe4][fatal] wrkr0-1 | bad function call
[23:24:58][0x0000284c][info] wrkr0-0 | Algorithm: CUDA-lbry parameters: B=116340,TPB=768,NPT=4
[23:24:59][0x000010c8][info] Shutting down
[23:24:59][0x000010c8][info] http | Closing

I get bad function call only on daggerhashimoto. Please help.
my config:
[
   {"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["lbry","lbry.eu.nicehash.com:3356","16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["daggerhashimoto","daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353","16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test2"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["1","0"]}
   ]},
   {"time":10,"loop":10,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
   ]}
]
djeZo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 09:28:01 PM
 #609

I'm still not 100% clear how to mine with multiple GPUs. Cheesy Is this correct for a 4 GPU rig?

[
   {"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["lbry","lbry.suprnova.cc:6256","account.worker"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]}
   ]},
   {"time":10,"loop":10,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["2"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["3"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
   ]}
]

Why is there 2 identical lines in the default .json file?
{"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]}
   ]},

Does this mean that the miner will use 2 threads per each GPU? Is it faster (higher hashrate) than 1 thread per GPU? The miner keeps crashing for me after 10-30 seconds of running and the window disappears too quickly so I can't even see the crash reason (I think it's "cuda error something"). Sorry for noobish questions, it's just most mining software out there has simple readme files explaining each parameter in detail, and this one has too many things that aren't obvious (like all those "id:1" things in the .json, it's probably all perfectly clear to those familiar with json files, but for those of us that aren't... well, the whole syntax is a bit confusing).

By the way, regarding those rejected "low difficulty" shares on suprnova — there's now a note on top of the page, saying "Nicehash: lbry.suprnova.cc:6257". Kinda cryptic, does it mean that if I'm using excavator with suprnova lbry pool, I'm supposed to connect to 6257 port, instead of 6256? Or is for nicehash users only?

All the instructions are on githib page, nicely explained, but you really need to read it all. If you don't, you cannot know how to use it.

Now, regarding crashing; launch with -f 0 (or modify existing script bat file to do full file logging); log files will be generated and paste one of them here.

Use NiceHash pool. Obviously, suprnova does not follow stratum protocol correctly (immediate diff changes instead of waiting for next job). Also, with next version (1.2.6a), we have improved lbry so there will be less stale shares.

djeZo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 09:29:02 PM
 #610

[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] Log started
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to load AMD Display Library.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to initialize AMD Display Library.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] Unable to access PCIe buses. Run miner as administrator instead.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Failed to load phymem.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][error] opencl | Please disable driver signature enforcement and run miner as administrator.
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] core | Found CUDA device: GeForce GTX 1070
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] http | Listening on 127.0.0.1:38080
[23:24:55][0x000010c8][info] core | Initialized!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connecting to 37.58.117.214:3356 (lbry.eu.nicehash.com)
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connecting to 37.58.117.214:3353 (daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com)
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connected!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Connected!
[23:24:55][0x0000250c][info] net | Authorized as 16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test2
[23:24:55][0x00000334][info] algo-daggerhashimoto | New job '00000008504fbedc', diff=1
[23:24:56][0x00000334][info] net | Authorized as 16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test1
[23:24:56][0x00000334][info] algo-lbry | New job '0000000913b5e0e5', diff=128
[23:24:58][0x00000334][info] algo-lbry | New job '0000000913b5edaa', diff=128
[23:24:59][0x00000fe4][fatal] wrkr0-1 | bad function call
[23:24:58][0x0000284c][info] wrkr0-0 | Algorithm: CUDA-lbry parameters: B=116340,TPB=768,NPT=4
[23:24:59][0x000010c8][info] Shutting down
[23:24:59][0x000010c8][info] http | Closing

I get bad function call only on daggerhashimoto. Please help.
my config:
[
   {"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["lbry","lbry.eu.nicehash.com:3356","16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["daggerhashimoto","daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353","16JXzYjdDcAojgkADGwtqM8UdKBkPXrZSn.test2"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["1","0"]}
   ]},
   {"time":10,"loop":10,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
   ]}
]


Daggerhashimoto is not yet supported on NVIDIA, read here which algorithms you can use: https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/tree/master/nvidia

zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 300


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 09:55:21 PM
 #611

I get the following error when trying to run with 6 x RX480 on Win 10. I have disabled the driver sig. Any help ??

=============================
Running Admin shell
=============================

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

======================= www.nicehash.com =====================
            Excavator v1.2.5a GPU Miner for NiceHash.
       Copyright (C) 2017 NiceHash. All rights reserved.
Developed by djeZo and zawawa with help and contributions from
         pallas, Vorksholk, bitbandi, ocminer, Genoil
======================= www.nicehash.com =====================

Build time: 2017-06-14 00:49:03
Build number: 388
Provided startup commandline:
        ..\excavator  -c ..\default_command_file.json

[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] Log started
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] opencl | Loaded phymem for direct PCIe access.
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][error] OpenCL error 'Out of resources' in func 'openclhelp::init' line 262

This is most likely a driver issue. I would try a different driver.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
trackers
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 2


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 10:30:51 PM
 #612

Is excavator generally more or less profitable than the nicehash cloud mining?

Is HW acceleration likely to occur for other AMD cards or just the ones listed? I've got a R9 390 and a couple RX550's

Thanks heaps for all your work, I'm a happy use of the standard GUI but looking to switch over to pool mining
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 300


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 01:33:03 AM
 #613

Is HW acceleration likely to occur for other AMD cards or just the ones listed? I've got a R9 390 and a couple RX550's

That's entirely up to whether I would be able to get my hands on the actual hardware.
I have two 7990's lying around and am getting R9-390X and R9-Nano, so these cards and their likes such as R9-390 and 7970 should be supported sooner than later. Hardware acceleration is actually coming along quite nicely so far with the RX series, and I would expect the same with other AMD cards.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
zorvalth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 06:05:19 AM
 #614

What speeds do you get on dagger? No matter what settings i try i always get around 2mh/s slower then claymore..
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 300


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 06:30:01 AM
 #615

What speeds do you get on dagger? No matter what settings i try i always get around 2mh/s slower then claymore..

I am getting around 29Mh/s with an overclocked RX 480.
For some reason, excavator does not perform as well as I expected when the GPU is overclocked.
I am working on the issue right now and will keep you updated.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 300


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 06:40:48 AM
 #616

Actually, what needs to be done is fairly clear.
It is just a lot of work. Oh well.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
Chipychop
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 08:13:43 AM
 #617

what's your opinion after testing that and compared with claymore?

I started mining a week ago, with claymore dual mining eth+dcr with rx 470 but I would like to know if other miner could be better
Adevill20
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 08:21:09 AM
Last edit: June 16, 2017, 11:35:00 AM by Adevill20
 #618

I get the following error when trying to run with 6 x RX480 on Win 10. I have disabled the driver sig. Any help ??

=============================
Running Admin shell
=============================

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.

======================= www.nicehash.com =====================
            Excavator v1.2.5a GPU Miner for NiceHash.
       Copyright (C) 2017 NiceHash. All rights reserved.
Developed by djeZo and zawawa with help and contributions from
         pallas, Vorksholk, bitbandi, ocminer, Genoil
======================= www.nicehash.com =====================

Build time: 2017-06-14 00:49:03
Build number: 388
Provided startup commandline:
        ..\excavator  -c ..\default_command_file.json

[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] Log started
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][info] opencl | Loaded phymem for direct PCIe access.
[23:01:29][0x0000080c][error] OpenCL error 'Out of resources' in func 'openclhelp::init' line 262

This is most likely a driver issue. I would try a different driver.

I was able to get further, had to disable the integrated graphics, however now I just get a "Excavator has crashed..." message. set debug level to 0 but does not show any other information, just
"opencl | Loaded phymem for direct PCIe access.
Excavator has crashed"

I'm running 16.9.2 as i'm currently using claymore, what driver would you recommend ? latest ?
davescream
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 06:46:00 PM
Last edit: June 16, 2017, 07:03:14 PM by davescream
 #619

ethash is here.
I have RX 580 4gb with modded+oc bios, on claymore miner I run dual (ETH+SIA) at 29.2+430
With genoil miner i have 27.2 mh
With excavator 1.2.6a i have the same ~27 mh

I tried dual mining with excavator and i have 25.7+146 ETH+SIA  on oc bios
https://pp.userapi.com/c637726/v637726838/62161/bthnUemZ7-s.jpg

and 19.1 + 142 ETH+SIA with all stock settings
https://pp.userapi.com/c637726/v637726838/62181/2z53ITFcxfY.jpg

I have binary kernels enabled.
On my Windows 7 x64 I disabled driver signature test, and rebooted, so my windows run in testmode, but excavator say that it failed to load phymem. does phymem work on Windows 7 x64? And how much it may add to speed?
https://pp.userapi.com/c637726/v637726838/621b8/zkwu5I1GNYo.jpg

I use 17.5.2 AMD drivers with atikmdag path.
----
the major problem and why im here is POLARIS blackout. Claymore miner benchmarks shows that on epoch 199 Polaris will drop hashrate to 45% (from 29.2mh to ~17mh). I ran genoil benchmarks with epoch 199, genoil speed dosent slow down, but i think genoil benchmarks is not true because it create DAG only 1.3GB instead of >2GB for epoch 199.

Guys may we ask you to make some benchmark that will allow to test daggerhashimoto speeds on ethash for epoch >150, that information about Polaris is so important for us.
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 300


Miner Developer


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 07:37:08 PM
 #620

ethash is here.
I have RX 580 4gb with modded+oc bios, on claymore miner I run dual (ETH+SIA) at 29.2+430
With genoil miner i have 27.2 mh
With excavator 1.2.6a i have the same ~27 mh

I tried dual mining with excavator and i have 25.7+146 ETH+SIA  on oc bios


and 19.1 + 142 ETH+SIA with all stock settings


I have binary kernels enabled.
On my Windows 7 x64 I disabled driver signature test, and rebooted, so my windows run in testmode, but excavator say that it failed to load phymem. does phymem work on Windows 7 x64? And how much it may add to speed?


I use 17.5.2 AMD drivers with atikmdag path.
----
the major problem and why im here is POLARIS blackout. Claymore miner benchmarks shows that on epoch 199 Polaris will drop hashrate to 45% (from 29.2mh to ~17mh). I ran genoil benchmarks with epoch 199, genoil speed dosent slow down, but i think genoil benchmarks is not true because it create DAG only 1.3GB instead of >2GB for epoch 199.

Guys may we ask you to make some benchmark that will allow to test daggerhashimoto speeds on ethash for epoch >150, that information about Polaris is so important for us.

I was wondering about the context of your request, but it's now clear to me.
We are on the same boat as I own a bunch of Polaris cards as well.
Let me see if I can run a benchmark or two for epoch 199.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!