Are terrorists only muslim in religion?

[andrei56]

why are all terror activities carried out in the world are by people of muslim religion?Why cant muslims let peace be there in the world?Are people of only muslim origins terrorist?so trumps decision by banning muslim is 100% correct?

Terrorism is carried by people of other religions as well, probably one of the most famous is  Timothy  McVeigh and the Oklahoma bombings.

[1713531433]

1713531433

[1713531433]

1713531433

[1713531433]

1713531433

[BADecker]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

Not only ISIS. Such currents in Islam a lot that confirms your words. It seems to me that Islam is not really closer to religion, but to a closed community. At the moment, the Muslims did not come to the consciousness of what on earth a lot of people who think differently and they also have the right to exist.

Yes. So, when ISIS kills other Muslims, they are only obeying the instructions in the Koran... to kill people who are falling away from Islam. This force makes Islam to be government besides religion.

My hope is that peaceful Muslims would unite, throw off Islam, and form a true religion of peace, but kill off violent Islam followers as their right of defense. And, that they would do this formally. There are many religions of peace all over the world that Muslims could copy to do this.

[Lieldoryn]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

Not only ISIS. Such currents in Islam a lot that confirms your words. It seems to me that Islam is not really closer to religion, but to a closed community. At the moment, the Muslims did not come to the consciousness of what on earth a lot of people who think differently and they also have the right to exist.

Yes. So, when ISIS kills other Muslims, they are only obeying the instructions in the Koran... to kill people who are falling away from Islam. This force makes Islam to be government besides religion.

My hope is that peaceful Muslims would unite, throw off Islam, and form a true religion of peace, but kill off violent Islam followers as their right of defense. And, that they would do this formally. There are many religions of peace all over the world that Muslims could copy to do this.

Most likely the Muslims will never abandon Islam. It's just that this religion will eventually become more tolerant. In the middle ages, the Catholic Church also burned at the stake those who disagree with its canons. Now it is a peaceful religion. Islam is still too young.

[BCEmporium]

Most likely the Muslims will never abandon Islam. It's just that this religion will eventually become more tolerant. In the middle ages, the Catholic Church also burned at the stake those who disagree with its canons. Now it is a peaceful religion. Islam is still too young.

Catholics lost WW 1, that's what made them "cool down" a bit.
One thing emerged by force hardly goes down on any other way...

[Sithara007]

Most likely the Muslims will never abandon Islam. It's just that this religion will eventually become more tolerant. In the middle ages, the Catholic Church also burned at the stake those who disagree with its canons. Now it is a peaceful religion. Islam is still too young.

No. Islam will never become tolerant. That is the difference between Islam and the other religions. Christianity and the other religions have become tolerant along with the progress of the human civilization. But the same can't be said about Islam.

[Spendulus]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

Not only ISIS. Such currents in Islam a lot that confirms your words. It seems to me that Islam is not really closer to religion, but to a closed community. At the moment, the Muslims did not come to the consciousness of what on earth a lot of people who think differently and they also have the right to exist.

Yes. So, when ISIS kills other Muslims, they are only obeying the instructions in the Koran... to kill people who are falling away from Islam. This force makes Islam to be government besides religion.

My hope is that peaceful Muslims would unite, throw off Islam, and form a true religion of peace, but kill off violent Islam followers as their right of defense. And, that they would do this formally. There are many religions of peace all over the world that Muslims could copy to do this.

Most likely the Muslims will never abandon Islam. It's just that this religion will eventually become more tolerant. In the middle ages, the Catholic Church also burned at the stake those who disagree with its canons. Now it is a peaceful religion. Islam is still too young.

Historically, religions with too rigid a set of rules were inflexibly unable to cope with changing conditions, changing worlds.  Those religions NO LONGER EXIST.

Won't bother me if that happens with Islam.

Bolded above, placing the fault on the age of the religion, is inaccurate.  First look at the actual scriptures, compare Christianity with Islam.  Then look at the behavior of the believers.

Islam says go be violent, and their people do just that.

[poetra2501]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

No, No.. You are very wrong brother, the Koran never says like that. A criminal is a criminal. In the Koran, surah Al-Ma’idah : 32 referred to:

"... Whoever kills a human being, not because of the people that (killing) someone else, or not because of the mischief of the Earth, then it's like he has killed the man completely. And whoever kept the life of a human being, then it's like he had kept all human life. …”
From this paragraph is quite clearly PROVES that Islam opposes the killing of any innocent man, Muslims or non-Muslims. Islam clearly challenging acts of terrorism in all its forms.

I have any questions for you :
1. Who always invades a country peaceful, secure, serene just for the sake of expansion?
2. Who is always broadcast a religious teachings in a way to invade her in advance?
3. Who is always interested in mastering as well as "robs" the country's oil is good in a way the country pitting opposition, funded, spreading bomb slander, making the State never there is peace?
4. Who is loan sucker the world (IMF) that makes the country so add their patients ' misery with a foul and vile system?
5. Who are the perpetrators and supporters of the occupation, deprivation of the land community, the massacre of Palestinians from 1948 until now?

Yes I'm Muslim and I'm proud be Muslim.

[Sithara007]

Bolded above, placing the fault on the age of the religion, is inaccurate.  First look at the actual scriptures, compare Christianity with Islam.  Then look at the behavior of the believers.

You can't compare Christianity with Islam. Christianity is not a religion which dictates your daily life. Adherence to Christianity doesn't require you to refrain from eating certain foods, or to undergo any body modifications. But Islam is a religion, which requires strict adherence to taboos and customs.

[Format.C^]

Not all muslims are terrorists but most of them are muslims and that is the reason people start having same perception about all muslims and have negative impression about them and for the same reason people hate muslims.

[SoulBargain]

You need to slightly modify your post. There are different types of terrorism, such as religious terrorism, drug-related terrorism, communist terror.etc. There are non-Muslims involved in some types of terror, such as the NDFP / NPA of the Philippines. But 99% of the terrorism motivated by religion are committed by Muslims.

I agree. Yes most religious terrorism are committed by Muslims which can be traced form ita history if you try to research it. Moreover, this movement is not really for their religion but rather their drive to power in uniting every Muslim ib the world as a caliphate and rule over them as caliph which are connected through the death of Muhammad and the greed of power which splits Islam into a lot of different factions.

FYI we studied the history of Islam way back when we were still making our term paper regarding the contemporary issue we continue to face particularly the ISIS or also known as ISIL.

[Sithara007]

Not all muslims are terrorists but most of them are muslims and that is the reason people start having same perception about all muslims and have negative impression about them and for the same reason people hate muslims.

Why normal people don't have any issues with Buddhists or Hindus? Why they only have issues with the Muslims? You can't play the victim card forever. First treat the non-Muslims living in Muslim countries humanely, and automatically other people will respect the Muslims.

[prince V]

Not all muslims are terrorists but most of them are muslims and that is the reason people start having same perception about all muslims and have negative impression about them and for the same reason people hate muslims.

Why normal people don't have any issues with Buddhists or Hindus? Why they only have issues with the Muslims? You can't play the victim card forever. First treat the non-Muslims living in Muslim countries humanely, and automatically other people will respect the Muslims.

muslims dont show humanity towards muslim how they will show towards mon-muslim.
history is the witness muslim kings used to kill their own father to become ruler/king.
Muslims had burnt and robbed temples and then built mosquees on that place/over temple.
Tell them to respect humanity and respect other religions and stop behaving all time like terrorists and only after that they can be differentiated from terrorists.till that only 1 thing can be said muslims are terrorists.
2 persons have voted no muslim is terrorist a msg for them, just visit wiki wiki link of islamic terrorism i have put up you will understand yourself

[BADecker]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

No, No.. You are very wrong brother, the Koran never says like that. A criminal is a criminal. In the Koran, surah Al-Ma’idah : 32 referred to:

"... Whoever kills a human being, not because of the people that (killing) someone else, or not because of the mischief of the Earth, then it's like he has killed the man completely. And whoever kept the life of a human being, then it's like he had kept all human life. …”
From this paragraph is quite clearly PROVES that Islam opposes the killing of any innocent man, Muslims or non-Muslims. Islam clearly challenging acts of terrorism in all its forms.

I have any questions for you :
1. Who always invades a country peaceful, secure, serene just for the sake of expansion?
2. Who is always broadcast a religious teachings in a way to invade her in advance?
3. Who is always interested in mastering as well as "robs" the country's oil is good in a way the country pitting opposition, funded, spreading bomb slander, making the State never there is peace?
4. Who is loan sucker the world (IMF) that makes the country so add their patients ' misery with a foul and vile system?
5. Who are the perpetrators and supporters of the occupation, deprivation of the land community, the massacre of Palestinians from 1948 until now?

Yes I'm Muslim and I'm proud be Muslim.

Doesn't the Koran teach that you can lie to non-Muslims without sinning? You admit that you are a proud Muslim. Be all you can be. You found one little verse and took it out of context. Look at some of the rest:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

 

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

 

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

 

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

 

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

 

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

 

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

 

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

 

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

 

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

 

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

 

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

 

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

 

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

 

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

 

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

 

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

 

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

 

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

 

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

 

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

 

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?

 

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

 

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

 

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

 

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

 

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

 

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.

 

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"   

 

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

 

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.

 

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

 

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

 

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

[BCTBF]

Not all muslims are terrorists but most of them are muslims and that is the reason people start having same perception about all muslims and have negative impression about them and for the same reason people hate muslims.

Why normal people don't have any issues with Buddhists or Hindus? Why they only have issues with the Muslims? You can't play the victim card forever. First treat the non-Muslims living in Muslim countries humanely, and automatically other people will respect the Muslims.

where you see a non-Muslim treated inhumanely in Muslim countries?
Have you ever seen or know people Muslims massacred in Thailand? which is where about 95% of the population in Thailand is buddha, where are you? whether you close your eyes and ears to know this news?
terrorist attack is not focused only to non-Muslims, terrorists also attacked the Muslims with the terrorist attack at random conclusions, meaning that all religions must unite to fight terrorism.

[markj113]

where you see a non-Muslim treated inhumanely in Muslim countries?
Have you ever seen or know people Muslims massacred in Thailand? which is where about 95% of the population in Thailand is buddha, where are you? whether you close your eyes and ears to know this news?
terrorist attack is not focused only to non-Muslims, terrorists also attacked the Muslims with the terrorist attack at random conclusions, meaning that all religions must unite to fight terrorism.

Have a look how the hired help is treated in Saudi

https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#safe=off&q=domestic+worker+abuse+saudi+arabia&*

[Spendulus]

Not all muslims are terrorists but most of them are muslims and that is the reason people start having same perception about all muslims and have negative impression about them and for the same reason people hate muslims.

Why normal people don't have any issues with Buddhists or Hindus? Why they only have issues with the Muslims? You can't play the victim card forever. First treat the non-Muslims living in Muslim countries humanely, and automatically other people will respect the Muslims.

where you see a non-Muslim treated inhumanely in Muslim countries?
Have you ever seen or know people Muslims massacred in Thailand? which is where about 95% of the population in Thailand is buddha, where are you? whether you close your eyes and ears to know this news?....

I'm not convinced you have a "victim card" to play for Muslims as victims in Southern Thailand.  Looking at this conflict's description in Wikipedia, here's what I get for the primary Muslim insurgent group.

The Barisan Revolusi Nasional-Koordinasi (BRN-C) is currently the most important group, spearheading the insurgency in southern Thailand. It was revived after 2001 and its leaders are mainly Salafi religious teachers who have rejected the Pan-Arab socialist ideology of the early BRN, engaging in political activism by recruiting followers in mosques and indoctrinating at Islamic schools. This group has the vision of becoming a mass movement, aiming towards having 400,000 members in its area of operation. The BRN-C has no constructive cultural or nationalistic goals; instead its immediate aim is to make southern Thailand ungovernable. It has been largely successful at spreading and maintaining an atmosphere of terror and uncertainty through well-trained secret militant units that engage in assassinations and calculated destruction.

Yet another bunch of terrorists.  Islamic terrorists.

Deal with it.

[BCEmporium]

No, No.. You are very wrong brother, the Koran never says like that. A criminal is a criminal. In the Koran, surah Al-Ma’idah : 32 referred to:

"... Whoever kills a human being, not because of the people that (killing) someone else, or not because of the mischief of the Earth, then it's like he has killed the man completely. And whoever kept the life of a human being, then it's like he had kept all human life. …”
From this paragraph is quite clearly PROVES that Islam opposes the killing of any innocent man, Muslims or non-Muslims. Islam clearly challenging acts of terrorism in all its forms.

I have any questions for you :
1. Who always invades a country peaceful, secure, serene just for the sake of expansion?
2. Who is always broadcast a religious teachings in a way to invade her in advance?
3. Who is always interested in mastering as well as "robs" the country's oil is good in a way the country pitting opposition, funded, spreading bomb slander, making the State never there is peace?
4. Who is loan sucker the world (IMF) that makes the country so add their patients ' misery with a foul and vile system?
5. Who are the perpetrators and supporters of the occupation, deprivation of the land community, the massacre of Palestinians from 1948 until now?

Yes I'm Muslim and I'm proud be Muslim.

First your quote actually proves you as a liar, because that's half of the quote and the rest isn't that "opposing to kill".
Then, where were the USA back on the VII Century? Nowhere, right? You're trying to excuse with the XX Century a thing that's bringing nothing but violence for the last 1400 years!

[af_newbie]

To everyone here, PLEASE STOP you are say Muslim is terorist, DON'T you are look at ISIS, ISIS is not Islam, But whom they want to destroyed a reputation of Islam in the world. We are Know that, in any religion, terorist is a word which very hated. If a person make a wrong, don't blame the religion, blame that's person.

ISIS is Islam. Why? They follow the words of the Koran and Hadiths for violence. The Koran violence can be seen here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm.

Many Muslims say that the violence is interpreted incorrectly. They say that Islam is a religion of peace. The peace is only for Muslims. Look at the words in the link. Are they interpret incorrectly? No. They are words of violence which are correctly translated.

Islamic clerics have taught Muslims that the words in the Koran do not say what they say. But anybody can see that the words are the accurately translated. What is the result of all this? Most Muslims are really not Muslim, because they believe the clerics rather than the Koran. This is why ISIS kills many of them. ISIS is killing backsliders who will not join them and obey the Koran.

Are you Muslim? Obey the Koran and kill people who are not Muslim. That is what the Koran says. That is what ISIS is doing.

No, No.. You are very wrong brother, the Koran never says like that. A criminal is a criminal. In the Koran, surah Al-Ma’idah : 32 referred to:

"... Whoever kills a human being, not because of the people that (killing) someone else, or not because of the mischief of the Earth, then it's like he has killed the man completely. And whoever kept the life of a human being, then it's like he had kept all human life. …”
From this paragraph is quite clearly PROVES that Islam opposes the killing of any innocent man, Muslims or non-Muslims. Islam clearly challenging acts of terrorism in all its forms.

I have any questions for you :
1. Who always invades a country peaceful, secure, serene just for the sake of expansion?
2. Who is always broadcast a religious teachings in a way to invade her in advance?
3. Who is always interested in mastering as well as "robs" the country's oil is good in a way the country pitting opposition, funded, spreading bomb slander, making the State never there is peace?
4. Who is loan sucker the world (IMF) that makes the country so add their patients ' misery with a foul and vile system?
5. Who are the perpetrators and supporters of the occupation, deprivation of the land community, the massacre of Palestinians from 1948 until now?

Yes I'm Muslim and I'm proud be Muslim.

You are an idiot.  That is who you are. 

Ask Allah to post here or shut the fuck up.

[bra4our]

I haven't heard anyone shouting Jesus is Great or Buddha is great whiles exploding themselves. Its only muslims who shouts Allahu Akbar when going on with their heinous deeds.

[tanyao93]

Terrorists exist in all religions, but more among Muslims. The reason for this is incorrect education, lack of moral and moral values, low level of economics and education.