Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Avirunes]

Check out PolMiners signature campaign
It looks good and promising

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785312.0

The rates are:

For Hero and Senior Members they pay :
0.25 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Full Members
0.15 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Members
0.05 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

The downside (?) is they require the user make their own signatures

It is closed !!!. Maybe you didn't checked [it looks like it is closed] in thread title. Signature campaign had very high rates.

and also very old signature campaign

September 16, 2014, 07:53:06 PM

[1713557682]

1713557682

[1713557682]

1713557682

[1713557682]

1713557682

[snipie]

Can I recommend to add new categories or exactly to split the PYNC to
PYNC-A (payments not yet confirmed & active) exemple : kingdice...
PYNC-F (payment not yet confirmed & full) example : luckywheel24...

Well this will complicate things a little but it will make it easier to Members to browse

[pawel7777]

Check out PolMiners signature campaign
It looks good and promising

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=785312.0

The rates are:

For Hero and Senior Members they pay :
0.25 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Full Members
0.15 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Members
0.05 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

The downside (?) is they require the user make their own signatures

That's an obvious scam. Cloudmining, refused to escrow, payment after one month, highest rates, didn't even bother to design signatures.
Luckily they got called on it, locked thread and took down their site.

[Mitchell]

Updated table v2.0 for today : http://paste.ee/r/wqiYY

Updated and removed the PAUSED campaigns, mostly because those tend to either stay very long or people keep asking questions about them. I used to have them in the table, but eh, it wasn't worth the effort. I hope you don't mind Fatanut.

[passwordnow]

There's an update at bitvest signature campaign.

Update: Payment structure has been updated, and a campaign payment after this post, will begin the new outlined rates:

★ Bonus pay only apply up to 20 Posts per week
★ 75 Posts max per week (More will count as 75)
★ Max of .03 BTC/Week

★ Personal Advertising Message ONLY: 0.00001 BTC
★ Side Advertising(Competitor + Personal MSG + Newbie Code): 0.00002 BTC
★ Side Advertising(Competitor + Personal MSG + JR Code): 0.000025 BTC
★ JR Member: 0.00006 BTC
★ Member: 0.00011 BTC
★ Full Member: 0.00021 BTC
★ Senior: 0.0003 BTC
★ Hero: 0.0004 BTC   

Bonus Pay Rates

★ JR Member: 0.00009 BTC
★ Member: 0.00016 BTC
★ Full Member: 0.00024 BTC
★ Senior Member: 0.00033 BTC
★ Hero Member:  0.00043 BTC

And also whyfuture campaign is now ready to go again for onemd has already top up the funds for his campaign.

Campaign has been topped off: https://blockchain.info/tx/0fb963fd1fb7c7e1c6b09fd255b95d31d85bea33f6b2c0916f86b9611176676f
And it is unpaused

Confirmed and campaign is now good to go.

I will prepare  sheet shortly once I get out of my busy hours.

So very good update for those members who are in those campaign. Keep up the good work.

[tabas]

hmm where is wingDAO f.e. ??
And can you explain:
amount 0.000x btc is for what period of time/post quantity ?

Well the list just applies to signature campaigns who are paying with bitcoins and not with alt coins. I hope this is going to enlighten you anyway. The amount "0.000 btc" means that rate per post for the rank where it belongs and that "x" that you have mentioned means that it does not apply to those ranks where it is inline on that campaign.

[uki]

I was wondering why the betcoin.ag, as the only campaign on the list is still marked with red star?
PS. Just in case saying that upfront, apart from being signature campaign member I am not related to that business.

[Lutpin]

I was wondering why the betcoin.ag, as the only campaign on the list is still marked with red star?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=202115

[uki]

I was wondering why the betcoin.ag, as the only campaign on the list is still marked with red star?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=202115

The newest entry in the trust rating and in the references provided there is from August, therefore my initial question. I was aware of that issue and that there have been some disputes open, but I haven't monitored this topic further. Has anything changed in the last three months? Are the reasons to avoid this campaign still in play to keep that red asterisk?

From my perspective, as a campaign member, I haven't noticed any directly related reasons to avoid this campaign. Payments are the most competitive in the entire forum, processing of each campaign round is smooth and there are no delays with the payments.

[Lutpin]

From my perspective, as a campaign member, I haven't noticed any directly related reasons to avoid this campaign.

Besides the moral question whether or not you as a user want to help promoting a service like that?
I'd say that's a fair question to ask and hence it's only reasonable to make interested users aware of the problems the service itself (not the signature campaign specifically) has.

[uki]

From my perspective, as a campaign member, I haven't noticed any directly related reasons to avoid this campaign.

Besides the moral question whether or not you as a user want to help promoting a service like that?
I'd say that's a fair question to ask and hence it's only reasonable to make interested users aware of the problems the service itself (not the signature campaign specifically) has.

Agree. I see however that this is a very thin ice territory that leaves a lot of space for subjective interpretations, what is ethically correct and what is not.
Not sure, if that is still in the original focus of this thread, which I love for its purely informative content (technical campaign details and users experience).  

Not to mention that a lot of additional reading must be done, to check each campaign for these aspects to get a fair view on each single campaign, which I doubt is done by most of the members. First because of the time, second because not all the evidence is always fully available. I don't want to sound as I am defending anyone, because I don't. Simply the cases aren't usually black or white, they are grey most of the time.

Just a food for thought.

[satmas]

mBIt casino has a new signature campaign thread here. it's 0.0008 BTC per post with a max of 20 posts per week for Senior members and up. SebastianJu is the escrow as well. Thanks InvoKing.

[InvoKing]

mBIt casino has a new signature campaign thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;topic=615953.5360;num_replies=5374
-snip-

Wrong url satmas
Here is the exact one:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1661862.0

[girlbtc.com]

I think we girlbtc are providing the highest post/week, because , what we are runnning is far different from other sites. we need to promote heavily  and make it success

our post worth 0.0014btc/post at most

you don't need to wear the signature to join this campaign

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1651598.msg16593370#msg16593370

 no need to wear your signature(means you can join two signature campaigns at same time)

double earn

this is a special reply example : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1663955.msg16707622#msg16707622  made by me just now

any question please PM me or reply on our campaign thread.

[Lauda]

Having signatures outside of your signature area will get you and your participants banned.

[kotwica666]

Having signatures outside of your signature area will get you and your participants banned.

Yes, but only when second signature campaign rules not allow to promote other services. In fact, the code included in the text of the post is not a signature. I know that is dangerous game of words, but no one, in this manner, does not break the rules.
It looks like some managers will have to update campaign regulations.

[Edwardard]

Having signatures outside of your signature area will get you and your participants banned.

Yes, but only when second signature campaign rules not allow to promote other services. In fact, the code included in the text of the post is not a signature. I know that is dangerous game of words, but no one, in this manner, does not break the rules.
It looks like some managers will have to update campaign regulations.

I think copying and pasting the same thing at the end of every post is considered as spam and also, it looks very annoying. Lauda is a staff and he knows better about the rules than you or me. just saying.

~snip

what if only include the key word "girlbtc" for 0.0014btc/post?

What do you think about starting a personal text campaign ?

[girlbtc.com]

Having signatures outside of your signature area will get you and your participants banned.

Yes, but only when second signature campaign rules not allow to promote other services. In fact, the code included in the text of the post is not a signature. I know that is dangerous game of words, but no one, in this manner, does not break the rules.
It looks like some managers will have to update campaign regulations.

what if only include the key word "girlbtc" for 0.0014btc/post?

[snipie]

or even only one sentence" The only way you can win from gambling is stopping gamble"

will it be anoying or break some rules of this forum?

Why not just run a simple signature and put the ads in the signature area like everyone?
If a campaign manager prohibited to join another signature and a user broke the rules then he needs to get banned from the signature in question.
Also mods already banned people posting repeatedly the same text at the end of the posts over and over.
Use the signature space or put an avatar or maybe a text in the area under the avatar but I am not sure whether the last one is permitted

[kotwica666]

Having signatures outside of your signature area will get you and your participants banned.

Yes, but only when second signature campaign rules not allow to promote other services. In fact, the code included in the text of the post is not a signature. I know that is dangerous game of words, but no one, in this manner, does not break the rules.
It looks like some managers will have to update campaign regulations.

I think copying and pasting the same thing at the end of every post is considered as spam and also, it looks very annoying. Lauda is a staff and he knows better about the rules than you or me. just saying.

Of course, that Lauda must know better than we rules of the forum! I didn't get his post as statement of Staff Member (to be honest I forgot that he is from the crew ). My post was only about the campaigns rules.
If Lauda says that this is not permitted by the rules of forum, it means, that girlbtc.com can forget about this type of promotion.