Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Betwrong]

Hi Mitchell!

First off, thanks for very useful info you provide to this forum.

I thought maybe it's time to update the OP according to this:

From Stage 14 policy change:
Maximum: 100 constructive posts per month
Minimum: 30 constructive posts per month

[1713426875]

1713426875

[InvoKing]

★★★ Signature Rate ★★★
  JR Member :    0.00005 BTC per constructive post.              - payout changed as of 6/13
  Member :        0.00008 BTC per constructive post.                   - payout changed as of 6/20
  Full Member : 0.00024 BTC per constructive post.             - payout changed as of 9/19   
  Senior :         0.00029 BTC per constructive post.                     - payout changed as of 9/19
  Hero  :          0.00035 BTC per constructive post.      - payout changed as of 10/25           
  Legendary :    0.00041 BTC per constructive post.      - payout changed as of 10/25         

and no one noticed that theses two prices has changed from a month ago (so you understand simply who are already using it)

[jacee]

New campaign Bitconnect: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1692930.0

Full members: 0.00065 BTC/Post
Sr. members: 0.0008 BTC/Post
Hero/Legendary members: 0.0011 BTC/Post

Payments every Friday morning.

[adamvp]

what about maximum amount available in post/weekly   | post/monthly campaign column ??

What do you mean exactly?

He means maximum amount of posts that the campaign is going to pay for. It could be a good idea but I'm not sure how the table you made is going to fit for more columns at this point.

Take a look at the tabel. Take a close look. Notice something? There's literally a column with exactly that name and information.

Not exactly..
I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...
f.e:

Code:

| 777Coin | post/weekly | ** | ** | ** | 0.00017 | 0.00012 | 0.00006 | x | 20/w | 80/w | Y/N |

So Full Member could earn 0.00017*80= 0.0136 btc/week
but yes it could be hard to put it in this table

[shorena]

what about maximum amount available in post/weekly   | post/monthly campaign column ??

What do you mean exactly?

He means maximum amount of posts that the campaign is going to pay for. It could be a good idea but I'm not sure how the table you made is going to fit for more columns at this point.

Take a look at the tabel. Take a close look. Notice something? There's literally a column with exactly that name and information.

Not exactly..
I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...
f.e:

Code:

| 777Coin | post/weekly | ** | ** | ** | 0.00017 | 0.00012 | 0.00006 | x | 20/w | 80/w | Y/N |

So Full Member could earn 0.00017*80= 0.0136 btc/week
but yes it could be hard to put it in this table

Id think only a small part of participants reach the limit, so it would make the table harder to read. On the other hands its not that complicated to multiply by the max or your personal estimate for the time for your rank yourself.

[Mitchell]

I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...

I personally think that it isn't a useful addition to the table as you can easily do this yourself. It makes a table a lot wider and thus harder to read on smaller screens (or not readable at all), so I'm personally against it.

EDIT: OP updated.

[Lutpin]

First payments for Crypto-News have been made earlier today (reference), as there are still open spots, the campaign can be moved to active.
All spots filled for now, the campaign can be moved to CFNP.

[adamvp]

I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...

I personally think that it isn't a useful addition to the table as you can easily do this yourself. It makes a table a lot wider and thus harder to read on smaller screens (or not readable at all), so I'm personally against it.

EDIT: OP updated.

but 0,005 with 10post/week maximum is a much worse than 0,002 with 50 post limit so it could be usefull, maybe not in main table.. but..

[actmyname]

I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...

I personally think that it isn't a useful addition to the table as you can easily do this yourself. It makes a table a lot wider and thus harder to read on smaller screens (or not readable at all), so I'm personally against it.

EDIT: OP updated.

but 0,005 with 10post/week maximum is a much worse than 0,002 with 50 post limit so it could be usefull, maybe not in main table.. but..

Then do the math yourself. For most of them, it only takes a quick peek at the price/post and max number of posts.

Personally, I do most calculations in price/post efficiency over maximum earnings since I don't really want to flood the forum with 200 posts a day, but it all depends on your "work ethic".


AFAIK, for Hero Members, the top-paying signature campaign is Crypto-News right now, cashing in at 0.182 BTC monthly if you include avatar + personal message

But I evaluated my own situation and did not think I would be able to do a minimum of 25 posts consistently every week. (At the end of it, it would be about an equal amount of work for barely any difference)
Hence, you should take care to research things yourself.

[Fatanut]

First payments for Crypto-News have been made earlier today (reference), as there are still open spots, the campaign can be moved to active.
All spots filled for now, the campaign can be moved to CFNP.

It says OPEN on your title again but I'm putting you on CFNP like you said.

[adamvp]

I mean maximum earnings = Max*{rank}rate...

I personally think that it isn't a useful addition to the table as you can easily do this yourself. It makes a table a lot wider and thus harder to read on smaller screens (or not readable at all), so I'm personally against it.

EDIT: OP updated.

but 0,005 with 10post/week maximum is a much worse than 0,002 with 50 post limit so it could be usefull, maybe not in main table.. but..

Then do the math yourself. For most of them, it only takes a quick peek at the price/post and max number of posts.

Personally, I do most calculations in price/post efficiency over maximum earnings since I don't really want to flood the forum with 200 posts a day, but it all depends on your "work ethic".


AFAIK, for Hero Members, the top-paying signature campaign is Crypto-News right now, cashing in at 0.182 BTC monthly if you include avatar + personal message

But I evaluated my own situation and did not think I would be able to do a minimum of 25 posts consistently every week. (At the end of it, it would be about an equal amount of work for barely any difference)
Hence, you should take care to research things yourself.

I wish it could not insert google spreadsheet or so here in post..
most of campaigns have 50post/week limit.  It is not much, it is easy to post about 8 post/day. But that was only my suggestion
and Mitchell you are doing great work and keep working

[Fatanut]

I wish it could not insert google spreadsheet or so here in post..
most of campaigns have 50post/week limit.  It is not much, it is easy to post about 8 post/day. But that was only my suggestion
and Mitchell you are doing great work and keep working

Personally, I think you should be grateful that this table exists. You don't have to scrape the whole services board just to find the best rates, minimum post counts, and the maximum earnings that you can get from various campaigns. It'll take up a lot of your time and you'll end up doing your own spreadsheet if you do that. Someone has been doing that for you now. Life's much easier. Only one guy has to scrape the services board for all the users here. So now that you have all the fundamental info about all the campaigns, maybe you should do your part and calculate the maximum earnings yourself.

But that was just my opinion and I'm just a no one here so don't mind it.

[Nivir]

Another signature campaign for project ICOBID. They seemed to have the highest payment offer right now. Here's the link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1641303.0;

[SFR10]

~Snipped~

It won't be listed here since they pay "ICOBID Token" and all of the campaigns that are listed here, are those that pay in BTCitcoin.

[King Sastro]

Unbelievable is Bitsane payment not yet confirmed moreover, for manager is Mr. Yahoo. But I don't know, why signature campaign betcoin.ag still available but the manager got trust -128.

[Lutpin]

Unbelievable is Bitsane payment not yet confirmed moreover, for manager is Mr. Yahoo.

All campaigns are listed as PNYC until they complete their first payout.
A campaign could be managed by satoshi themselves, it would still be considered PNYC in that initial period.

But I don't know, why signature campaign betcoin.ag still available but the manager got trust -128.

Betcoin.ag is a shady site, if you would have taken the time to check their feedbacks, you would know why they got the trust they have.
That being said, their campaign seems to be well-ran (besides the fact that there is a strong ethic dilemma about the product being advertised).
That's the reason why the campaign is still listed, although marked with a red warning asterisk.

[Lauda]

What do people think about adding another column, i.e. 'Manager'? I think it is also important to list, and provide a nice overview of users managing the campaigns in question. This comes with the cost of widening the list, thus making it look worse on some smaller screens.

[OmegaStarScream]

What do people think about adding another column, i.e. 'Manager'? I think it is also important to list, and provide a nice overview of users managing the campaigns in question. This comes with the cost of widening the list, thus making it look worse on some smaller screens.

I'm not even able to see 'Max' and 'Escrow' at the moment (and I guess It's the case for other people as well) unless I make things smaller so another column will screw the table probably.

Normal view :




After making things smaller :

[Lauda]

I'm not even able to see 'Max' and 'Escrow' at the moment (and I guess It's the case for other people as well) unless I make things smaller so another column will screw the table probably.

What resolution do you use? HD, or even lower? With fHD it currently fits nicely and has enough space for at least another column (I think).

[OmegaStarScream]

I'm not even able to see 'Max' and 'Escrow' at the moment (and I guess It's the case for other people as well) unless I make things smaller so another column will screw the table probably.

What resolution do you use? HD, or even lower? With fHD it currently fits nicely and has enough space for at least another column (I think).

I'm using the recommended (and the maximum) resolution1280x1024 and It shows like the first picture I posted and as I said , to see them I need to change the zoom in the browser.