Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 02:20:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 18223 18224 18225 18226 18227 18228 18229 18230 18231 18232 18233 18234 18235 18236 18237 18238 18239 18240 18241 18242 18243 18244 18245 18246 18247 18248 18249 18250 18251 18252 18253 18254 18255 18256 18257 18258 18259 18260 18261 18262 18263 18264 18265 18266 18267 [18268] 18269 18270 18271 18272 18273 18274 18275 18276 18277 18278 18279 18280 18281 18282 18283 18284 18285 18286 18287 18288 18289 18290 18291 18292 18293 18294 18295 18296 18297 18298 18299 18300 18301 18302 18303 18304 18305 18306 18307 18308 18309 18310 18311 18312 18313 18314 18315 18316 18317 18318 ... 33285 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26364812 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
rolling
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824
Merit: 712


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:05:29 AM

Can someone tell Ver and Wu to pump another fork so I can cash them out too? Maybe a nice BTG or BTX pump? Thanks!
1713579613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713579613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713579613
Reply with quote  #2

1713579613
Report to moderator
1713579613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713579613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713579613
Reply with quote  #2

1713579613
Report to moderator
1713579613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713579613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713579613
Reply with quote  #2

1713579613
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 2230


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:17:10 AM

Ah that's it: We can use the Tesla truck to tow our car-carrier full of Lambos!

As for selling, bit at a time for bitcoin-cost averaging....
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 1708



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:21:47 AM

Forget the Tesla. This is a real sports car.

Buy today for $15K and sell in 10 years for $50K.

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 11969


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:24:06 AM

Forget the Tesla. This is a real sports car.

Buy today for $15K and sell in 10 years for $50K.



Mmmm buy a btc today 7.7k sell in then years for ..........?? How Many figures ?
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1826



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:26:18 AM

When was Bitcointalk forum hacked? This was the one from a year ago correct?
May 2015. I'm still getting phising spam from time to time because of it.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:26:31 AM

So a thought occurs. Many of us were eager to tell everyone about bitcoin when we first got into it, but over time have transitioned to a kind of... "meh" stage, where we let people come to us and only deal out information sparingly. Which is completely normal and reasonable, given how humans operate.

But how far does that reach? When the collapse eventually happens and we become some of the few people who are still doing alright, will we still have the same indifferent attitude to people? How will things go?

Eh, after seeing the backlash online years ago from people telling their friends, family, colleagues, etc. about Bitcoin and getting nothing but shit and ridicule, my attitude remains to keep it to myself and not discuss with anyone. You can lead a horse to water and all that.

I'm not sure what "coming out of the darkweb closet" moment Bitcoin will finally have when it is legitimized in the public eye and people can discuss their involvement openly and freely without fear of ridicule or condescension. When Bitcoin is finally seen as solid, financial game-changer and a force to be reckoned with.

Going to $50K in a year? Amazon adopting it? Apple endorsing it? Google? A whole country? Buffett? The market crashes but Bitcoin goes up? Who knows what it will be, or when.
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1123



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:30:46 AM

 There's a difference. Even Wu won't claim BCH is Bitcoin. He says it's something different. At least he's honest about it.


I wonder.  Can you even coherently and without contradiction use the terms "honest" and Wu in the same sentence?


I will concede that you are likely only referring to Wu's rhetoric in regards to BCH NOT being bitcoin, but still, he seems to be such a sneaky destructive slime ball in so many other regards, that it causes me to believe that you may have by giving him too much credit in suggesting that he is "honest" some regard, because I tend to think of honesty as a more deeper character description rather than just some words that are used in a narrow context that happen to be truthful (this time).

Like Trump blasting Sen. Franken-groper, but not Moore, his buddies nor himself, the Groper-In-Chief.

Now...back to our regularly scheduled Moon shot....

Sen. Franken-groper didn't blast himself either all that time and that photo of him kidding on he is about to grope a sleeping soldier to me is creepy and just totally wacko for a man in his position. If the media made a fuss over the Trump audio tape they should surely roast Franken more than they are doing and demand an apology too.

Oh, he's getting hammered!  Besides, he wasn't a Senator then-- just a stand-up comedian...just not very stand-up.   Angry
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:31:19 AM

What is this then, attack of the clone coin again?
ghandi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 505



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:32:57 AM

Maybe they want to push the weekend dump further down by pumping bch.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:33:23 AM

...
No. Dabs was the one that first postulated daily opening and closing channels. I merely am guiding Dabs to the natural conclusion of that postulate.

If Dabs made proposition for one use-case, and you make generalization based on single case, doesn't that sound wrong to you?

I was not generalizing to all use cases. I was specifically and pointedly correcting the errors in his specific example. If anyone generalized the discussion, it was you.

Quote
Quote
Quote
Not only that channels can send funds to each other for the purpose of closing,
Admittedly, I've not heard that before. So you are saying the transactions will never be settled on-chain? You realize then that such transactions are by definition 'not Bitcoin', right?

And yes, LN channels are 'not Bitcoin',

right...

Quote
... until they close sometime in the future.

...right...

Quote
All countless transactions that can securely happen on the channel do not pollute the blockchain like your big blocks pollute BCH blockchain.

So transactions are pollution? Interesting viewpoint.

Quote
So again go educate yourself to find another topic to spread FUD, preferable for you less obviously false.

You have not disagreed with anything I actually asserted. Any disagreement you claim to have with me here is only against some strawman you have misconstructed. I am not spewing FUD, I am correcting inaccuracies.

With the current Bitcoin Segwit, if each user is to open and close a single channel daily (Dabs' hypothetical), the network cannot accommodate more than a quarter-million users. Period. 'Cause math.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:33:53 AM

Several more posts deleted. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2402558.msg24764984#msg24764984

I sure wish @infofront would inform me of exactly what stated criteria I have run afoul of, while the posts to which I am replying somehow escape deletion.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:41:00 AM

Several more posts deleted. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2402558.msg24764984#msg24764984

I sure wish @infofront would inform me of exactly what stated criteria I have run afoul of, while the posts to which I am replying somehow escape deletion.

Were you this excited about ETH? did you ride that flippening too?
Also, what's your professional involvement in monero? you submitted code? how many alt pies you got your hands in exactly?
Pistacia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 3


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:46:28 AM

Several more posts deleted.

Glad to see this crap deleted from this valuable thread... was about time cause IMO it's brazen to pollute this thread the way you did

Must keep the discussions free from deceiving propaganda.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:48:01 AM

 There's a difference. Even Wu won't claim BCH is Bitcoin. He says it's something different. At least he's honest about it.


I wonder.  Can you even coherently and without contradiction use the terms "honest" and Wu in the same sentence?


I will concede that you are likely only referring to Wu's rhetoric in regards to BCH NOT being bitcoin, but still, he seems to be such a sneaky destructive slime ball in so many other regards, that it causes me to believe that you may have by giving him too much credit in suggesting that he is "honest" some regard, because I tend to think of honesty as a more deeper character description rather than just some words that are used in a narrow context that happen to be truthful (this time).

Like Trump blasting Sen. Franken-groper, but not Moore, his buddies nor himself, the Groper-In-Chief.

Now...back to our regularly scheduled Moon shot....

Sen. Franken-groper didn't blast himself either all that time and that photo of him kidding on he is about to grope a sleeping soldier to me is creepy and just totally wacko for a man in his position. If the media made a fuss over the Trump audio tape they should surely roast Franken more than they are doing and demand an apology too.

Agreed. All these creepos need to be outed. Sexual harassment has no place in politics or anywhere else.

But let's clarify one thing.... that woman was neither a soldier, nor very demure.
https://www.google.com/search?q=leeann+tweeden&client=firefox-b-1&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-pMil8sbXAhXIQiYKHbOxBugQ_AUICigB&biw=1093&bih=503
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:49:59 AM

The important part is that channel can stay open indefinitely, there's a big penalty to messing with the channel's funds, and also, that funds can be tranferred to other channels (and even other blockchains) without an onchain transaction.
Let's keep things accurate here. What itod said was:
Not only that channels can send funds to each other for the purpose of closing, search for news today where LN channels successfully worked between two different blockchains, BTC and LTC.

...while we were discussing that opening or closing channels consume on-chain transaction capacity. Given the context, it seemed to me that itod was asserting that a channel could be closed by sending funds to another channel, with the implication that the on-chain transaction to close the channel would be eliminated. Did I misinterpret itod's statement? I not, that is what I saw as new information I had not yet heard. If itod was not making such a claim, my proper response is 'so what'. We've all known for ages that Lightning allows transfer of funds through a chain of channels*.

*provided that you know a priori a path from A to B. Unfortunately, last I looked, nobody knows how to do anonymous decentralized route discovery for this purpose.

Quote
440000 channels can be opened or closed per day

Unlikely number to be realized, but let's go with that for rhetorical purposes. Once those 440,000 channels get opened or closed (not both), there is exactly zero capacity for any other transactions on the network.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 12:51:00 AM

Several more posts deleted. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2402558.msg24764984#msg24764984

I sure wish @infofront would inform me of exactly what stated criteria I have run afoul of, while the posts to which I am replying somehow escape deletion.
Honestly? It's probably because you are a cash clown. I mean when my posts about biology and what that means for the jewish problem don't get deleted and yours do, what other conclusion could be reached? And I'm fine with that.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 01:01:43 AM

Bitthumb BCH volume at $1.46 billion and climbing, five times higher than next closest exchange BFX on $340 million.  Looks like round 2 whale game is on.  Shame about SW2X falling over this morning, would have made it more interesting.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
November 18, 2017, 01:03:20 AM

how many of you are secretly trading bch i wonder Tongue
fabiorem
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 347


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 01:25:42 AM

Can someone tell Ver and Wu to pump another fork so I can cash them out too? Maybe a nice BTG or BTX pump? Thanks!


That would be nice. They can program it too. Every weekend they can dump BTC and pump some forkcoin. Then they release a new forkcoin each three months, easy retrievable with a cold wallet.

You receive freely, dump it on the high, and use it to buy more BTC which would be low. Then BTC rise on the monday and everybody will be happy. Rinse and repeat.

HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 01:27:13 AM

Can someone tell Ver and Wu to pump another fork so I can cash them out too? Maybe a nice BTG or BTX pump? Thanks!


That would be nice. They can program it too. Every weekend they can dump BTC and pump some forkcoin. Then they release a new forkcoin each three months, easy retrievable with a cold wallet.

You receive freely, dump it on the high, and use it to buy more BTC which would be low. Then BTC rise on the monday and everybody will be happy. Rinse and repeat.



We do have Bitcoin Gold pumps to look forward to when this shitshow eventually dies.
Pages: « 1 ... 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 18223 18224 18225 18226 18227 18228 18229 18230 18231 18232 18233 18234 18235 18236 18237 18238 18239 18240 18241 18242 18243 18244 18245 18246 18247 18248 18249 18250 18251 18252 18253 18254 18255 18256 18257 18258 18259 18260 18261 18262 18263 18264 18265 18266 18267 [18268] 18269 18270 18271 18272 18273 18274 18275 18276 18277 18278 18279 18280 18281 18282 18283 18284 18285 18286 18287 18288 18289 18290 18291 18292 18293 18294 18295 18296 18297 18298 18299 18300 18301 18302 18303 18304 18305 18306 18307 18308 18309 18310 18311 18312 18313 18314 18315 18316 18317 18318 ... 33285 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!