Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bones261]

I can't seem to find the web page that will help me construct transactions with text and picture. Anyone have the link?

Maybe this???

https://bitcoinstrings.com/all

Edit: following some bread crumbs.....

http://www.righto.com/2014/02/ascii-bernanke-wikileaks-photographs.html

Edit²:

https://www.cryptograffiti.info/

Thank you. I was able to search and found it.  https://www.cryptograffiti.info/

[PoolMinor]

I can't seem to find the web page that will help me construct transactions with text and picture. Anyone have the link?

Maybe this???

https://bitcoinstrings.com/all

Edit: following some bread crumbs.....

http://www.righto.com/2014/02/ascii-bernanke-wikileaks-photographs.html

Edit²:

https://www.cryptograffiti.info/

Thank you. I was able to search and found it.  https://www.cryptograffiti.info/

Also found this too.

http://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/cscfaculty/1/

Edit
"For larger amounts of data, if quantity at low cost is paramount and
security is unimportant, the Data Drop w/o Sig method may be the best choice."

[TERA2]

Why nobody buying ?? 

So much cheap coins!!!!!???

20.000 tommorow??? 

They are buying, they pumped the price up by $300 on stamp during the last hour. Extrapolating that price increase rate by 24 hours results in $20000 coins tomorrow.  

I want to have babies with you 

calves

[realr0ach]

When I took the garbage out today I hate to wait for the dump truck to finish emptying the dumpster. It's the first time I saw it standing 10 feet away. It's funny how the world gives you clues.

Bitcoin seigniorage fee:  around $11,000 - market price is 467% higher than cost of production    

Physical silver seigniorage fee: around $1.20 - market price is 7.5% higher than cost of production

When the price of real money is that low, the "purchase bitcoin" button should be relabeled "get cucked".  Let's not even get into the fact that since bitcoin is an imaginary object based around artificial scarcity, the real seigniorage fee of bitcoin is closer to infinite.

[criptix]

Why nobody buying ?? 

So much cheap coins!!!!!???

20.000 tommorow??? 

They are buying, they pumped the price up by $300 on stamp during the last hour. Extrapolating that price increase rate by 24 hours results in $20000 coins tomorrow.  

I want to have babies with you 

calves

Give me my infinite pump right now!!

[jojo69]

yeah, I would be fairly confident about getting filled

 

[realr0ach]

Give me my infinite pump right now!!

Anne Frank is hiding in the attic printing infinite fiat and tethers, but you can tell her r0ach is coming for her, and hells coming with him.

[Wekkel]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

[realr0ach]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

Complete bullshit definition.  It's just some Tyler on ZH talking his book.  He used the definition of CURRENCY as the definition of MONEY.  Dog shit can be used as currency.  Money has mandatory, required traits like fungibility.  That Tyler is a scammer.  He also ended his post with "but cryptos and blockchain are the future".  Just like how every mindless baboon scammer on this forum repeats the same cut and paste phrase "blockchain is the future", "ethereum is the future", "ripple is the future".

Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  That's why it's called "cryptocurrency", you apes.  Cryptocurrencies are designed to centralize, permissioned ledger, non-fungible, Rube Goldberg machine currencies.  They sure as fuck aren't money. As if something based on artificial scarcity could be money.  You do know scarcity is also a required trait of money, right?  And no, scarcity does not mean "artificial scarcity" where some Russian jackass named Vitalik instantly creates a billion scamcoins in his basement by snapping his fingers, and can do the same thing again 5 seconds later.  That does not qualify as scarcity.  Neither does bitcoin.  Artificial scarcity is not scarcity.

Silver and gold are money.  Bitcoin is a currency just like US dollars and airline miles.  Have you noticed the common denominator of currencies yet?  They're generally all based on artificial scarcity.

[Dakustaking76]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

Complete bullshit definition.  It's just some Tyler on ZH talking his book.  He used the definition of CURRENCY as the definition of MONEY.  Dog shit can be used as currency.  Money has mandatory, required traits like fungibility.  That Tyler is a scammer.  He also ended his post with "but cryptos and blockchain are the future".  Just like how every mindless baboon scammer on this forum repeats the same cut and paste phrase "blockchain is the future", "ethereum is the future", "ripple is the future".

Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  That's why it's called "cryptocurrency", you apes.

Ughl roach cant u Just go away
n44b
Only complaining about bitcoin, Just buy it man while it still can...!

[realr0ach]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

Complete bullshit definition.  It's just some Tyler on ZH talking his book.  He used the definition of CURRENCY as the definition of MONEY.  Dog shit can be used as currency.  Money has mandatory, required traits like fungibility.  That Tyler is a scammer.  He also ended his post with "but cryptos and blockchain are the future".  Just like how every mindless baboon scammer on this forum repeats the same cut and paste phrase "blockchain is the future", "ethereum is the future", "ripple is the future".

Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  That's why it's called "cryptocurrency", you apes.  Cryptocurrencies are designed to centralize, permissioned ledger, non-fungible, Rube Goldberg machine currencies.  They sure as fuck aren't money. As if something based on artificial scarcity could be money.  You do know scarcity is also a required trait of money, right?  And no, scarcity does not mean "artificial scarcity" where some Russian jackass named Vitalik instantly creates a billion scamcoins in his basement by snapping his fingers, and can do the same thing again 5 seconds later.  That does not qualify as scarcity.  Neither does bitcoin.  Artificial scarcity is not scarcity.

Silver and gold are money.  Bitcoin is a currency just like US dollars and airline miles.  Have you noticed the common denominator of currencies yet?  They're generally all based on artificial scarcity.

Ughl roach cant u Just go away
n44b
Only complaining about bitcoin, Just buy it man while it still can...!

Stop trying to scam people and claim garbage based on artificial scarcity is "money".  From my example above, any idiot can tell that if Buttalik Butterin can snap his fingers and create a billion scamcoins in his basement then do it again 5 seconds later that is neither scarcity nor money.  It qualifies as a currency only because almost anything can qualify as a currency, but it damn sure does not qualify as money.

[TERA2]

[realr0ach]

asdf

Thanks Tera for alerting the (((authorities))) that too many goyim know and it's time to shut it down.

http://dailystormer.red/new-south-carolina-law-will-make-it-illegal-to-criticize-israel/

[PoolMinor]

Unspent coins....hmmm

https://blockchain.info/address/1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF

[orpington]

"Buttalik Butterin" Russian jackass!

[Dakustaking76]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

Complete bullshit definition.  It's just some Tyler on ZH talking his book.  He used the definition of CURRENCY as the definition of MONEY.  Dog shit can be used as currency.  Money has mandatory, required traits like fungibility.  That Tyler is a scammer.  He also ended his post with "but cryptos and blockchain are the future".  Just like how every mindless baboon scammer on this forum repeats the same cut and paste phrase "blockchain is the future", "ethereum is the future", "ripple is the future".

Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  That's why it's called "cryptocurrency", you apes.  Cryptocurrencies are designed to centralize, permissioned ledger, non-fungible, Rube Goldberg machine currencies.  They sure as fuck aren't money. As if something based on artificial scarcity could be money.  You do know scarcity is also a required trait of money, right?  And no, scarcity does not mean "artificial scarcity" where some Russian jackass named Vitalik instantly creates a billion scamcoins in his basement by snapping his fingers, and can do the same thing again 5 seconds later.  That does not qualify as scarcity.  Neither does bitcoin.  Artificial scarcity is not scarcity.

Silver and gold are money.  Bitcoin is a currency just like US dollars and airline miles.  Have you noticed the common denominator of currencies yet?  They're generally all based on artificial scarcity.

Ughl roach cant u Just go away
n44b
Only complaining about bitcoin, Just buy it man while it still can...!

Stop trying to scam people and claim garbage based on artificial scarcity is "money".  From my example above, any idiot can tell that if Buttalik Butterin can snap his fingers and create a billion scamcoins in his basement then do it again 5 seconds later that is neither scarcity nor money.  It qualifies as a currency only because almost anything can qualify as a currency, but it damn sure does not qualify as money.

Oke explain us what are you doing here if your against bitcoin???

But give us a good explain, Why?

[bitcoinPsycho]

Just to add to the eternal 'what is money' debate:

Money is anything that is commonly recognized as a medium of exchange and store of value. Most societies used seashells, rocks, severed skulls or metals. China invented paper money during Tang dynasty and with fits and starts, it gradually became the standard. Fiat money can’t be consumed and neither can it be used in production. Hence currencies do not have intrinsic value but rather trade on perception of value. As discussed (here), unlike fiat currencies, cryptos are more difficult to inflate, cost money & time to produce and are built around mathematics rather than fraud or politics. Hence, they already reflect the essence of money better than existing money. However, we are still closer to the 1900s than 1920s. There are serious challenges (e.g. depth, acceptance, custody etc). But cryptos & blockchain are the future

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-11/henry-ford-dotcom-bitcoins

Complete bullshit definition.  It's just some Tyler on ZH talking his book.  He used the definition of CURRENCY as the definition of MONEY.  Dog shit can be used as currency.  Money has mandatory, required traits like fungibility.  That Tyler is a scammer.  He also ended his post with "but cryptos and blockchain are the future".  Just like how every mindless baboon scammer on this forum repeats the same cut and paste phrase "blockchain is the future", "ethereum is the future", "ripple is the future".

Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  That's why it's called "cryptocurrency", you apes.  Cryptocurrencies are designed to centralize, permissioned ledger, non-fungible, Rube Goldberg machine currencies.  They sure as fuck aren't money. As if something based on artificial scarcity could be money.  You do know scarcity is also a required trait of money, right?  And no, scarcity does not mean "artificial scarcity" where some Russian jackass named Vitalik instantly creates a billion scamcoins in his basement by snapping his fingers, and can do the same thing again 5 seconds later.  That does not qualify as scarcity.  Neither does bitcoin.  Artificial scarcity is not scarcity.

Silver and gold are money.  Bitcoin is a currency just like US dollars and airline miles.  Have you noticed the common denominator of currencies yet?  They're generally all based on artificial scarcity.

Ughl roach cant u Just go away
n44b
Only complaining about bitcoin, Just buy it man while it still can...!

Stop trying to scam people and claim garbage based on artificial scarcity is "money".  From my example above, any idiot can tell that if Buttalik Butterin can snap his fingers and create a billion scamcoins in his basement then do it again 5 seconds later that is neither scarcity nor money.  It qualifies as a currency only because almost anything can qualify as a currency, but it damn sure does not qualify as money.

Oke explain us what are you doing here if your against bitcoin???

But give us a good explain, Why?

it's what happens when you sell 500 btc for $230  BUTTHURT

[realr0ach]

But give us a good explain

[Enjel]

Gold and Silver are two of the most heavily manipulated commodities in existence, especially if you live in the US.

They haven't even done well (they've done terribly) against holding the USD at 0% interest.


Bitcoin becomes money if people believe in the Bitcoin brand, it being the first coin. Limited supply and fungibility? Check.

I've always wondered why the Bitcoin price, despite technological inferiority, rose so much recently. It's not just because Bitcoin is constantly changing, but rather that people believe in Bitcoin for itself, and its history.


The only thing that Ag and Au have for them are the facts that they have endured their value as money for a long long time. They are highly overvalued compared to their utilitarian use value.

So, as Bitcoin survives more and more, it will further fulfill its role as money.


There is just one big BUT: Unless something comes along that threatens Bitcoin's security - just like alchemy would destroy the value of gold, quantum computing or other threats could potentially destroy Bitcoin.

These threats just need to be adapted to, and things are fine. There are obviously more threats to Bitcoin than to the precious metals... but Bitcoin has survived a lot.

I read r0ach's blog, and it's just like a broken clock thing... eventually you will be right.. but at what cost?

[Last of the V8s]

"Buttalik Butterin" Russian jackass!