Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2019, 05:02:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 28:
$0 - 5 (2.8%)
<$7,000 - 4 (2.3%)
$7,000-$7,499 - 0 (0%)
$7,500-$7,999 - 0 (0%)
$8,000-$8,499 - 1 (0.6%)
$8,500-$8,999 - 3 (1.7%)
$9,000-$9,499 - 4 (2.3%)
$9,500-$9,999 - 27 (15.3%)
$10,000-$10,499 - 24 (13.6%)
$10,500-10,999 - 13 (7.3%)
$11,000-$11,499 - 14 (7.9%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 15 (8.5%)
>$12,000 - 53 (29.9%)
>$20,000 - 14 (7.9%)
Total Voters: 177

Pages: « 1 ... 21715 21716 21717 21718 21719 21720 21721 21722 21723 21724 21725 21726 21727 21728 21729 21730 21731 21732 21733 21734 21735 21736 21737 21738 21739 21740 21741 21742 21743 21744 21745 21746 21747 21748 21749 21750 21751 21752 21753 21754 21755 21756 21757 21758 21759 21760 21761 21762 21763 21764 [21765] 21766 21767 21768 21769 21770 21771 21772 21773 21774 21775 21776 21777 21778 21779 21780 21781 21782 21783 21784 21785 21786 21787 21788 21789 21790 21791 21792 21793 21794 21795 21796 21797 21798 21799 21800 21801 21802 21803 21804 21805 21806 21807 21808 21809 21810 21811 21812 21813 21814 21815 ... 24364 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21247723 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (66 posts by 16 users deleted.)
PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1658
Merit: 1060


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:26:12 AM

The most interesting thing is that currently Bcash (ABC) has almost reached mining profit equilibrium with Bitcoin.

The way i see it they trust Calvin not going to attack BAB chain so they are moving their hash to the more profitable chain which is Bitcoin.

Question is, why don't BSV do the same?

Some major shit might happen soon considering both sides are back stabbing conmen.

Yes, they (ABC) have reduced hashrate to reach profitability equilibrium with BTC (which probably isn't profitable anyways at current price). With the checkpoints and the possibility of redirecting more hashrate in case of need I don't think they worry so much about an attack.

If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

BSV is not mining for profit but for security. So no, I doubt they would switch to BTC.
Crypto Casino Since 2014
Level Up & Get Even More Rewards!
Daily Treasure Chest
& Much More
Roll Hunt
Rakeback
Blackjack
Jackpot
Dice
Slots
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561611728
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561611728

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561611728
Reply with quote  #2

1561611728
Report to moderator
dutchlincoln
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 30


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:30:45 AM

What bothers me is we are getting well ahead of schedule.   We shouldn't be into $3k before January.  

We are doing it ahead of schedule because it had to be done before Bakkt and ETF are operational. Nobody on WS opens up a brand new venue during the shitstorm.

Notice how neatly GBTC started trading just as the bear was on the last legs in 2015 and just as it started, there was the last good pulldown before the train left the station for a 2015-2017 run up.

I hope you are correct

Hope is for church... Here i.r.l. we do facts...  Grin
becoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:30:52 AM
Merited by BobLawblaw (1)

In the coming week I'll be reallocating capital from other projects I have to put it in bitcoins. Current price level is a lifetime opportunity that should not be missed!
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1074



View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:31:53 AM

The most interesting thing is that currently Bcash (ABC) has almost reached mining profit equilibrium with Bitcoin.

The way i see it they trust Calvin not going to attack BAB chain so they are moving their hash to the more profitable chain which is Bitcoin.

Question is, why don't BSV do the same?

Some major shit might happen soon considering both sides are back stabbing conmen.

Yes, they (ABC) have reduced hashrate to reach profitability equilibrium with BTC (which probably isn't profitable anyways at current price). With the checkpoints and the possibility of redirecting more hashrate in case of need I don't think they worry so much about an attack.

If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

BSV is not mining for profit but for security. So no, I doubt they would switch to BTC.

Theoretically speaking : I wonder what kind of impact low hashrate would have on those large blocks of them (128 mb ?)  
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 761


HODL.


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:32:04 AM


If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

They (BSV) already backpedalled a couple times. They said no split, now they are offering terms to get a clean split.

I wouldn't surprise If they abandon the project all together and disappear. Nobody gives a shit about what they say anyway. I mean nobody should give a shit about bcash in the first pleace but Vermin has .com domain and various other major propaganda points like @bitcoin so he can continue his scam for a long time.

What does Prof Fucktard have? Nothing.

CSW has a real billionaire (calvinayre), so a deep a pocket behind. And as the cons they are I would be surprised if they didn't short the market before their shitshow. So, deeper pockets now.
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1435



View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:33:05 AM


If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

They (BSV) already backpedalled a couple times. They said no split, now they are offering terms to get a clean split.

I wouldn't surprise If they abandon the project all together and disappear. Nobody gives a shit about what they say anyway. I mean nobody should give a shit about bcash in the first pleace but Vermin has .com domain and various other major propaganda points like @bitcoin so he can continue his scam for a long time.

What does Prof Fucktard have? Nothing.

CSW has a real billionaire (calvinayre), so a deep a pocket behind. And as the cons they are I would be surprised if they didn't short the market before their shitshow. So, deeper pockets now.

I don't deny it and very well aware of it but I don't think Calvin is serious to take that bet.

Even if he was serious, it'll take years to build a story behind SV chain. They need to build their own business allies (like bitmain), news channels, paid shills... they need a massive network to do what? Compete against BAB. Don't think so.
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 761


HODL.


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:34:17 AM

The most interesting thing is that currently Bcash (ABC) has almost reached mining profit equilibrium with Bitcoin.

The way i see it they trust Calvin not going to attack BAB chain so they are moving their hash to the more profitable chain which is Bitcoin.

Question is, why don't BSV do the same?

Some major shit might happen soon considering both sides are back stabbing conmen.

Yes, they (ABC) have reduced hashrate to reach profitability equilibrium with BTC (which probably isn't profitable anyways at current price). With the checkpoints and the possibility of redirecting more hashrate in case of need I don't think they worry so much about an attack.

If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

BSV is not mining for profit but for security. So no, I doubt they would switch to BTC.

It is obvious they are not mining for profit but... security? what do you mean? No one is going to attack that shit even if they reduced their hashrate to the equilibrium point.

If Ver/WU wanted to attack it, they could do it right now with just a small part of their hashrate.
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:34:58 AM
Last edit: November 29, 2018, 07:27:30 AM by alevlaslo
Merited by Karartma1 (1)

the price became too early 3600, now there will be a strong correction upward









somac.
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 558
Merit: 173


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:35:24 AM

What bothers me is we are getting well ahead of schedule.   We shouldn't be into $3k before January.  

We are doing it ahead of schedule because it had to be done before Bakkt and ETF are operational. Nobody on WS opens up a brand new venue during the shitstorm.

Notice how neatly GBTC started trading just as the bear was on the last legs in 2015 and just as it started, there was the last good pulldown before the train left the station for a 2015-2017 run up.

I hope you are correct

Hope is for church... Here i.r.l. we do facts...  Grin

and how are the current facts treating you?
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1070


Be Revolutionary Or Die Trying


View Profile WWW
November 25, 2018, 09:35:59 AM

Please all imagine those giant green candles that are ready to pop up when "institutionals" will get officially on board. Everything happens for a reason and I think this got well planned all along. The parabolic rise in 2017 was unreal as this 2018 drop.
Expect fireworks when Etfs and bakkt shit will take off.
That's how I see it.
Bitcoin is an asset for the institutionals. They can't control the instrument (they don't even get it) but sure as hell they can control the price.

Am I being dumb here?
criptix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1076


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:36:32 AM

The most interesting thing is that currently Bcash (ABC) has almost reached mining profit equilibrium with Bitcoin.

The way i see it they trust Calvin not going to attack BAB chain so they are moving their hash to the more profitable chain which is Bitcoin.

Question is, why don't BSV do the same?

Some major shit might happen soon considering both sides are back stabbing conmen.

Yes, they (ABC) have reduced hashrate to reach profitability equilibrium with BTC (which probably isn't profitable anyways at current price). With the checkpoints and the possibility of redirecting more hashrate in case of need I don't think they worry so much about an attack.

If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

BSV is not mining for profit but for security. So no, I doubt they would switch to BTC.

Theoretically speaking : I wonder what kind of impact low hashrate would have on those large blocks of them (128 mb ?)  


There should be no effect because of difficulty adjustment (except in the case majority of hash disappears long before diff adjustment)


Btw I dont think hashwar is the reason for the dump.

Also think we gonna bounce to at least 4 k from here.
somac.
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 558
Merit: 173


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:36:47 AM





That first bounce is a bit optimistic don't you think?
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1074



View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:38:53 AM

Looks like Bitcoin is getting ready to take a dive below $3600 on Bitstamp
Currently $3636
PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1658
Merit: 1060


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:39:12 AM

The most interesting thing is that currently Bcash (ABC) has almost reached mining profit equilibrium with Bitcoin.

The way i see it they trust Calvin not going to attack BAB chain so they are moving their hash to the more profitable chain which is Bitcoin.

Question is, why don't BSV do the same?

Some major shit might happen soon considering both sides are back stabbing conmen.

Yes, they (ABC) have reduced hashrate to reach profitability equilibrium with BTC (which probably isn't profitable anyways at current price). With the checkpoints and the possibility of redirecting more hashrate in case of need I don't think they worry so much about an attack.

If BSV does the same (as it was logical) that would go against everything they have been saying about the long term commitment of their full hashrate, being determined to keep mining at a loss for a full decade, etc.... It's not that they are man's of word at all, and I am sure they will sooner than later do it.... but they are probably thinking about a good excuse that they can "sell".

BSV is not mining for profit but for security. So no, I doubt they would switch to BTC.

It is obvious they are not mining for profit but... security? what do you mean? No one is going to attack that shit even if they reduced their hashrate to the equilibrium point.

If Ver/WU wanted to attack it, they could do it right now with just a small part of their hashrate.

Keep drinking the kool-aid.
allohm
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:39:54 AM

Please all imagine those giant green candles that are ready to pop up when "institutionals" will get officially on board. Everything happens for a reason and I think this got well planned all along. The parabolic rise in 2017 was unreal as this 2018 drop.
Expect fireworks when Etfs and bakkt shit will take off.
That's how I see it.
Bitcoin is an asset for the institutionals. They can't control the instrument (they don't even get it) but sure as hell they can control the price.

Am I being dumb here?

Imagine you were one of those institutional guys (which already are unofficially in BTC). WOuld you trust your funds into an instrument that can tank because for example two morons decided to do a hard fork some time? Or that the price can tank just because a kiddo was playing with the security of some exchange and managed to hack it? just two of the numerous "childhood diseases" of btc.
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:40:59 AM

if bitcoin falls because of the risk of attack 51, then why does the ETH fall too, it should grow on the contrary
Raja_MBZ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 858


Vegeta! What does the scouter say about BTC value?


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:41:08 AM

Once upon a time, bitcoin was 50% down in 2 days:

https://twitter.com/JoelHeyman/status/409376815849811968
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:43:17 AM


That first bounce is a bit optimistic don't you think?

the price became too early 3600, now there will be a strong correction upward
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 568


View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:44:11 AM

Looks like Bitcoin is getting ready to take a dive below $3600 on Bitstamp
Currently $3636

because USDT 0.94$
FractalUniverse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 555



View Profile
November 25, 2018, 09:47:39 AM

Whoever posted the link with screaming sun couple of days ago thank you ! I didnt even know this series existed. downloaded first season and just now finished watching 6th episode - it fit very well with today's market carnage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evYxx8qjZFs

Cry fucking idiots still holding these worthless digital beanie babies.  IT will continue to crash, are you idiots just going to hold to zero?
I will not just hold. I will keep buying all the way down :p

off to bed soon; im giving it 60% chance that when i come in the morning, price will be back above 4k finex. if we continue down, ~3250 is my next buy area.

O.k?  Why we use finex as our BTC price reference point?

If it is not above $4k bitstamp, then why would it matter if it above $4k finex?

I guess being above $4k finex would assume being above $3,800 bitstamp or maybe $3850-ish?
coz i bought it there; yes that would be about 3800 stamp. but it didnt come back overnigt..
..so, what about some end-of-the-weekend pump? :p
Pages: « 1 ... 21715 21716 21717 21718 21719 21720 21721 21722 21723 21724 21725 21726 21727 21728 21729 21730 21731 21732 21733 21734 21735 21736 21737 21738 21739 21740 21741 21742 21743 21744 21745 21746 21747 21748 21749 21750 21751 21752 21753 21754 21755 21756 21757 21758 21759 21760 21761 21762 21763 21764 [21765] 21766 21767 21768 21769 21770 21771 21772 21773 21774 21775 21776 21777 21778 21779 21780 21781 21782 21783 21784 21785 21786 21787 21788 21789 21790 21791 21792 21793 21794 21795 21796 21797 21798 21799 21800 21801 21802 21803 21804 21805 21806 21807 21808 21809 21810 21811 21812 21813 21814 21815 ... 24364 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!