Bitcoin Forum
August 04, 2020, 05:02:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How much of your corn do you plan on cashing out in the next massive bull run?
None - 19 (19%)
1-10% - 11 (11%)
11-20% - 12 (12%)
21-30% - 16 (16%)
31-40% - 4 (4%)
41-50% - 10 (10%)
51-60% - 8 (8%)
61-70% - 5 (5%)
71-80% - 3 (3%)
81-90% - 2 (2%)
91-99% - 1 (1%)
100% - 9 (9%)
Total Voters: 100

Pages: « 1 ... 23820 23821 23822 23823 23824 23825 23826 23827 23828 23829 23830 23831 23832 23833 23834 23835 23836 23837 23838 23839 23840 23841 23842 23843 23844 23845 23846 23847 23848 23849 23850 23851 23852 23853 23854 23855 23856 23857 23858 23859 23860 23861 23862 23863 23864 23865 23866 23867 23868 23869 [23870] 23871 23872 23873 23874 23875 23876 23877 23878 23879 23880 23881 23882 23883 23884 23885 23886 23887 23888 23889 23890 23891 23892 23893 23894 23895 23896 23897 23898 23899 23900 23901 23902 23903 23904 23905 23906 23907 23908 23909 23910 23911 23912 23913 23914 23915 23916 23917 23918 23919 23920 ... 27068 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21781216 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (147 posts by 36 users deleted.)
AlcoHoDL
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 994
Merit: 800


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 04:30:03 AM
Merited by cAPSLOCK (1)

I see that some seemingly intelligent people here support Craig S. Wright... Directly or indirectly. I wonder why. It defies belief how anyone in their right mind cannot see the fraud that he is and the damage to Bitcoin he and his friends are causing...

nutildah's post above shows just a few of the evidence against him. And yet, there are people that support him and his shitcoins. Human stubbornness and/or stupidity is infinite, it seems...

OTOH, maybe this is good, as it has shown (and will continue to show) the robustness and strength of BTC, and how it can resist attacks and come out stronger than ever.

Bring it on...!
1596560550
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596560550

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596560550
Reply with quote  #2

1596560550
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1596560550
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596560550

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596560550
Reply with quote  #2

1596560550
Report to moderator
1596560550
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596560550

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596560550
Reply with quote  #2

1596560550
Report to moderator
1596560550
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1596560550

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1596560550
Reply with quote  #2

1596560550
Report to moderator
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 04:35:54 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

This chart has some great info!


$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback?
Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days
BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away

https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808

It had that pullback on bitstamp only.   all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19%  average of 17.5%

It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall.

It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho.

I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position.   There are way too many homeless folks already. 

my home is quite safe. 

and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry.
https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/

Since you are predicting a price of $2500 ... you need to worry a lot.   It seems you are not even close to understanding how Bitcoin works.    You are basically predicting and counting on a total failure of the bitcoin network. 

like it has for long periods before you mean?  Like when miners mined at a loss? like when they had to folk it to reduce the sha256 hash power so that the price could keep up with the profit curve, with countless forks thereafter.   Like when they have to hire an army of bull trolls to maintain the bull phase .  Like when they have to DDOS multiple sites, log multiple people out of trading accounts during breakouts to make it work?  or are you discussing something different? 

Wow you are really showing a lack of understanding.    Many events did happen, but they were all short term.   If the price were to crash as low as you are hoping for the blocks times would slow down to hours or even days.  The network couldn't survive that.   Yes the difficulty would adjust, but it could take months and at that point there wouldn't be any interest left.   All that would be left is a few altcoins and crypto controlled by governments and banks.   So your $2500 bet is a sucker bet.  

It is possible that events could cause a quick plunge to those levels.  It is highly unlikely you would be able to cover though.

Now if you were banking on BTC dropping back to $8000 I would think you have some sense.   Heck $7000 is possible, just not as likely.   We might even see days at $5000 but those prices aren't network killers.   Given time the network could support a $2500 price point, but that would be so slow that a short position would have other problems.   It is difficult to maintain a short position for many months or years.   Well unless you're position is so tiny it doesn't really matter.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 2479


no FOMO


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 04:41:47 AM

uhhhh

$2500 would be fine

I mean, sure, it would be a bummer and all, but what the actual fuck with all this alarmism?

No, the network would not grind to a halt, fucks sake, what a load of bollocks.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 04:48:28 AM

"Hitler was right" now receives 80% upvotes 20% downvotes on Zerohedge.  My work here is done.

Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3374
Merit: 1049


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 05:11:01 AM

-On the other hand if BTC1MM gets dumped across exchanges, even with a signed message of "i'm not CSW", might bring BTC to its knees.

BTC1M dumped wouldn't change the fundamentals. Bitcoin would bounce right back.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 05:16:46 AM
Last edit: May 29, 2019, 10:06:44 AM by realr0ach

stock to flow reduction

The "stock to flow" scam chart people are posting are just wannabe pump and dump scammers.  Such metrics have absolutely zero correlation with Bitcoin as I explained to Anonymint:

As for the whole stock/flow deal, it makes a lot of bad assumptions like assuming the entire planet is willing to be the greater fool for imaginary, valueless bitcoins when they aren't, or that Bitcoin even has a valid Schelling point in the first place when it doesn't.  If S/F was valid for digital shitcoins, there wouldn't be a mountain of dead PoW coins already.

Stock/flow only works on an actual commodity that humans need and NOBODY actually needs Bitcoin.  It's a fake commodity.  If you hoard all 21 million, the entire planet can just ignore you like you don't even exist.  If you hoard all the physical silver, the world doesn't get to ignore you and stock/flow actually functions.  Tricking the goyim to hoard a fake, valueless commodity instead of a real one might be the greatest Jew scam of all time because it grants you absolutely zero power while pretending it does.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 05:48:59 AM

Will add some more fuel into the fire, r0ach is going to love this: I bought gold.

I think there are reasons to own both gold and silver, but you did it backwards:

Lambie Slayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 603



View Profile
May 29, 2019, 05:50:11 AM

Ok guys, this isnt how we pamp 10 percent a day till 100k, we are way behind schedule now. Embarrassed
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 05:50:41 AM

uhhhh

$2500 would be fine

I mean, sure, it would be a bummer and all, but what the actual fuck with all this alarmism?

No, the network would not grind to a halt, fucks sake, what a load of bollocks.

A quick drop of $2500 would probably cause 90% of the miners to shutdown as for most of us our costs are closer to $3500/BTC.   So block times would slow to around 90 minutes / block.   That would further increase the cost of mining short term.    While it possible some fork could be done to change the difficulty it would basically freeze most transactions for months.    The problem isn't really with the mining it is with the users and the press.

A slow decline to $2500 would be survivable, but BTC isn't prone to slow moves.   This would have to happen over months to allow the difficultly to adjust.  

Generally short positions cost money to hold open as one is playing interest.   Shorts generally don't survive for years.    Long positions just cost opportunities and one can often hold even for decades.  

(Currently 1 TH is running me around $0.11/day and most of that is the cost of electricity)
Lambie Slayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 603



View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:02:40 AM


I have a few sample choices for you sir Cheesy

https://i.imgur.com/sglf4ki.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/pexJm56.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kZoNrzS.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/LXAvLbp.jpg


Eeny, meeny, miny, moe, who is the sweetest of them awww...



Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD?
Something does not compute.

maybe bc they censor genitals out of their porn? probably also all the QE, it seems the more money your nation prints the lower the birth rate which would mean less sex. Birth rates were way higher before central banking in every first world country. Not much time to smash when you are busy wage cucking to afford ever rising costs as your masters debase your wages.
Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE.

Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both.

Yes, good point, when the man cant support a woman and or children with his wage cuckery due to wages debased every day via money printing, the woman must become a wagecuck as well.

Sound money means women will have more time to look hot and practice blow job skills. Cheesy
More blow jobs mean men are more productive and society improves drastically.
No. Wages went down BECAUSE women work, they are not a reaction to it.

Right, wages do go down when women enter the work force that weren't working before. That basic bitch stuff you brought up and I agree with that basic bitch logic you brought to the table.

Wrong of you to imply women categorically are not entering the work force because of reduced wages from currency debasement.  I earlier laid out a case where women go to work because their husbands or male partners have decreased wages due to currency debasement. Im specifically referring to decreased wages as in decreased purchasing power(debasement) of the said wages, not the actual dollar amount of the wage going down. That should be blatantly obvious imo, but if its what caused confusion then it should be clear now.

Sound money will fix the problem of decreased purchasing power of male wages and will encourage many women to leave the work force since Big Daddy will be bringing home more than enough bacon for many couples. This exodus of large amounts of women will add further pressure to employers to raise wages and as I said earlier, women can focus on things they are best at like looking good and blowjobs.

Sound money wins. Money printers lose.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1938



View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:06:59 AM

You are a smart guy.  You have designed hardware storage controllers.  How on earth do you not see the amazing bullshit happening right before your eyes???

Jbreher is not a hardware storage disigner that was a blatant lie ...lol.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:37:02 AM

Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE.

Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both.

Women, even while in the workforce, are a large net negative as a tax base (i.e. they're drawing a lot more money from the govt than they put in over their lives).  This is not the case for men.  So technically they're not productive even while working.  It's numerous reasons from living 8-10 years longer, not being evolutionarily designed as resource gatherers so they suck at it, and also stemming from that fact, are terrible at managing money and resources in general.  

If a man is given some type of resources, he may use those resources to generate more resources than he had before.  Allocating the same resources to a woman is usually malinvestment and pointless because the resources will not be used in a productive manner.  So the more patriarchal a nation is, the more likely it is to be an economic powerhouse.  The US is occupied by Jewish Marxists pushing things like feminism (matriarchy), and radical seizure of male assets through the courts, so of course it will be totally useless economically.
AlcoHoDL
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 994
Merit: 800


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:39:28 AM

You are a smart guy.  You have designed hardware storage controllers.  How on earth do you not see the amazing bullshit happening right before your eyes???

Jbreher is not a hardware storage disigner that was a blatant lie ...lol.

Even if he is, it doesn't mean anything. OTOH, being associated with, or supporting the work endorsed by Wright, Ver, Wu and Ayre can tell a lot about a person's motives, morals, and overall attitude towards Bitcoin and what it stands for.
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:43:34 AM


I have a few sample choices for you sir Cheesy

https://i.imgur.com/sglf4ki.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/pexJm56.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kZoNrzS.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/LXAvLbp.jpg


Eeny, meeny, miny, moe, who is the sweetest of them awww...



Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD?
Something does not compute.

maybe bc they censor genitals out of their porn? probably also all the QE, it seems the more money your nation prints the lower the birth rate which would mean less sex. Birth rates were way higher before central banking in every first world country. Not much time to smash when you are busy wage cucking to afford ever rising costs as your masters debase your wages.
Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE.

Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both.

Yes, good point, when the man cant support a woman and or children with his wage cuckery due to wages debased every day via money printing, the woman must become a wagecuck as well.

Sound money means women will have more time to look hot and practice blow job skills. Cheesy
More blow jobs mean men are more productive and society improves drastically.
No. Wages went down BECAUSE women work, they are not a reaction to it.

Right, wages do go down when women enter the work force that weren't working before. That basic bitch stuff you brought up and I agree with that basic bitch logic you brought to the table.

Wrong of you to imply women categorically are not entering the work force because of reduced wages from currency debasement.  I earlier laid out a case where women go to work because their husbands or male partners have decreased wages due to currency debasement. Im specifically referring to decreased wages as in decreased purchasing power(debasement) of the said wages, not the actual dollar amount of the wage going down. That should be blatantly obvious imo, but if its what caused confusion then it should be clear now.

Sound money will fix the problem of decreased purchasing power of male wages and will encourage many women to leave the work force since Big Daddy will be bringing home more than enough bacon for many couples. This exodus of large amounts of women will add further pressure to employers to raise wages and as I said earlier, women can focus on things they are best at like looking good and blowjobs.

Sound money wins. Money printers lose.


As someone that has some macro economics background and who is also married to a Japanese woman I'm going to ignore the profound stupidity presented in this thread.  

When there are not enough people in the workforce, productivity on a national level suffers and economies can actually shrink.   That is actually the problem Japan has been facing for some time.     Sexism has actually damaged the economy and it is only very slowly changes.   While it is true that more people going to work can drive down wages, that really isn't important.   What is important is what those wages can buy.   How many hours you have to work to live is actually more important than how much of some variable currency you actually earn.  

In Japan more women are moving into the workplace and more people are working longer.   This last year over 97% of college grads have already started working.   The school year ended in March and by April 1st over 97% were employed.  That is a strong labor market.

Anyway the average woman is a lot smarter than most of the bozos here that can't control their hormones.    
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:49:51 AM

As someone that has some macro economics background and who is also married to a Japanese woman I'm going to ignore the profound stupidity presented in this thread.  

You completely ignored the fact (as I mention in my post above) that in a vacuum, if you allocate 50% of the resources to men and 50% to women, the male group is always going to vastly outperform the female group to the point where you can almost consider women holding any resources at all malinvestment for a civilization that's trying to compete against other civilizations.  Then factor in women have no interest in marrying men who are poorer than they are and you're self destructing your own civilization on purpose by trying to artificially rig some 'equitable' outcome.
elrippos friend
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 880
Merit: 149


only hodl what you understand and love!


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:53:16 AM

LET THE PARTY BEGIN


Nice, just wondering if she is wearing a petzl  Grin Grin Grin Roll Eyes Shocked
dyask
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 510


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 06:59:00 AM

As someone that has some macro economics background and who is also married to a Japanese woman I'm going to ignore the profound stupidity presented in this thread.  

You completely ignored the fact (as I mention in my post above) that in a vacuum, if you allocate 50% of the resources to men and 50% to women, the male group is always going to vastly outperform the female group to the point where you can almost consider women holding any resources at all malinvestment for a civilization that's trying to compete against other civilizations.  Then factor in women have no interest in marrying men who are poorer than they are and you're self destructing your own civilization on purpose by trying to artificially rig some 'equitable' outcome.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't even pass a typical Japanese high school math entrance exam.   That isn't that high of a bar either.   It is a profoundly sad truth that idiots don't know they are idiots. 
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 07:03:47 AM

As someone that has some macro economics background and who is also married to a Japanese woman I'm going to ignore the profound stupidity presented in this thread.  

You completely ignored the fact (as I mention in my post above) that in a vacuum, if you allocate 50% of the resources to men and 50% to women, the male group is always going to vastly outperform the female group to the point where you can almost consider women holding any resources at all malinvestment for a civilization that's trying to compete against other civilizations.  Then factor in women have no interest in marrying men who are poorer than they are and you're self destructing your own civilization on purpose by trying to artificially rig some 'equitable' outcome.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't even pass a typical Japanese high school math entrance exam.   That isn't that high of a bar either.   It is a profoundly sad truth that idiots don't know they are idiots.  

You're not very good at macro-anything if you think what I said is not true.  You will need to stick to micro.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2828
Merit: 1488


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
May 29, 2019, 07:04:17 AM

You are a smart guy.  You have designed hardware storage controllers.  How on earth do you not see the amazing bullshit happening right before your eyes???

Jbreher is not a hardware storage disigner that was a blatant lie ...lol.

Well, I never used the term 'hardware storage designer' on this board. Yet there it is. Of course, I designed hardware storage controllers decades ago. My more recent work is more significant than that.

Get yourself a clue, Paashaas. You're proudly displaying your arrogance-ignorance again.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1405



View Profile
May 29, 2019, 07:06:09 AM


like it has for long periods before you mean?  Like when miners mined at a loss? like when they had to folk it to reduce the sha256 hash power so that the price could keep up with the profit curve, with countless forks thereafter.   Like when they have to hire an army of bull trolls to maintain the bull phase .  Like when they have to DDOS multiple sites, log multiple people out of trading accounts during breakouts to make it work?  or are you discussing something different? 


you actually believe that "hiring bull trolls" keeps the price of bitcoin rising?   i want to be hired! Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 23820 23821 23822 23823 23824 23825 23826 23827 23828 23829 23830 23831 23832 23833 23834 23835 23836 23837 23838 23839 23840 23841 23842 23843 23844 23845 23846 23847 23848 23849 23850 23851 23852 23853 23854 23855 23856 23857 23858 23859 23860 23861 23862 23863 23864 23865 23866 23867 23868 23869 [23870] 23871 23872 23873 23874 23875 23876 23877 23878 23879 23880 23881 23882 23883 23884 23885 23886 23887 23888 23889 23890 23891 23892 23893 23894 23895 23896 23897 23898 23899 23900 23901 23902 23903 23904 23905 23906 23907 23908 23909 23910 23911 23912 23913 23914 23915 23916 23917 23918 23919 23920 ... 27068 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!