_javi_
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 05:56:00 PM |
|
Money Heist reference.. lol, nice one, goose. oh btw.. observing 5 digits and being happy. go BTC go!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
mindrust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 2282
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:22:24 PM Last edit: July 31, 2019, 06:43:41 PM by mindrust |
|
BOO YAA The FED cut the interest rates by .25% and surprisingly, EUR/USD (1.1111 right now) is dumping yuuge. I thought the opposite would happen. This looks bad for the central banks. They did this to stop USD from gaining strength and USD is just replying with a "fuck you". The end is nigh. (for FIAT) Buy bitcoin. EDIT: LOOOL WTHAT THE FLYING FUCK, EUR is 1.1108 and gold is -%0.41! Edit2: BTC stays strong at $10k. 1.1084 $1419
|
|
|
|
jackbauercsgo
Copper Member
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 499
Merit: 117
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:22:38 PM |
|
Fed cut rates 0.25 % today
Speculate away oh speculation board
|
|
|
|
fillippone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 12239
Merit Rascal - Pizza Maker - Golden Feather 2022
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:25:41 PM Last edit: July 31, 2019, 06:40:22 PM by fillippone |
|
Gold reacted badly to the news, selling off with rates. Now it's bouncing back to day High. Bitcoin doesn't give a f.ck.
Anybody noticed it is the first (and first one of a series) FED cut since 2008? This means it's the first FED easing cycle since Bitcoin came into existence, challenging low interest rates world.
Good luck central Banksters!
|
|
|
|
willope
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:28:51 PM |
|
Who cares about fiat shitcoins? Bitcoin doesn't give a f.ck.
That's all.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:42:53 PM |
|
What’s the reverse of FUD? PAMP? I refuse to buy into this Chinese PAMP. Edit: however I do buy Fed PAMP. Go the Fed!
|
|
|
|
OROBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1637
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:44:18 PM |
|
Gold reacted badly to the news, selling off with rates. Now it's bouncing back to day High. Bitcoin doesn't give a f.ck.
Anybody noticed it is the first (and first one of a series) FED cut since 2008? This means it's the first FED easing cycle since Bitcoin came into existence, challenging low interest rates world.
Good luck central Banksters!
Excellent observation. Gold has traditionally done well in low interest (and lowering interest) environments. It will be very interesting to follow BTC price in the weeks to come. It will, after all, be easy to remember today's price ($10k) when Powell and Company cut the Fed Funds Rate.
|
|
|
|
kurious
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1618
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:52:50 PM |
|
Good chart, comforting. But nothing "seems to be sure" She does what she wants.
#haiku
Oh mistress Bitcoin Your butterfly path we plot Fly up to the stars #haikubackatcha
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 06:57:36 PM |
|
What is more likely is that several computers or servers were used to mine the first million coins. Since there were no pools, each mined coin comes from a wallet on different computers.
Multiple computers can all use the same wallet. But the nonces on the blocks indicate that they came from a single "system" that was very fast, probably some sort of pool-like configuration. Or the difficulty was low No. The nonces in each won block indicate that the vast majority of mining power in the first days was definitely coordinated. How is that inconsistent with low difficulty on a single laptop? Even if multiple machines, which I doubt, I don’t know how you can say with confidence that sequential nonces aren’t just crappy code shared by all machines. To state the bleeding obvious, if all clients count their nonces starting at “1”, and then “1 + 1” etc, your blockchain will have a series of nonces counting in order. None of this pool conspiracy theory makes any sense.
|
|
|
|
Febo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1285
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:08:35 PM |
|
Meanwhile another lil pump?  Bitcoin derivatives provider LedgerX announced it has launched the first physically-settled bitcoin futures contracts in the U.S. Wednesday. It looks like BAAKT hype was not so silly after all. LedgerX launched earlier and it seems pushed price of Bitcoin up.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:09:20 PM |
|
Incidentally, it is working splendidly so far.
Yeah jbreher, splendidly is far from a couple of recent reorg occasions. With no known negative consequences. eta: Other than the loss of the coinbase tx revenues for the initial orphaned miners. Right, why would it have any negative consequences since nobody uses it, dah? Way to completely miss the point. Again. All the txs (again, save for the coinbase tx of each orphaned block) were ultimately included onchain. Nevermind the obvious blatant lie that "nobody uses it". Is this what substitutes for honest discourse in your pathological mind? Thanks Craig for sorting that out. We don't know what we would do without you.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:11:29 PM |
|
The SEC will start to mine some btc soon... The SEC Set To Begin Running Bitcoin and Ethereum Nodes The US Securities and Exchange Commission is looking for quotes from contractors who will run the Ethereum and Bitcoin nodes for them.
What is the motivation behind the move?
Moving forward, the contractors will have to make additions of new blockchains as the SEC requires. The SEC has, however, not given any valid reason as to why it wants to operate its own nodes. The only explanation the agency has provided is stating that the objective is to support monitoring risk, compliance enhancement as well as to inform SEC policymaking on digital assets.
The SEC will ramp up its analytics to aid its blockchain complaisance investigations and monitoring. In essence, they have stated that the subscription will collect blockchain data from the various hosted nodes instead of offering the data through blockchain explorers.https://cryptoiq.co/the-sec-set-to-begin-running-bitcoin-and-ethereum-nodes/Anyone here want to charge the SEC $100k a month to run a node for them?
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:13:24 PM |
|
Good evening at $10.009  I've seen higher figures today. Daily still looking good, continuing yesterdays trend. I'll wait one more green daily candle with short wick to feel safe. Don’t try to feel safe man. That’s a trap. Just go with the flow. It’s all going in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 4404
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:39:34 PM Last edit: July 31, 2019, 08:54:52 PM by Torque |
|
Nevermind the obvious blatant lie that "nobody uses it". Is this what substitutes for honest discourse in your pathological mind?
He meant "nobody" as in nobody that matters. You, Judas, Aussie Man, Porn Man, Coke Man, and a handful of other idiots don't count. So, no not a blatant lie. Lol.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1593
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:49:33 PM |
|
What is more likely is that several computers or servers were used to mine the first million coins. Since there were no pools, each mined coin comes from a wallet on different computers.
Multiple computers can all use the same wallet. But the nonces on the blocks indicate that they came from a single "system" that was very fast, probably some sort of pool-like configuration. Or the difficulty was low No. The nonces in each won block indicate that the vast majority of mining power in the first days was definitely coordinated. How is that inconsistent with low difficulty on a single laptop? Quite evidently, it is not. I must have misunderstood what you were trying to convey. It seemed as if you were arguing against the post to which you responded. Specifically therein: "the nonces on the blocks indicate that they came from a single "system"". Sorry for the confusion.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:53:02 PM |
|
What is more likely is that several computers or servers were used to mine the first million coins. Since there were no pools, each mined coin comes from a wallet on different computers.
Multiple computers can all use the same wallet. But the nonces on the blocks indicate that they came from a single "system" that was very fast, probably some sort of pool-like configuration. Or the difficulty was low No. The nonces in each won block indicate that the vast majority of mining power in the first days was definitely coordinated. How is that inconsistent with low difficulty on a single laptop? Quite evidently, it is not. I must have misunderstood what you were trying to convey. It seemed as if you were arguing against the post to which you responded. Specifically therein: "the nonces on the blocks indicate that they came from a single "system"". Sorry for the confusion. Ok thank you. I try to make posts crisp and clear. JJG has taught me something. However brevity can sometimes introduce its own misunderstandings.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1593
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 07:54:08 PM |
|
Incidentally, it is working splendidly so far.
Yeah jbreher, splendidly is far from a couple of recent reorg occasions. With no known negative consequences. eta: Other than the loss of the coinbase tx revenues for the initial orphaned miners. Right, why would it have any negative consequences since nobody uses it, dah? Way to completely miss the point. Again. All the txs (again, save for the coinbase tx of each orphaned block) were ultimately included onchain. Nevermind the obvious blatant lie that "nobody uses it". Is this what substitutes for honest discourse in your pathological mind? Thanks Craig for sorting that out. We don't know what we would do without you. Precious. HM thinks I'm Craig. Jiggy thinks I'm a government agent. OTOH, several here have provided thinly-veiled evidence that they know exactly who I am. Which is, incidentally, neither of the above. Nor am I HM nor Jiggy, for that matter.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 08:06:21 PM |
|
Precious. HM thinks I'm Craig. Jiggy thinks I'm a government agent.

|
|
|
|
makrospex
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 317
nothing to see here
|
 |
July 31, 2019, 08:06:44 PM Last edit: July 31, 2019, 08:38:44 PM by makrospex |
|
Good evening at $10.009  I've seen higher figures today. Daily still looking good, continuing yesterdays trend. I'll wait one more green daily candle with short wick to feel safe. Don’t try to feel safe man. That’s a trap. Just go with the flow. It’s all going in the right direction. Yep, as always. Since i don't trade and just hodl...  EDIT: Feeling "safe" about an intermediate uptrend. I guess it's about a 50% chance to see big red candles after day3 of the daily uptrend. Still 50% chance of not seeing one. We'll see. EDIT2: intermediate = mid-term.
|
|
|
|
|