Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Ambatman]

WO is becoming as quiet as Bitcoin. Hope y'all Good Btw

We could use a bit of excitement.  For me, I'm excited about the low price and stability because that shows me we are in an accumulation phase and I'm right to be continuing to load up on them sweet coins.  It will be extremely exciting soon enough.  The fact it is this quiet in the ecosystem and we're at $84K is crazy.  I imagine when we hit $150K we'll see another influx of users here and people screaming about Bitcoin all day long on the news again.  Only a matter of time in my opinion.  Hopefully I'm not wrong.

Yeah Boring is better than falling.

I want Bitcoin to reach 1 K so that I can buy a ridiculous amount of Bitcoin before it goes to 100K again.

If bitcoin goes that low that just signify that a big flaw was found in its protocol.
Oh Boy.

[philipma1957]

What value do you want bitcoin to reach?, what your the reason !?.
For example, i want it to reach 100 k $ in 5 days so i could buy a gift with my profit.

dream on.

But if we are dreaming I will say 101,957 on march 31

[fillippone]

*******

****?

Face melting

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Biodom]

WO is becoming as quiet as Bitcoin. Hope y'all Good Btw

That was not a good character, though...albeit, well played by G. Oldman...
"Everryyyy one!"

I've actually never seen it, what its name?

I liked his character in The Fifth Element though!

ADDED: If anyone thinks DuckDuckGo doesn't track and sell your data, I did a search on Gary Oldman to see what the movie was and immediately got this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5h1WGdKVWc as a top recommendation from youtube when the vid i was watching ran out.

if you did not find it yet, it is "The Professional".
A pretty good flick, imho.

[goldkingcoiner]

I want Bitcoin to reach 1 K so that I can buy a ridiculous amount of Bitcoin before it goes to 100K again.

If bitcoin goes that low that just signify that a big flaw was found in its protocol.
Oh Boy.

That's right, Ambatman, destroyer of dreams.  

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[philipma1957]

R.I.P.

George Foreman


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Foreman

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[philipma1957]

And a buddy sandwich to boot.

[Hueristic]

WO is becoming as quiet as Bitcoin. Hope y'all Good Btw

That was not a good character, though...albeit, well played by G. Oldman...
"Everryyyy one!"

I've actually never seen it, what its name?

I liked his character in The Fifth Element though!

ADDED: If anyone thinks DuckDuckGo doesn't track and sell your data, I did a search on Gary Oldman to see what the movie was and immediately got this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5h1WGdKVWc as a top recommendation from youtube when the vid i was watching ran out.

if you did not find it yet, it is the "Professional".
A pretty good flick, imho.

W0w, I totally forgot, guess I should rewatch it!

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[vapourminer]

so, 83k is the new 83k?

[Biodom]

Remember the guy who said that bitcoin would be 84K on March 14 (he said it on Nov 26)?
Spookily, it happened.

In the same verse, he hinted at a 444K peak.

What's going on?
Are we in a 'controlled' universe where everything already happened or, perhaps, pre-programmed?
I don't really think so, but this gives me strange vibes:

https://youtu.be/2HRBJCp9XkI?t=21

Musk said something along the line a day or two ago, but not many people noticed:

https://youtu.be/CkManNuuYog?t=3320

This sounded truly "weird".

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[xhomerx10]

Remember the guy who said that bitcoin would be 84K on March 14 (he said it on Nov 26)?
Spookily, it happened.

In the same verse, he hinted at a 444K peak.

What's going on?
Are we in a 'controlled' universe where everything already happened or, pehaps, pre-programmed?
I don't really think so, but this gives me strange vibes:

https://youtu.be/2HRBJCp9XkI?t=21

Musk said something along the line a day or two ago, but not many people noticed:

https://youtu.be/CkManNuuYog?t=3320

This sounded truly "weird".

Concevons qu’on ait dressé un million de singes à frapper au hasard sur les touches d’une machine à écrire...

Emile Borel

edit: added the attribution for the quote

[Biodom]

Remember the guy who said that bitcoin would be 84K on March 14 (he said it on Nov 26)?
Spookily, it happened.

In the same verse, he hinted at a 444K peak.

What's going on?
Are we in a 'controlled' universe where everything already happened or, pehaps, pre-programmed?
I don't really think so, but this gives me strange vibes:

https://youtu.be/2HRBJCp9XkI?t=21

Musk said something along the line a day or two ago, but not many people noticed:

https://youtu.be/CkManNuuYog?t=3320

This sounded truly "weird".

Concevons qu’on ait dressé un million de singes à frapper au hasard sur les touches d’une machine à écrire...

Emile Borel

edit: added the attribution for the quote

million monkeys would produce nothing as far as an intelligent text is concerned, but maybe milllion milllion million million.... monkeys could 'produce' something meaningful.
To be exact:

Ignoring punctuation, spacing, and capitalization, a monkey typing letters uniformly at random has a chance of one in 26 of correctly typing the first letter of Hamlet. It has a chance of one in 676 (26 × 26) of typing the first two letters. Because the probability shrinks exponentially, at 20 letters it already has only a chance of one in 2620 = 19,928,148,895,209,409,152,340,197,376[d] (almost 2 × 1028). In the case of the entire text of Hamlet, the probabilities are so vanishingly small as to be inconceivable. The text of Hamlet contains approximately 130,000 letters.[e] Thus, there is a probability of one in 3.4 × 10183,946 to get the text right at the first trial. The average number of letters that needs to be typed until the text appears is also 3.4 × 10183,946,[f] or including punctuation, 4.4 × 10360,783.[g]

Even if every proton in the observable universe (which is estimated at roughly 10^80) were a monkey with a typewriter, typing from the Big Bang until the end of the universe (when protons might no longer exist), they would still need a far greater amount of time – more than three hundred and sixty thousand orders of magnitude longer – to have even a 1 in 10^500 chance of success. To put it another way, for a one in a trillion chance of success, there would need to be 10360,641 observable universes made of protonic monkeys.

Hence, it is very unlikely...
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

[nutildah]

We need more monkeys
Maybe start with a haiku
Instead of Hamlet

[xhomerx10]

Remember the guy who said that bitcoin would be 84K on March 14 (he said it on Nov 26)?
Spookily, it happened.

In the same verse, he hinted at a 444K peak.

What's going on?
Are we in a 'controlled' universe where everything already happened or, pehaps, pre-programmed?
I don't really think so, but this gives me strange vibes:

https://youtu.be/2HRBJCp9XkI?t=21

Musk said something along the line a day or two ago, but not many people noticed:

https://youtu.be/CkManNuuYog?t=3320

This sounded truly "weird".

Concevons qu’on ait dressé un million de singes à frapper au hasard sur les touches d’une machine à écrire...

Emile Borel

edit: added the attribution for the quote

million monkeys would produce nothing as far as an intelligent text is concerned, but maybe milllion milllion million million.... monkeys could 'produce' something meaningful.
To be exact:

Ignoring punctuation, spacing, and capitalization, a monkey typing letters uniformly at random has a chance of one in 26 of correctly typing the first letter of Hamlet. It has a chance of one in 676 (26 × 26) of typing the first two letters. Because the probability shrinks exponentially, at 20 letters it already has only a chance of one in 2620 = 19,928,148,895,209,409,152,340,197,376[d] (almost 2 × 1028). In the case of the entire text of Hamlet, the probabilities are so vanishingly small as to be inconceivable. The text of Hamlet contains approximately 130,000 letters.[e] Thus, there is a probability of one in 3.4 × 10183,946 to get the text right at the first trial. The average number of letters that needs to be typed until the text appears is also 3.4 × 10183,946,[f] or including punctuation, 4.4 × 10360,783.[g]

Even if every proton in the observable universe (which is estimated at roughly 10^80) were a monkey with a typewriter, typing from the Big Bang until the end of the universe (when protons might no longer exist), they would still need a far greater amount of time – more than three hundred and sixty thousand orders of magnitude longer – to have even a 1 in 10^500 chance of success. To put it another way, for a one in a trillion chance of success, there would need to be 10360,641 observable universes made of protonic monkeys.

Hence, it is very unlikely...
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

  You're taking it too literally.   We get all sorts of predictions for the price bitcoin will be in a given time frame - some of them are correct.   We discount the incorrect and focus on the correct so we essentially validate those individuals' skills and perceive success when in reality it's more likely a lucky monkey imo.