Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 03:43:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 [345] 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 ... 33301 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26367792 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:26:11 PM
 #6881

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50

Hm? What is this?

Would you say gold is too expensive, middle class should buy silver instead because it's cheaper?

A bit (or mBTC) is still only 12 cents. Cheap enough for the middle class to buy?
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
1714059833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714059833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714059833
Reply with quote  #2

1714059833
Report to moderator
Coinseeker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:29:15 PM
 #6882

It's not just the low volume that scares me.  This coincided with Gox restricting and/or disabling bots. It appears that not only do the bots move walls to control the price, but they are also responsible for most of the volume.

 link?

There are some reports earlier in the thread by users who had bots disabled/restricted.  I'll try to find.

Not surprising though. Gox has previously posted on facebook or twitter that they temporarily restricted the bots after a DDOS attack. I believe this was done shortly after the engine upgrade in April. Similar to the present situation, those restrictions also resulted in low volume and stagnant price.

*edit*

some reports around p 337.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg2087032#msg2087032

For this who missed it. ^

This will probably be the new trend following DDOS attacks. No more panic sells. Rather, Gox disables bots. Price and volume doesn't move until they are re-enabled. Then the pumping and dumping continues.


This is probably a very accurate statement. 
DougTanner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:30:27 PM
 #6883

I really hope this upward breakout didn't come as a huge surprise to anybody. I understand that there is still a lot of - justified - reservation about the question if the post-bubble correction is really over, and users like evolve and slipperyslope certainly like to remind us of that reservation on a daily basis (no offense. I appreciate the posts of you guys), but any serious look at the recent order book totals, the money flow of the past 6 days, or the sentiment on this forum ("I'm gonna buy *so hard* once price hits 90") should have convinced you that, at least short term, the only way was up. What will happen in a longer time frame, next weeks/months, is another question.

I concur. The absolute deluge of good news over the past week didn't hurt either.
Quantum_Negatum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:31:58 PM
 #6884

I really hope this upward breakout didn't come as a huge surprise to anybody. I understand that there is still a lot of - justified - reservation about the question if the post-bubble correction is really over, and users like evolve and slipperyslope certainly like to remind us of that reservation on a daily basis (no offense. I appreciate the posts of you guys), but any serious look at the recent order book totals, the money flow of the past 6 days, or the sentiment on this forum ("I'm gonna buy *so hard* once price hits 90") should have convinced you that, at least short term, the only way was up. What will happen in a longer time frame, next weeks/months, is another question.

I concur. The absolute deluge of good news over the past week didn't hurt either.

There is almost no correlation between good/bad news and up/down price. There is however a very strong correlation with volatility and an upward trend when Gox let's the bots do as they please.
lebing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:34:01 PM
 #6885

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50

Hm? What is this?

Would you say gold is too expensive, middle class should buy silver instead because it's cheaper?

A bit (or mBTC) is still only 12 cents. Cheap enough for the middle class to buy?

I admire your patience.
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 2113


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:35:03 PM
 #6886

Hey Bears! *knock knock*


Is it just me or does it look like rpietila flying through the door of the plush hotel ?  Tongue

Can't be... where's the limo?

glendall
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1018


Sugars.zone | DatingFi - Earn for Posting


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:35:31 PM
 #6887

Whew well that was an awesome frenzy morning to wake up to.

Had my sell orders in last night for 121.33 at Gox.  

Looks like that was the perfect place to be... high-fiving myself...
Piper67
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:37:35 PM
 #6888

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50

Hm? What is this?

Would you say gold is too expensive, middle class should buy silver instead because it's cheaper?

A bit (or mBTC) is still only 12 cents. Cheap enough for the middle class to buy?

I admire your patience.

Yeah, molecular, what's the point in ignoring the troll if you're going to quote him anyway... Nevertheless, your patience is admirable  Cheesy
Coinseeker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:41:12 PM
 #6889

I really hope this upward breakout didn't come as a huge surprise to anybody. I understand that there is still a lot of - justified - reservation about the question if the post-bubble correction is really over, and users like evolve and slipperyslope certainly like to remind us of that reservation on a daily basis (no offense. I appreciate the posts of you guys), but any serious look at the recent order book totals, the money flow of the past 6 days, or the sentiment on this forum ("I'm gonna buy *so hard* once price hits 90") should have convinced you that, at least short term, the only way was up. What will happen in a longer time frame, next weeks/months, is another question.

I concur. The absolute deluge of good news over the past week didn't hurt either.

I'm happy for you bulls who guessed right coming out of this "consolidation", if that's what it was.  But let's be real, we're talking a less than 10 point jump here.  Not exactly earth shattering and certainly not enough at this point to blindly believe it wont fall right back down.  I don't see anything fundamentally different other than the bots coming back online.
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 2113


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:41:40 PM
 #6890

Here is the next triangle.



Uh, no.
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:43:31 PM
 #6891

Whew well that was an awesome frenzy morning to wake up to.

Had my sell orders in last night for 121.33 at Gox.  

Looks like that was the perfect place to be... high-fiving myself...

that might be a little premature.
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:46:02 PM
 #6892

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50

Hm? What is this?

Would you say gold is too expensive, middle class should buy silver instead because it's cheaper?

A bit (or mBTC) is still only 12 cents. Cheap enough for the middle class to buy?

I admire your patience.

Yeah, molecular, what's the point in ignoring the troll if you're going to quote him anyway... Nevertheless, your patience is admirable  Cheesy

oops. well, I'm at work and I can't read the whole thread (it's become quite impossible anyway, wanted to lower my time-wasting). Only clicking on last 1 or 2 pages (skipping 20-30 at a time) recently.

Didn't notice he was trolling us.
phoenix1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:46:23 PM
 #6893


Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 2113


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:46:37 PM
 #6894

I wonder if bitcoin is at the "too big to fail" stage yet....or how far away are we. Guess depends on your definition of fail maybe..

There is no "too big to fail". There is "corporate welfare" which Bitcoin isn't in line for.
byronbb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000


HODL OR DIE


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:46:47 PM
 #6895

I really hope this upward breakout didn't come as a huge surprise to anybody. I understand that there is still a lot of - justified - reservation about the question if the post-bubble correction is really over, and users like evolve and slipperyslope certainly like to remind us of that reservation on a daily basis (no offense. I appreciate the posts of you guys), but any serious look at the recent order book totals, the money flow of the past 6 days, or the sentiment on this forum ("I'm gonna buy *so hard* once price hits 90") should have convinced you that, at least short term, the only way was up. What will happen in a longer time frame, next weeks/months, is another question.

This. The market can absorb HUGE volume sells and pops on 10k buys.
zachcope
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:47:00 PM
 #6896


Only way Bitcoin fails is if governments seriously saboteur it by preventing banks from processing fiat transactions in relation to it, but the gamble is that once the establishment tries to assault Bitcoin, the counter force and backlash will serve to propel Bitcoin to the level of a household name and away we go.

This didn't work out to well for online poker.  If major government intervention happens as you describe...SELL, SELL, SELL. 

Au contraire, I first found Bitcoin as a result of the poker 'black friday'. The weak point in online poker was the bank funding re third parties. That got me thinking about how governments can (and do) influence the banks to effectively shut down undesirable industries. The beauty of bitcoin is that it can't be shut down that way. Although exchanges can be attacked or outlawed in individual countries, it is impossible to shut down face to face currency exchange or bitcoin sales. There is no central authority to control, unlike the poker companies.

I use bitcoins to play poker, even though I don't need to (live in Europe) just because I can.

BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

Coinseeker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:49:17 PM
 #6897


Like I said before, waiting until we break 25 before I loose all hope of getting cheap coin.

Don't give up hope.  This is starting to just look like a little pent up demand to me and possibly nothing more.  This stall in the 120ish range is worth noting. Of course as soon as I say that, it will shoot to 160.   Grin
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2422
Merit: 2113


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:50:51 PM
 #6898

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50



That assertion has no basis in anything. All Bitcoin needs is infrastructure, wide adoption and stability. The price is actually irrelevant.
StarenseN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 1362



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:51:09 PM
 #6899

If BTC wants to reach out to the average middle class out there it needs to value itself at $30-50



Yeah, it's a real shame that bitcoins can not be divided.

I lol'd IRL
Coinseeker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 10, 2013, 02:54:06 PM
 #6900


Only way Bitcoin fails is if governments seriously saboteur it by preventing banks from processing fiat transactions in relation to it, but the gamble is that once the establishment tries to assault Bitcoin, the counter force and backlash will serve to propel Bitcoin to the level of a household name and away we go.

This didn't work out to well for online poker.  If major government intervention happens as you describe...SELL, SELL, SELL.  

Au contraire, I first found Bitcoin as a result of the poker 'black friday'. The weak point in online poker was the bank funding re third parties. That got me thinking about how governments can (and do) influence the banks to effectively shut down undesirable industries. The beauty of bitcoin is that it can't be shut down that way. Although exchanges can be attacked or outlawed in individual countries, it is impossible to shut down face to face currency exchange or bitcoin sales. There is no central authority to control, unlike the poker companies.

I use bitcoins to play poker, even though I don't need to (live in Europe) just because I can.

BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC



I know man, I was there.  I felt like a part of me had died.   Cry   My thoughts are they can absolutely cripple Bitcoins growth via the banks.  Not to mention pushing away all hope of legitamate US business getting on board which will just stagnant Bitcoin altogether.  It would continue in the black markets and underground poker sites, etc. sure....but they can do major damage.  But hey that's negative talk...its' too early for that.   Let's celebrate the rise and hope for the best.  Cheesy

EDIT:  I stand by my sell order should something major come along.
Pages: « 1 ... 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 [345] 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 ... 33301 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!