Bitcoin Forum
April 21, 2026, 04:00:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 35548 35549 35550 35551 35552 35553 35554 35555 35556 35557 35558 35559 35560 35561 35562 35563 35564 35565 35566 35567 35568 35569 35570 35571 35572 35573 35574 35575 35576 35577 35578 35579 35580 35581 35582 35583 35584 35585 35586 35587 35588 35589 35590 35591 35592 35593 35594 35595 35596 35597 [35598] 35599 35600 35601 35602 35603 35604 35605 35606 35607 35608 35609 35610 35611 35612 35613 35614 35615 35616 35617 35618 35619 35620 35621 35622 35623 35624 35625 35626 35627 35628 35629 35630 35631 35632 35633 35634 35635 35636 35637 35638 35639 35640 35641 35642 35643 35644 35645 35646 35647 35648 ... 35716 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26961838 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 03:01:17 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BTCETFInvestor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 67

Toodaloo! ..-. ..- -.-. -.- / -.-- --- ..-


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 03:39:13 PM

fast sandwich made for lunch time.

here is some sat morning f.u.d.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/latest-trump-threatens-irans-oil-044416352.html

so Iran still doing missiles at random spots across the Middle East.

me a rich guy in the Middle East I am buying corn as I can stash it in the clouds safely

thus btc go up.

Still sucks if you live anywhere in the middle east.

When I think that countries that have so much money sit like clay pigeons and wait for rockets and drones instead of responding to attacks with the same force. Honestly, I expected that Iran's military capability would be pretty much destroyed by now, but they have obviously been preparing for decades for what is happening to them right now.

I read that there is mention of the possibility of US and Israeli special forces breaking into underground facilities and trying to seize or destroy enriched uranium, which would probably lead to the end of the attack.

Seizing the enriched uranium is really not feasible.  Destroying or disabling Iran’s enriched uranium capability is the best approach - mostly by massive and repeated airstrikes, sabotage, and collapsing access to facilities - - not by physically removing every gram of uranium.

Physically seizing the material would require large, complex ground operations with heavy equipment and WMD‑handling units, inside hostile, fortified territory - militarily possible in theory, but extraordinarily risky and highly escalatory.

Serious analyses keeps coming back to the same conclusion; you can set the program back, but fully securing or eliminating all enriched uranium is extremely hard, especially once it’s dispersed in different unknown areas and deep underground under mountainous areas.

I personally look for massive, repeated airstrikes to take place, collapsing access to facilities that are believed to be used to store Iran’s already enriched uranium or is used to enrich it.   
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4522
Merit: 7053


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 03:50:51 PM

It's impossible to seize something that doesn't exist, yellow cake anyone?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 04:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BTCETFInvestor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 67

Toodaloo! ..-. ..- -.-. -.- / -.-- --- ..-


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 04:32:56 PM
Last edit: March 14, 2026, 04:55:52 PM by BTCETFInvestor

It's impossible to seize something that doesn't exist, yellow cake anyone?

It sounds like you're referencing the infamous Niger uranium forgeries, where the phrase "it's impossible to seize something that doesn't exist" became a cynical summary of the search for Iraqi WMDs.

The "yellowcake" controversy centered on a set of documents; later proven to be crude forgeries suggesting Saddam Hussein tried to buy 500 tons of uranium from Niger.

The assertion that it is impossible to seize something that does not exist is true in principle, but the case of Iraqi yellowcake involves a complex distinction between pre-existing stockpiles and alleged new acquisitions.


Here is the factual breakdown based on historical records:

The "Non-Existent" Yellowcake (The Allegation): The 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq was partially justified by claims that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase "large quantities" of yellowcake uranium from Niger. These claims were based on forged documents (mentioned above) and were determined to be false before the war began. In this sense, the alleged new African yellowcake did not exist.

However, Saddam Hussein did have a large amount of pre-existing yellowcake in Iraq and it was seized:

While the allegation about new purchases was false, the United States did secure a large amount of pre-existing yellowcake (roughly 550 metric tons) stored at the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center south of Baghdad. This was not a new purchase but rather leftovers from Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program from before the 1991 Gulf War.

Final Disposition: In 2008, after years of the material being unguarded and looted, a secret US mission finalized the removal of this 1991-era yellowcake from Iraq to Canada for use in nuclear energy facilities.

In summary: The 'yellowcake' Iraq was accused of trying to buy (after 2000) was nonexistent forged intel; the 'yellowcake' that existed in stockpiles (before 1991) was eventually seized, sold, and removed.

So, the fact of the matter is this - 'yellowcake' absolutely did exist in Iraq and it was thought that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase 'large quantities' more of 'yellowcake' uranium from Niger.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is what is known about the origin of the forgeries - Multiple investigations - journalistic, intelligence, and diplomatic - converge on the same core facts:

• SISMI (Italy’s military intelligence service) was the first entity to circulate the documents in 2001. They were passed to U.S. and U.K. intelligence as evidence that Iraq sought to buy 500 tons of yellowcake uranium from Niger.

• Rocco Martino, a former Carabinieri officer with ties to SISMI, was the middleman who attempted to sell the documents. He later claimed he was encouraged by an Italian intelligence officer, Antonio Nucera, to distribute them for money.

• The documents were quickly exposed as crude forgeries - containing wrong names, wrong dates, and even signatures of long-retired officials. The IAEA determined they were fake within hours of examination.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 5377



View Profile
March 14, 2026, 04:59:33 PM
Merited by Hueristic (1)

Far from my usual world right now, but never too far from our lil fiend. Just trying to catch up with WO reading is a task that overwhelms me at the moment!
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 05:01:15 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5446
Merit: 6181


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
March 14, 2026, 05:14:32 PM

The correction ended the day we hit 71k

59k to 71k is plus 20% so we are in the beginning of a new bull run.

Of course it is a bare minimum to qualify. But it is plus  20% so if we float around at 71k or so it is baby bull beginning  not correction.

With Iran popping drones and missiles all over the middle east many are stacking wealth into btc since you can blow up a house you can blow up a painting but you can't blow up btc if it is stored correctly.

According to Grok there were 3 bear market bounces of 20% or more during the crash of 2022 before the market eventually hit bottom. While I don’t put any value on the number of bounces, a 20% rally not leading to a bull run is nothing new. Failure to put in a new short term high above $74K was a clear indicator the trend is still down.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 6129



View Profile
March 14, 2026, 05:48:35 PM
Last edit: March 14, 2026, 06:08:52 PM by Biodom
Merited by philipma1957 (1), JayJuanGee (1)

The correction ended the day we hit 71k

59k to 71k is plus 20% so we are in the beginning of a new bull run.

Of course it is a bare minimum to qualify. But it is plus  20% so if we float around at 71k or so it is baby bull beginning  not correction.

With Iran popping drones and missiles all over the middle east many are stacking wealth into btc since you can blow up a house you can blow up a painting but you can't blow up btc if it is stored correctly.

According to Grok there were 3 bear market bounces of 20% or more during the crash of 2022 before the market eventually hit bottom. While I don’t put any value on the number of bounces, a 20% rally not leading to a bull run is nothing new. Failure to put in a new short term high above $74K was a clear indicator the trend is still down.

I tend to agree with the part that it is currently unclear, but I wouldn't proclaim any significance of the 74K spot so far.
Besides, the classical definition of a bear is 20% down, but the reverse 20% is not a bull definition.
Bull definition is the increase that brings about a new high (after a 20% decline).
By this criteria, no true bull until we breach 126K.

However, this might be too strict and going backwards we could all agree, perhaps, that the last bull started at 15.7K, but we only knew it for sure once it exceeded the prior high of 68.6K or about.
Therefore, current market could be a new bull, but also may be a bear bounce.
OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 5017


Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 05:51:51 PM

Far from my usual world right now, but never too far from our lil fiend. Just trying to catch up with WO reading is a task that overwhelms me at the moment!

Yeah, that sucks. I more often pull the TLDR brakes than not in these situations.
At the same time it remembers me of AlcoHODL's weekly digests (sorry for fucking up the casing on your nickname, i'm sure i did), which were really convenient.
They gave me a good hint if it was worth it to backread (or not).

The correction ended the day we hit 71k

59k to 71k is plus 20% so we are in the beginning of a new bull run.

Of course it is a bare minimum to qualify. But it is plus  20% so if we float around at 71k or so it is baby bull beginning  not correction.

With Iran popping drones and missiles all over the middle east many are stacking wealth into btc since you can blow up a house you can blow up a painting but you can't blow up btc if it is stored correctly.

According to Grok there were 3 bear market bounces of 20% or more during the crash of 2022 before the market eventually hit bottom. While I don’t put any value on the number of bounces, a 20% rally not leading to a bull run is nothing new. Failure to put in a new short term high above $74K was a clear indicator the trend is still down.

I tend to agree with the part that it is currently unclear, but I wouldn't proclaim any significance of the 74K spot so far.
Besides, the classical definition of a bear is 20% down, but the reverse 20% is not a bull definition.
Bull definition is the increase that brings about a new high (after a 20% decline).
By this criteria, no true bull until we breach 126K.

However, this might be too strict and going backwards we could all agree, perhaps, that the last bull started at 15.7K, but we only knew it for sure once it exceeded prior high of 68.6K or about.
Therefore, current market could be a new bull, but also may be a bear bounce.

Hmm, i'd still call this a recovery, because we fell from $86 (or $78) and now we haven't even touch these level (yet?).
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 06:01:17 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Ambatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1282


Don't tell anyone


View Profile WWW
March 14, 2026, 06:04:24 PM

@philipma1957 can you please open your thread for saving merit record for sometime
I have one that I believe it's worth sharing there.




Been scared for days someone shouldn't cross it without me saving Cheesy

1234
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 6129



View Profile
March 14, 2026, 06:06:50 PM

Far from my usual world right now, but never too far from our lil fiend. Just trying to catch up with WO reading is a task that overwhelms me at the moment!

Yeah, that sucks. I more often pull the TLDR brakes than not in these situations.
At the same time it remembers me of AlcoHODL's weekly digests (sorry for fucking up the casing on your nickname, i'm sure i did), which were really convenient.
They gave me a good hint if it was worth it to backread (or not).

The correction ended the day we hit 71k

59k to 71k is plus 20% so we are in the beginning of a new bull run.

Of course it is a bare minimum to qualify. But it is plus  20% so if we float around at 71k or so it is baby bull beginning  not correction.

With Iran popping drones and missiles all over the middle east many are stacking wealth into btc since you can blow up a house you can blow up a painting but you can't blow up btc if it is stored correctly.

According to Grok there were 3 bear market bounces of 20% or more during the crash of 2022 before the market eventually hit bottom. While I don’t put any value on the number of bounces, a 20% rally not leading to a bull run is nothing new. Failure to put in a new short term high above $74K was a clear indicator the trend is still down.

I tend to agree with the part that it is currently unclear, but I wouldn't proclaim any significance of the 74K spot so far.
Besides, the classical definition of a bear is 20% down, but the reverse 20% is not a bull definition.
Bull definition is the increase that brings about a new high (after a 20% decline).
By this criteria, no true bull until we breach 126K.

However, this might be too strict and going backwards we could all agree, perhaps, that the last bull started at 15.7K, but we only knew it for sure once it exceeded prior high of 68.6K or about.
Therefore, current market could be a new bull, but also may be a bear bounce.

Hmm, i'd still call this a recovery, because we fell from $86 (or $78) and now we haven't even touch these level (yet?).

Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5446
Merit: 6181


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
March 14, 2026, 06:11:56 PM

Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.

I could change my name to future if it would make the truth easier to digest for you. Smiley

Jokes aside, as long as we keep seeing lower highs the bear market is in place. This latest bounce that resulted in a rejection at the $74K resistance level was actually extremely bearish.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 6129



View Profile
March 14, 2026, 06:38:20 PM

Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.

I could change my name to future if it would make the truth easier to digest for you. Smiley

Jokes aside, as long as we keep seeing lower highs the bear market is in place. This latest bounce that resulted in a rejection at the $74K resistance level was actually extremely bearish.

Nah, it wasn't...it's too early to tell...if we are still here (or lower) by mid April, then, maybe bearish.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4424
Merit: 14327


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 06:54:51 PM


Nighty Night, Mr. Bear, it's time for you to hibernate. And Mr. Bull, it's time to wake up and run really fast!
With a red hue on the bear side and a green hue on the bull side, it would be perfect. Although, bull+red makes sense too.

I like her new magic wand(s) (with the crystals). Very Myst-like (if you know, you know).
That's funny. When I made it, I was actually considering changing the colors of the things exactly as you say. But I was just messing around and I had just been messing around the whole time.

"We" cannot take you seriously if you are reversing the colors on "us."

 Angry Angry Angry Angry

The correction ended the day we hit 71k
59k to 71k is plus 20% so we are in the beginning of a new bull run.

Of course it is a bare minimum to qualify. But it is plus  20% so if we float around at 71k or so it is baby bull beginning  not correction.

With Iran popping drones and missiles all over the middle east many are stacking wealth into btc since you can blow up a house you can blow up a painting but you can't blow up btc if it is stored correctly.
According to Grok there were 3 bear market bounces of 20% or more during the crash of 2022 before the market eventually hit bottom. While I don’t put any value on the number of bounces, a 20% rally not leading to a bull run is nothing new. Failure to put in a new short term high above $74K was a clear indicator the trend is still down.
I tend to agree with the part that it is currently unclear, but I wouldn't proclaim any significance of the 74K spot so far.
Besides, the classical definition of a bear is 20% down, but the reverse 20% is not a bull definition.
Bull definition is the increase that brings about a new high (after a 20% decline).
By this criteria, no true bull until we breach 126K.

Sure, there is value in trying to define what is a bull market versus a bear market, yet getting back to the prior ATH seems a bit much.. even though on a personal level, I largely conceded that we were no longer in a bull market around the time of our late January / early February dropping below the mid-$0ks without any real return after a few days... .. so then it had seemed to be clear that we had gotten knocked out of the bull market - yet at the same time, I have trouble trying in any territory that we are not in one or another.. so then in that sense, perhaps from my own somewhat lame definition, we can ONLY be in bear or bull at any given time.. so then the question might be at what point can we confirm that we have returned back to a bull, and surpassing the ATH seems a bit much.

I recall that in 2023, it started to appear clear that we were back to the bull in around late 2023 when the BTC price started to pump (from $27k and upwardly) which was largely due to an anticipation that the BTC spot ETF approval was imminent.

I am not sure if it matters the reason for the pump, yet when it starts to seem that the bottom is "in" then the return to a bull market could be called.. and I am not exactly sure when that would be triggered, and there could be some symbolism that is involved since getting back above $100k and staying there for a few days, and maybe even more than a week, may well be enough to proclaim that "the bottom is" more likely "in" than not... so then when the odds for up become greater than the odds for down, seems to be my own personal (and sure perhaps somewhat lame and difficult to pinpoint) definition of what might allow me to start to perceive that it is quite likely that we have returned to a bull market.

However, this might be too strict

You don't say..??.??

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

and going backwards we could all agree, perhaps, that the last bull started at 15.7K, but we only knew it for sure once it exceeded the prior high of 68.6K or about.

By the way.. $15,479 was the bottom.. on Bitstamp (our official price measure)..  Tongue Tongue Tongue

For me, I think getting above something like $35k in around November 2023 and staying there for more than a week or so had brought quite a bit of confirmation (or was it conviction?) that we had returned to a bull market and the bottom was in.

Therefore, current market could be a new bull, but also may be a bear bounce.

I agree that once we know that the bottom is in, then we can retroactively describe the whole period from $59,930 (on February 5th-ish) and upward to have had constituted a bull market, even though we were not able to "confirm" that the bottom was "in" until a later date... which maybe staying above $100k-ish for a week may well be enough.  By the way, I would choose a lower price, except in this case there seems to be quite a bit of value in that round number of $100k.. it has some seeming ongoing symbolism in the brains of "us" mere mortals.

By the way.. I will concede that there might be some scenarios that we do not have to return back above $100k to confirm that our current bottom is in, which surely could be a product of both time and price and perhaps if there might be some plausible explanation (news) for the price going up and becoming less likely to retest the bottom.

@philipma1957 can you please open your thread for saving merit record for sometime
I have one that I believe it's worth sharing there.

Been scared for days someone shouldn't cross it without me saving Cheesy

1234

Not wanting to ruin ur lil party (or maybe I am?). You reached such fabulous and largely random numerology on Friday the 13th.  

I am not sure if such an event is such a good thing.

[edited out]
Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.

"Baby bull."  You deserve a virtual slap for that one.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.
I could change my name to future if it would make the truth easier to digest for you. Smiley

Jokes aside, as long as we keep seeing lower highs the bear market is in place. This latest bounce that resulted in a rejection at the $74K resistance level was actually extremely bearish.

The lower highs theory is not implausible (and not even stupid, in spite of its author proponent.. hahahahhahahaha).. especially since it works, until it doesn't... depending on timeline in which such lower highs are proclaimed to exist, too.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2477


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 07:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 5017


Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)


View Profile
March 14, 2026, 07:23:04 PM

@philipma1957 can you please open your thread for saving merit record for sometime
I have one that I believe it's worth sharing there.




Been scared for days someone shouldn't cross it without me saving Cheesy

1234

I wanted to merit your post, but at the same time i would have ruined it.
There are numbers, and there are beautiful numbers.
It's an artifact of our brain's pattern recognition, it triggers a Dopamine release. A basic part of the dynamics of human learning through observation.
Primal stuff.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 6129



View Profile
March 14, 2026, 07:30:33 PM
Merited by philipma1957 (2)

[edited out]
Sure...a recovery, but only future would say if it was a baby bull or just a bounce.
However, i hope for the former.

"Baby bull."  You deserve a virtual slap for that one.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


au contraire...baby bull is almost perfect comparison because it does two things: suggests that it is early (which it is, no doubt) while also suggesting that it could develop into a full grown specimen of a bull.
You may call it a bull calf...if baby bull is too cute for ya.
 Grin
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4830
Merit: 11783


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 14, 2026, 07:34:15 PM

It's impossible to seize something that doesn't exist, yellow cake anyone?

Actually I am a fan of a quality cheesecake not a yellow cake.

Last I looked Iran borders on the Caspian Sea as does Russia. So if Russia sends a large navy ship to Iran will the USA sink it?

Or better yet if Russia send a sub to Iran across or should I say  under the Caspian Sea to  Iran are we going to sink it.

The logic of attacking Iran escapes me.

So prevention of Iran from Nuke missiles means preventing Russia from sending some to them.
Pages: « 1 ... 35548 35549 35550 35551 35552 35553 35554 35555 35556 35557 35558 35559 35560 35561 35562 35563 35564 35565 35566 35567 35568 35569 35570 35571 35572 35573 35574 35575 35576 35577 35578 35579 35580 35581 35582 35583 35584 35585 35586 35587 35588 35589 35590 35591 35592 35593 35594 35595 35596 35597 [35598] 35599 35600 35601 35602 35603 35604 35605 35606 35607 35608 35609 35610 35611 35612 35613 35614 35615 35616 35617 35618 35619 35620 35621 35622 35623 35624 35625 35626 35627 35628 35629 35630 35631 35632 35633 35634 35635 35636 35637 35638 35639 35640 35641 35642 35643 35644 35645 35646 35647 35648 ... 35716 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!