Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Cconvert2G36]

wow people have finally figured out it's retarded and completely against self interest to loan your coins out to people who want to dump down the price ? hot damn !

If you are confident that bitcoin has positive demand pressure in the long term, it is absolutely not against your interest to loan them the coins to push you higher when they close. Unfortunately you have to park them with someone else, which could very easily negate the interest income. We have too few shorts right now, not too many.

[1713559529]

1713559529

[1713559529]

1713559529

[1713559529]

1713559529

[1713559529]

1713559529

[suda123]

Well, seeing as you lot have turned it into the Lambie Observer Thread again.

 Izabella Kaminska has a classic case of acute sociopathic personality disorder. She fits the symptoms as well as one can. The sociopath fears exposure above most things. I don't know what methods The Doxing used to unmask her and they likely weren't legal in many jurisdictions, but it has already been done. It is understandable that The Doxing left no concrete proof to avoid incriminating himself. I for one would not want to see him arrested for making the world a better place. It is very obvious she is indeed Lambie, and she has admitted it on multiple occasions, so further proof is not necessary. If she is low on funds from shorting bitcoin in hopes of blogging hit pieces and trolling the market so much she turned a profit, then I believe she would make a great candidate for a high level psychiatric study that might warrant a stipend. I believe in her delusions of grandeur she believed that one blogger could affect a world wide market. One can't help but notice the irony that Izabella tweets about her financial hardships, yet spends her days and nights fighting to defend the corrupt system that make her barely able to afford the high cost of living in London, rather than finding a mate and giving birth to and raising more Izabellambies. Perhaps that is for the best, who knows. It is nice to know who is doing all the ridiculous trolling, so The Doxing, if your reading, this ones for you buddy.


https://twitter.com/izakaminska/

This is an obvious attempt to provoke people to harass an innocent financial blogger in an attempt to generate bad press for bitcoin.

I tend to agree with this.

This, " interested in all things energy, central banky, market structurey and science fictiony.", is just so horrible... a pseudo-intellecutual-valley-girl-speak that doesn't jive with what we know. Real lambie's ego is far too huge and confident to willingly smear their own public image so badly.

I think shes missing a vital important piece of information.

Her likes and favorites are only 1-4 people

She thinks that 30 thousand people are actually reading her stuff, someone should go break the news to her.

Trust me im like in my early 20s, and work at an accounting firm, adults make this mistake ALLL the time.

Take for instance when we were in middle school or highschool, and we had a crush we liked on facebook or myspace, wed type random shit about them hoping they'd read it, and we actually believed that they were reading it.

[xxxxxzzzzz]

wow people have finally figured out it's retarded and completely against self interest to loan your coins out to people who want to dump down the price ? hot damn !

If you are confident that bitcoin has positive demand pressure in the long term, it is absolutely not against your interest to loan them the coins to push you higher when they close. Unfortunately you have to park them with someone else, which could very easily negate the interest income. We have too few shorts right now, not too many.

well ... yes ... if you don't trade ever and only care about price X years from now instead of X minutes / hours / days from now and have a long term expectation of higher prices ... then definitely I agree ... personally i'd never lend my btc out to others who would wish to use those coins to suppress the price on any time scale ... to me btc is far more valuable to personally trade the 1-5% daily chop than to get a 0.05% daily interest ... of course that requires correct trades vs zero thought or participation whatsoever ... not that that's a bad thing ... sure would be less stress ... the world needs long term holders too

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[JayJuanGee]

500 will come soon but I believe most traders are cautious if a bubble gets formed and we go to $1k

If we go to $1k, we will shoot right passed it.

[dropt]

Lambie, you are some kinda special. The kind that not even a mother can love.

I still find it hilarious that you think i'm the only one that can't stand you. It's obvious multiple people on this forum enjoy giving you a taste of your own medicine. Sure, for your sanity's sake. Call me all of them. It's not the first time others have joined in to add to my brilliance, thus gaining momentum that I am in control of other people's accounts. You are humorous with your shamed debacle.

Most us just put her on ignore.  Her words and opinion are not worth our time, and will likely never be.  Just move forward with your life as if she doesn't exist, because realistically, she might as well not.

[Chef Ramsay]

Yep, you're a confirmed paranoid psychopath. I actually wish those accounts were mine now. Not for trolling, but for your sake. So you could be right about at least one thing. Sadly, you're just a pathetic anti BTCitcoin keyboard warrior.

You seem to have an odd obsession with facials and underage individuals. Lambie, were you abused as a child? Is that why everyone professes that when you were doxxed it was brought to light you are an avid carpet muncher?

Interesting, 4 buttlickers on the way in and another 3 or more on the way out. Crotch-face loves those butts in any event. Epic crotch valuations coming up.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[bitebits]

Why has no one posted a dino-chart lately?

Whatever happened to the MagicMexican guy....  I miss dinosaurs with great hats.

*sigh*

Nostalgia ain't what it used to be....

If I am not mistaken dinosaurs live in the 600$ era.

[MNDan]

Why has no one posted a dino-chart lately?

Whatever happened to the MagicMexican guy....  I miss dinosaurs with great hats.

*sigh*

Nostalgia ain't what it used to be....

If I am not mistaken dinosaurs live in the 600$ era.

Won't be long..........

[marcus_of_augustus]

maybe we will see dinosaurs, or sheep, mutton dressed up as lamb ... who knows what in the run to six hundy?

[Searing]

maybe we will see dinosaurs, or sheep, mutton dressed up as lamb ... who knows what in the run to six hundy?

well ....if there is a plan of a plan that comes out of the Hong Kong btc scaling dev conference....well we will go over 400 usd btc quick imho..


http://www.coindesk.com/chinas-miners-heat-up-blocksize-debate-at-scaling-bitcoin-hong-kong/

if nothing comes of it ...even something as lame as the above a plan for a plan....some kinda process hell it will probably drop back to mid 200's again

I mean the rest of KNOW we don't know wtf is going on with crypto and btc......we have 'guideline' that we think is gonna happen

but if the core devs can't figure it out among themselves either well ..'shudder' just scared myself

just saying..they can lie to me/ make stuff up/ I don't care ...I don't code.....just make it frigging 'plausible' that there is a plan for a plan

us bitcoin types are used to little info and much hope ...so hell even that much would work ...to calm the 'kiddies"

[ErisDiscordia]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vql34/segregated_witness_and_its_impact_on_scalability/

tl;dr bitcoin can scale for the forseeable future (4-6yrs) without hardfork ... uberbullish.

I like this a lot and I'm pleasantly surprised that the conference seems to be working towards what we all want: scaling without incurring needless centralization risks. Would be nice if this could end the toxic blocksize vitriol-spewing trench warfare of opinions I'm sick of it.

[r0ach]

Newest most accurate TA:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279383.0

[marcus_of_augustus]

maybe we will see dinosaurs, or sheep, mutton dressed up as lamb ... who knows what in the run to six hundy?

well ....if there is a plan of a plan that comes out of the Hong Kong btc scaling dev conference....well we will go over 400 usd btc quick imho..


http://www.coindesk.com/chinas-miners-heat-up-blocksize-debate-at-scaling-bitcoin-hong-kong/

if nothing comes of it ...even something as lame as the above a plan for a plan....some kinda process hell it will probably drop back to mid 200's again

I mean the rest of KNOW we don't know wtf is going on with crypto and btc......we have 'guideline' that we think is gonna happen

but if the core devs can't figure it out among themselves either well ..'shudder' just scared myself

just saying..they can lie to me/ make stuff up/ I don't care ...I don't code.....just make it frigging 'plausible' that there is a plan for a plan

us bitcoin types are used to little info and much hope ...so hell even that much would work ...to calm the 'kiddies"

not sure if you read some of my previous posts up page ... there is way more than a plan in place already
imho that seg-witness stuff looks like a viable solution for the foreseeable future (4-6yrs) plus some other benefits to boot, better than a risky can kick, it is a low risk restructuring that buys time and makes lite clients a real thing again (not just security theatre like SPV bitcoinJ)

tl;dr short-term scaling is solved ... we can worry about the long term when it arrives because we will know better what it looks like then (particularly the fees market with less reward transition conundrum)

[Cconvert2G36]

maybe we will see dinosaurs, or sheep, mutton dressed up as lamb ... who knows what in the run to six hundy?

well ....if there is a plan of a plan that comes out of the Hong Kong btc scaling dev conference....well we will go over 400 usd btc quick imho..


http://www.coindesk.com/chinas-miners-heat-up-blocksize-debate-at-scaling-bitcoin-hong-kong/

if nothing comes of it ...even something as lame as the above a plan for a plan....some kinda process hell it will probably drop back to mid 200's again

I mean the rest of KNOW we don't know wtf is going on with crypto and btc......we have 'guideline' that we think is gonna happen

but if the core devs can't figure it out among themselves either well ..'shudder' just scared myself

just saying..they can lie to me/ make stuff up/ I don't care ...I don't code.....just make it frigging 'plausible' that there is a plan for a plan

us bitcoin types are used to little info and much hope ...so hell even that much would work ...to calm the 'kiddies"

not sure if you read some of my previous posts up page ... there is way more than a plan in place already
imho that seg-witness stuff looks like a viable solution for the foreseeable future (4-6yrs) plus some other benefits to boot, better than a risky can kick, it is a low risk restructuring that buys time and makes lite clients a real thing again (not just security theatre like SPV bitcoinJ)

tl;dr short-term scaling is solved ... we can worry about the long term when it arrives because we will know better what it looks like then (particularly the fees market with less reward transition conundrum)

tl;do read

I'll let luke-jr supply a little cold water for your 4-6 year solution euphoria:

[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 6 points 2 hours ago
Hmm, problem here is that CPU usage is not the primary bottleneck for block sizes: bandwidth is. And unfortunately, SW doesn't help in the bandwidth area at all. So while I do think we should take this opportunity to get the block size changes softforked in instead of hardforked (buying us a bit more time before a hardfork is required?), it does still need to be gradual and not just 4x at once.
My suggestion is to go based on either BIP 103 or John Sacco's double-the-limit-every-subsidy-halving idea.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Well, seeing as you lot have turned it into the Lambie Observer Thread again.

 Izabella Kaminska has a classic case of acute sociopathic personality disorder. She fits the symptoms as well as one can. The sociopath fears exposure above most things. I don't know what methods The Doxing used to unmask her and they likely weren't legal in many jurisdictions, but it has already been done. It is understandable that The Doxing left no concrete proof to avoid incriminating himself. I for one would not want to see him arrested for making the world a better place. It is very obvious she is indeed Lambie, and she has admitted it on multiple occasions, so further proof is not necessary. If she is low on funds from shorting bitcoin in hopes of blogging hit pieces and trolling the market so much she turned a profit, then I believe she would make a great candidate for a high level psychiatric study that might warrant a stipend. I believe in her delusions of grandeur she believed that one blogger could affect a world wide market. One can't help but notice the irony that Izabella tweets about her financial hardships, yet spends her days and nights fighting to defend the corrupt system that make her barely able to afford the high cost of living in London, rather than finding a mate and giving birth to and raising more Izabellambies. Perhaps that is for the best, who knows. It is nice to know who is doing all the ridiculous trolling, so The Doxing, if your reading, this ones for you buddy.


https://twitter.com/izakaminska/

This is an obvious attempt to provoke people to harass an innocent financial blogger in an attempt to generate bad press for bitcoin.

I tend to agree with this.

This, " interested in all things energy, central banky, market structurey and science fictiony.", is just so horrible... a pseudo-intellecutual-valley-girl-speak that doesn't jive with what we know. Real lambie's ego is far too huge and confident to willingly smear their own public image so badly.

Still, someone seems to have taken the bait:

Izabella Kaminska ‏@izakaminska 32m32 minutes ago

The world of bitcoiners is so binary. Hilarious. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq65d/kaminska_critiques_goldman_sachs_setlcoin_patent/ …? (Fyi - I have not changed my view of Bitcoin)

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[Fatman3001]

tl;do read

I'll let luke-jr supply a little cold water for your 4-6 year solution euphoria:

[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 6 points 2 hours ago
Hmm, problem here is that CPU usage is not the primary bottleneck for block sizes: bandwidth is. And unfortunately, SW doesn't help in the bandwidth area at all. So while I do think we should take this opportunity to get the block size changes softforked in instead of hardforked (buying us a bit more time before a hardfork is required?), it does still need to be gradual and not just 4x at once.
My suggestion is to go based on either BIP 103 or John Sacco's double-the-limit-every-subsidy-halving idea.

wut?

no magic?

Small-block scaling is starting to remind me of cold fusion.

[marcus_of_augustus]

not sure if you read some of my previous posts up page ... there is way more than a plan in place already
imho that seg-witness stuff looks like a viable solution for the foreseeable future (4-6yrs) plus some other benefits to boot, better than a risky can kick, it is a low risk restructuring that buys time and makes lite clients a real thing again (not just security theatre like SPV bitcoinJ)

tl;dr short-term scaling is solved ... we can worry about the long term when it arrives because we will know better what it looks like then (particularly the fees market with less reward transition conundrum)

tl;do read

I'll let luke-jr supply a little cold water for your 4-6 year solution euphoria:

[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 6 points 2 hours ago
Hmm, problem here is that CPU usage is not the primary bottleneck for block sizes: bandwidth is. And unfortunately, SW doesn't help in the bandwidth area at all. So while I do think we should take this opportunity to get the block size changes softforked in instead of hardforked (buying us a bit more time before a hardfork is required?), it does still need to be gradual and not just 4x at once.
My suggestion is to go based on either BIP 103 or John Sacco's double-the-limit-every-subsidy-halving idea.

euphoria huh? Luke-Jr is always conservative on bandwidth because lives in rural Florida on an apparently sub-par connection. If we scale TX rate 4x without a hard-fork then current bandwidth is already capable of handling that ... not sure where your cold water thinking is here, a damp squib?

The key is without risky hard-fork for now ... in the meantime technology hardware, software and network data knowledge all improve while transition to fees driven PoW security gets closer (halving to 6.25btc reward) ... and lite nodes now have a viable future instead of client-server (risky offchain). It's all very encouraging, an alternative consensual path for foreseeble future to bludgeoning through an unpopular blocksize hardfork with exponential scaling into an unknowable outcome. The world might look very different in 2 years, let alone 5 or 20.