Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 09:39:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 17209 17210 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 17247 17248 17249 17250 17251 17252 17253 17254 17255 17256 17257 17258 [17259] 17260 17261 17262 17263 17264 17265 17266 17267 17268 17269 17270 17271 17272 17273 17274 17275 17276 17277 17278 17279 17280 17281 17282 17283 17284 17285 17286 17287 17288 17289 17290 17291 17292 17293 17294 17295 17296 17297 17298 17299 17300 17301 17302 17303 17304 17305 17306 17307 17308 17309 ... 33281 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26364528 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
yonton
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 262



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 04:45:45 AM

Who will mine BCC other than viabtc?
1713562741
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562741

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562741
Reply with quote  #2

1713562741
Report to moderator
1713562741
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562741

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562741
Reply with quote  #2

1713562741
Report to moderator
1713562741
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562741

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562741
Reply with quote  #2

1713562741
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713562741
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713562741

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713562741
Reply with quote  #2

1713562741
Report to moderator
r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 05:18:20 AM

millions of coins will be dumped all at once.
they all believe BCC is worthless
they all believe everyone will sell BCC ASAP
they will sell BCC in a hurry no matter how low or how far price has already tanked
and we know they are coming soooo...
price will crash really really hard, like nothing you've ever seen.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10130


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 05:29:24 AM

[edited out]


if we strip away speculation and conspiracy theories(thanks todd!)... here are the facts.
segwit2x is meant to active segwit AND provide a 2mb hf later.


miner DID NOT need to to signal support for segwit2x to get segwit activated.

There seems to have been a kind of combination of these factors that brought segwit over the threshold, including BIP91, but since segwit2x is a compound question, there is ambiguity about what it causes - yet the combination of the various supports, including segwit2x seems to have provided a catalyst that would not have occurred otherwise (except for through BIP 148 - which also seems to have contributed to such combination of motivating factors).  Accordingly, I think that is factually inaccurate to imply that segwit would have been so easily locked in without the segwit2x support folded therein through BIP91 and largely segwit2x support got folded into BIP91.



the recent activation of segwit, and the signaling for segwit2x were two completely independent things.

I think that you are lacking factual and logical integrity to make such claims of non-connectedness. 



>90% of miners signaled for segwit2x last week, ~87% are signaling for segwit2x currently.


Probably you are going to continue to see this "signaling of intention" to continue to drop, and if it remains on the websites (such as coin.dance), then it will likely shrink a lot more after segwit is actually active in the end of August - I don't see what purpose it serves because there is no triggering mechanism through that "intention" signaling..   Maybe in the future there will be a need to remove the segwit portion from such intention signaling and then see what level of support remains if there were only the 2mb hardfork in the signaling of intention?



now for my speculations:
I believe the signaling for segwit2x is mostly (90%) genuine,

We hardly even know what the fuck it means... so it is genuine about what, exactly?


miner are willing to do this compromise.

Again what are they doing?  Is there software for them to run, yet?





and athlo core was quick to go back on Their agreement in the HKA the miners from NYA will not backstab the agreement so lightly,

Without getting into characterizations of core as if it were some kind of centralized entity, I would not speculate that the outcome in the NYA is going to come out much different.  There are likely to be a lot of defections because once segwit activates, there is likely little to no reason to continue to support segwit2x.. because the 2x hardfork portion is going to continue to be without factual or logical justification - beyond some amorphous claim that "you already agreed" and the "you already agreed" part remains quite ambiguous regarding about which aspects they had supposedly agreed.



because they have much more to gain by sticking to the plan then they do by breaking there agreement.

unlikely... they probably have more incentive to just support the status quo.. which is going to become segwit1x


BCC is the credible threat that will keep miners and nodes willing to compromise and actually do activate the 2mb hf part of segwit2x
should miners and the "community" fail to deliver the 2mb hf, BCC will gain more traction from miners and users alike


I question what is credible about the BCC threat..

  Currently, it seems incredible and may become more incredible with the additional passage of time and after the activation of segwit.

By the way, I have no doubt that BCC will be threatened and be a whining point, but beyond that, who knows?  maybe it could become some random and failing alt?



Core will do everything in there power to stop the 2mb hf, if they succeed... well lets just hope they fail...


You seem to be calculating the threat of a 2mb hardfork to be greater than it is... I doubt that core will have to do much of anything because they will continue to be within the status quo.. so when in doubt the status quo will continue to be the presumed system unless there is overwhelming facts and logic to the contrary (which I doubt will build anytime soon). 


[quote author=Killerpotleaf link=topic=178336.msg20363165#msg20363165 date=1500955960

now having said all that, i am convinced BCC will be a "thing" regardless, even if the 2mb hf dose go threw and the community is "untied once again", things will quickly go to shit again and BCC will be back on the menu.

[/quote]

You are probably right that BCC will remain a thing of whining - whether any trigger is pulled might be another story.. and depends upon whether the BCC supporters can get further support beyond the fringes.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 05:58:41 AM
Last edit: July 25, 2017, 06:09:35 AM by jbreher

To scale to visa/mastercard transactions per second, the blocks can never be big enough (if I remember correctly we need about 6Gig per block),

Never? Have you forgotten the mechanics of compound interest?

Internet bandwidth is growing by 24% CAGR. (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/vni-hyperconnectivity-wp.html)

There is a ratio of 6000 between 1MB and 6GB. This is less than 12 doublings.

If 1MB was small enough for 2010, then 6GB will be small enough in the year 2045 or so. Dominant payment mechanism in 30 years? I like the sound of that. You really think adoption will move that fast?


https://lightning.network/
Quote
Scalability. Capable of millions to billions of transactions per second across the network. Capacity blows away legacy payment rails by many orders of magnitude.

And the point of blowing way past any conceivable takeup is ... ... ... what, exactly?

The security tradeoffs are not worth it to me. And as mentioned before, there's that entire lack of a working routing mechanism thing.

Oh - and you didn't answer my question, did you?

Lightning Network...this ones goes to a billion.



Much like Nigel's relabeling of '10' as '11', SegWit accomplishes its block size magic by mere dishonest accounting trickery. XD

Incidentally, the Fender Bassman model 5F6-A, upon which the first Marshall amps were based - went to '12'.
fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 601



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 06:16:26 AM

Much like Nigel's relabeling of '10' as '11', SegWit accomplishes its block size magic by mere dishonest accounting trickery.


The only serious research I have seen into block size is Bitfury's
http://bitfury.com/content/5-white-papers-research/block-size-1.1.1.pdf


Look at the requirements for 32M blocks, 400GB daily, 128Gb ram.
At 32M, this excludes 95% of the current bitcoin nodes creating almost total miner centralisation.
Imagine what 6Gb blocks require.



I take these figures with due scepticism, but there is nothing else to compare it against.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2017, 06:42:27 AM

we are going to have a second layer and we will allow bigger blocks.

stop worrying about irrelevant stats like node count, 10000 raspberry pies with poor connectivity isn't going to make your network more resilient than 1000 20K dollar machines.

bitcoin's security model is based on hash power. dont like that? make an Proof Of Nodes altcoin.

Bigger blocks on a second later will be pretty sweet.
Dakustaking76
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 579
Merit: 267


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 06:53:24 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?
Small dropp i know But just asking Why aint we going forward
r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 06:59:22 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?

Because the sheklers at Goldman Sachs told people to buy bitcoin with both hands, which means it's probably going to 12 cents:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/goldman-nervous-bitcoin-traders-be-patient-next-surge-will-take-it-above-3600
micalith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 894
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:01:18 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?

Because the sheklers at Goldman Sachs told people to buy bitcoin with both hands, which means it's probably going to 12 cents:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/goldman-nervous-bitcoin-traders-be-patient-next-surge-will-take-it-above-3600

yup, lots of good news, so final chance of selling manipulation for buying 'cheap coin'

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/ledgerx-gets-us-approval-for-derivatives-on-digital-currencies-20170724-01338
Olivious
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:06:54 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?

Because the sheklers at Goldman Sachs told people to buy bitcoin with both hands, which means it's probably going to 12 cents:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/goldman-nervous-bitcoin-traders-be-patient-next-surge-will-take-it-above-3600

yup, lots of good news, so final chance of selling manipulation for buying 'cheap coin'

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/ledgerx-gets-us-approval-for-derivatives-on-digital-currencies-20170724-01338
I like how it falls $100 then people panics again and again and again. They should research why is it rising or falling.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10130


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:12:20 AM

the recent activation of segwit, and the signaling for segwit2x were two completely independent things.
I think that you are lacking factual and logical integrity to make such claims of non-connectedness.  
maybe so, but i'm still right.
the activation lock-in of segwit was done via version bits, while signaling for NYA was done coinbase string ( less formal ).
there was no version bits that meant segwit2x support
there was bit4 for bip91 and bit1 for bip141

miners could have simply set bit4 on and not signal NYA in there coinbase, wouldn't REALLY of made a dif. so the fact that almost all miner bothered to signal NYA in there coinbase ( needlessly ) was a sign of good faith to make good on the NYA nothing more nothing less.



Your above statement is internally contradictory.  I am not really disagreeing with you regarding the technical aspects of the signaling being a separate thing in each.. the signaling of Segwit2x being different from the signaling of BIP91 - however, you are suggesting that the Segwit2x did not mean anything in terms of contributing to the locking in of BIP91.. but yet at the same time, the signaling of segwit2x means that those folks signaling are serious about the 2x part. 

maybe it is like beating a dead horse if we were to continue to go over this, because I am saying that you cannot infer the level of 2x support from the segwit2x signaling and you are saying that segwit2x is a decent indicator of 2x support... we seem to be at a dead end (logger heads)



Probably you are going to continue to see this "signaling of intention" to continue to drop, and if it remains on the websites (such as coin.dance), then it will likely shrink a lot more after segwit is actually active in the end of August - I don't see what purpose it serves because there is no triggering mechanism through that "intention" signaling..   Maybe in the future there will be a need to remove the segwit portion from such intention signaling and then see what level of support remains if there were only the 2mb hardfork in the signaling of intention?
i would assume miners will continue to signal NYA so long as they intent to fallow threw with the agreement (in full)


Yeah, but if signaling NYA does not commit them to anything, then it should have very little value... We will have to see what happens here, because our predictions are quite opposite.

I don't think it is necessary to respond to the remainder of your points because it seems that we are just coming to opposite conclusions based on our speculation regarding whether when the rubber hits the road is the bigblocker support going to be there... I say no, and you say yes.  So, we disagree, even though I would not assert my position as an absolute because some matters could change, but as of now, based on what I see in terms of both facts and logic, I really doubt that the material and relevant miner support for 2x HF is as great as you are asserting that support to be.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10130


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:14:34 AM


if you cannot will not spend a little bit of money to help this network,  you have no business in its faith, so PISS OFF!




Craig?   Craig?   Is that you?
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2017, 07:19:42 AM

we are going to have a second layer and we will allow bigger blocks.

stop worrying about irrelevant stats like node count, 10000 raspberry pies with poor connectivity isn't going to make your network more resilient than 1000 20K dollar machines.

bitcoin's security model is based on hash power. dont like that? make an Proof Of Nodes altcoin.

Bigger blocks on a second later will be pretty sweet.

Sweets are killing your life more than weapons these days...


Bigger blocks at first is the healthy medicine a Bitcoin maximalist needs most.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2492
Merit: 11969


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:21:03 AM

Bet CLOSED! Let the game begins...
Thank you all for supporting this game and I wish you all good luck. Let's make contact when ATH touched.
Final list:
20/07 Siggy  Cry
21/07 Mr Frog Cry
22/07 Protokol Sad
23/07 Bitcoinaire Sad
24/07 Lost_in_base Sad
25/07 rjclarke2000
26/07 Globbo
27/07 Poolminor
28/07 TeeBone
29/07 Ted E. Bear
30/07 bathy
31/07 Infofront
01/08 Vin
02/08 Steelboy
03/08 D_eddie
04/08 Bitserve
05/08 Bikerleszno
06/08 Last of the v8s
07/08 Pajulapoiss
08/08 Imbatman
09/08 Mikenz
10/08 Machasm
11/08 Aesma
12/08 doc12
13/08 Fluidjax
14/08 ShroomsKit_Disgrace
15/08 Fragout
16/08 Orpington
17/08 sirazimuth
18/08 Ivomm
19/08 Elwar
20/08 Oblox
21/08 Haciendo
22/08 Boba
23/08 ErisDiscordia
24/08 Ludwig Von
25/08 Hazukison
26/08 SportbetMaster
27/08 Nanobtc
28/08 Vamos1
29/08 Paashaas
30/08 RayX12
31/08 BinaryReign
02/09 Patrisorvieto
05/09 Entons
06/09 Oinas
09/09 Edgar
11/09 Buwaytress
15/09 MinermanNC
17/09 Spaceman_spiff
21/09 undeadbitcoiner
01/10 K.Ehleyr
02/10 Petemoss2
04/10 Herman Hesse
13/10 Cryptoqueen
05/11 Chainsaw
21/11 Icygreen
12/12 Kurious
23/12 Fractaluniverse
14/01/2018 In the silence
05/02/2018 savetherainforest
fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 601



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:23:28 AM

if you cannot will not spend a little bit of money to help this network,  you have no business in its faith, so PISS OFF!

its not about distributing the blockchain to everyone.
its about allowing everyone to participate in it.

no offence intended, i worded that rather harshly :S


Craig Steven Wright is that you? Smiley
(edit: lol I now see JJG says the same)

I'm happy to spend money on my nodes, but it's about ensuring the network is de-centralised.  That is the only thing that truly distinguishes it from the corporate payment systems.
Mass participation, store of value... who cares about any of this if its not decentralised.

I will resist anything that erodes that.


Slow death
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1098


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:23:57 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?
Small dropp i know But just asking Why aint we going forward





As long as we do not pass on August 1 there will still be many uncertainties





Speaking on August 1, viabtc already removed its txaccelerator


https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 601



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:31:22 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?
Small dropp i know But just asking Why aint we going forward

TA made the price drop, the pennant nearly closed without an real sign of rising, it's easy to dump first and then pick up your coins on the followers.
petemoss2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:38:37 AM
Last edit: July 25, 2017, 07:56:39 AM by petemoss2


Speaking on August 1, viabtc already removed its txaccelerator


https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/



It's still there. You just need to click "txaccelerator" twice.

edit: the link above will bring you to a "404 error...." page. Click on the "accelerator" option.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10130


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:39:40 AM

Price is going lower again
What happend?
Small dropp i know But just asking Why aint we going forward


This is be called bitcoin.


Why you want to get excited by a little bit of price movement?

Generally, we are in striking distance of ATH and really within a kind of range of $2600 to $2950.... ...

Now, maybe it is starting appear that we are going to break down.. but at the moment, as I type, we are still in the range.. currently $2650...

If we break down below $2600 (or maybe $2550), then the next area of support would likely be in the $2200 to $2400 territory...

Anyhow, we are not there yet, and decent ongoing buying pressure seems to continue in bitcoinlandia..
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1075


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 07:42:17 AM

https://medium.com/@jimmysong/bitcoin-cash-what-you-need-to-know-c25df28995cf
Pages: « 1 ... 17209 17210 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 17247 17248 17249 17250 17251 17252 17253 17254 17255 17256 17257 17258 [17259] 17260 17261 17262 17263 17264 17265 17266 17267 17268 17269 17270 17271 17272 17273 17274 17275 17276 17277 17278 17279 17280 17281 17282 17283 17284 17285 17286 17287 17288 17289 17290 17291 17292 17293 17294 17295 17296 17297 17298 17299 17300 17301 17302 17303 17304 17305 17306 17307 17308 17309 ... 33281 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!