Bitcoin Forum
October 17, 2018, 12:54:14 PM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Oct. 16 Closing Price:
<$5,000 - 18 (12.5%)
$5000-$5,500 - 7 (4.9%)
$5,500-$6,000 - 7 (4.9%)
$6,000-$6,500 - 23 (16%)
$6,500-$7,000 - 34 (23.6%)
$7,000-$7,500 - 18 (12.5%)
$7,500-$8,000 - 9 (6.3%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 4 (2.8%)
>$8,500 - 24 (16.7%)
Total Voters: 144

Pages: « 1 ... 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 18172 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 18180 18181 18182 18183 18184 18185 18186 18187 18188 [18189] 18190 18191 18192 18193 18194 18195 18196 18197 18198 18199 18200 18201 18202 18203 18204 18205 18206 18207 18208 18209 18210 18211 18212 18213 18214 18215 18216 18217 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 18223 18224 18225 18226 18227 18228 18229 18230 18231 18232 18233 18234 18235 18236 18237 18238 18239 ... 21419 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 20607743 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1051



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 10:36:18 PM


1539780854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539780854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539780854
Reply with quote  #2

1539780854
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1539780854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539780854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539780854
Reply with quote  #2

1539780854
Report to moderator
1539780854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539780854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539780854
Reply with quote  #2

1539780854
Report to moderator
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1408


no FOMO


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 10:45:52 PM



ALL ABOARD!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhgHrDbN4EU&index=1&list=PLF123EE52E1AC7A90
har23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 323
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 10:52:53 PM

10 000 $ soon  Roll Eyes
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 10:57:30 PM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.

LN is a toy. Who gives a shit? Who gives a shit about buying gewgaws from bloody Amazon?
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1013


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:00:45 PM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.

LN is a toy. Who gives a shit? Who gives a shit about buying gewgaws from bloody Amazon?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476196/number-of-active-amazon-customer-accounts-quarter/
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:03:01 PM

ok well... Tongue
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1029



View Profile WWW
November 08, 2017, 11:07:47 PM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.

You will open an account (payment channel) with a bank (lightning node hub) which routes your payments where they need to go. The lightning network will certainly evolve to be central hubs routing payments.  These banks (lightning node hubs) will settle on the blockchain when you close your account (payment channel) but otherwise won't really need the blockchain much.

Unless I'm mistaken
d_eddie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 371



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:19:01 PM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.
It's still peer to peer (no central authority), but not one-to-one. There will be multiple routes. Irregular mesh topology over Tor.

You will open an account (payment channel) with a bank (lightning node hub) which routes your payments where they need to go. The lightning network will certainly evolve to be central hubs routing payments.  These banks (lightning node hubs) will settle on the blockchain when you close your account (payment channel) but otherwise won't really need the blockchain much.

Unless I'm mistaken

Right, not much need for on-chain stuff except opening/closing channels. Or possibly topping them up, I am still not clear on what will happen with "refill" operations as the protocol evolves. The hubs will be "central" only in the sense of "hyperconnected, with lots of money at stake in multiple channels". They won't be able to censor transactions or tamper with the protocol - or even figure out where the coins ultimately go. Hubs can be routed around if desired or necessary. Someone else will get the fees - if any. Not that shabby, is it?
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:21:21 PM

Open a node over Tor for online shopping. w/e Cheesy
d_eddie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 371



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:22:53 PM

Open a node over Tor for online shopping. w/e Cheesy
Are you trolling? BTC can already use Tor as the network layer if it works on your BTC node.
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:25:21 PM

Open a node over Tor for online shopping. w/e Cheesy
Are you trolling? BTC can already use Tor as the network layer if it works on your BTC node.
No I just don't get it. Isn't there a law about using fiat for shopping, because it's basically disintegrating anyway? Gresham or Hanlon or Newton...there's a law.
Sorry, I'll butt out.
d_eddie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 371



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:28:28 PM

Open a node over Tor for online shopping. w/e Cheesy
Are you trolling? BTC can already use Tor as the network layer if it works on your BTC node.
No I just don't get it. Isn't there a law about using fiat for shopping, because it's basically disintegrating anyway? Gresham or Hanlon or Newton...there's a law.

The "bad money pushes good money out of circulation" law? That's Gresham's.
But - admitting you wish to use BTC for coffee or whatever - it will be your LN client that manages the Tor connection, figures out a route to the recipient, and initiates the transaction. You don't have to actually set up any Tor node.
Gab0
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 283
Merit: 127



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:34:26 PM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.
It's still peer to peer (no central authority), but not one-to-one. There will be multiple routes. Irregular mesh topology over Tor.

You will open an account (payment channel) with a bank (lightning node hub) which routes your payments where they need to go. The lightning network will certainly evolve to be central hubs routing payments.  These banks (lightning node hubs) will settle on the blockchain when you close your account (payment channel) but otherwise won't really need the blockchain much.

Unless I'm mistaken

Right, not much need for on-chain stuff except opening/closing channels. Or possibly topping them up, I am still not clear on what will happen with "refill" operations as the protocol evolves. The hubs will be "central" only in the sense of "hyperconnected, with lots of money at stake in multiple channels". They won't be able to censor transactions or tamper with the protocol - or even figure out where the coins ultimately go. Hubs can be routed around if desired or necessary. Someone else will get the fees - if any. Not that shabby, is it?

I appreciate your answers. It sounds very interesting, but still highly speculative.
I have a question, related to the bitcoin incentive system. What will happen in the long term, when the reward for each block decreases, and a large part of the transactions are made out of the chain?
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1524


Bitcointalks Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:40:58 PM



This .gif accurately summarizes today.

What a freaking crazy ride, amirite ?
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1013


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:42:33 PM

I have a question, related to the bitcoin incentive system. What will happen in the long term, when the reward for each block decreases, and a large part of the transactions are made out of the chain?

It will not matter what will happen, the "root" of the value will always be a chain. if they want to raise the value of business they do off-chain they will always have to raise the value of the chain first.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1392


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 11:55:34 PM

We can celebrate, but let's not gloat guys.

I, for one, praise the S2X camp for achieving the internal consensus to pull back from the brink.

We will eventually, in a safe and orderly manner, address their concerns regarding scaling.

In the end, they behaved like rational adults.  Perhaps we can have nice things.


You are too nice....  Roll Eyes


Giving too much credit to confirmed terrorists.    Tongue
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1029



View Profile WWW
November 09, 2017, 12:01:44 AM


I can be wrong, correct me if I do.
To use LN you must create payment channels. If I want to buy something on Amazon, I should open a payment channel with Amazon. But, if tomorrow I want to buy something on Ebay, I must also open a channel with them? And if later I want to buy a coffee at Starbucks, should I open another channel?

No such need, as long as you share a channel with a node (that has a channel shared with a node (that has...  ...)))) with Starbucks.  Same for Amazon. It's a mesh network. The general opinion is that there will be enough channels open to reach any relevant agent.

Ah you mean like Bitcoin? But then without the peer to peer? Sounds great.
It's still peer to peer (no central authority), but not one-to-one. There will be multiple routes. Irregular mesh topology over Tor.

You will open an account (payment channel) with a bank (lightning node hub) which routes your payments where they need to go. The lightning network will certainly evolve to be central hubs routing payments.  These banks (lightning node hubs) will settle on the blockchain when you close your account (payment channel) but otherwise won't really need the blockchain much.

Unless I'm mistaken

Right, not much need for on-chain stuff except opening/closing channels. Or possibly topping them up, I am still not clear on what will happen with "refill" operations as the protocol evolves. The hubs will be "central" only in the sense of "hyperconnected, with lots of money at stake in multiple channels". They won't be able to censor transactions or tamper with the protocol - or even figure out where the coins ultimately go. Hubs can be routed around if desired or necessary. Someone else will get the fees - if any. Not that shabby, is it?

Very tough question for me, how shabby? On the face of it sounds quite cool. But deep down I remain very suspicious of lightning network which stems from my distrust of banks. It feels like a banking layer being plonked down on top of bitcoin with the aim of bypassing hard money constraints that having transactions logged on a blockchain imposses. I have immense dislike of banking system which is what led me to bitcoin in the first place. "Be your own bank" At least having bitcoin as a settlement layer is a constraint of some form. It could be that the system if it does go that way will be a bit like an updated gold standard system whereas gold used to be the settlement layer now it will be bitcoin.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1272


Hello You


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 12:04:58 AM

There's no point in talking about Lightning Networks until we get some actual ones to play with. Until then it's completely pointless conjecture. Ain't no one who knows what they're going to be yet.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1408


no FOMO


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 12:07:26 AM



You are too nice....  Roll Eyes



Perhaps, but I think it is important now to take the high road and build a path forward with as broad a consensus as possible.  While actual evil actors may have been at work in this drama, many in the other camp do, in fact, have genuine concerns and believe that they are acting in the best interests of Bitcoin.  I may disagree with them on how we get there, or even on where "there" is, but these people are not the evil ones.

Bitcoin will find it's real enemies, let us not make them out of our friends.
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 12:11:08 AM



You are too nice....  Roll Eyes



Perhaps, but I think it is important now to take the high road and build a path forward with as broad a consensus as possible.  While actual evil actors may have been at work in this drama, many in the other camp do, in fact, have genuine concerns and believe that they are acting in the best interests of Bitcoin.  I may disagree with them on how we get there, or even on where "there" is, but these people are not the evil ones.

Bitcoin will find it's real enemies, let us not make them out of our friends.

Another civil war has come to an end. Bygones will be bygones.
Pages: « 1 ... 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 18172 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 18180 18181 18182 18183 18184 18185 18186 18187 18188 [18189] 18190 18191 18192 18193 18194 18195 18196 18197 18198 18199 18200 18201 18202 18203 18204 18205 18206 18207 18208 18209 18210 18211 18212 18213 18214 18215 18216 18217 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 18223 18224 18225 18226 18227 18228 18229 18230 18231 18232 18233 18234 18235 18236 18237 18238 18239 ... 21419 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!