Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:36:41 PM |
|
Why are you reacting so emotionally? You have held bitcoin for a long time, and so you would have equal coins on both the Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Cash chains. If Bitcoin evolves as peer-to-peer digital cash, with low fees and reliable confirmation, you win; if Bitcoin evolves as digital gold, with high fees and transaction friction, you win too.
I believe in the original vision for Bitcoin as described in the white paper: as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. I am working to help shape bitcoin to that vision and will continue to do so.
Could I be wrong? Sure. Maybe it actually is good to have $20 fees (soon to be $50) and a network that can only process 3 transactions per seconds (one thousand times less than Visa).
And that is why I hold both BTC and BCH.
i react emotionally because YOU play games with my live savings. why the fuck aren´t you creating just another altcoin to realize your great vision? why tamper with bitcoin? if you are not happy with it, leave it. well, you sort of did, but you try to steal as much juice of it as possible, trying to hurt bitcoin as much as possible. now you expecting me to hug you for it? your game is called hijacking and it is evil. From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing to allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth, and then by fundamentally changing the structure of the BTC coin by adding segwit. Bitcoin Cash represents the original vision for Bitcoin as peer-to-peer electronic cash. I will continue work to realize this vision, and help resist the hijack attempt by Blockstream and Core.
|
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3500
Merit: 3603
born once atheist
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:38:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4144
Merit: 4786
You're never too old to think young.
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:39:30 PM |
|
Major Baghodler.
Proud of it.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:40:40 PM |
|
take hash power away from Core in "bursts" to drive up network congestion so that the problem with small blocks became more obvious We still need more throughput. Tactics aside the point is valid.
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:45:49 PM |
|
Why are you reacting so emotionally? You have held bitcoin for a long time, and so you would have equal coins on both the Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Cash chains. If Bitcoin evolves as peer-to-peer digital cash, with low fees and reliable confirmation, you win; if Bitcoin evolves as digital gold, with high fees and transaction friction, you win too.
I believe in the original vision for Bitcoin as described in the white paper: as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. I am working to help shape bitcoin to that vision and will continue to do so.
Could I be wrong? Sure. Maybe it actually is good to have $20 fees (soon to be $50) and a network that can only process 3 transactions per seconds (one thousand times less than Visa).
And that is why I hold both BTC and BCH.
i react emotionally because YOU play games with my live savings. why the fuck aren´t you creating just another altcoin to realize your great vision? why tamper with bitcoin? if you are not happy with it, leave it. well, you sort of did, but you try to steal as much juice of it as possible, trying to hurt bitcoin as much as possible. now you expecting me to hug you for it? your game is called hijacking and it is evil. From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing the allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth, and then by fundamentally changing the structure of the BTC coin by adding segwit. Bitcoin Cash represents the original vision for Bitcoin as peer-to-peer electronic cash. I will continue work to realize this vision, and help resist the hijack attempt by Blockstream and Core. from the perspective of a wrong-way driver it really looks like all the others are wrong. visions can and should compete. but playing foul/malicious games that will hurt peoples life savings is one big ego trip. where are your contributions towards bitcoin to address the problem you describe? didn't´t get merged? why?
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:47:50 PM |
|
Why are you reacting so emotionally? You have held bitcoin for a long time, and so you would have equal coins on both the Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Cash chains. If Bitcoin evolves as peer-to-peer digital cash, with low fees and reliable confirmation, you win; if Bitcoin evolves as digital gold, with high fees and transaction friction, you win too.
I believe in the original vision for Bitcoin as described in the white paper: as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. I am working to help shape bitcoin to that vision and will continue to do so.
Could I be wrong? Sure. Maybe it actually is good to have $20 fees (soon to be $50) and a network that can only process 3 transactions per seconds (one thousand times less than Visa).
And that is why I hold both BTC and BCH.
i react emotionally because YOU play games with my live savings. why the fuck aren´t you creating just another altcoin to realize your great vision? why tamper with bitcoin? if you are not happy with it, leave it. well, you sort of did, but you try to steal as much juice of it as possible, trying to hurt bitcoin as much as possible. now you expecting me to hug you for it? your game is called hijacking and it is evil. From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing the allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth, and then by fundamentally changing the structure of the BTC coin by adding segwit. Bitcoin Cash represents the original vision for Bitcoin as peer-to-peer electronic cash. I will continue work to realize this vision, and help resist the hijack attempt by Blockstream and Core. from the perspective of a wrong-way driver it really looks like all the others are wrong. visions can and should compete. but playing foul/malicious games that will hurt peoples life savings is one big ego trip. where are your contributions towards bitcoin to address the problem you describe? didn't´t get merged? why? We all knew bitcoin was a risk when we signed up. That's really not a valid argument. There is no inherent goodness in people. Just different brands of selfishness. Life is a competition. Win and live, lose and die. Or in this case, simply lose some money. It's not a bad deal, all told.
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1477
Self made HODLER ✓
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:48:08 PM |
|
This is getting hilarious... How much can a fork of a fork of a fork be worth? Airdrops on airdrops on airdrops.... Funny. And profitable I must say. Also I am finding this BCH AWESOME for daytarding -scalping on the volatility as if it was BTC @ 2013-. My BTC stash has growed significantly and I still have more than 1/3 BCH left to keep playing. Thanks, I guess. A lot of work for the past few days though. I am getting as much tired as "richer". I need some sleep now.
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:49:19 PM |
|
from the perspective of a wrong-way driver it really looks like all the others are wrong.
visions can and should compete. but playing foul/malicious games that will hurt peoples life savings is one big ego trip. where are your contributions towards bitcoin to address the problem you describe? didn't´t get merged? why?
You need to step out of the Theymos controlled foras and gain some perspective, because you are confused. Right now there are two bitcoins: Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Core. Presently, Core has the advantage. That might change however. Like I said earlier, it is unlikely that both will survive long-term, unless one of them changes PoW.
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:50:45 PM |
|
From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing to allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth
Don't you already have Bitcoin Cash that allows continued growth? What's wrong with it?
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 2380
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:52:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:53:21 PM |
|
This is getting hilarious... How much can a fork of a fork of a fork be worth? Airdrops on airdrops on airdrops.... Funny. And profitable I must say. Also I am finding this BCH AWESOME for daytarding -scalping on the volatility as if it was BTC @ 2013-. My BTC stash has growed considerably and I still have more than 1/3 BCH left to keep playing. Thanks, I guess. A lot of work for the past few days though. I am getting as much tired as "richer". I need some sleep now. aha I tricked you though because 'nodes don't matter', remember. glad you got some dosh out of this heist. but I do still feel sorry for the Korean customers who Roger Ver stole from
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:53:26 PM |
|
From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing to allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth
Don't you already have Bitcoin Cash that allows continued growth? What's wrong with it? Nothing is wrong with it. That's why we're working on it. To continue building Bitcoin as a P2P eCash system. Right now the market and the miners are trying to figure out which is superior: Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Core.
|
|
|
|
Ludwig Von
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:56:34 PM |
|
take hash power away from Core in "bursts" to drive up network congestion so that the problem with small blocks became more obvious We still need more throughput. Tactics aside the point is valid. Exploiting a generally known problem in a system to promote another system is by no means trying to improve the original. But is simply marketing the other system. So claiming it is to improve the original is misleading when it is just competing the original.
|
|
|
|
OdalvHacked
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:57:47 PM |
|
Is he a developer? He was in here shilling for BCH at 0.45!
He's a BU developer / promoter, and a centralization shill that wants to push 1 GB blocks onto the network. I guess NSA and Google will be the ones running nodes in Peter R's version of Bitcoin. ... yeah, calling himself a developer is a little generous. He's like the bizarro-world version of one of those guys who call themselves 'evangelists', except what is it called when you are shilling for Satan?... like Son-Of-Sam for BCH or something, his dark arts in pure charlatanry is pretty impressive. Thanks for the compliment. By the way, have you analyzed the new difficulty adjustment algorithm for Bitcoin Cash (live today) and the effect it may have on the migration of hash power between Core and Cash? Remember readers, if you hold Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Cash in equal proportions, you can sit back and watch the whales battle it out. If you don't have inside information, you're at a significant disadvantage when trading. Bitcoin has a very bright future, as we bring peer-to-peer electronic cash to all of the world's population. If you are average smart enough then you know that selling BCH will make you a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 5281
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:58:42 PM |
|
Presently, Core has the advantage. That might change however.
Well if you are sure that the free market will decide, then why are you campaigning so hard for BCH on this sub forum thread? I can go back on your posting history to prove that for the last 3-4 years you've never posting anything in this WO thread. And now all of a sudden you are here. Along with all the other BCH shills and trolls. If you are sure that BCH will win long term, then leave us alone and go off and do some BCH pre-victory laps... or something. The free market will sort it out.
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
|
November 13, 2017, 08:59:58 PM |
|
Nothing is wrong with it.
Really? Then why don't you just use Bitcoin Cash and forget about Bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1305
Merit: 1708
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
|
November 13, 2017, 09:00:25 PM |
|
From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing to allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth
Don't you already have Bitcoin Cash that allows continued growth? What's wrong with it? Nothing is wrong with it. That's why we're working on it. To continue building Bitcoin as a P2P eCash system. Right now the market and the miners are trying to figure out which is superior: Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Core. there is no skill behind making a block bigger. zero innovation. no skill = no value
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
November 13, 2017, 09:02:40 PM |
|
From my perspective, it is Blockstream/Core that are tampering with Bitcoin, by refusing to allow a much-needed capacity increase to reduce fees and allow for continued growth
Don't you already have Bitcoin Cash that allows continued growth? What's wrong with it? Nothing is wrong with it. That's why we're working on it. To continue building Bitcoin as a P2P eCash system. Right now the market and the miners are trying to figure out which is superior: Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Core. there is no skill behind making a block bigger. zero innovation. no skill = no value he's doing it for the dollars from his research grants
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
|
|
November 13, 2017, 09:04:09 PM |
|
I consider the BCH team to be as reprehensible as if they they orchestrated a 51% attack on the bitcoin network.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
November 13, 2017, 09:06:13 PM |
|
I consider the BCH team to be as reprehensible as if they they orchestrated a 51% attack on the bitcoin network.
Sound about right.
|
|
|
|
|