Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 01:06:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 19161 19162 19163 19164 19165 19166 19167 19168 19169 19170 19171 19172 19173 19174 19175 19176 19177 19178 19179 19180 19181 19182 19183 19184 19185 19186 19187 19188 19189 19190 19191 19192 19193 19194 19195 19196 19197 19198 19199 19200 19201 19202 19203 19204 19205 19206 19207 19208 19209 19210 [19211] 19212 19213 19214 19215 19216 19217 19218 19219 19220 19221 19222 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 ... 33299 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26367475 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1826



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 12:58:21 AM

Sheeit.

Things are not looking very good right now, folks.

Bitcorn is moving in the wrong direction. Looks like we might be testing 4 digits again at this rate.

Well, I set a bunch of bids starting at $10750 all the way down to $8750 in $250 increments. Looks like one of my bids was filled already. I'd prefer BTC was going the other direction though. Oh well, when life gives you lemons, make lemonade.
1714007208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714007208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714007208
Reply with quote  #2

1714007208
Report to moderator
1714007208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714007208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714007208
Reply with quote  #2

1714007208
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714007208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714007208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714007208
Reply with quote  #2

1714007208
Report to moderator
1714007208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714007208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714007208
Reply with quote  #2

1714007208
Report to moderator
1714007208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714007208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714007208
Reply with quote  #2

1714007208
Report to moderator
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127


Whimsical Pants


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:08:02 AM


I have no doubt, but I'm on a schedule. I've made peace parting with 20-30% of my Bitcorn reserves to fund my retirement, within the next 30 days.

Now I'm just dealing with the stress of timing my sell-walls Sad

Is people like you that are holding the train.. you waited how many years to sell BTC and now you cant wait to be a fiatllionare?  WTF?
Who are you to tell people what to do with their money?

Bob may be a pretty big fish in the WO pond but even his sales of a few hundred btc are a plink in the ocean.

And someone is BUYING his bitcoin.

AND he is not selling into the market.

In other words he is making the price go UP.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10148


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:12:10 AM

Sheeit.

Things are not looking very good right now, folks.

Bitcorn is moving in the wrong direction. Looks like we might be testing 4 digits again at this rate.

Well, I set a bunch of bids starting at $10750 all the way down to $8750 in $250 increments. Looks like one of my bids was filled already. I'd prefer BTC was going the other direction though. Oh well, when life gives you lemons, make lemonade.

You see.

Even Bones is getting onboard with buying on the way down (rather than selling)...  Shocked Shocked

What's next?   Cheesy
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:21:09 AM


yea, sorry, double post; this thread produces so many pages a day, missed it (your post).
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1510



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:36:53 AM

You can get a brand new android phone from China on ebay for 40 bucks and free shipping, I just bought one to keep my free coins in. Will start to claim after Bitcoin Atom's snapshot on 25/26 this month.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Ultrathin-5Android-5-1-Quad-Core-2G-8G-4G-GSM-Bluetooth-WiFi-Dual-Smart-phone/222764422358?hash=item33ddcb54d6:m:mpEJ82Tk8SCS3joqufkdiXg


You can emulate it in Windows as well. Tbh, I prefer /u/ymgve's script, as you don't expose your private keys to anyone. I've looked at the source and it all seems legit.

During the '13/'14 downturn, there was just constant dumping. Thousands and thousands of coins, over such long months of non-stop dumping. It baffled everyone. Then later when it was revealed that Mt. Gox had been hacked two years earlier and was insolvent, I suddenly realized where all those mystery coins were coming from.

Didn't WizSec's findings reveal that the majority were sold before the 2013 rally though? I'd probably say it was responsible for $2, not for $200.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:37:39 AM

Coinbase ... probably they were getting back-handers from Jihad , Roger and jbreher and those big-block bum-buddies to keep fees high and sow mayhem.

Shutteth up about things which thou knoweth not.

Fuckhead.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:40:37 AM

Ok.  They broke me.  My key indicators are pointing downwardsly and I recall 2014 only too vividly.  The thing that has really troubled me is the emptying of the mem pool.  Rightly or wrongly I am interpreting this as sharply reduced activity consistent with the low volume rallies we are seeing with price.

I took some profit out of the market around $13,500 and have done so again. I am working from a zero adjusted cost base and have never before felt so goddam guilty taking profit.  Shitcoins never made me feel like this.

Still hodling a majority of the stack and using a good wedge of the fiat to progressively buy back in as well as ramp up my bear trading activities.  Other portions are allocated for tax payment.  The balance will go into other long term assets including property.

Scenario A is badger bounces and goes straight up from here.  I accept I may be forced to buy back higher but will only do so on retracements.  Scenario B is we continue to grind down.   I will be buying back in increments and doing some fancy stuff on the side and hopefully ending up with a much larger BTC balance soon enough.

I remain very bullish on BTC long term and love lightning but I think we have some short term issues to work through. 
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4309


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:43:42 AM

Ok.  They broke me.  My key indicators are pointing downwardsly and I recall 2014 only too vividly.  The thing that has really troubled me is the emptying of the mem pool.  Rightly or wrongly I am interpreting this as sharply reduced activity consistent with the low volume rallies we are seeing with price.

I took some profit out of the market around $13,500 and have done so again. I am working from a zero adjusted cost base and have never before felt so goddam guilty taking profit.  Shitcoins never made me feel like this.

Still hodling a majority of the stack and using a good wedge of the fiat to progressively buy back in as well as ramp up my bear trading activities.  Other portions are allocated for tax payment.  The balance will go into other long term assets including property.

Scenario A is badger bounces and goes straight up from here.  I accept I may be forced to buy back higher but will only do so on retracements.  Scenario B is we continue to grind down.   I will be buying back in increments and doing some fancy stuff on the side and hopefully ending up with a much larger BTC balance soon enough.

I remain very bullish on BTC long term and love lightning but I think we have some short term issues to work through. 

Now THIS is the kind of capitulation talk we need more of.

The trend is down.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:55:49 AM

HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:58:03 AM

My wife is very happy with me.  Happy wife, happy life.


Edit:   I never knew I wanted a surfing bear.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:01:43 AM

Like the last 3 movies I watched included a gold digging wife that stayed with their shitty husband because he made money and then as soon as he loses the money they want to get a divorce and take the children.
suspiciously square
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 3


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:02:45 AM

Now THIS is the kind of capitulation talk we need more of.
The trend is down.

I CAN'T TAKE THIS PRESSURE ANY MORE !!! DON'T MAKE ME PLACE A SELL ORDER AT $10,500 YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE !!!

* BobLawblaw cries out in sobbing anguish. Dramatically tips back head, and places back-of-the-hand on forehead, while feigning fainting...

Is it going to the moon after you put your sell order on at $10,500?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10148


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:31:51 AM

Coinbase ... probably they were getting back-handers from Jihad , Roger and jbreher and those big-block bum-buddies to keep fees high and sow mayhem.

Shutteth up about things which thou knoweth not.

Fuckhead.

Come on, picnic bear. 


Don't be a party poop.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:41:56 AM

So, good luck to you if you find yourself with only sporadic appearances in the official books of state, if you are a rural migrant without a recorded birthdate, identifiable parents, or an ID number. Sorry if you lack markers of stability, if you are a rogue traveller without permanent address, phone number or email. Apologies if you have no symbols of status, if you're an informal economy hustler with no assets and low, inconsistent income. Condolences if you have no official stamps of approval from gatekeeper bodies, like university certificates or records of employment at a formal company. Goodbye if you have a poor record of engagements with recognised institutions, like a criminal record or a record of missed payments.
https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/war-cash h/t @J9Roem
I missed this from 2016
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:51:45 AM

Quote
For those playing along at home, you'll no doubt note that (should my understanding be correct), BW consumption scales at O(n^2).
I'm sure it will improve when the routing invention breakthrough occurs.
Of course - the clueless developers! D'oh, what an unforgivable oversight! The system they implemented is doomed. They chose the SAN (Spam All Network) algorithm for both route discovery and node state update. They slept during their networking lessons, or was it calculus? So they failed to notice that bandwidth grows quadratically with the number of nodes. This way, it's almost as bad as if one increased the block size. But who would ever think of that?
Hyperbole duly noted. Be that as it may, do you have any evidence that suggests that my understanding is incorrect?

Honestly, I don't know which solution has eventually been adopted in this first version of the LN, but already in 2016 the proposed method was significantly better than the naive SAN technique you hint at.

Great. What does that have to do with the shipping implementation? Anything?

Let's summarize our path so far:
you: I'll try it out
me: cool - please let me know about your BW use. My understanding is it broadcasts all state to everyone
you: oh posh! how dare you assume the devs did not do better
me: well, that's what I'm led to believe - you have better info?
you: no, but here's a possibly relevant scrap of a possibly workable design that would do better

I mean, I don't mean to misrepresent anything here, but that's the way it looks from my vantage point.

Quote
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@emabfuri/bitfury-bitcoin-routing-lightning-network-solution

Here's a relevant excerpt.
Quote
Using a fog of war like design, the collected information by the routing algorithm “includes channels within a low hop-distance and paths to randomly selected nodes further away… As a result, a node will have a well-illuminated map of its local neighborhood within the network, with random patches of visibility further away enabled by the selection of beacon nodes.”

I often write with rhetorical metaphorical flourish as well. But not within a technical specification that I expect to be taken seriously. So in addition to questioning this excerpt's relevance to current code, I also question it's author's capability.

Quote
So, it's not an initially low TTL that gets conservatively increased as I had wildly imagined, but not so far off either: closer nodes are exhaustively enumerated, while a small set of distant nodes is selected pseudorandomly.

Which still leaves quite the bulk elided from view. In what way is this anonymous? How does it handle nodes dropping off the network? And the ensuing rejoins? 'Beacons'? Is that a euphemism for trusted intermediary?

It just sounds like we're being asked to buy a pig in a poke. Again, my assumptions could be wrong. But life has taught me well that SW projects are rarely underpromised and overdelivered.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:54:57 AM

I was hoping not to have to install special instrumentation like wireshark.

Well, wireshark is about as universal a network analysis tool as exists.

Quote
BTW, 8333 is for bitcoind. LN uses a different port (can't recall right now).

Exactly. Filter out all 8333 and what are you left with? Traffic not to/from your validating client - which I believe was what you were looking for in your query.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 03:40:38 AM

yaya and jbreher is a lying scammer, but he's 'polite' so that's fine

What the hell have I lied about? Nothing.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4309


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 03:46:13 AM

Damn man, this Doug Polk guy is legit.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:06:48 AM

Like the last 3 movies I watched included a gold digging wife that stayed with their shitty husband because he made money and then as soon as he loses the money they want to get a divorce and take the children.

Where can I find a wife like that?
savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 609


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:31:48 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 19161 19162 19163 19164 19165 19166 19167 19168 19169 19170 19171 19172 19173 19174 19175 19176 19177 19178 19179 19180 19181 19182 19183 19184 19185 19186 19187 19188 19189 19190 19191 19192 19193 19194 19195 19196 19197 19198 19199 19200 19201 19202 19203 19204 19205 19206 19207 19208 19209 19210 [19211] 19212 19213 19214 19215 19216 19217 19218 19219 19220 19221 19222 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 ... 33299 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!