JayJuanGee, I'm not even going to bother replying to that blob of poop,
Here's what I think of your non-response response:
And here is what i think of your attempt at "clean language"
but if you haven't noticed, transaction validators in craptocurrency are ALWAYS designed to centralize through either economy of scale, compounding stake interest, foundry capital requirements, technique or other IP monopolization, asymmetric energy costs and subsidies, and a million other variables. Instead of isolated, these issues are not only culmulative, but multiplicative with each other in nature to make it even more stupid.
Blah, blah, blah.. you can say all that you like about a tendency towards centralization, but you are not saying one fucking thing, beyond asserting a conclusion that you want to make that is based on theory rather than facts.
It's 100% not possible to create a decentralized cryptocurrency.
Yes, there may not be 100% decentralization, but who fucking cares. Bitcoin is amongst the closest to decentralized that there is, especially when it comes to currency and store of value... so you take what level of decentralization that exists and you decide whether it is worth investing into or not. If you think that bitcoin is not worth investing into, and you think that stupid ass precious metals, such as gold or silver are better investments, then go forth and invest in that crap... you are not really providing much value here with your contrarian and non-substantive pie in the sky bitcoin naysaying talking points, are you?
Since the tokens are non-fungible and transaction validators are designed to centralize, that makes it a permissioned ledger by default.
Yes, another nonsensical talking point. fungible is a term of relativity, and so far bitcoin has been pretty fungible - unless perhaps you are working with trying to send them to an exchange that is engaging in blacklisting (which seems a hypothetical point, currently - in other words, you are making shit up).. so yeah, throw out your assertions of non-fungibility or permissioned, but you are again talking in pie in the sky theory about some kind of problem that does not yet exist, excepts perhaps in some exceptional and anecdotal instances, that you are probably not even able to point out any actual meaningful or representative instances of such.
If you had actually spent any amount of time studying these issues instead of scratching yourself like a baboon you might have figured it out.
I have figured out that you spread a lot of nonsense, and to the extent that you have any education, yourself, you use your education to engage in the spreading of hypothetical nonsense and hate and distracting talking points, rather than engaging in any kind of substantive and meaningful sharing of information. which deserves another pathetic and lame eyeroll, but I cannot muster the energy.
Poll
