Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2025, 07:11:20 AM *
News: Pizza day contest voting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 6 (7.1%)
$120K - 14 (16.7%)
$130K - 12 (14.3%)
$140K - 9 (10.7%)
$150K - 14 (16.7%)
$160K - 1 (1.2%)
$170K+ - 28 (33.3%)
Total Voters: 84

Pages: « 1 ... 20102 20103 20104 20105 20106 20107 20108 20109 20110 20111 20112 20113 20114 20115 20116 20117 20118 20119 20120 20121 20122 20123 20124 20125 20126 20127 20128 20129 20130 20131 20132 20133 20134 20135 20136 20137 20138 20139 20140 20141 20142 20143 20144 20145 20146 20147 20148 20149 20150 20151 [20152] 20153 20154 20155 20156 20157 20158 20159 20160 20161 20162 20163 20164 20165 20166 20167 20168 20169 20170 20171 20172 20173 20174 20175 20176 20177 20178 20179 20180 20181 20182 20183 20184 20185 20186 20187 20188 20189 20190 20191 20192 20193 20194 20195 20196 20197 20198 20199 20200 20201 20202 ... 34646 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26795203 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1689


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 03:37:03 AM
Last edit: April 21, 2018, 03:51:59 AM by jbreher

Well, the way I see it, Lightning was two years too late. And it will be three or four years too late before it makes an appreciable difference. In professional engineering, one always does the best bang for the buck before engaging more resource intensive, longer, more complex solutions. Simple blocksize increase first.
Yea well maybe if that had been the rhetoric of the big blockers at the time there wouldn't have developed this schism. If they had said, look we need to increase the block size enough to get us over this hump until we can roll out some more practical second layer solutions and pressed for that I bet they could have gotten our capitulation.

That was the rhetoric. Since about 2014. Well before the fork.

Quote
Instead Ver comes out ranting and raving about how he is the one true emissary of Satoshis will and that Satoshi wanted huge blocks, big enough that everyone and their grandma can fit how ever many trivial transactions as they wish in there and that that WAS the solution to scaling, not a temporary stop gap measure.

Ver? Ver wasn't involved in Bitcoin Cash until well after the fork. At least as far as I have seen. Have you forgotten Bitcoin Unlimited? Bitcoin XT? etc?

Quote
Your argument sounds reasonable enough but they are not the arguments I am familiar with from the bcash community. I think perhaps you may be projecting rather than accurately describing the general consensus in the community. Unless you are trying to run defense for them by presenting them in a more rational light.

Defense for whom? This silly conflating of Ver, Wu, and Wright as 'the BCH community' is a complete mischaracterization. Yes, they talk about BCH. As do a host of others. But the only ones that seem to be quoted by those that hate BCH are these three. Well, maybe Mcafee too.

Quote
Add that the way Core/BS implemented the ugly kluge of shoehorning segwit in via a so-called soft fork has fundamentally changed Bitcoin's security model, and there is not much to love there.
They did that because their hand was forced by you guys. No one wanted to roll that out as early as they did in that state. They were trying to save bitcoin from Ver's hair brained machinations.

No. That was the segwit plan from the start of when core started seriously discussing its implementation. Long before serious talk of Bitcoin Cash. Which was itself a defensive move to save Bitcoin from the cancer that is The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.

Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 03:39:25 AM
Merited by BobLawblaw (2), JimboToronto (1), Searing (1)

the cancer that is The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.
dude
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465


Clueless!


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 03:47:17 AM

Are we back to weekend pumps?


Indeed I hope so, one more major FUD fest like the last month and the IRS taxes due date...and I'll crack like a walnut...not sure how I would handle

another FUD fest and dump to 6,600 again...

(just saying, long time HODL'er..but man, I need a break on the cycles happening this fast ..it is dizzying!)

crosses fingers Smiley
infofront (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2998


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 03:56:43 AM

Without looking at any charts, it seems to me like a replay of last Spring. In April we had BTC gains followed by a huge altcoin pump. In May it looked like "t3h flippening" was imminent.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:28:50 AM

Looks like we need to take a break and consolidate at $8800.  We might be here for a few days.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3556
Merit: 5091


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:29:01 AM
Merited by Digithusiast (5)

Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:30:51 AM

So really all I know is that they intended to "scale" by increasing the blocksize. ... Has anything changed? Are they proposing realistic alternatives to lightning for scaling? Are there new developments that I should be aware of?
0 confirmation transactions. No, seriously - that's the amazing and innovative feature bcash has implemented to try to compete with lightning.

What, did they get some sort of commitment from a federation of miners/pools that when they receive conflicting transactions in their mempool they will mine the one they encountered first rather than the one with the larger fee? That could be done with like 2 lines of code. If it's more interesting than that than I will go do some research.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 4197



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:31:05 AM

Charts?  D,4h and 1h for your viewing pleasure.





moneyForjam
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 4

Always believe in magic


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:34:32 AM

Pornhub Now Accepts Payment In Cryptocurrency:


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-17/pornhub-now-accepts-payment-cryptocurrency
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 4197



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 04:46:46 AM
Merited by erre (3), Neo_Coin (1)

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 05:16:09 AM

Who would have guessed the most fraudulent exchange on the planet where no real humans even trade on for fear of being Gox'd would try and paint the tape higher with tethers printed from thin air.

Governments do that constantly and nobody cares, nobody says its "immoral".

I hope they print more. We are going up to 10k now. Cry me a river.

That's a dumb comment.  When just about every single person in this space knows Bitfinex is a giant fraud cooking the books and even acknowledges all price movements occur due to fraud on that exchange, it would make bitcoin a toxic asset.  Because what is the real price once the fraud is inevitably removed?  $3k? $1k?  $400?  $200?  A lot of noobs here have every single penny invested in bitcoin, and once this newer version of Gox eventually blows up, they will all be Bernie Madoff'd back to the stone age.  

The existence of crooked exchanges who cook their books 24/7 like Gox, Huobi, and Bitfinex is not a good thing for anyone advocating bitcoin as a "store of value".  If the price is entirely a derivative of what occurs on Bitfinex, it's just a store of fraud.
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1915
Merit: 3229


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 05:39:09 AM

No chance  Grin
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 293


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 05:42:15 AM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1), d_eddie (1)

 Grin Grin

mike4001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 443
Merit: 260


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 05:58:07 AM

Look at that walls at Bitstamp.

What I also like is that buywalls are forming

1300 BTC need to be sold to move back to 8,5k
2100 BTC need to be sold to move back to 8,0k

=> So this will not happen that fast :-)

Meanwhile we need 600 BTC to 9k or 1200 BTC to 10k
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 06:07:54 AM

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 06:18:58 AM
Merited by Rosewater Foundation (1)

Ever seen a roach get squeezed?

It was the whiteness of r0ach the silver whale and the color of his bullion above all things that appalled me.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 06:37:46 AM

Ever seen a roach get squeezed?

It was the whiteness of r0ach the silver whale and the color of his bullion above all things that appalled me.

Nazism is a brilliant trigger. You could teach a course.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2284


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 21, 2018, 06:51:00 AM

$8900 already is a nice surprise
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 06:52:51 AM

I love Bitcoin, every time I sell some the price shoots up a few weeks later Smiley
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1425



View Profile
April 21, 2018, 07:09:10 AM
Merited by Ibian (1)

Anybody still holding Byteball? That's one of the few BTC airdrops I never dumped. It seems like it's been tanking the last 8 months though.
Yes bro! My favorite after Bitcoin. There have been hard times with the distribution model but, hey, so far so good. One of the best projects around.

Back to bitcoin, i bought some more. 19th of every month is my bitcoin buying day

It seems like you made some cash if you sold them by the 20 something of every month, there have been a few peaks at the 20s past few months, right?
Maybe you misunderstood me: I don't sell, I am buying only and increasing my war chest. There's no point selling so cheap. I have much higher targets  Wink
I see, thank you for clarifying that.
Just out of curiosity, have you never felt inclined to trade a bit? I mean, not selling your coins all at once but trying to profit some % every now and then while still holding/increasing your wallet? Wouldn't it help you grow your wallet a little more than just by simply holding?
Of course I did, and sometimes still do. But, you see, I prefer accumulation over short term fiat profits. I have a regular job that let me live with my money without having to worry about touching my stash. I'm basically building my way into the future. I don't need much in my life: I don't need no lambo, no fancy house, no shit. I need to be like a regular guy, similar to many, to mix with the crowd and be free.
I have a plan for my life, and for the first time I will be able to achieve it: without bitcoin I would probably still feel like a slave.
Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 20102 20103 20104 20105 20106 20107 20108 20109 20110 20111 20112 20113 20114 20115 20116 20117 20118 20119 20120 20121 20122 20123 20124 20125 20126 20127 20128 20129 20130 20131 20132 20133 20134 20135 20136 20137 20138 20139 20140 20141 20142 20143 20144 20145 20146 20147 20148 20149 20150 20151 [20152] 20153 20154 20155 20156 20157 20158 20159 20160 20161 20162 20163 20164 20165 20166 20167 20168 20169 20170 20171 20172 20173 20174 20175 20176 20177 20178 20179 20180 20181 20182 20183 20184 20185 20186 20187 20188 20189 20190 20191 20192 20193 20194 20195 20196 20197 20198 20199 20200 20201 20202 ... 34646 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!