Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2019, 06:44:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What year will we achieve a new ATH?
2019 - 43 (28.7%)
2020 - 59 (39.3%)
2021 - 34 (22.7%)
2022 - 8 (5.3%)
2023 - 1 (0.7%)
Never - 5 (3.3%)
Total Voters: 150

Pages: « 1 ... 20209 20210 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 20256 20257 20258 [20259] 20260 20261 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 20307 20308 20309 ... 23961 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21179743 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (24 posts by 13 users deleted.)
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 266


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 08:50:16 PM

have the pools ever banned transactions?

Yes, pools started banning dice transactions, ie spam.

nice!!! bitcoin should rally on this new!!! thank you for sharing... who decided what spam is? the pools... okay.

...then SPV wallets should not exist and everyone should be independently verifying transactions with their own full blockchain.

with some spv wallet you can connect to your own node, otherwise it's even less privacy Smiley
1558809858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558809858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558809858
Reply with quote  #2

1558809858
Report to moderator
1558809858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558809858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558809858
Reply with quote  #2

1558809858
Report to moderator
PLAY OVER 3000 GAMES
LIGHTNING FAST WITHDRAWALS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1558809858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558809858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558809858
Reply with quote  #2

1558809858
Report to moderator
1558809858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558809858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558809858
Reply with quote  #2

1558809858
Report to moderator
1558809858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558809858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558809858
Reply with quote  #2

1558809858
Report to moderator
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1911


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 09:09:59 PM
Last edit: April 23, 2018, 03:27:55 PM by BobLawblaw

...and the counter would be, show me in the original whitepaper where it says use LN or some other equivalent.

My counter is "Don't shift the goalposts, asshole."

It's arguable LN is more "reasonable" for micropayments than the main chain, because you need to lock funds in, before you can do anything, to begin with, so 0-conf doesn't even enter the equation.

LN is at least 3 confirmations, IIRC, for on-chain resolution.
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2019


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 09:12:56 PM
Merited by BobLawblaw (20), Toxic2040 (1)

And my last Smerit saved for This saturday evening go’s to you....

Goossens is out of sMerits ? This simply will not stand.

THX for thinking that way BUT most of all .........



YOU just qouted it like a sentence in the big lebowski and that tattoo'd all on my underarm under the BTC roller
just funny  Grin

do realize the lebowski ain't finisht yet still work on that one     normal the "this will not stand man " gonna get a space as wel
LOL

micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2019


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 09:25:13 PM

But a micgoossens whitout BTC would be more worse  Roll Eyes
However coming saturday iT wil not be the last Smerit story for sure iT wil be a drunk one, but boblawblaw took
Care for the coming time of sharing Smerit ✌🏻
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 920



View Profile
April 22, 2018, 09:54:26 PM

And my last Smerit saved for This saturday evening go’s to you....

Goossens is out of sMerits ? This simply will not stand.

THX for thinking that way BUT most of all .........


YOU just qouted it like a sentence in the big lebowski and that tattoo'd all on my underarm under the BTC roller
just funny  Grin

do realize the lebowski ain't finisht yet still work on that one     normal the "this will not stand man " gonna get a space as wel
LOL


+10 WOsMerits   

the Goose wins the thread.  /imout    Cheesy Smiley Grin Cool
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1746


no FOMO


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 09:58:13 PM
Merited by jbreher (1)

it really tied the room together
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2019


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 10:30:02 PM

it really tied the room together

it shurely did .... love that movie just such a classic , if BTC would exist @that time .... the dude would mentioned it  Grin
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 700
Merit: 2019


Be safe, Elwar and Nadia !!


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 10:32:09 PM

QUICK list 12288 is finisht GOOD LUCK   WO's

16/04/2018 serveria.com Sad
27/04/2018 BinaryReign
28/04/2018 Toxic2040
29/04/2018 BobLawblaw
30/04/2018 RayX12
05/05/2018 kaicrypzen
07/05/2018 InvoKing
08/05/2018 ChinkyEyes
13/05/2018 mfort312
15/05/2018 Paashaas
16/05/2018 player99
17/05/2018 bikerleszno
19/05/2018 Bitcoinaire
20/05/2018 willope
21/05/2018 rafanadal
22/05/2018 strawbs
24/05/2018 yonton
25/05/2018 JimboToronto
26/05/2018 Colonel Panic
29/05/2018 ivomm
30/05/2018 Lontonbit
31/05/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE
01/06/2018 RoomBot
02/06/2018 rjclarke2000
03/06/2018 oblox
04/06/2018 wachtwoord
05/06/2018 Wekkel
08/06/2018 hisslyness
09/06/2018 LodisMcguire
11/06/2018 Raja_MBZ
12/06/2018 bitcoinPsycho
13/06/2018 erre
14/06/2018 vroom
15/06/2018 d_eddie
16/06/2018 coralreefer
18/06/2018 Robin,Hood
20/06/2018 rolling
22/06/2018 Biodom
23/06/2018 Dunkelheit667
25/06/2018 bones261
26/06/2018 Arriemoller
28/06/2018 klaaas
30/06/2018 DarkStar_
01/07/2018 o_e_l_e_o
02/07/2018 jojo69
03/07/2018 Karatma1
04/07/2018 Elwar
13/07/2018 sirazimuth
14/07/2018 Ludwig Von
21/07/2018 Lauda
22/07/2018 LFC_Bitcoin
26/07/2018 Icygreen
02/08/2018 fragout
03/08/2018 supremnoob
06/08/2018 cAPSLOCK
08/08/2018 infofront
10/08/2018 HairyMaclairy
15/08/2018 Phil_S
16/08/2018 Rosewater Foundation
17/08/2018 B1tUnl0ck3r
19/08/2018 Imbatman
21/08/2018 BitcoinBunny
27/08/2018 soullyG
28/08/2018 RealMachasm
29/08/2018 STT
04/09/2018 flynn
08/09/2018 xhomerx10
09/09/2018 vapourminer
11/09/2018 Dakustaking76
20/09/2018 Digigami
22/09/2018 Agapios
26/09/2018 itod
30/09/2018 DeathAngel
12/10/2018 IntroVert
15/10/2018 explorer
18/10/2018 Searing
26/10/2018 kurious
09/11/2018 fabiorem
15/11/2018 bitserve
20/11/2018 Globb0
22/11/2018 Last of the V8s
01/12/2018 Alexander_Z
07/03/2019 CoinCube
15/04/2019 Spaceman_Spiff_Original
20/06/2019 bitebits
13/12/2019 nikauforest
10/04/2020 yefi
05/09/2020 samson   
23/06/2021 fortune143             

 
GOOD LUCK go BTC go !!!!
infofront
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1686


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 10:39:22 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1), ssmc2 (1), BobLawblaw (1), micgoossens (1)

No. I don't EVER trust 0 confirmations. That's not how its supposed to work in Bitcorn.
Yet it did. Work, that is. Hmm.

Before I metaphorically rip you a new asshole, please show me the part in the Bitcoin white paper that tells us to trust 0 confirmation transactions.

...and the counter would be, show me in the original whitepaper where it says use LN or some other equivalent. Just because it specifically doesn't exist in the original text doesn't mean it can't in the future. 0conf acceptance is a choice and certainly reserved for those you deem "trustworthy" (friends/family) or for immaterial amounts. If you don't care to use them, don't. Having said all this, I think BCH is a joke.






Satoshi strongly implied the need for second layer solutions later on. Meanwhile, the entire fucking premise of bitcoin is based on "Don't trust, verify", but the backwards bcash 0-conf crowd is basically saying "Trust, and maybe verify. But verification isn't really needed, since we trust Jihan Wu, Roger Ver, and Craig Wright so much".

The argument was specifically as it related to the whitepaper, not what was said later on.

...further if the entire premise of Bitcoin is based on not trusting and verifying for yourself, then SPV wallets should not exist and everyone should be independently verifying transactions with their own full blockchain. Yet low and behold, plenty use SPV wallets for convenience.

If you're going to look to the whitepaper as the Word of God, then you can't ignore the New Testament. And I don't give a fuck who's using SPV wallets.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
April 22, 2018, 10:52:31 PM

Someone give this man a sMerit.^
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1148
Merit: 2134


Be a bank.


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:08:56 PM

So it was all a ponzi after all?
infofront
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1686


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:12:56 PM

Someone give this man a sMerit.^

You're too kind  Wink


So it was all a ponzi after all?

Yeah - only those of use who got in under $1 million per BTC are going to make any money.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1746


no FOMO


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:14:44 PM

So it was all a ponzi after all?

looks like it

Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1148
Merit: 2134


Be a bank.


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:35:33 PM

RewFrew
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 110


Give me your tips for free.. And yes thanks.


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:36:23 PM

Those peoples crying for a "healthy bitcoin correction, like they said" to join the bitcoin rocket are the ones that waited for a bitcoin price around 4K.

They pray everyday for a bitcoin crash, but there is just very small trap bears inside a big long bull.

They gonna stay  there untill bitcoin cross several resistances and go over 15K then they gonna buy back lol.

Neo_Coin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 159


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
April 22, 2018, 11:38:35 PM

Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1148
Merit: 2134


Be a bank.


View Profile
April 23, 2018, 12:01:44 AM

https://blog.kraken.com/post/1561/krakens-position-on-regulation/
kraken would rather talk tough than create a working exchange
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1018


View Profile
April 23, 2018, 01:28:22 AM

No. I don't EVER trust 0 confirmations. That's not how its supposed to work in Bitcorn.
Yet it did. Work, that is. Hmm.

Before I metaphorically rip you a new asshole, please show me the part in the Bitcoin white paper that tells us to trust 0 confirmation transactions.

...and the counter would be, show me in the original whitepaper where it says use LN or some other equivalent. Just because it specifically doesn't exist in the original text doesn't mean it can't in the future. 0conf acceptance is a choice and certainly reserved for those you deem "trustworthy" (friends/family) or for immaterial amounts. If you don't care to use them, don't. Having said all this, I think BCH is a joke.






Satoshi strongly implied the need for second layer solutions later on. Meanwhile, the entire fucking premise of bitcoin is based on "Don't trust, verify", but the backwards bcash 0-conf crowd is basically saying "Trust, and maybe verify. But verification isn't really needed, since we trust Jihan Wu, Roger Ver, and Craig Wright so much".

The argument was specifically as it related to the whitepaper, not what was said later on.

...further if the entire premise of Bitcoin is based on not trusting and verifying for yourself, then SPV wallets should not exist and everyone should be independently verifying transactions with their own full blockchain. Yet low and behold, plenty use SPV wallets for convenience.

If you're going to look to the whitepaper as the Word of God, then you can't ignore the New Testament. And I don't give a fuck who's using SPV wallets.

Again, Bob started this whole referencing the whitepaper bullshit. I could give two shits about what was said in a paper 10 years ago, let alone one written thousands of years ago. Tongue
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 1383


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2018, 02:29:17 AM

For Earth Day I lit a candle in front of my Karl Marx statue and repeated the planks of the communist manifesto.

Community, Equality, Tyranny my fellow citizens.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 920



View Profile
April 23, 2018, 02:49:33 AM
Merited by infofront (1)

Slight downward curl indicates a softening on bids but hodling fairly steady.  Looking pretty firm at current levels for support. Another good zone to let the indicators relax some before we move upwards again.
Markets are thin and volume quite low.. I would expect volatility as the new week begins. #dyor

Pages: « 1 ... 20209 20210 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 20256 20257 20258 [20259] 20260 20261 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 20307 20308 20309 ... 23961 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!