Bitcoin Forum
April 16, 2024, 05:39:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 42 (71.2%)
<$60,000 - 17 (28.8%)
Total Voters: 59

Pages: « 1 ... 21205 21206 21207 21208 21209 21210 21211 21212 21213 21214 21215 21216 21217 21218 21219 21220 21221 21222 21223 21224 21225 21226 21227 21228 21229 21230 21231 21232 21233 21234 21235 21236 21237 21238 21239 21240 21241 21242 21243 21244 21245 21246 21247 21248 21249 21250 21251 21252 21253 21254 [21255] 21256 21257 21258 21259 21260 21261 21262 21263 21264 21265 21266 21267 21268 21269 21270 21271 21272 21273 21274 21275 21276 21277 21278 21279 21280 21281 21282 21283 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 21290 21291 21292 21293 21294 21295 21296 21297 21298 21299 21300 21301 21302 21303 21304 21305 ... 33266 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26355559 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Bitcoinaire
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 695
Merit: 439



View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:13:59 PM

Whale alert! 🐋 Someone moved 29,999 BTC ($194M) in block 545,911

Transaction cost: $0.10

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/bace354d53088d92740485ade3211309d80b427355b931a790575b6646970202



https://twitter.com/BtcBlockBot/status/1051921418613592066
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
1713245951
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713245951

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713245951
Reply with quote  #2

1713245951
Report to moderator
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3136
Merit: 4282


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:33:11 PM

or tether knew they were solvent. spread the fud themselves. bought your bitcoins for cheap. dumped on you at the top.

jesus

cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127


Whimsical Pants


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:36:55 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (1)

I think it's kinda cool that while finex deflates,  stamp is holding steady.  I mean it would be even better if they kind of met in the middle. Wink  But I'll take the other.

We saw the highest spike in volume in 6 months.

That is not about tether IMHO.  There is some pretty good news coming in. And the fundamentals are starting to interrupt this bear a little...

The tether incident is like a very drunk friend that comes to a great party and makes everyone laugh for a moment before he vomits in the punch bowl.

I think in the end the party might just survive.
StartupAnalyst
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 317


Crypto Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:45:54 PM


goldkingcoiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1606


BTC 100k 2024


View Profile WWW
October 15, 2018, 09:50:21 PM

I think it's kinda cool that while finex deflates,  stamp is holding steady.  I mean it would be even better if they kind of met in the middle. Wink  But I'll take the other.

We saw the highest spike in volume in 6 months.

That is not about tether IMHO.  There is some pretty good news coming in. And the fundamentals are starting to interrupt this bear a little...

The tether incident is like a very drunk friend that comes to a great party and makes everyone laugh for a moment before he vomits in the punch bowl.

I think in the end the party might just survive.

well, he probably won't be invited again. And while I personally like tether, I am also quite paranoid when it comes to it. But all that said, I am guessing it has around ~80% liquidity. I am sure they have not had 100% liquidity, at all times. Just observing their business practices, I also feel confident they are planning for a lawsuit, and to flee jurisdiction. And the fact that they keep dodging the audit situation and they fired their auditors, and hired a lawyer to issue an auditors report lookalike is a huge red flag to me.
kirreev070
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 293



View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:50:55 PM

S for Stablecoin
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 10127


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:52:06 PM


According to Wekkel, Roach has a Lambo, supposedly.


I meant to refer to micgoossens, my bad. Mobile phones aren't all that....  Roll Eyes

Oh?   Seems that I misread regarding which one is currently sporting a lambo.

So, if it is Micpeep with the Lambo, I wouldn't have thought that micpeep would be in Lambo territory until about $75k plus.. .perhaps?     I am not saying that he could not afford one now, but I am assuming a kind of multi-millionaire status before a Lambo becomes part of an arguably reasonable fabric rather than a show-off piece that stretches the budget because the "owner" can barely afford it.

Maybe I missed some evidentiary posts in that direction?


via Imgflip Meme Generator

Seems like you missed that one .....

Hahahahahaha

I did not miss that subsequent post from you in which you denied owning a Lambo.  I made my above post, then I saw your Lambo denial - but that subsequent denial did not change my assessment of the situation (accordingly, I felt no need to amend or edit my earlier post)... 

By the way, since you seem interested in this topic about when or whether Micpeep is going to buy a Lambo, do you have a response to my earlier assessment that Lambo territory for you would be in the supra $75k BTC territory - that is if you are at all in the mood for Lambos?  What do you think?  Was I in the ball park? 
toknormal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 09:54:15 PM


The tether incident is like a very drunk friend that comes to a great party and makes everyone laugh for a moment before he vomits in the punch bowl.

They made a film about it.

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 11909


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:09:25 PM


According to Wekkel, Roach has a Lambo, supposedly.


I meant to refer to micgoossens, my bad. Mobile phones aren't all that....  Roll Eyes

Oh?   Seems that I misread regarding which one is currently sporting a lambo.

So, if it is Micpeep with the Lambo, I wouldn't have thought that micpeep would be in Lambo territory until about $75k plus.. .perhaps?     I am not saying that he could not afford one now, but I am assuming a kind of multi-millionaire status before a Lambo becomes part of an arguably reasonable fabric rather than a show-off piece that stretches the budget because the "owner" can barely afford it.

Maybe I missed some evidentiary posts in that direction?


via Imgflip Meme Generator

Seems like you missed that one .....

Hahahahahaha

I did not miss that subsequent post from you in which you denied owning a Lambo.  I made my above post, then I saw your Lambo denial - but that subsequent denial did not change my assessment of the situation (accordingly, I felt no need to amend or edit my earlier post)... 

By the way, since you seem interested in this topic about when or whether Micpeep is going to buy a Lambo, do you have a response to my earlier assessment that Lambo territory for you would be in the supra $75k BTC territory - that is if you are at all in the mood for Lambos?  What do you think?  Was I in the ball park? 
So you getting more intrested in our car choices these days ??  Tongue
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 10127


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:17:52 PM




BTC’s price will be:  First column in 2-3 years    Second column in 6-7 years

Below $1k =             Less than 3%      Less than 1.5%

$1k to $3k =              8% to 12%              7% to 9%

$3k to $5k =             10% to 15%      8% to 12%

$5k to $10k =              10% to 15%      8% to 12%

$10k to $19k =              15% to 18%      12% to 15%

$19k to $30k =             15% to 18%      15% to 18%

$30k to $50k =             15% to 18%      15% to 18%

$50k to $100k =             12% to 15%      15% to 18%

$100k to $500k =              5% to 10%      10% to 15%

$500k to $1mill =              2% to 4%      10% to 15%

More than $1mill =             Less than 1%      Less than 5%


...we cannot rule out extremely bearish or extremely bullish scenarios, even though the probabilities seem to be on a kind of upwardly skewed bell curve.



That is a fair way of putting it, and yes, I would broadly agree with those 'guesstimates'.

'upwardly skewed bellcurve'   : I also like that term !   It can be termed bullish, even though there are very significant probabilities of loss in the next few years.

It does seem that frequently there are quite a few of us who may agree on the overall parameters, but then we also might get into some pretty BIG QUIBBLES regarding particulars... and especially we may get caught up on more loud arguing during higher periods of volatility when it can be quite difficult to get bearings on both what is going on and how any of us might think about what is going on while we are caught up in it.

Regarding your point about "significant probabilities of loss in the next few years,"  I largely agree with you that upside potential for bitcoin would likely remain significantly intact, even if from here on we suffer tremendously for two to three years.  It may be worse for getting back UP if either $2k or $1k support is broken for any significant period of time - which surely, I place the odds pretty low (at least at this time) for those kinds of levels of support to be broken (even though certainly not impossible). 

By the way, I am surprised that you largely agree with my numbers.... I would have thought that if you independently put your own numbers into those same slots, you are going to come out a bit different and even higher percentages for the possible downside?  Yes  or  no?  or does my guestimation range completely capture your current thinking on the topic?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 10127


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:20:50 PM


According to Wekkel, Roach has a Lambo, supposedly.


I meant to refer to micgoossens, my bad. Mobile phones aren't all that....  Roll Eyes

Oh?   Seems that I misread regarding which one is currently sporting a lambo.

So, if it is Micpeep with the Lambo, I wouldn't have thought that micpeep would be in Lambo territory until about $75k plus.. .perhaps?     I am not saying that he could not afford one now, but I am assuming a kind of multi-millionaire status before a Lambo becomes part of an arguably reasonable fabric rather than a show-off piece that stretches the budget because the "owner" can barely afford it.

Maybe I missed some evidentiary posts in that direction?


via Imgflip Meme Generator

Seems like you missed that one .....

Hahahahahaha

I did not miss that subsequent post from you in which you denied owning a Lambo.  I made my above post, then I saw your Lambo denial - but that subsequent denial did not change my assessment of the situation (accordingly, I felt no need to amend or edit my earlier post)... 

By the way, since you seem interested in this topic about when or whether Micpeep is going to buy a Lambo, do you have a response to my earlier assessment that Lambo territory for you would be in the supra $75k BTC territory - that is if you are at all in the mood for Lambos?  What do you think?  Was I in the ball park? 
So you getting more intrested in our car choices these days ??  Tongue


Lambo is not just a car, it is a lifestyle choice, and the purchase or aspirations regarding such can say quite a bit about a person.

I have posted my own views in the past about such topic, so I don't mind sharing some of my current thinking, either if anyone is interested - but I do frequently get accused of "oversharing" so sometimes I will attempt to self-regulate (believe it or not?)... hahahahaha
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 10127


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:35:52 PM
Merited by d_eddie (1)

The little spike triggered my safety stop, so I gained 10% less than I could have if I'd closed at the local bottom. Not going to open another short for the moment.

Call me paranoid, but it was so quick and sharp that it looks just like stop hunting.

I am sure that you recognize that "stop hunting" can happen at any time, and it is part of the parameters of "playing around with margin." 

If you are going to use margin, you gotta be prepared for any manipulation that is quite hard to gauge, especially if you are not either the one doing the manipulating or have some kind of insider information about it.

Surely, it is better to fail to earn as much (such as 10%) like you mentioned, rather than getting caught with a losing position which is also part of the balancing of positions test that you seem to be considering when you first place your shorts and your seeming current reluctance to enter a short at this time.
StartupAnalyst
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 317


Crypto Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:47:39 PM



El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 11909


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:48:30 PM

YEAH



NOW




 Grin  Grin
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 4851


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:49:35 PM

10 pages today, I guess the price went up? Cheesy
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 11909


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:51:16 PM





THEY SHOULD MAKE ONE FOR coiners and nocoiners as well......

or BTC'ers and Bcashers etc

 Roll Eyes

BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:52:17 PM

THEY SHOULD MAKE ONE FOR coiners and nocoiners as well......

or BTC'ers and Bcashers etc

 Roll Eyes


Apple just announced emojis for BCashers.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 11909


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:52:35 PM

10 pages today, I guess the price went up? Cheesy

200$

El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 11909


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:53:18 PM

THEY SHOULD MAKE ONE FOR coiners and nocoiners as well......

or BTC'ers and Bcashers etc

 Roll Eyes


Apple just announced emojis for BCashers.

the little shit image got a B on top of it ??
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
October 15, 2018, 10:54:37 PM

THEY SHOULD MAKE ONE FOR coiners and nocoiners as well......

or BTC'ers and Bcashers etc

 Roll Eyes


Apple just announced emojis for BCashers.

the little shit image got a B on top of it ??
They're for disaBled people. Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 21205 21206 21207 21208 21209 21210 21211 21212 21213 21214 21215 21216 21217 21218 21219 21220 21221 21222 21223 21224 21225 21226 21227 21228 21229 21230 21231 21232 21233 21234 21235 21236 21237 21238 21239 21240 21241 21242 21243 21244 21245 21246 21247 21248 21249 21250 21251 21252 21253 21254 [21255] 21256 21257 21258 21259 21260 21261 21262 21263 21264 21265 21266 21267 21268 21269 21270 21271 21272 21273 21274 21275 21276 21277 21278 21279 21280 21281 21282 21283 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 21290 21291 21292 21293 21294 21295 21296 21297 21298 21299 21300 21301 21302 21303 21304 21305 ... 33266 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!