Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2019, 04:07:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What year will we achieve a new ATH?
2019 - 35 (28%)
2020 - 50 (40%)
2021 - 30 (24%)
2022 - 5 (4%)
2023 - 1 (0.8%)
Never - 4 (3.2%)
Total Voters: 125

Pages: « 1 ... 22606 22607 22608 22609 22610 22611 22612 22613 22614 22615 22616 22617 22618 22619 22620 22621 22622 22623 22624 22625 22626 22627 22628 22629 22630 22631 22632 22633 22634 22635 22636 22637 22638 22639 22640 22641 22642 22643 22644 22645 22646 22647 22648 22649 22650 22651 22652 22653 22654 22655 [22656] 22657 22658 22659 22660 22661 22662 22663 22664 22665 22666 22667 22668 22669 22670 22671 22672 22673 22674 22675 22676 22677 22678 22679 22680 22681 22682 22683 22684 22685 22686 22687 22688 22689 22690 22691 22692 22693 22694 22695 22696 22697 22698 22699 22700 22701 22702 22703 22704 22705 22706 ... 23931 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21174401 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (24 posts by 13 users deleted.)
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 728


HODL.


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:01:57 AM

Peter Vessenes is such an incredible a..ho.e .  claiming 25% of btc marketcap, what a shitshow.

It's almost like he's trying to be openly obtuse. The Japanese court ought to instantly reject these claims, but the incredibly bureaucratic nature of things probably means claimants will be waiting years now.

So the plot thickens. Apparently, under Japanese law standard practice is to accord 50% voting rights to rejected claims. That means CoinLab would hold majority voting rights and could veto CR taking everyone back to bankruptcy. It has been suggested that this may be a means for Vessenes to extract a favourable settlement for his claims which he knows stand on weak ground.

Are you sure it is not to 50% of ACCEPTED claims as everywhere else in the world?

Supposedly it is 100% of accepted claims and 50% of disputed claims.  

Japanese bankruptcy processes are not as sophisticated as in the West. For starters, you aren’t supposed to go bankrupt. Loss of face and all that.

oh I see what you mean now. I thought it was about the majority of (approved) creditors (50%) had in any important decision being voted.

Anyway, it is stupid.... I remember there was some guy that claimed a couple trillion or something like that. Surely rejected but.... now he has the majority of voting rights? Ridiculous.
1558584447
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558584447

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558584447
Reply with quote  #2

1558584447
Report to moderator
GET 25 FREE SPINS AT REGISTRATION
GET 100% BONUS ON FIRST DEPOSIT
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1558584447
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558584447

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558584447
Reply with quote  #2

1558584447
Report to moderator
1558584447
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558584447

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558584447
Reply with quote  #2

1558584447
Report to moderator
1558584447
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558584447

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558584447
Reply with quote  #2

1558584447
Report to moderator
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1755


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:15:28 AM

Apart from the one idea about attempting to spend as many bitcoins as possible before death, there's going to be a lot of this loss of coins through death happening, which is a little bit problematic for intergenerational maintenance and passing down of value... even though the overall loss of coins is bullish on the BTC price due to increased scarcity.

It's a dilemma. Do you relinquish control and permit your funds to be spent without your express permission, or do you maintain that control but recognise that your stash will die with you.

You generally shouldn’t try to control things from beyond the grave (notable exceptions being dependent vulnerables such as children who cannot make their own decisions or pets)

Make up too many stupid rules and it just ends up getting litigated.

Note that Yefi is not referring to what a guy (or gal) does after being dead, but instead trying to figure out what to do before dying, in terms of putting that information out there that could end up being compromised (spent without your permission).
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1359


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:20:27 AM

Now would be an appropriate time to put pressure on Vessenes by other means.  Lean on his board of directors and VCs.  Organize a boycott of New Alchemy. Go after the ICOs on his platform.

Not that it’s anything to do with me.  Not my dog in the fight.
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1359


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:22:04 AM

Apart from the one idea about attempting to spend as many bitcoins as possible before death, there's going to be a lot of this loss of coins through death happening, which is a little bit problematic for intergenerational maintenance and passing down of value... even though the overall loss of coins is bullish on the BTC price due to increased scarcity.

It's a dilemma. Do you relinquish control and permit your funds to be spent without your express permission, or do you maintain that control but recognise that your stash will die with you.

You generally shouldn’t try to control things from beyond the grave (notable exceptions being dependent vulnerables such as children who cannot make their own decisions or pets)

Make up too many stupid rules and it just ends up getting litigated.

Note that Yefi is not referring to what a guy (or gal) does after being dead, but instead trying to figure out what to do before dying, in terms of putting that information out there that could end up being compromised (spent without your permission).

The article was talking about a multi-sig deadman’s switch but ok, my comment was misplaced.

I feel that if you can’t find people in your life that you can trust with your life savings then you need to work on your relationships.  Appreciate those in unstable marriages may disagree but that’s kinda the point.
bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 728


HODL.


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:38:53 AM

Apart from the one idea about attempting to spend as many bitcoins as possible before death, there's going to be a lot of this loss of coins through death happening, which is a little bit problematic for intergenerational maintenance and passing down of value... even though the overall loss of coins is bullish on the BTC price due to increased scarcity.

It's a dilemma. Do you relinquish control and permit your funds to be spent without your express permission, or do you maintain that control but recognise that your stash will die with you.

You generally shouldn’t try to control things from beyond the grave (notable exceptions being dependent vulnerables such as children who cannot make their own decisions or pets)

Make up too many stupid rules and it just ends up getting litigated.

Note that Yefi is not referring to what a guy (or gal) does after being dead, but instead trying to figure out what to do before dying, in terms of putting that information out there that could end up being compromised (spent without your permission).

The article was talking about a multi-sig deadman’s switch but ok, my comment was misplaced.

I feel that if you can’t find people in your life that you can trust with your life savings then you need to work on your relationships.  Appreciate those in unstable marriages may disagree but that’s kinda the point.

Trust is never completely absolute (people can even lose their mind and turn into a completely different person - I have unfortunately witnessed that). I chose to give some persons I trust, enough info so that they could recover my stash by working together (plus some effort). If "they" decided to betray me... well, not only I am confident enough that won't happen.... they should also better kill me as part their plan.

It's not that much money anyways... currently.

Anyways, if JJG doesn't trust some else enough... then I guess that he has no reason to leave anything to anyone. So no problem there.
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1359


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:44:02 AM

bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 728


HODL.


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:47:24 AM

I have just checked three things I used to check very often in the past:

- coinatm - Number of Bitcoin ATM's worldwide still raising at good pace.

- difficulty - Surprisingly, after the drop in december it has stopped dropping and even recovered some to around August levels.

- Lightning network - Still growing at a very good pace.

I guess everything is fine.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1755


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 03:58:58 AM

Apart from the one idea about attempting to spend as many bitcoins as possible before death, there's going to be a lot of this loss of coins through death happening, which is a little bit problematic for intergenerational maintenance and passing down of value... even though the overall loss of coins is bullish on the BTC price due to increased scarcity.

It's a dilemma. Do you relinquish control and permit your funds to be spent without your express permission, or do you maintain that control but recognise that your stash will die with you.

You generally shouldn’t try to control things from beyond the grave (notable exceptions being dependent vulnerables such as children who cannot make their own decisions or pets)

Make up too many stupid rules and it just ends up getting litigated.

Note that Yefi is not referring to what a guy (or gal) does after being dead, but instead trying to figure out what to do before dying, in terms of putting that information out there that could end up being compromised (spent without your permission).

The article was talking about a multi-sig deadman’s switch but ok, my comment was misplaced.

I feel that if you can’t find people in your life that you can trust with your life savings then you need to work on your relationships.  Appreciate those in unstable marriages may disagree but that’s kinda the point.

Trust is never completely absolute (people can even lose their mind and turn into a completely different person - I have unfortunately witnessed that). I chose to give some persons I trust, enough info so that they could recover my stash by working together (plus some effort). If "they" decided to betray me... well, not only I am confident enough that won't happen.... they should also better kill me as part their plan.

It's not that much money anyways... currently.

Anyways, if JJG doesn't trust some else enough... then I guess that he has no reason to leave anything to anyone. So no problem there.

O.k.  Even though I was not specifically referring to any fact that I might not trust someone else, that angle of inference of trust was raised by yefi, and I don't even think that he was referring to anyone specifically, only as a general concept (or possible motivating factor).  Now, that we have elaborated on the trust factor a bit, I can recognize how that could be a factor for a lot of people, yet I surmise that the more common issue revolves around mere organizing the matters and putting them in one place and just figuring out ways that the information might not be compromised, and it is not merely trust, but having that information out there could cause issues regarding the information getting into the wrong hands whether willful, negligent or accidental. 

In other words, my initial hypothesis was that a lot of coins are likely going to get lost because of deaths, and could be due to lack of organization or due to some of the lack of trust issues that came up subsequently.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1755


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 04:00:35 AM



Is there some kind of utility in retweeting (recirculating) such nonsense?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1755


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 04:04:54 AM

I have just checked three things I used to check very often in the past:

- coinatm - Number of Bitcoin ATM's worldwide still raising at good pace.

- difficulty - Surprisingly, after the drop in december it has stopped dropping and even recovered some to around August levels.

- Lightning network - Still growing at a very good pace.

I guess everything is fine.

Yeah, of course.

Everything is just fine right now.

HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1359


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 04:35:26 AM



Is there some kind of utility in retweeting (recirculating) such nonsense?

It’s a joke.  Pick the wrong metric and get a nonsense result.  

To be fair, you probably need to be a native English speaker to know that it is a joke because the nuance of the wording “that is a lot of coins” is a bit hidden. Which makes it funnier because it is pretending to be serious. But yeah.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1299


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 05:54:28 AM

Hmm.

They are deleting my giant green dildo from Satoshis.place.

I think this calls for something drastic.

Now what text do I include in the next incarnation I upload.

Hmm...

* BobLawblaw goes off to play in Pootyshoop

Can't we club together for a Gay Niggers From Outer Space FULL PAGE takeover of Satoshis.place?  I am in - you bought the beers, time for the thread to payback and have a little fun. Let's blitz it.

I see he did it.. and I already defaced it.

I *will* pitch in. But only via lightning.

Talk to me.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1256


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 05:54:59 AM

https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/blob/master/docs/bitcoin-core-usage.md
hardware wallet integration might get merged in to core

Umm... BIP 32 is old since years.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1256


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 06:06:53 AM


Haha. How definitively beta.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1256


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 06:16:15 AM
Merited by infofront (1)

How is your morning, Gentlemen ?

All is well from 30km east of Carolina.



Only worry today is finding a sports bar where the wife can watch the super bowl. We'll watch it again when we get back home. For accordingly experience hath shewn that the super bowl in PR is accompanied by local commercials, rather than the creativity fest shown back on the mainland.

Imagine that... watching TV for the ads. Whatta life.

Jbreher, are you scouting it out for residency?

In a word, yes.

I don't know how productive the trip will be. I've never before scouted an area for residency. But the special cap gains treatment demand investigation. Perhaps most importantly during a down market.

One week here on the east side, next week on the west side. We shall see what we shall see.

For the time being, yo soy Boricua!
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1256


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 06:20:18 AM

shitcoins... by the way who is selling Merits? I nearly running out of sMerits.

Never selling... never sell!

</keenan doing LeVar Ball voice>
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1299


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 06:27:43 AM

I defaced it again... but it was  good cause!



Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 915



View Profile
February 04, 2019, 06:38:48 AM

Post Superbowl LIII report. Patriots win again over the Rams 13-3 in a defensive battle with the 16 points combined setting the record for lowest in history . While perhaps not to everyones taste, I thought it was still a pretty good smash mouth kinda game as both teams defenses put forth heroic efforts.

The bitcoin market has kinda reflected that...low scoring, not a lot of action and that equals a small spinning top and low volume as we begin a new week of trading.
1h


D
StartupAnalyst
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 182


The 🧢 WO gang power, help the price of BTC


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 07:01:26 AM
Merited by HairyMaclairy (1)

jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1256


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
February 04, 2019, 07:08:25 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3tW5u1JHM0
Stella ad superbowl feat Dude

we'd seen this tho?

Disappointing. Of course, there is something about Sarah Jessica Parker that still makes her look attractive*, despite being a godddamn horse-face for the last twenny years. But the Dude reference is well-nigh shark jumping.

I'm drinking my first white russian in years in order to commiserate. Half and half, and freekin vanilla Kahlua, but one must do what one must do. It's all I have on hand.

Let Bridges and Parker share a communal casket.
Pages: « 1 ... 22606 22607 22608 22609 22610 22611 22612 22613 22614 22615 22616 22617 22618 22619 22620 22621 22622 22623 22624 22625 22626 22627 22628 22629 22630 22631 22632 22633 22634 22635 22636 22637 22638 22639 22640 22641 22642 22643 22644 22645 22646 22647 22648 22649 22650 22651 22652 22653 22654 22655 [22656] 22657 22658 22659 22660 22661 22662 22663 22664 22665 22666 22667 22668 22669 22670 22671 22672 22673 22674 22675 22676 22677 22678 22679 22680 22681 22682 22683 22684 22685 22686 22687 22688 22689 22690 22691 22692 22693 22694 22695 22696 22697 22698 22699 22700 22701 22702 22703 22704 22705 22706 ... 23931 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!