Bitcoin Forum
February 18, 2020, 03:38:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Feb. 15 Closing Price:
$0 - 3 (2.5%)
<$8,500 - 6 (5.1%)
$8,500-$9,000 - 3 (2.5%)
$9,001-$9,500 - 2 (1.7%)
$9,501-$10,000 - 13 (11%)
$10,001-$10,500 - 30 (25.4%)
$10,501-$11,000 - 21 (17.8%)
$11,001-$11,500 - 14 (11.9%)
$11,501-$12,000 - 7 (5.9%)
>$12,000 - 10 (8.5%)
>$30,000 - 9 (7.6%)
Total Voters: 118

Pages: « 1 ... 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 23012 23013 23014 23015 23016 23017 23018 23019 23020 23021 23022 23023 23024 23025 23026 23027 23028 23029 23030 23031 23032 23033 23034 23035 23036 23037 23038 23039 23040 23041 23042 23043 23044 23045 23046 23047 23048 23049 23050 23051 23052 23053 23054 23055 [23056] 23057 23058 23059 23060 23061 23062 23063 23064 23065 23066 23067 23068 23069 23070 23071 23072 23073 23074 23075 23076 23077 23078 23079 23080 23081 23082 23083 23084 23085 23086 23087 23088 23089 23090 23091 23092 23093 23094 23095 23096 23097 23098 23099 23100 23101 23102 23103 23104 23105 23106 ... 26067 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21527701 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (142 posts by 32 users deleted.)
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 10:58:22 AM

Poor lil Warren. Imagine being a market guru all your life and all of a sudden missing on #bitcoin

$2051 invested in Bitcoin (at Bitcoin pizza prices) are worth $1,000,000,000 today.

Of course he is not a fan.

#shortWarren Long Bitcoin

https://twitter.com/hodlgames/status/1104779950408765442?s=21
To be fair, the guy is a genius when it comes to traditional investments. Not that that means much in a world full of people who don't know what compound interest is.
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. Server-assisted clients like blockchain.info rely on centralized servers to do their network verification for them. Although the server can't steal the client's bitcoins directly, it can easily execute double-spending-style attacks against the client.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1582040320
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582040320

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582040320
Reply with quote  #2

1582040320
Report to moderator
Findingnemo
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 826
Merit: 147


Don't trust Shitcoins!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:00:00 AM

"Bitcoin will run upto $5000 by May"

BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:00:21 AM

Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.
This is, currently, fact. And the fact that science has been politicized and commercialized in a way that fundamentally goes against the scientific method is more problematic than any environmental issues that we face. With science we can rebuild anything, without it we're just straight up fucked.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:09:52 AM

While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

This would also make overpopulation (@Ibian) irrelevant if humans were smart enough to focus on figuring out how to relocate people too dumb to not concentrate in cities they can not even afford to live in.


For climate, here's an interesting paper that claims that CO2 is preceded by global warming, as opposed to causing it. It also claims alternating periods of warming and cooling. Here's a link: https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804588-6.00009-4
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:13:15 AM

Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?

I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.

According to the Chinese government, there is no link between cigarettes and cancer. Western cigarette companies continue to argue in US courts that the link between cancer and cigarettes is only speculative.

Do you agree that cancer being caused by cigarettes is an unproven hypothesis?
I know that there are people who chain smoke and live happy healthy lives well into their 80s and 90s.

Whether you'll get cancer depends on many factors, such as your genetic make-up, your mentality, and your overall lifestyle.

So no, it's not proven that cigarettes de facto cause cancer. They correlate with an increased risk of such, the reasons for which are not fully understood. If they were we would've identified a counter-mechanism to it by now.


This is the problem with science and people who don't understand statistics arguing about it by the way. This includes most scientists who never studied statistics rigorously and only know how to run shitty t-tests and compute confidence intervals, σ-values and whatnot.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 3373


Bitcointalk, where moral and ethical people post!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:15:11 AM

Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?https://i.ibb.co/9n20X4t/IMG-20190310-164901-758.jpg

What if i am satoshi Tongue

But f*** i’m getting bored sometimes (i see many WO’s are getting bored :/ )

I start to miss China and the PBOC.......

Who else ? Smiley

Lucky i found myself a PERFECT spot with ??

via Imgflip Meme Generator
^
Indeed with a beverage Cheesy
And hope Some Will follow

Cheers my HODLing WO bro’s
Phil_S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 388


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:15:19 AM

Oh, and climate change is primarily driven by the sun. It changes distance and levels of activity all the time.

Sun is a very big and very stable system.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:19:30 AM

Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
This data is irrelevant to the question. It shows that earth is warming, but if you check the paper of my previous post you can see that this is potentially perfectly normal behaviour. Your link does not show that CO2 causes warming and it only covers a laughably small time scale. Life on earth has been around for far more than the 100ish years on that table.

If anything, the link you provide does not discredit the claim that scientists could be milking government grants with real, but irrelevant and falsely interpreted data.

And I say that as a strong believer in what NASA has done in the past. I don't know what they're up to these days, but I'm certainly grateful for all the things they've come up with to indirectly enrich all of our lives.
Globb0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1580


Touch my badself


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:20:17 AM

Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?

its not that, its more like the #MeToo movement

"We are all Satoshi" because nobody knows.


Think this in reverse...…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:22:30 AM

Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
I said numbers. But you don't have any. So you throw out random bullshit in an attempt to distract people and cover up the fact that your position is objectively wrong.

Why do you keep thinking you can get away with this? We have been through this clown circus too many times by now.
To be fair, both of you argue the same way. Just from opposing positions. I suppose I wasn't the only one getting tired of even trying to have a conversation on here at times.
Findingnemo
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 826
Merit: 147


Don't trust Shitcoins!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:22:41 AM
Merited by cAPSLOCK (1), El duderino_ (1)


^Still in need of 58 sM to wear a hat like you guys,it take too long though.


^^^^^ In case if anyone want to help with that. Grin

Now only in need of 46sM...
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 3373


Bitcointalk, where moral and ethical people post!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:25:00 AM

^
My last one brother
Hope you get Some more luck Smiley
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:26:58 AM


I do believe in science and math, that's precisely why I don't believe in a man made environmental change. It's an unproven hypothesis.
LOL how?

1. How could you deny the environmental pollution causing by the industrial smokes, cars etc?
2. How could you deny the fact that we are destroying the environmental ecosystem by cutting the forests?[/b]
3. How could you deny that we are killing animals and imbalancing the entire food chain?
4. How could you deny the climate change?
5. How could you deny the increased sea level?

Do you know what will happen if the last bee dies?
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjID1ugr1fo
1. On a local scale, sure. And while China is clearly fucked, I'm perfectly healthy over here in Europe. Including all the wildlife around me.
2. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/tree-growth-increasing-world-climate-change/
3. Fair claim. Animals are disappearing. And I don't like it either because I like animals more than the average human.
4. Climate change happens every second even without human intervention. That's why we have weather.
5. Sea levels were higher in the past than they are now. It just depends on how you pick your data.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:29:54 AM

Nice to see some voices of reason today in this world of total madness.

The founder of Greenpeace,  the legendary environmental fighter Patrick Moore speaks out and calls the hypothesis about human caused environmental changes the "biggest bluff in history". https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/03/07/greenpeace-founder-global-warming-hoax-pushed-corrupt-scientists-hooked-government-grants/



If you don’t believe in science and math, how can you believe in bitcoin?
Show us the numbers.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
I said numbers. But you don't have any. So you throw out random bullshit in an attempt to distract people and cover up the fact that your position is objectively wrong.

Why do you keep thinking you can get away with this? We have been through this clown circus too many times by now.

Go argue it with NASA.  Tell them about your rat theory revelation.  I am sure they will be fascinated.
His rat theory actually has merit.

And even without rats we've known about this for a long time.

It's called population models and they're the first thing you study when learning about differential equations.

Populations start decreasing for one reason or another once they get too large and then either disappear or return to an equilibrium state.

How this plays out in practice is not understood for humans, because we're the most new phenomenon on this planet and thus have no data to compare with.
Phil_S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 388


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:30:12 AM

While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:30:48 AM

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue.

The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense.

NASA is a big business centre.

I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says:

• the earth is flat

•  the moon landings were faked

• cigarettes don’t cause cancer

So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.  It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.

What about those that says XRP is the best coin??

Or Bcash = the real Bitcoin

What about those?
Beeconnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect is the real Bitcorn.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:32:05 AM



Do you know what will happen if the last bee dies?



Its natural, they will just be replaced with swarms of hummingbirds

Or bees.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-01/good-news-for-bees-as-numbers-recover-while-mystery-malady-wanes
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 3373


Bitcointalk, where moral and ethical people post!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:34:44 AM

Guys, please explain to me the logic of the people who wear these t-shirts.  Does anybody believe them?

its not that, its more like the #MeToo movement

"We are all Satoshi" because nobody knows.


Think this in reverse...…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ

Hey where was that pic please ??
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 779



View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:38:12 AM

While pictures like that look impressive, they're not necessarily significant. Humans only occupy some 10% of the land on earth, which just isn't much.

Humans can pollute a lot more land/water than they occupy with their physical bodies.

I bet that Ganges River is not as clean now as let's say 10 000 years ago.
Yeah, but India is one of the most populated places on earth. Fix India and teach them sanitation and you've got a clean Ganges. Shitting in my toilet doesn't mean that yours is about to get dirty though. Just like an ant colony shitting in my backyard won't pollute that of my neighbour.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 3373


Bitcointalk, where moral and ethical people post!


View Profile
March 11, 2019, 11:42:18 AM

To be fair, I don’t expect you to believe NASA if you are a flat earther or think the moon landings were faked.
Flat earther and moon landing can not be linked together. Two different dimension to argue.

The earth is flat for the fools who do not have any idea about how gravity works, who do not know anything about basic physics. But moon landing was/is questionable and a lot of them make sense.

NASA is a big business centre.

I have a general rule not to debate with anyone on the internet who thinks or says:

• the earth is flat

•  the moon landings were faked

• cigarettes don’t cause cancer

So 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.  It is a beautiful day here and I hope you have a good one.

What about those that says XRP is the best coin??

Or Bcash = the real Bitcoin

What about those?
Beeconnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeect is the real Bitcorn.

Still i think that Carlos matos character was hilarious really laught with him
Pages: « 1 ... 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 23012 23013 23014 23015 23016 23017 23018 23019 23020 23021 23022 23023 23024 23025 23026 23027 23028 23029 23030 23031 23032 23033 23034 23035 23036 23037 23038 23039 23040 23041 23042 23043 23044 23045 23046 23047 23048 23049 23050 23051 23052 23053 23054 23055 [23056] 23057 23058 23059 23060 23061 23062 23063 23064 23065 23066 23067 23068 23069 23070 23071 23072 23073 23074 23075 23076 23077 23078 23079 23080 23081 23082 23083 23084 23085 23086 23087 23088 23089 23090 23091 23092 23093 23094 23095 23096 23097 23098 23099 23100 23101 23102 23103 23104 23105 23106 ... 26067 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!