Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/DanDarkPill/status/1105818282362310656

The dumbing down of discourse around Bitcoin reached an all time low with $BCH.  But, in all my years, I've never seen a scam as idiotic as $BSV. It's beyond stupid.  There's no plausible deniability for shilling this tacky bitcoin-branded corporate MLM run by frauds & imbeciles.


@notsofast Replying to @DanDarkPill

Despite all that truth, I found a redeeming quality in that it's a massive dev sandbox playground for @_unwriter to code up a bunch of cool #altcoin type applications (that, like many altcoin apps, are experimental and unlikely to be used other than as pumpfuel).

@RobinShilliams Replying to @DanDarkPill

I just think it’s nice that Calvin posts pictures of his grand daughters all the time

[1713913390]

1713913390

[1713913390]

1713913390

[1713913390]

1713913390

[1713913390]

1713913390

[1713913390]

1713913390

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1105440265664290816

[xhomerx10]

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?

[Last of the V8s]

Yup almost everything's a hangout nowadays.

[ivomm]

Which site gives the accurate volume of all traded bitcoins (not USD but only BTC's, including Binance and excluding China's fake volume)?

[Ibian]

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?

Pretty fucking high?

[jojo69]

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?

I'd put that in the 90th percentile.

[Biodom]

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

[cAPSLOCK]

here is an article with some words in it.

https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-quietly-enters-crypto-custody-market-with-tech-designed-for-banks

Interesting the word "Bitcoin" was never in it...

[bitcoinPsycho]

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.

Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.

[Toxic2040]

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19

[VB1001]

House Lawmakers Pass Bill Targeting Bitcoin and Crypto Asset Use by Terrorists

New legislation affecting Bitcoin and crypto just passed the US House of Representatives. The FinCen Improvement Act, introduced on February 27 by representative Jennifer Wexton (D-VA), passed the House on Monday and was received in the Senate on Tuesday.

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/03/13/house-lawmakers-pass-bill-targeting-bitcoin-and-crypto-asset-use-by-terrorists/

They do not know what to do to have more control in BTC.

This rabble shop and sell with undeclared fiat money, not with Bitcoin.

[Toxic2040]

Good afternoon all.

Increasing support has developed around the 0.382 fib seeming to indicate we might try another run at the $4k resistance level. #dyor
1h


Slow sideways ladder until the end of the month.
4


For all of you waiting for a lower low...scheduling a -20%+ drop between now and the end of the year is becoming increasingly difficult in my mind. I am not saying it cant happen, just that it is becoming less probable each day.
D

#strongerhands'19

[Last of the V8s]

https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/bcause-the-worlds-first-fullstack-cryptocurrency-ecosystem-to-launch-on-nasdaq-market-technology-20190313-00218
-more people from away
-stock up now!

[JohnUser]

https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/bcause-the-worlds-first-fullstack-cryptocurrency-ecosystem-to-launch-on-nasdaq-market-technology-20190313-00218
-more people from away
-stock up now!

Our way isn't to move them off ?

[AlcoHoDL]

I didn't even know Calvin Ayre before viewing his photo with the underage girls... What a sick f*ck!

I quickly browsed through his Twitter account. There are literally dozens of similar photos of him with little girls, mostly of Asian and African origin. In some of these photos you can also see Craig Wright, Roger Ver and other members of the BCash / BCH and BSV teams. Wright & Ver are also featured in several other posts.

Calvin Ayre is clearly associated with, and heavily promotes BSV/BCH.

It just goes to show what sick minds are behind those shitcoins...

[JayJuanGee]

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.

[Toxic2040]

-snip-
On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.

So you would describe the possibility as somewhere between 15% and 3% of a pull back from the breaching the next ATH? or between 30% and 15%?  or between 30% and 3%? You might be able to deduce why I am asking for something more specific. The ranges you postulate are fairly broad imho and I would really like to put you more on the spot with posting such a prediction.   

[Biodom]

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?

[jbreher]

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.

Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.

If you had a point you wished to make, it did not make it into your post.