Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 03:56:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 25413 25414 25415 25416 25417 25418 25419 25420 25421 25422 25423 25424 25425 25426 25427 25428 25429 25430 25431 25432 25433 25434 25435 25436 25437 25438 25439 25440 25441 25442 25443 25444 25445 25446 25447 25448 25449 25450 25451 25452 25453 25454 25455 25456 25457 25458 25459 25460 25461 25462 [25463] 25464 25465 25466 25467 25468 25469 25470 25471 25472 25473 25474 25475 25476 25477 25478 25479 25480 25481 25482 25483 25484 25485 25486 25487 25488 25489 25490 25491 25492 25493 25494 25495 25496 25497 25498 25499 25500 25501 25502 25503 25504 25505 25506 25507 25508 25509 25510 25511 25512 25513 ... 33285 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26364862 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Millionero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 807
Merit: 423


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 03:38:55 AM

Monthly DT1 Update by theymos if anybody is interested -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.0

Spoiler - theymos is rotated out  Cheesy
And what, may I ask, is DT?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713585419
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713585419

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713585419
Reply with quote  #2

1713585419
Report to moderator
1713585419
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713585419

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713585419
Reply with quote  #2

1713585419
Report to moderator
1713585419
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713585419

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713585419
Reply with quote  #2

1713585419
Report to moderator
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1848


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2020, 03:41:58 AM

Nice Article ´Falsifying the log growth model of Bitcoin value´



Quote
we encounter a good reason to take the log of the price — the span is much too broad.

Source: https://medium.com/@phraudsta/falsifying-the-log-growth-model-of-bitcoin-value-7db6ca3603f2?
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4303


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 04:20:02 AM

heteroscedasticity
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10134


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 04:45:35 AM
Last edit: January 04, 2020, 05:39:50 AM by JayJuanGee

OT: Holy shit, is Palladium in an uber massive spec bubble or what?  Shocked

never heard of it.  Embarrassed
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 7954



View Profile
January 04, 2020, 05:00:02 AM

heteroscedasticity

 Augmented Dickey Fuller
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10134


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 05:11:19 AM
Last edit: January 04, 2020, 05:37:33 AM by JayJuanGee


Isn't it strange that scammer CSW is listed in that article (I constrained myself from clicking on any video linked in the article involving that fucktwat), as if he had anything to do with bitcoin, beyond attempting to mislead, deceive and scam innocent peeps?  So to me it seems that any link or reference to him would also have a misleading, deceiving and scamming impact, no?

TLDR: Idea of bitcoin 11 year b-day completely valid... Idea that fucktwat scamster knows anything about it besides reading about it misleading, deceptive and scammy at best.

Can we cite a better article regarding king daddy's 11 year old b-day... wouldn't any of us have liked to have been a "king daddy" at only 11?    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

What are you mumbling about "king daddies" and 11 years old you perv?

You deny all that you like regarding your purported holier than thou non king daddy desires, but I already know you sufficiently good to know that you would not have minded having had reached king daddy status by the time 11 years old (and surely even earlier than that).

And where is your prediction on Mic's game? We are all waiting for your wall-of-text prediction over there. C'on show those wordless noobs how it's done!  Grin

I have not changed my mind in regards to pay for play... even though I appreciate anyone who elects to donate their winnings, there still is a problem with the whole pay for play concept, so I just say no to that kind of stuff.

Remember nancy reagan.... ?




For some reason, I like this one, moar better:

  Wink

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


JJG is very cautious, I think he will be on theymos line, which is not a bad prediction and possibly that is the scenario,
but Bitcoin is an indomitable beast, we must not forget this.

To tell the truth, I am a bit disappointed with another quarterly timeline, and believe that there is much more excitement in the timing of any prediction to the actual block of the halvening.

Are we in a real world of true and steady bitcoin blocks that are relevant to our considerations regarding the passage of time?

Sure, I am conservative in my personal expectations because I do not want to be disappointed, so I am surely prepared for Theymos type scenarios and even worse, but in terms of a halvening prediction, I am thinking that we gotta go supra $10k between now and then... I am talking the halvening, not the end of the quarter in which I could give less than two shits about the end of the quarter.. especially when we have a halvening coming within about 6 weeks thereafter.

So, yeah, halvening... supra $10k, and maybe below $13,880... but surely I would NOT mind seeing a front running, but I am thinking that we might not get such considerable front running before the actual halvening..... but even reaching new ATHs before November 2020.. would end up being a kind of front running of the 4 year fractal, which surely is far from out of the question.

I can safely say that he is not a microgoose.

He might need his own "beat him up" day of the week... like some other peep(s) not to be mentioned... since we are currently in Saturday-ish territory.   Tongue

In the end I'll probably make a lot less money but doing it like this I have no problems at night while sleeping.

Guys I am starting to have sleep problems Sad Because bitcoin will moon and I am not all in Grin

Get the fuck in.  All in, if you recognize what I am mumblingtm (courtesy of bitserve), here?  What are you waiting for?  Bad advices from dumb made-up nym peeps inside the interwebs?

Follow your passionenings.. and start to sleep MOAR better!!!!!!!  #nohomo
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10134


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 05:49:10 AM


(I constrained myself from clicking on any video linked in the article involving that fucktwat)

Gratuitous virtue-signaling disclaimer is hilarious.

That is why I place it in those cutie pie lillie parentheses .... Like this:  "(.........)"......

Pro tip:  Try it some time, it will make you feel much MOAR better about your new van, even though you failed and refused to get four wheel drive in it because you were so maniacally obsessed with the plain Jane color.   Wink       Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


(I constrained myself from clicking on any video linked in the article involving that fucktwat)

Gratuitous virtue-signaling disclaimer is hilarious.

I do not see why.  It is really par for the course.  I mean, I have bet a significant amount of Money that CSW is not who he says he is, and is therefore accurately described by our resident asshat wordy-man. (also accurate)

You should speak about others, cAPSLOCK, when you are not even willing to demonstrate a de minimus quantity of emotional forbearance to substantively respond to a bit of an "explanatory" explorationings.  Go figure?


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10134


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:06:44 AM

^
Lack of activity with that woman Roll Eyes
You know how to fix that!

I will need some guidance to get her more online as it is .......  Roll Eyes

Tie her up next to the computer, and tell her that you are not going to feed her until she types at least one post every two weeks. It works every time (until it doesn't).  You will thank me later.
VB1001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 2540


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2020, 06:28:19 AM
Merited by Biodom (1), JayJuanGee (1)


Quote
A decade of returns sorted by asset class (including BTC).
Thank you to http://www.offthechain.capital  for producing this chart.
https://twitter.com/BrianEstes32/status/1212843876337299463
Millionero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 807
Merit: 423


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:37:52 AM
Last edit: January 04, 2020, 06:54:05 AM by Millionero
Merited by d_eddie (1)

Nice Article ´Falsifying the log growth model of Bitcoin value´



Quote
we encounter a good reason to take the log of the price — the span is much too broad.

Source: https://medium.com/@phraudsta/falsifying-the-log-growth-model-of-bitcoin-value-7db6ca3603f2?
Putting time on a log scale makes no sense to me.  Time doesn't aggregate quantity, like a price going up several orders of magnitude, or power measured in decibels.  The year 2020 is no more massive in that sense than the year the earth was formed.  
In fact, the log time scale gives an inferior fit.  
Empirically, an inverse quadratic time scale fits bictoin's log price history better than log time does (ugh, just writing "log time" makes me queasy).  
Which agrees with my sense.

sucking slime out of dead whale skulls
Don't knock it til you've tried it
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:48:08 AM

It's almost funny how some days I decide to quietly contemplate and compare Bitcoin graphs in different timeframes, during hours, as if I was gonna see a signal/pattern that instantly enlightened my mind and everything were going to be crystal clear then.


Spoiler: Nope. Nothing. Again. Will just keep hodling and waiting. As always.
Millionero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 807
Merit: 423


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:57:26 AM
Merited by bitserve (1)

It's almost funny how some days I decide to quietly contemplate and compare Bitcoin graphs in different timeframes, during hours, as if I was gonna see a signal/pattern that instantly enlightened my mind and everything were going to be crystal clear then.


Spoiler: Nope. Nothing. Again. Will just keep hodling and waiting. As always.
Don't abandon your quest.
Siddhartha had to sit under the bodhi tree seven weeks before he saw the signal that enlightened his mind.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3836



View Profile
January 04, 2020, 06:59:59 AM


Quote
A decade of returns sorted by asset class (including BTC).
Thank you to http://www.offthechain.capital  for producing this chart.
https://twitter.com/BrianEstes32/status/1212843876337299463

So, btc was either first (by a mile) or dead last...You never know what you gonna get, but much better chance than even for btc outperformance (so far)

REITs -nice show as well, probably boosted by the RE uptick after the GFC.
Maybe RE is a place to put some fiat in the next few years as stocks might disappoint due to overvaluation.
VB1001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 2540


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2020, 07:00:55 AM
Merited by mindrust (1), fillippone (1)



Quote
Have been asked to expand on this. While we have such limited data during the 2 full cycles thus far we've seen comparable $BTC performance in the 1,2, & 3 years pre-halving. Do we see similar performance yet again the year of and year post which would mean +100% performance? https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1213194896535891969

Although we will have difficult days, I think that every day, month, year, hodlers increase against weak hands and this is a clear sign of consolidation.

jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3150
Merit: 4303


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 07:02:59 AM

back in a bit guys, it is make a log time
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3836



View Profile
January 04, 2020, 07:10:20 AM
Merited by fillippone (2)



Quote
Have been asked to expand on this. While we have such limited data during the 2 full cycles thus far we've seen comparable $BTC performance in the 1,2, & 3 years pre-halving. Do we see similar performance yet again the year of and year post which would mean +100% performance? https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1213194896535891969

Although we will have difficult days, I think that every day, month, year, hodlers increase against weak hands and this is a clear sign of consolidation.



I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.
fillippone
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2142
Merit: 15364


Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2020, 07:14:25 AM


<...>

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.



“Don’t trust, verify”
VB1001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 2540


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2020, 07:25:27 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)


<...>

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.



“Don’t trust, verify”


https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432

Now I can't do the check, but I think it refers to this graph.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 07:26:07 AM

It's almost funny how some days I decide to quietly contemplate and compare Bitcoin graphs in different timeframes, during hours, as if I was gonna see a signal/pattern that instantly enlightened my mind and everything were going to be crystal clear then.


Spoiler: Nope. Nothing. Again. Will just keep hodling and waiting. As always.
Don't abandon your quest.
Siddhartha had to sit under the bodhi tree seven weeks before he saw the signal that enlightened his mind.

Good one Smiley

I have checked your post history: You are funny, knowledgeable and seem to have been involved in crypto since 2013. (#nohomo)

Why do you not have a hat? You surely deserve one.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
January 04, 2020, 07:27:24 AM
Last edit: January 04, 2020, 09:05:08 AM by realr0ach

Hi Wall Observers,

Better late than never: ****** Happy new year, the best wishes and good health in 2020!! ******

xoxo Cryptoqueeen

This is why wahmen are banned from the forum.  We would be permanently knee deep in vapid, meaningless text like this resembling a last minute, gas station birthday or Christmas card written by a Chinese man then translated into English.  Sort of like JayJuanGee posts except shorter.

Wahmen are sort of low effort organisms in general.  Life takes the path of least resistance in evolutionary terms, so as long wahmen believe the sheer act of existing and being a 3/10 or higher makes them some sort of valuable resource, and loser men worship them for this fact and put them up on a pedestal, it's a system of positive reinforcement creating an endless assembly line of more bimbos.  Lauda - leader of the global, digital scamcoin movement - is probably around a 2/10, just under the 3/10 threshold for wahmen believing they're some sort of deity that should be worshipped instead of negative yielding assets, so her posts are much higher effort; but still, being a wahmen, completely terrible.

To top things off, the flooding of countries with 3rd world brown zombies amplifies this phenomenon exponentially higher.  Virtually nobody wants to invest in negative yielding assets (white women), and even less people want junk bonds (brown women).  So the demand that does exist is entirely for white bimbos.  Importing a bunch of brown zombies just lopsides the demand of white bimbos to be vastly higher than supply, making white bimbos think they're delusionally even more valuable and important than they already are.  It's a lose/lose scenario for everyone except bimbos whose relative worth skyrockets, until they hit their expiration date of 25.  Then the bimbos themselves lose because they irrationally thought their value was ridiculously higher than it really is and don't even know how to act at that point.
Pages: « 1 ... 25413 25414 25415 25416 25417 25418 25419 25420 25421 25422 25423 25424 25425 25426 25427 25428 25429 25430 25431 25432 25433 25434 25435 25436 25437 25438 25439 25440 25441 25442 25443 25444 25445 25446 25447 25448 25449 25450 25451 25452 25453 25454 25455 25456 25457 25458 25459 25460 25461 25462 [25463] 25464 25465 25466 25467 25468 25469 25470 25471 25472 25473 25474 25475 25476 25477 25478 25479 25480 25481 25482 25483 25484 25485 25486 25487 25488 25489 25490 25491 25492 25493 25494 25495 25496 25497 25498 25499 25500 25501 25502 25503 25504 25505 25506 25507 25508 25509 25510 25511 25512 25513 ... 33285 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!