hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:41:18 PM |
|
If we dont go up from here then we're still in the main downward channel from the ath. We need to break this to confirm a true reversal
everything's on track tho -> https://www.tradingview.com/e/eKyhwaqZ/Don't disagree I'm almost full btc again so would like us to go up just throwing it out there. We've gone up over $250 in a couple of days would hardly be surprising to see a significant pull back. yea.. whales can/do surprinse us...
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:41:21 PM |
|
Two orders went through
{"date": "1393957577", "tid": 3913507, "price": "633.64", "amount": "12.23303074"}, {"date": "1393957576", "tid": 3913506, "price": "633.64", "amount": "0.14733528"}
Oops, the start of the next goxing haha. Lucky person.
|
|
|
|
kkaspar
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
banned but not broken
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:41:40 PM |
|
If we dont go up from here then we're still in the main downward channel from the ath. We need to break this to confirm a true reversal
everything's on track tho -> https://www.tradingview.com/e/eKyhwaqZ/javascript:void(0); 't Are you telling me that one of the biggest exchanges losing their customers money didn't cause a reversal from a downtrend that was caused by the loss of demand in China? How can this be? :O This is impossible!
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:43:12 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:43:30 PM |
|
ps - let's all pitch in to send a bag to karpeles as a 'thank you'
|
|
|
|
bassclef
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:44:39 PM |
|
If we dont go up from here then we're still in the main downward channel from the ath. We need to break this to confirm a true reversal
Meaningless analysis. It depends entirely on which time scale you are using. We had a reversal at the 400 bottom and yesterday we saw confirmation. It was a massive confirmation so the consolidation period should take a while. Fortunately, I made enough money yesterday to survive for another month before needing to cash out any more profits, so I can let most of them ride. There is resistance at $700 and support at $662 and $642 in this range. I agree with Billy. The triple bounce off the 200 day EMA on the daily chart is conformation enough for me. I bought LTC yesterday and today so we'll see where that takes us in the mid term.
|
|
|
|
MoreFun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:45:28 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Take a look at my prev post - is visible also in bitstamp api.
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2265
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:47:58 PM |
|
Wah wah wah wah wah
|
|
|
|
porcupine87
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:48:28 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Like MoreFun said. The Api shows, that there were 2 trades went through. Check a few trades earlier or https://www.bitstamp.net/api/transactions/ (633.64)
|
|
|
|
kkaspar
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
banned but not broken
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:50:35 PM |
|
Wah wah wah wah wah
I'm not actually surprised that all you understood was "Wah wah wah wah".
|
|
|
|
tarmi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:50:51 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Like MoreFun said. The Api shows, that there were 2 trades went through. Check a few trades earlier or https://www.bitstamp.net/api/transactions/ (633.64) that is some serious bug.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 10889
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:55:06 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Like MoreFun said. The Api shows, that there were 2 trades went through. Check a few trades earlier or https://www.bitstamp.net/api/transactions/ (633.64) So let me get this straight... if this were NOT a bitstamp trading error fuck up, then every single order down to $633.64 should have been filled, and that would have taken about 3,000 bitcoins to fill all of those orders from $680 to $633.64 (unless some big fish pulled their order(s)).. Thereafter, if some such big fish had put in a 3k sell, it would have taken several minutes for traders to recreate new orders... therefore, a glitch in the system.
|
|
|
|
|
barbs
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:57:02 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Like MoreFun said. The Api shows, that there were 2 trades went through. Check a few trades earlier or https://www.bitstamp.net/api/transactions/ (633.64) So let me get this straight... if this were NOT a bitstamp trading error fuck up, then every single order down to $633.64 should have been filled, and that would have taken about 3,000 bitcoins to fill all of those orders (unless some big fish pulled their order).. then it would have taken several minutes for traders to recreate new orders... therefore, a glitch in the system. really really suspect. what the hell, i saw that on bitcoinity after the gym and thought wtf 633?? and the price was still at 675? ugh...
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:57:24 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Take a look at my prev post - is visible also in bitstamp api. I see. This makes no sense at all, and really bad news, in my opinion. If Bitstamp doesn't address this, I will seriously consider moving my business from them.
|
|
|
|
kkaspar
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
banned but not broken
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:58:33 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Take a look at my prev post - is visible also in bitstamp api. I see. This makes no sense at all, and really bad news, in my opinion. If Bitstamp doesn't address this, I will seriously consider moving my business from them. So, it's confirmed..
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:58:56 PM |
|
What just happened on Bitstamp? 64 btc order down to 633, doesn't make sense. Anyone can confirm it's just a btcwisdom glitch, or did the trade actually hit 630 for real?
WTF?! Just checked on tradingview, they show it as well. Bitstamp trading enging fucked up?!
Like MoreFun said. The Api shows, that there were 2 trades went through. Check a few trades earlier or https://www.bitstamp.net/api/transactions/ (633.64) So let me get this straight... if this were NOT a bitstamp trading error fuck up, then every single order down to $633.64 should have been filled, and that would have taken about 3,000 bitcoins to fill all of those orders (unless some big fish pulled their order).. then it would have taken several minutes for traders to recreate new orders... therefore, a glitch in the system. yea or maybe stamp is experiencing some "issues" and the BTCs down to $633.64 got "lost" i'm smelling fear and uncertainty suddently...
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:59:16 PM |
|
Are you telling me that one of the biggest exchanges losing their customers money didn't cause a reversal from a downtrend that was caused by the loss of demand in China? How can this be? :O This is impossible! Sounds like you missed the rally and hope to get another crack. GTFO. The correction to $530 was because of China. Gox took us down to $400. These things can overlap.
|
|
|
|
slovenc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:59:38 PM |
|
guys...what do u think how safe is that u have fiat for longer time on bitfinex ?
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
March 04, 2014, 06:59:42 PM |
|
There is resistance at $700 and support at $662 and $642 in this range.
Substantial resistance it seems. Back to range-trading mode. Might do better long in LTC.
|
|
|
|
|