Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[El duderino_]

Bought a physical painting today. Feels much better than the NFT hype.

I'm parlaying part of my Bitcoin holdings into an absolutely bonkers AFA Graded Star Wars Stormtrooper and Mandalorian collection.

Action figures are sorta like paintings, no?

Good diversification, got 100’s of wobblers and head knockers myself lot of Star Wars etc as well

[1713577951]

1713577951

[1713577951]

1713577951

[lightfoot]

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll 

Heyyyyy

Damn, I was hoping for Proudhon. :-)

[El duderino_]

[Sayeds56]

Damn. My cousin (the altcoiner I'm meeting tomorrow), once had nearly 1 million DOGE. At that time he said he would not touch them until the thing pumped. He ended up selling them early and without much profit. Now he has none. I guess it's a roll of the dice. For some it works, for most it doesn't.

That's the problem with alts, up and down like a whore's panties.

The only sure thing is to buy Bitcoin.
Tried, tested and proven by math & science.

Agreed

And no, llamas cannot sing.

Well they try, but usually it sounds like they have been constipated for years with the amount of shit that comes out of them.  

 What a beautiful Line, "constipated for years with the amount of shit that comes out of them" Nice sense of humour.

[Hueristic]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

[Sayeds56]

The Life of Trader is really stressful. Good presentation though images.

[Wilhelm]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars 

[marcus_of_augustus]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars  

the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on/around the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon Lagrange points or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

[BTCaesar]

OT: Just for reference...since I did not have any side effect and after my second pfizer shot the shoulder was not even sore, I decided to check for Ab at Labcorp (self-directed, so it cost $10 out of pocket). The result shows >250 u/ml with more than 0.8 u/ml considered positive for Ab.
I am posting this for those who did not have any (or minimal) side effects.
As you can see, there is no correlation.

EDIT: COIN is trading, currently at around $400

Hello Biodom,
i got my first shot 2,5 days ago... since then there is no side effect. The doc took the injection quickly out and my arm did bleed very hard. He forgot to put a piece of cotton or any similar silly things just after taking the injection out. I was a bit worried and asked him whether the liquid went out by blood as well? He tried to comfort and convince me but i was not satisfied at all.
The next shot is by the end of May. So, you made a decision to check but do not understand anything with levels such as >250u/ml and 0.8 u/ml... Do you mean that the vaccine does not work out?

[Wilhelm]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars 

the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...

....

3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚

[El duderino_]

[philipma1957]

NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/

Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....

And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars 

the reasons for going to the moon are more than just stepping stone to mars, first there maybe some minerals there that are economic to mine, but that's still speculative, to be proven.

most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.

we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.

1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...

....

3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚

Well gravity says you are so very wrong.
Along with atmosphere or lack of it.

We could shuttle stuff to the moon

big a bigger boat with more fuel as gravity would allow for easier take off. Also moon would be used as a spinning sling shot to boost that rocket ship.

Finally the lack of or very thin atmosphere would along for less friction on take offs and landing.

So If you really want us to go to mars a large basecamp on the moon makes sense.

As for military on the moon the military has always sucked and will always suck.  But Leaders love the war games.

[FIFA worldcup]

[Biodom]

OT: Just for reference...since I did not have any side effect and after my second pfizer shot the shoulder was not even sore, I decided to check for Ab at Labcorp (self-directed, so it cost $10 out of pocket). The result shows >250 u/ml with more than 0.8 u/ml considered positive for Ab.
I am posting this for those who did not have any (or minimal) side effects.
As you can see, there is no correlation.

EDIT: COIN is trading, currently at around $400

Hello Biodom,
i got my first shot 2,5 days ago... since then there is no side effect. The doc took the injection quickly out and my arm did bleed very hard. He forgot to put a piece of cotton or any similar silly things just after taking the injection out. I was a bit worried and asked him whether the liquid went out by blood as well? He tried to comfort and convince me but i was not satisfied at all.
The next shot is by the end of May. So, you made a decision to check but do not understand anything with levels such as >250u/ml and 0.8 u/ml... Do you mean that the vaccine does not work out?

re levels...nah.
The purpose of any vaccine is to elicit the production of antibodies against the target, in this case antibodies against COVID's spike protein.
Labcorp (with the input of CDC, I am sure) decided that to be positive for antibodies you need to have above 0.8u/ml (u=units, but they don't say what units signify, so it is arbitrary, probably some numerical value, like mkg/ml, ng/ml or something like that).
My results show the level of antibodies which is about 300X of what is considered to be positive.
I guess this means that the antibody level is high post-vaccination (in this particular case).
This test cannot predict protection.
EDIT: you have to wait 3-4 wks after the SECOND shot (in a two-shot regimen like Pfizer or Moderna) to ascertain your max Ab level.
Not a medical advice, of course, I am not an MD.

[JohnBitCo]

[BTCaesar]

OT: Just for reference...since I did not have any side effect and after my second pfizer shot the shoulder was not even sore, I decided to check for Ab at Labcorp (self-directed, so it cost $10 out of pocket). The result shows >250 u/ml with more than 0.8 u/ml considered positive for Ab.
I am posting this for those who did not have any (or minimal) side effects.
As you can see, there is no correlation.

EDIT: COIN is trading, currently at around $400

Hello Biodom,
i got my first shot 2,5 days ago... since then there is no side effect. The doc took the injection quickly out and my arm did bleed very hard. He forgot to put a piece of cotton or any similar silly things just after taking the injection out. I was a bit worried and asked him whether the liquid went out by blood as well? He tried to comfort and convince me but i was not satisfied at all.
The next shot is by the end of May. So, you made a decision to check but do not understand anything with levels such as >250u/ml and 0.8 u/ml... Do you mean that the vaccine does not work out?

re levels...nah.
The purpose of any vaccine is to elicit the production of antibodies against the target, in this case antibodies against COVID's spike protein.
Labcorp (with the input of CDC, I am sure) decided that to be positive for antibodies you need to have above 0.8u/ml (u=units, but they don't say what units signify, so it is arbitrary, probably some numerical value, like mkg/ml, ng/ml or something like that).
My results show the level of antibodies which is about 300X of what is considered to be positive.
I guess this means that the antibody level is high post-vaccination (in this particular case).
This test cannot predict protection.
EDIT: you have to wait 3-4 wks after the SECOND shot (in a two-shot regimen like Pfizer or Moderna) to ascertain your max Ab level.
Not a medical advice, of course, I am not an MD.

Thanks for your reply and clarification. It helped me a lot to understand right now. 

[Sayeds56]

Simply amazing.

[sirazimuth]

a few pseudo-intellectual snarky replies because hey, its Friday night and I've had a couple.... love you bros  (nohomo)

....

Oh it's proudhon, he's been doing this a long long time..

Ya think?

>

woof woof  AWOOOOOO

ftfy

snip.. the usual gembitz weeeee  spam

scrolled by  (I dont use the ignore button )...

snip ...words

tldr...what else is new?

....

awesome (laser eyes) post, as per usual.

.....

The infamous "alt season". Bitcoin's drop in Market Capitalization happened in 2017 too: people jump into alts hoping to get more Bitcoins. And when they start selling, Bitcoin goes up in market share as well as in fiat value. I expect the same again: Bitcoin remains quite stable in value while alts are growing, and in a few months Bitcoin will absorb all that value.

/so far my wishes and expectations

nailed it

First person to respond to this gets to choose the next poll  

Howdy stranger. Rumor has it, you are the mod of this historic mega thread, amirite?

.....

Dude!... my favorite WOber (nohomo)

....

I promise not bug you about that equation anymore.

....

yo fellow senior citizen miner bro... ^5.

GO BITCOIN

[Arriemoller]

Seems like $60k is acting support, $70k next?

According to my calculations we are going to skip both $70k and $80k like nothing as soon as we cross $69,420.. End station would be around $94,300 for a small correction to $87,500 and that'll be the lowest we go until 2022.

I remain slightly skeptical.

[BitcoinBunny]