Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Kylapoiss]

Chart buddy should stay, posting every 4 hours is good enough.

I'm too "young" here to have really experienced ChartBuddy's posts, so just a suggestion: can the frequency of ChartBuddy be adjusted based on how active the topic is? There's not really a point of having 20 graphs on a page if nobody else posts.
But if there's a lot of activity in this topic, that usually means there's a lot of activity in the market, which means more frequent ChartBuddy posts would be a good thing!
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

That's actually a good idea, maybe Ricky will make it possible?

[1713504541]

1713504541

[1713504541]

1713504541

[Kylapoiss]

Chart buddy should stay, posting every 4 hours is good enough.

I agree with suchmoon, trolls are tolerated but important information isn't?

Please make a poll.

OH MY GOSH! just every 4 hours? it should be at least every hour.

WHY?

have you ever asked yourself why the Bitcoin price is so low?

look at the page count you jerk. it's just 28819.

EDIT: that Swedish military fan boy should get his own Bot coded with pussy pics every 4 hours if he is not gay. 

Oh of course, every minute then maybe? Thread count up and we'll see 500k in no time, we can't even plan the 100k properly before we have to start planning for the 500k one.

[cAPSLOCK]

Only a mom could love a bot like that.

Hi mom!!!!... aka cAPS

I can't wait for you to get to my latest JJG imitation post.  It was a pretty good one, I think.

[suchmoon]

So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

Maybe it could check the page number and not post until it's higher than bitcoin price more than once on the same page.

But honestly... considering that we're already bitching about it for 2 or 3 pages after the bot stopped, I'm sure we would have no problem to create enough useless drivel to drown once-per-hour bot posts.

[Richy_T]

The reason I don't like CB is the fact that it's just posting a chart, information that I or anybody else can and do look up ourselves when we need it, it feels like force feeding something I don't want to be fed.

I will point out that Chartbuddy actually aggregates an hour's worth of data into a 3d chart which allows for movements and wall changes to be visualized in a way that's otherwise not intuitive. Which is not to dismiss your annoyance, just to point out that it's not just chart regurgitation.

[Richy_T]

I'm too "young" here to have really experienced ChartBuddy's posts, so just a suggestion: can the frequency of ChartBuddy be adjusted based on how active the topic is? There's not really a point of having 20 graphs on a page if nobody else posts.
But if there's a lot of activity in this topic, that usually means there's a lot of activity in the market, which means more frequent ChartBuddy posts would be a good thing!
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

Believe me, I've tried to work out how to implement such a scheme and it just can't work well. Chartbuddy's output is about the market and not based on the volume of this thread. Longer times between posts don't work either since any big moves which are reported three hours later are old news and in any case, compressing three or four hours of data onto a chart makes it useless. So basically, not going to happen. Not because I'm ideologically opposed to it, it's just not a good use of my time. (Edit: a separate thread ain't gonna work either. It's been tried).

I've considered other options such as ON/OFF bitcoin addresses (now made infeasible by high fees), in-comment voting (possibly restricted to legendaries) and other similarly Rube-Goldberg type schemes. My latest is to have on/off posts which are weighted by merit. I think though that the most reasonable option is going to be making Chartbuddy invokable (again, limited to legendaries). I'm sure I'll get around to it sometime.

I just turned Chartbuddy on quick because, y'know big price moves and all but it appears that some people have PTSV from the robot wars.

[Richy_T]

Though I have one complain...   PLEASE let xhomerx10 gear/HAT chartbuddy up and Gogogogo

Before xhomerx10 starts warming up his tablet, I'll just point out that Chartbuddy is overdue for a makeover so anything based on the current avatar will likely be short-lived. Also I'm quite particular that the red/green blue eyes are correctly arrayed.

[Sayeds56]

source please or are you so good at painting.  

if BTC manages to close above 42500 on Daily Candle , it  will be good sign

[serveria.com]

Nice pump meanwhile...   and yes we need to keep chartbuddy (it's back finally)  

[El duderino_]

Nice pump meanwhile...   and yes we need to keep chartbuddy (it's back finally)  

Pump?

[ChartBuddy]

Chartbuddy Yes

If this post has more merits than the Chartbuddy No post by 5PM Central today, I'll turn Chartbuddy on for 72 hours.

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

[ChartBuddy]

Chartbuddy No

If this post has more merits than the Chartbuddy Yes post by 5PM Central today, I won't turn Chartbuddy on.

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

[Arriemoller]

Only a mom could love a bot like that.

Hi mom!!!!... aka cAPS

I can't wait for you to get to my latest JJG imitation post.  It was a pretty good one, I think.

It was, I actually had to check to see if it really was you, even though I have JJG on ignore, I thought maybe there was some glitch or something.

[suchmoon]

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Don't merit back... this kind of merit "trading" is usually frowned upon since merit is supposed to be used for good posts, not to pay someone back.

Come to think of it, even voting via merit is kinda sketchy but at least those yes/no posts could arguably be considered "good".

[serveria.com]

Nice pump meanwhile...   and yes we need to keep chartbuddy (it's back finally)  

Pump?

Yeah, the one for ants: 39900 -> 40500 (going down a bit now again) 

[El duderino_]

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Don't merit back... this kind of merit "trading" is usually frowned upon since merit is supposed to be used for good posts, not to pay someone back.

Come to think of it, even voting via merit is kinda sketchy but at least those yes/no posts could arguably be considered "good".

Don’t need them back.... thought the yes no is a good idea.... not many More yes needed if the no isn’t merited .... :-)

But imo some positive previous history of the thread shouldn’t be ignored but embraced, it’s just a part of the thread

[cAPSLOCK]

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Don't merit back... this kind of merit "trading" is usually frowned upon since merit is supposed to be used for good posts, not to pay someone back.

Come to think of it, even voting via merit is kinda sketchy but at least those yes/no posts could arguably be considered "good".

Don’t need them back.... thought the yes no is a good idea.... not many More yes needed if the no isn’t merited .... :-)

But imo some positive previous history of the thread shouldn’t be ignored but embraced, it’s just a part of the thread

Agree.  And I do not think counting multiples from a single source is fair.  Just an aggregate of unique posters.  I did give 10 merits.  So I am speaking against any advantage given by that.  But I also see it as worth 10 merits.  I understand not everyone feels it, but I thin CB is a strong net positive.

[Arriemoller]

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Don't merit back... this kind of merit "trading" is usually frowned upon since merit is supposed to be used for good posts, not to pay someone back.

Come to think of it, even voting via merit is kinda sketchy but at least those yes/no posts could arguably be considered "good".

Don’t need them back.... thought the yes no is a good idea.... not many More yes needed if the no isn’t merited .... :-)

But imo some positive previous history of the thread shouldn’t be ignored but embraced, it’s just a part of the thread

Or, you could just let previous history be previous.

[cAPSLOCK]

Chartbuddy Yes

If this post has more merits than the Chartbuddy No post by 5PM Central today, I'll turn Chartbuddy on for 72 hours.

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Wait a minute, ChartBuddy.  I am in Central time too!  Somewhat south of OK.

[El duderino_]

I'll have Chartbuddy merit everyone back on both posts (up to 200 merits total)

Don't merit back... this kind of merit "trading" is usually frowned upon since merit is supposed to be used for good posts, not to pay someone back.

Come to think of it, even voting via merit is kinda sketchy but at least those yes/no posts could arguably be considered "good".

Don’t need them back.... thought the yes no is a good idea.... not many More yes needed if the no isn’t merited .... :-)

But imo some positive previous history of the thread shouldn’t be ignored but embraced, it’s just a part of the thread

Or, you could just let previous history be previous.

There is no true right or wrong between our choices.... just some different kind of what we like or don’t like I guess I’m in favor nothing more as just my opinion