Buddy breaker! Where the hell is everybody?
I think if ever I were to agree to meet a WOer in real life, to check that they really are who they say, I would ask them "What is ChartBuddy, how often, and at what time to within the nearest minute?"
If they can't answer those three questions, they're a fake and are most likely after your stash.
Yes...
If people do not act quickly, they are going to even have troubles getting up to 0.21BTC.. - let alone some of the BIGGER stashes that are more than 0.63BTC. #justsaying.
Actually, 21 million satoshis does not really sound that bad, even talking about somewhere between 1 million and 10 million satoshis might not sound bad after this next upcoming cycle...so I suppose get your 0.21BTC while you still can peeps and if you can work towards higher numbers that's fine too.. do what you can in order to feel moar better at later times.
Buddy breaker! Where the hell is everybody?
I think if ever I were to agree to meet a WOer in real life, to check that they really are who they say, I would ask them "What is ChartBuddy, how often, and at what time to within the nearest minute?"
If they can't answer those three questions, they're a fake and are most likely after your stash.
Well, I am glad you said something because now I know the answer. But I would have just said we breaks up the walls and walls of JJG posts. And sometimes a few in a row at night.
For some strange reason, I am wondering what forum beneficial purposes would be served by breaking up any of my imaginary post walls to the extent that they might exist beyond the imagination of some peeps and their inabilities to appreciate the role of the scroll wheel if that might be helpful to achieve some kind of a similar objective.
I think we should ask theymos to implement a feature, where you can select to have all your old posts deleted after an X period of time. Or better yet, after a certain amount of the price rising, e.g. delete all posts that were posted when BTC was worth 100x less then it is now.
I don't know about the member driven selection of an automatic deletion feature, but surely some members have chosen to go back and delete their posts, and surely some members have been quite aggressive about it. Surely, we know that some members have changed their user-names too in connection with concerns about their prior posts or concerns that they had ended up being targeted in real life. Personally, I don't feel any need to delete my old posts, and I have not deleted any - and most of the times when I edit any posts it is within an hour or so of posting (fix some things).. but surely every once in a while I have edited some posts that were a few days old.. but mostly in order to attempt to make them more understandable rather than to remove personal information.
Many of us have made efforts to be somewhat amorphous in terms of the information that we post.. so I might be able to say, "if I were to have 1,000 BTC, then x, y z might be applicable to me."
For sure, there are some difficulties in sharing information if few or no specifics are provided, and even the kinds of examples in regards to the number of BTC that equals something like $5k investment or a $10k investment or even a $20k investment that we might use in 2021 may well be different than the kinds of examples that we had used in 2014/2015-ish.
For example, the other day, I used an example of investing $20k, and how reachable something like a $20k investment might be for many people.. so in 2015, $20k could have gotten you around 80 BTC for a decent amount of time, when BTC prices were in the mid-$200s.. but even some folks might not have spent the whole year accumulating up to $20k and then might have made mistakes.. so even if they had been reasonably able to accumulate $80k with a decently aggressive strategy, many people have chosen NOT to be so aggressive, and still might have been able to acquire something like 20 BTC.. but then have they been able to hang onto those BTC is quite another question / practice that challenges a lot of us.
Another thing that frequently happens is that there are guys touting BTC strategies to time the market and bullshit like that, and so sometimes we can use their forum registration date or some other information that they had provided regarding how long that they had supposedly been in bitcoin, and then refer to the DCA.com website in order to compare various modest to aggressive strategies of DCA and to cause them to acknowledge whether or not their touted strategy would have been so sound as to be able to beat the performance of a ongoing DCA strategy - whether such strategy had been modest or more aggressive.
Some of us guys might have also come to realize such benefits of an ongoing dollar cost averaging strategy after making quite a few mistakes along the way.. and of course, even removing coins from exchanges or assuring your own securing of coins strategies might cause ONLY small portion of your overall BTC holdings to actually be flowing through exchanges or other third parties... which reminds me of risks that also might come from trying to earn cashflow (or interest) by putting your BTC with various third parties.. and there remains a considerable amount of personal discretion regarding how much BTC (if any) might be used in that kind of way. - especially when a pure HODLing strategy has tended to perform quite well relative to the dollar - especially zooming out in longer time-horizons and perhaps there can be some realization that bitcoin is already designed to pump forever, and it is not worth the risk to gamble with BTC principle by holding much if any with any third parties who may well end up running off with your BTC or there may well be other risks in keeping BTC with them, including if you have failed/refused to properly read their terms..and could end up losing your BTC through those kind of ignorance-laden
(or would it be greed-laden?) ways, too.
Poll
