Cosmic Beyonders
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 75
UCT (United Crowd)
|
|
April 14, 2022, 12:55:12 PM Last edit: April 14, 2022, 02:20:20 PM by Cosmic Beyonders |
|
Alt Season is near to us. Well its Spring going to end in my Area and now another Spring in the crypto market is starting. This is the best thing Spring after Spring for me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
|
|
April 14, 2022, 01:17:11 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141
|
|
April 14, 2022, 02:28:09 PM |
|
Hi...good morning. Another tip...besides telling all us a-holes to F-off when needed....and it is needed from time to time......is when you are just posting a link or image...maybe put down a few words on what you see or what you think about it. Then its not just regurgitating info that might already be out there. Not that that is minded either....ymmv. As pointed out a few times upthread...some come for knowledge....some signals...many come here just to relax...not be judged and perhaps most important...find a little entertainment. ------ anyway... number retreating this morning and currently trading near 40.4kish $42k will have to be challenged to return the 50ma to support instead of resistance patience is key in troubled waters dyor 4h D stronghands
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2478
|
|
April 14, 2022, 02:34:37 PM |
|
I think if taxes were lower then sure, the ECB, Fed and BoE COULD rocket interest rates to 5% and above. In the current climate of high taxes including wealth taxes and all sorts of other claptrap with energy prices also gone insane I just don't see how anything above 3- 3.5% is possible. People will be thrown out their homes and on the street. Entire economies will completely collapse. I suspect the charade of we are doing well and pretending inflation isn't above 5-10% will continue and if we are "in trouble" again (ie the stock market or housing market goes down), the printers will go brrr some more.
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2066
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
April 14, 2022, 03:00:25 PM |
|
I didn't know Finland has such a hot Prime minister. Sanna Marin We must protect Finland at all costs ❤
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
April 14, 2022, 03:03:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
|
|
April 14, 2022, 03:57:00 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Well...NFT's are jus that, non fungible
so you are buying a "unique" asset. Good luck selling that, by definition its an illiquid maket. easy to buy, impossible to sell. get recked fools
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:01:35 PM |
|
Well...NFT's are jus that, non fungible
so you are buying a "unique" asset. Good luck selling that, by definition its an illiquid maket. easy to buy, impossible to sell. get recked fools
For sure, these.... jpegs pixel art NFTs , are 99.99% shyte. I mean a NFT that represents a real world asset is sorta more interesting...... but if you spend $2.9 million dollars, for a jpeg of a tweet , then you deserve what you get .....
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:04:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039
|
I mean a NFT that represents a real world asset is sorta more interesting......
Is it now? Here is my NFT for sale for a 1000g gold bar. I'll even sell it to you for 20% off of spot price....
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2066
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:24:50 PM |
|
I mean a NFT that represents a real world asset is sorta more interesting......
Is it now? Here is my NFT for sale for a 1000g gold bar. I'll even sell it to for 20% off of spot price.... I think your missing the point. Nft as a public register for land/property etc can be very useful
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10148
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:40:28 PM |
|
Sounds like gobble-dee-gook to me. I don't know what the fuck is "crypto." Look -m even billionaires are dumb fucks. "I changed my mind about crypto.. I don't know what the fuck it was but now that I changed my mind about it, I still do not know what it is." In other words, he does not know what he changed his mind about, and if anyone interviews him to find out what he is doing exactly, I hope that they can at least get him to describe what he might be doing (that is different) beyond vague ass concepts of changing his mind from one amorphous thing to another amorphous thing. Total Marketcap is decreasing that indicates that one the most dangerous signal that investors taking exit from the market and BTC Dominance is continues to Decrease by the way Lets see new investment will decide where to move I seem that you are trying really hard to shrink down your image size. Yes sir Trying to manage reason is that every image has its own Resolution size and evertime a new width and Height is too annoying. Any best settings for every Image?? Around width=300 tends to be pretty good, but sure sometimes you will want it larger so that it is legible, and sometimes it is legible even if it is smaller. Sometimes (especially when quoting someone else) width=30 is good enough.. just to show that an image was there in case the reader would like to click on the original and see the actual size.. so you would need to use your discretion regarding how much of the visibility of the image is relevant to what you are saying, and hopefully you can arrive at largely correct outcomes rather than just posting whatever you like - merely in way that just seems to be more annoying rather than actually contributory. I don't disagree with how Vapourminer described what he does either. After you have selected the size for your image, then just click on preview and see how the size looks before you post it, and if you make a mistake and post an inappropriate (or not useful size) then you can edit and adjust the size up or down to a size that fits whether you are posting an image for the first time or if you are quoting someone else's post that happens to have an image contained therein. The choice is yours ultimately.,. and I have noticed that you, Cosmic Beyonders, have a tendency to NOT post links very often, even though there is likely needs (or wants) to verify your sources.. If you are not attempting to make it easy on fellow WO members we are likely going to just get increasingly pissed off at you and start to call you names... even though maybe some of us will try to give you some benefit of the doubt and help from time to time, but patience can ONLY go so far if it seems that you are not even trying. Even if true.. and even if you might be delicate or pregnant.. you are not going to get any special treatment around here, even if you happen to be a girl... think about it.
And furthermore.... , haven't you heard that >>>>>>on the internet, no one knows that you are a cat/dog (or whatever).<<<<<<
I know that sir therefore I am here. Otherwise I keep my self out from WO. If I want to learn. So when I bear these kind of languages then will be succeeded. But if anyone teach in a good way so I can appreciate on internet him/her. And thanks to teach me in a good way. It is probably better to not even say anything about gender, unless it is relevant. For example, sometimes some of us get caught up on topics about health or lifestyle, and surely some of the choices, preferences and even what is better for one person or another might relate to their gender, too. Another thing is that women are sometimes in relationships with men in which they might be stuck with way more of the childcare duties than men, and so sometimes those kinds of duties/interactions can end up contributing to a perspective that is different than a typical guy - yet even some guys here talk about some of their interactions with their kids too.. whether we are talking about finances or just day to day interactions that might or might not be directly related to this thread - including whether the snot-nosed brats deserve any bitcoin inheritance - and guys/gals will differ in how to consider those topics too. In the end, you do whatever you want in terms if you want to bring up the girl thing or not... and yeah, sometimes I can see how it might matter, and also sometimes you might want to suggest that you are more receptive (or less receptive) to certain kinds of ways of expressing yourself.. and some of those choices might be o.k. or not.. For example, there are choices in what kinds of language that you use.. but there is all kinds of variance in the ways that guys/gals here express themselves.. some are more polite and formal than others, and others talk like drunk sailors 24/7 whether they are drunk (or a sailor) or not.
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:52:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:57:55 PM |
|
I mean a NFT that represents a real world asset is sorta more interesting......
Is it now? Here is my NFT for sale for a 1000g gold bar. I'll even sell it to you for 20% off of spot price.... Obviously there needs to be a mechanism in place to verify that the nft confers ownership of said asset... or even a "shard" of the NFT that represents the asset.. Art collectors, for example, I believe in the end could possibly embrace this model, for various reasons.. for example, art collectors, currently, have serious funds locked up in their collections... now imagine that an art collector can sell, via "shards" effectively shares of individual pieces of art.. but the collector maintains a "controlling share" of said piece of art. The art itself, remains, in verified lockups, or gallery's. (Yes there would need to be a legal framework that is established for this, but this could be done via a legal framework within a DAO, coupled with a "established custody solution for the underlying asset". This then enables an art collector to release equity from their collection, whilst maintaining control of the art. Which in turn enables them to speculate and purchase even more art to add to their collections... For the buyer of the nft shard, it allows a way to speculate on the appreciation of the art, without having to cough up for an entire Monet... Tbh there are for sure other mechanisms whereby this could be achieved.. but NFT shards which represent partial share of a minority share of art, could be one way it is done... Would it be entirely "trustless" , in truth no, there would still be some counterparty risk involved with the custody solution... and in theory the warehouse/gallery/vault etc could be robbed or burned down/flooded/involved in a boating accident etc.. but then I suppose there could be some insurance set up that is coupled with the custody solution. Does this really solve a real world problem? hmmmmm not a huge one ... but it could be a interesting way to "democratise and decentralise and distribute" art speculation.. and also, to make the whole process easier. This whole industry of releasing equity from art collections is already done by various companies in meat life that are not connected to blockchain/NFT projects. Its pretty big business. Could this be done by simple tokens and smart contracts sans NFT's or shards, yeah sure. There are various other projects that play on this theme in other niches also... property, wine etc. Personally, I am not in a hurry to buy shards in art, but some may. I'm not married to the idea, but I find it interesting enough to follow..
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
|
|
April 14, 2022, 04:59:36 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Elon Musk offers $43 billion to takeover Twitter.
Obviously he wouldn't pay a cent for it. Probably some sort of leveraged buyout shit. Although I wouldn't cry if Twitter gets pillaged and razed. I mean a NFT that represents a real world asset is sorta more interesting......
Or you could get the "real world asset" and not invent new "more interesting" types of fraud.
|
|
|
|
|