Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 07:27:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 59 (86.8%)
$48,000 - 9 (13.2%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 31588 31589 31590 31591 31592 31593 31594 31595 31596 31597 31598 31599 31600 31601 31602 31603 31604 31605 31606 31607 31608 31609 31610 31611 31612 31613 31614 31615 31616 31617 31618 31619 31620 31621 31622 31623 31624 31625 31626 31627 31628 31629 31630 31631 31632 31633 31634 31635 31636 31637 [31638] 31639 31640 31641 31642 31643 31644 31645 31646 31647 31648 31649 31650 31651 31652 31653 31654 31655 31656 31657 31658 31659 31660 31661 31662 31663 31664 31665 31666 31667 31668 31669 31670 31671 31672 31673 31674 31675 31676 31677 31678 31679 31680 31681 31682 31683 31684 31685 31686 31687 31688 ... 33204 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26336604 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2375



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 12:06:19 PM

Fuck everyone else this year.



1711654070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711654070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711654070
Reply with quote  #2

1711654070
Report to moderator
1711654070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711654070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711654070
Reply with quote  #2

1711654070
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
bct_ail
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 2158


https://t1p.de/6ghrf


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2023, 12:18:57 PM

Fuck everyone else this year.



off you go

Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 5031



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 12:48:02 PM

Amazon to axe 18,000 jobs as it cuts costs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64171008


"You having a job is the problem."




 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Yep, came here to post the same.

Amazon will lay off more than 18,000 workers

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/04/business/amazon-layoffs/index.html

Like no one saw more layoffs coming from a galaxy away.

I like how Jeff Bezos was telling the public in December to "hold off buying televisions and electronics, in order to have some dry powder."

Yeah, we know why now Jeff.  Roll Eyes
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 01:01:17 PM


Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 02:01:17 PM


Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 03:01:21 PM


Explanation
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 7805



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 03:03:16 PM

✨ Singer Lily Allen turning down 200,000 #Bitcoin  BTC  to play live on Second Life

Over $3,000,000,000 today  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy





Source

Wonder what she would do for 200,000 BTC today.



...



 Probably colour her hair.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:01:17 PM


Explanation
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2375



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:26:08 PM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1), JayJuanGee (1)

✨ Singer Lily Allen turning down 200,000 #Bitcoin  BTC  to play live on Second Life

Over $3,000,000,000 today  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy





Source

Wonder what she would do for 200,000 BTC today.



...



 Probably colour her hair.


I'll give her 0.1 BTC for wearing my cap for a year in public instead. Deadline offer: end of 2023.
Hopefully she will listen this time and not regret it again in 10 years when 1 BTC is $100 million.
strawbs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1339



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:34:24 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1)

I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunks

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 7887



View Profile WWW
January 05, 2023, 04:39:36 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1)

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

OpenSea does blacklist stuff if the original owner can clearly prove it was stolen. However, they can still be sold on other markets or P2P I suppose. CryptoPunks is one of the first series of "PFP collectible" NFTs on Ethereum, which is why they are worth big money. I think they look like crap but wouldn't say no if someone wanted to give me one.

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.

You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2375



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:39:44 PM
Merited by HI-TEC99 (1), strawbs (1)

I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunks

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.

Just a scam, like so many things these days.

Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam.





krishnaverma
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 105



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:40:31 PM

I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunks

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.

I also do not know much about NFT but their is digital signature kind of thing to prove ownership. You cannot screenshot it and claim it to be yours.
strawbs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1339



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 04:42:15 PM


You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.

Yup, that's my point!
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 7887



View Profile WWW
January 05, 2023, 04:45:55 PM


You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.

Yup, that's my point!

A bit different from owning the original tho innit.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 05:01:19 PM


Explanation
eXPHorizon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 132


Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 05:58:12 PM

I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunks

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.

Just a scam, like so many things these days.

Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwsqb4B1lKY

 POV: Logan Paul Steals Your Wallet



pretty funny  Grin
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 06:01:20 PM


Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1743


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 05, 2023, 07:01:19 PM


Explanation
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 7805



View Profile
January 05, 2023, 07:30:04 PM

I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunks

Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?

I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.

Just a scam, like so many things these days.

Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam.







 What's in that stuff, Gwyneth Paltrow's urine?
Pages: « 1 ... 31588 31589 31590 31591 31592 31593 31594 31595 31596 31597 31598 31599 31600 31601 31602 31603 31604 31605 31606 31607 31608 31609 31610 31611 31612 31613 31614 31615 31616 31617 31618 31619 31620 31621 31622 31623 31624 31625 31626 31627 31628 31629 31630 31631 31632 31633 31634 31635 31636 31637 [31638] 31639 31640 31641 31642 31643 31644 31645 31646 31647 31648 31649 31650 31651 31652 31653 31654 31655 31656 31657 31658 31659 31660 31661 31662 31663 31664 31665 31666 31667 31668 31669 31670 31671 31672 31673 31674 31675 31676 31677 31678 31679 31680 31681 31682 31683 31684 31685 31686 31687 31688 ... 33204 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!