[ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund [$53 Million] - Decentralized Mobile Gaming Solutions

[Jack Kuveke]

If MobileGo can be used as a iMessage app for games like GamePigeon, it will blow, trust me. Everyone on twitter asks to play 8ball etc all day long on Snapchat & Twitter.

MobileGo isn't used for messaging apps, you've got nothing to worry about. This is a strictly gaming oriented coin.

The store to play games will be a app correct?  So it will be placed on the android and iOS stores? So what I'm saying it should be integrated into the iMessage like GamePigeon also.

It's a neat way to play games with just someone's number, that you may communicate with everyday. If you haven't seen how GamePigeon works, you should check it out.

The GAME Store will not be available on the APP Store and Google play. We are major competition. Rather than take 30% of game developers revenue like google play and apple, we only take 10% and we provide several other great benefits. We're here to give more freedom to developers, and google and apple will be our competition. Users will be able to download our application from our website and it will sync like a normal APP. This is the system currently working in China as they have 200 third party mobile stores.

Then there are will be same applications as in the Google store, only you are an alternative platform?

Yes we will integrate the same games that are on Google, with some different indie ones that couldn't survive on google. However we offer competitive advantages for gamers as well. Gamers using our mobile store can actually earn money by playing and in GameCredits sponsored tournaments. These GameCredits given to players will come from both developers and GameCredits Inc. Developers will be happy to give away a percentage of the 20% saved using GameCredits. By doing this they will bring more players to their platform and continue to increase revenue. In the end, developers might only take .1% of revenue saved, and use it to distribute to gamers via gameplay and tournaments.

GameCredits is creating an entire economic ecosystem in the gaming world.

And those are just the benefits of GameCredits, MobileGo offers even more.

[1713406238]

1713406238

[1713406238]

1713406238

[1713406238]

1713406238

[RegimeOrder]

If MobileGo can be used as a iMessage app for games like GamePigeon, it will blow, trust me. Everyone on twitter asks to play 8ball etc all day long on Snapchat & Twitter.

MobileGo isn't used for messaging apps, you've got nothing to worry about. This is a strictly gaming oriented coin.

The store to play games will be a app correct?  So it will be placed on the android and iOS stores? So what I'm saying it should be integrated into the iMessage like GamePigeon also.

It's a neat way to play games with just someone's number, that you may communicate with everyday. If you haven't seen how GamePigeon works, you should check it out.

The GAME Store will not be available on the APP Store and Google play. We are major competition. Rather than take 30% of game developers revenue like google play and apple, we only take 10% and we provide several other great benefits. We're here to give more freedom to developers, and google and apple will be our competition. Users will be able to download our application from our website and it will sync like a normal APP. This is the system currently working in China as they have 200 third party mobile stores.

I understand what's going to happen now. In that case, it would be a big idea once you download the application off the website, that it also goes into your iOS message apps section also. That way you can play two optional ways.

Just a random thought I had. If you never seen GamePigeon, it looks like this. http://imgur.com/a/Zq76Z

These games would just be casual games with a friend etc. I was just shooting a idea.

[nelson4lov]

Coming from GameCredits, I'm confident about MobileGO. When will the Crowdfund be coming up? Will like to be part of this.

[Ethirald]

Even if they are "only" a competitor of Google Play Store, they try to promote a differend payment system, and it is good, indeed!

[Jack Kuveke]

Coming from GameCredits, I'm confident about MobileGO. When will the Crowdfund be coming up? Will like to be part of this.

The Crowdfund will start April 25th and run for 1 month. You can invest using GAME, ETH, BTC, WAVES, and Fiat.

[Kaznachej123]

MobileGo ICO Sergey Sholom founder of GameCredits interview, answers to questions!

    YouTube Video: https://youtu.be/ZHnxb-ZdhGo  for  Russian-speaking people!  ICOTRACKER.NET - https://icotracker.net/project/mobilego

[Jack Kuveke]

A quick update regarding translations!

So far we have whitepapers for Chinese, German, Portuguese, Russian, Greek, Japanese, English, and French speakers. If you know anyone who might be interested in MobileGo who speaks one of these languages, feel free to direct them to our website: https://mobilego.io/

[windjc]

MobileGo ICO Sergey Sholom founder of GameCredits interview, answers to questions!

   YouTube Video: https://youtu.be/ZHnxb-ZdhGo  for  Russian-speaking people!  ICOTRACKER.NET - https://icotracker.net/project/mobilego

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

[SeanPiknick]

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about

[Jack Kuveke]

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about

I understand where you're coming from, but I think there is some merit to Jon's argument. It did seem you published a review of MobileGo without any real basis of what was going on. Perhaps you really do have great reasoning for the score you gave, but without providing reasons why it could be entirely based on opinion. I think we can both see a problem with that. You can't really dish out scores to projects without giving your detailed reasoning. Maybe now you're a bit annoyed with Jon because of his comments, so you're biased and just give the project bad marks. Without defining your individual process for each project, you don't  give your website integrity, and you don't help projects improve/defend themselves.

[TeaPanda]

Very interesting project and very helpful community 

[windjc]

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about

I understand where you're coming from, but I think there is some merit to Jon's argument. It did seem you published a review of MobileGo without any real basis of what was going on. Perhaps you really do have great reasoning for the score you gave, but without providing reasons why it could be entirely based on opinion. I think we can both see a problem with that. You can't really dish out scores to projects without giving your detailed reasoning. Maybe now you're a bit annoyed with Jon because of his comments, so you're biased and just give the project bad marks. Without defining your individual process for each project, you don't  give your website integrity, and you don't help projects improve/defend themselves.

Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.

For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends.  Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?

At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.

[SeanPiknick]

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about

I understand where you're coming from, but I think there is some merit to Jon's argument. It did seem you published a review of MobileGo without any real basis of what was going on. Perhaps you really do have great reasoning for the score you gave, but without providing reasons why it could be entirely based on opinion. I think we can both see a problem with that. You can't really dish out scores to projects without giving your detailed reasoning. Maybe now you're a bit annoyed with Jon because of his comments, so you're biased and just give the project bad marks. Without defining your individual process for each project, you don't  give your website integrity, and you don't help projects improve/defend themselves.

Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.

For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends.  Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?

At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.

Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.

[Jack Kuveke]

Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.

You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.

Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.

It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.

[SeanPiknick]

Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.

You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.

Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.

It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.

I get the impression that my "Russian English" is so bad that does not reflect the essence of what was said.

Ok. We will raise the issue of the correctness of MobileGo evaluation at our next team meeting. Thank you for your criticism.

[Papski]

Joined this awesome project! I am a gamer, I support projects that would take a gaming industry to another level 

[penoze]

Looking forward how this project is developing.

When ICO is live i going throw a few € in it. This project have potential and it is something what crypto needs for further adoption. 
The gamingeconomy is big and is still growing.


Have a nice day 

[Jack Kuveke]

In Conversation with Jon Comer, the CMO of Gamecredits, a Decentralised Mobile Gaming Store

NewsBTC Article Link: http://bit.ly/2mD3tYV

[jeffthebaker]

Coming from GameCredits, I'm confident about MobileGO. When will the Crowdfund be coming up? Will like to be part of this.

The Crowdfund will start April 25th and run for 1 month. You can invest using GAME, ETH, BTC, WAVES, and Fiat.

Let's goooooooooo. Time to build up my BTC so I can put it all down lmao. Super excited about this endeavor.

Will there be deposit bonuses for those who buy in early? Like 20% bonus if you invest in the first week of the crowdfund or whatnot?

[anehh]

Yep, i hope so the first day of Mobilego crowdsale will be provided bonuses to participants