Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 07:29:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!  (Read 215230 times)
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 07:44:09 AM
 #1361

Hmm the wallet might still need some fixing.
I came accross some failed asserts the other day when setting up my old desktop to run a full node (no tx pruning).

I did too, but much less frequently than before the fixes.

About that @pallas:
Am I correct to add the "-txindex 1" parameter to the wallet path?
While saying that: the selektion21.de explorer is still running a normal node. Once I get confirmation for that parameter, I will add it and have it run a full tx history.

And next time I see that assert fail, I will post a debug.log.

Yes the parameter is used to keep a local index of all the transactions, even though the block explorer may get the information directly from the blocks, otherwise how could it show the information already :-)
I didn't look at the explorer code enough to give you an answer right away, but I can look into it later, if you need it.

Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711654179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711654179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711654179
Reply with quote  #2

1711654179
Report to moderator
1711654179
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711654179

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711654179
Reply with quote  #2

1711654179
Report to moderator
adsjohn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 08:22:03 AM
 #1362

Just 4 months, ten times the previous day, now at the bottom of the valley, through the XCN earned high profits
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 10:50:58 AM
 #1363

I've created a poll about the bounty amounts on the slack channel.
Come and vote.

krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 105


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 12:11:22 PM
 #1364

supprnova pool is unstable - a lot of disconnects -( anyone know how to mine solo, or create a pool? I installed cryptonite wallet, but it seems that it accept miners over old getwork protocol(??) which is deprecated ?
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 12:13:02 PM
 #1365

supprnova pool is unstable - a lot of disconnects -( anyone know how to mine solo, or create a pool? I installed cryptonite wallet, but it seems that it accept miners over old getwork protocol(??) which is deprecated ?

you can easily mine solo.
creating a pool is not trivial.
getwork method is the only one supported by ccminer.

krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 105


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 12:26:42 PM
 #1366

supprnova pool is unstable - a lot of disconnects -( anyone know how to mine solo, or create a pool? I installed cryptonite wallet, but it seems that it accept miners over old getwork protocol(??) which is deprecated ?

you can easily mine solo.
creating a pool is not trivial.
getwork method is the only one supported by ccminer.

My conf file:
Quote
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcallowip=*
rpcport=8252
port=8253
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1
addnode=explorer.cryptonite.info
addnode=5.157.115.132
addnode=24.23.220.26
addnode=24.246.60.145
addnode=45.120.112.97
addnode=45.55.155.188
addnode=46.105.118.15
addnode=46.109.38.201
addnode=47.18.185.42
addnode=47.184.199.191
addnode=47.184.226.200
addnode=47.200.219.7
addnode=60.242.6.82
addnode=61.164.253.37
addnode=61.164.253.41
addnode=62.75.210.104
addnode=62.75.241.240
addnode=68.56.121.148
addnode=68.193.116.54
addnode=77.111.163.71
addnode=77.233.244.74
addnode=79.155.232.191
addnode=81.0.115.79
addnode=81.196.22.245
addnode=82.116.52.170
addnode=84.25.101.219
addnode=84.201.247.230
addnode=84.217.19.85
addnode=85.14.250.2
addnode=85.228.176.15
addnode=86.127.154.22
addnode=87.100.232.157
addnode=87.92.62.65
addnode=89.99.27.94
addnode=91.152.122.132
addnode=92.52.46.192
addnode=93.33.170.142
addnode=93.80.161.18
addnode=93.122.250.57
addnode=94.0.121.107
addnode=94.137.33.135
addnode=95.47.105.137
addnode=95.223.11.160
addnode=94.253.215.85
addnode=95.25.80.210
addnode=96.127.136.18
addnode=96.244.98.123
addnode=98.169.196.179
addnode=101.127.169.209
addnode=101.166.130.197
addnode=106.186.126.57
addnode=108.180.78.128
addnode=109.174.57.122
addnode=110.140.110.203
addnode=112.229.90.152
addnode=113.53.148.11
addnode=118.174.153.195
addnode=118.178.139.196
addnode=125.236.224.55
addnode=137.189.91.64
addnode=137.189.91.71
addnode=149.56.20.223
addnode=155.143.193.174
addnode=158.69.27.82
addnode=178.26.208.109
addnode=180.253.248.218
addnode=180.253.249.183
addnode=182.71.181.102
addnode=183.63.48.118
addnode=186.146.145.16
addnode=188.68.159.143
addnode=188.252.239.4
addnode=188.252.239.235
addnode=190.44.84.248
addnode=193.106.171.8
addnode=194.88.107.212
addnode=211.149.194.156

I am getting this on rigs:

Quote
./ccminer -a m7 -o 10.0.0.1:8252 -u username -p password
***** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by djm34 - M7 version *****
based on original ccMiner by Christian Buchner and Christian H. 2014 ***
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 DJM34

Fixed for newer cuda versions and cards by pallas
BTC donation address: 1H7qC5uHuGX2d5s9Kuw3k7Wm7xMQzL16SN

[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2017-06-26 03:40:11] 6 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm.
[2017-06-26 03:40:12] hex2bin failed on '7.'
[2017-06-26 03:40:12] JSON invalid bits
[2017-06-26 03:40:12] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds

Quote
./ccminer -a m7 -o 10.0.0.1:8253 -u username -p password
***** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by djm34 - M7 version *****
based on original ccMiner by Christian Buchner and Christian H. 2014 ***
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 DJM34

Fixed for newer cuda versions and cards by pallas
BTC donation address: 1H7qC5uHuGX2d5s9Kuw3k7Wm7xMQzL16SN

[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] 6 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm.
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2017-06-26 03:40:01] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2017-06-26 03:40:04] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from server
[2017-06-26 03:40:04] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds

Its shame, but i never mined altcoins solo (;
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 12:42:00 PM
 #1367

I don't think the djm34 version has this solomine fix:

https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/commit/29e0784d5e5a9b649b4865828764c2dba399b8b5

alexepp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 02:43:29 PM
 #1368

you can easily mine solo.
creating a pool is not trivial.
getwork method is the only one supported by ccminer.
[/quote]

The speed with which you can start solo?
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 03:03:32 PM
 #1369

you can easily mine solo.
creating a pool is not trivial.
getwork method is the only one supported by ccminer.

The speed with which you can start solo?
[/quote]

Depends on your tastes but I'd say 1/100 of the network hashrate.

alexepp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 03:13:01 PM
 #1370

you can easily mine solo.
creating a pool is not trivial.
getwork method is the only one supported by ccminer.

The speed with which you can start solo?

Depends on your tastes but I'd say 1/100 of the network hashrate.
[/quote]
Now judging by the pool solo no!
nobodywanttocry
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 14


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 03:16:21 PM
 #1371

Bter is scam, withdraws not working on any coin
Maybe just in maintaining.

nobodywanttocry
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 14


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 03:18:51 PM
 #1372

Just 4 months, ten times the previous day, now at the bottom of the valley, through the XCN earned high profits

That's because BTC38.com  added  XCN-CNY trading .

krnlx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 105


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 05:16:38 PM
 #1373


Finally, I found block, but there is an issue with nonce distribution across rigs - it seems, that they are brutforcing against the same nonces

Code:
cat /cluster/home/krnl/xcn/solo/ccminer-m7-branch/err_f1*|grep acc
Quote
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 132617 kh/s NO
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 132632 kh/s NO
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 132470 kh/s NO
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 130971 kh/s NO
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 131068 kh/s YES
[2017-06-26 19:43:38] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 132805 kh/s NO

6 rigs found solution simultaneously -(
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 26, 2017, 06:17:15 PM
 #1374

Maybe you could try using --coinbase-sig or --coinbase-addr

EDIT: hmmm not sure they do anything on getwork.

robo2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 08:08:59 AM
 #1375

any windows wersion of new wallet?
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 08:15:36 AM
 #1376

any windows wersion of new wallet?

the windows build available on the site should be up to date with github.

DLGHT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 11:24:34 AM
Last edit: June 27, 2017, 11:37:07 AM by DLGHT
 #1377

Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.

So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.

But I am shocked I am getting less  than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)

How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?

The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.

Thanks for all your help.

EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 11:45:45 AM
 #1378

Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.

So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.

But I am shocked I am getting less  than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)

How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?

The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.

Thanks for all your help.

EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova

It is an old architecture, also probably lower core clock (memclock matters very little).
When they will update to pascal based cards it might be interesting to try cloud gpu mining.

DLGHT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 12:08:31 PM
 #1379

Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.

So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.

But I am shocked I am getting less  than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)

How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?

The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.

Thanks for all your help.

EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova

It is an old architecture, also probably lower core clock (memclock matters very little).
When they will update to pascal based cards it might be interesting to try cloud gpu mining.

Thank you for your reply.

core clock is 875MHz and I set it on max.
pallas (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
June 27, 2017, 12:47:37 PM
 #1380

Hi Pallas, George and everyone here.

So I just got this free subscription on Azure. and I decided to whip up a instance with 4 K80 GPUs (2 per card).
It had 4992 cores, 5000MHz memspeed, and 480 GB/s bandwidth, 24GB video memory on each card.
I just wanted to determine what they will give.

But I am shocked I am getting less  than 24MH/s. Each GPU die is more powerful than a 1070 (in all the numbers), so I should have at least 40MH/s (even the worst 1070 here gave 10MH/s)

How can I optimise that? What I am not getting right?

The card is Compute 3.7 and I am using djm34 CUDA miner on Windows.

Thanks for all your help.

EDIT: OR does it have anything to do with setting the vardiff on Suprnova

It is an old architecture, also probably lower core clock (memclock matters very little).
When they will update to pascal based cards it might be interesting to try cloud gpu mining.

Thank you for your reply.

core clock is 875MHz and I set it on max.

the 1070 runs at double that :-)

Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!