[ANN ][SCORE]

[marksteven]

People are asking me to make a Poll for the Masternode Price, but my answer is NO:

because i learned from my last lesson, that many newcomers, i mean people wich dont know anything about Masternodes will also vote.

No poll this time

[1714116920]

1714116920

[1714116920]

1714116920

[1714116920]

1714116920

[1714116920]

1714116920

[mrhans]

Wow, I don't think that changing masternodes cost like every second week is a good idea. Before announcing a price, you should think what will happen, not reverting a decision a dozen times. Doesn't seem to be promising.

[outthu141]

Hi DEV!

I see ARC coin Circulating Supply 23M coin. 1000 ARC for a masternode and It grows well.

I think DEV can review. and buil Masternode Score!

You have bounty for a translate or retwitter?

I think you need a campaign strong about Marketing, before perfom Masternode.

I can help you!

[amishpancake]

In my opinion a masternode should not cost less than 25K coins.

[kurbeks]

Hi DEV!

I see ARC coin Circulating Supply 23M coin. 1000 ARC for a masternode and It grows well.

I think DEV can review. and buil Masternode Score!

You have bounty for a translate or retwitter?

I think you need a campaign strong about Marketing, before perfom Masternode.

I can help you!

Artic still has only 4% locked into MN. Same as it was week ago. And it shows that 1k MN on this ammount is usless. No point in running them. They barely pay back VPS costs and that is before MN count goes up.

[.LooTz.]

Hi DEV!

I see ARC coin Circulating Supply 23M coin. 1000 ARC for a masternode and It grows well.

I think DEV can review. and buil Masternode Score!

You have bounty for a translate or retwitter?

I think you need a campaign strong about Marketing, before perfom Masternode.

I can help you!

Artic still has only 4% locked into MN. Same as it was week ago. And it shows that 1k MN on this ammount is usless. No point in running them. They barely pay back VPS costs and that is before MN count goes up.

I agree even 25k is low, an investment in a masternode should be an investment. Not some spare change you got from selling a few 5hitcoins.

[CryptoTalapoin]

Personally I think it should be 25k+. there are a lot of coins that are 1k or 10k, this could potentially differentiate this coin since there would be less dilution of the master nodes. It might attract larger investors.

[hu!k]

Dev if you really want the project to succeed, you must keep the limit for mns higher. Probably a minimum of 100k or 150k. 100k coins at current price is 0.24 btc. If you can't expect a masternode investor to invest atleast a quarter of btc, then I'm sorry to say this project won't succeed in the long term. You are not distributing chump change here, 10k would be like owning 10 masternodes for 0.25 btc.. You really want that? I don't think so.

Minimum 1000$ investment for a mn or I'm out.

[peiratis]

Dev if you really want the project to succeed, you must keep the limit for mns higher. Probably a minimum of 100k or 150k. 100k coins at current price is 0.24 btc. If you can't expect a masternode investor to invest atleast a quarter of btc, then I'm sorry to say this project won't succeed in the long term. You are not distributing chump change here, 10k would be like owning 10 masternodes for 0.25 btc.. You really want that? I don't think so.

Minimum 1000$ investment for a mn or I'm out.

Come on.No one will invest for masternode if the price is 100k.10k or 15k is a good price.

[.LooTz.]

Dev if you really want the project to succeed, you must keep the limit for mns higher. Probably a minimum of 100k or 150k. 100k coins at current price is 0.24 btc. If you can't expect a masternode investor to invest atleast a quarter of btc, then I'm sorry to say this project won't succeed in the long term. You are not distributing chump change here, 10k would be like owning 10 masternodes for 0.25 btc.. You really want that? I don't think so.

Minimum 1000$ investment for a mn or I'm out.

Come on.No one will invest for masternode if the price is 100k.10k or 15k is a good price.

I would, I will not invest in a silly 10k. 10-15k is a joke for children.

[kurbeks]

As a big holder of course i would like to have MN price higher. But seriously 10k is just stupid.

This will lead to this being Arctic coin nr. 2 where noone will run MN.

Reason being:

1) Low profits of MN holders will hold back new MN, or plp getting into them. More MN-> less profits. Thus price won't increase because of lack of locked in coins and it's kinda of circle. So 10k MN will just seee Pump/dump spike during MN introduction where price will stablize on more or less same price as it was before.
2) Low costs is only interesting for plp who just want to get cheap into as many MN coins as possible running 1 or 2 VPS. Then if price increases they just dump their coins. Thus 10k would be profitable for plp looking to make cheap and quick profits out of MN coins, instead of plp who actually belive in SCORE or Tradev2. As these MN have to be profitable to cover VPS singlehandly, not by running dozen of different coins on same server.
3) Also SCORE price is continuing to slide down. And by Late August it can very well be below 100 sats, thus MN would barely cost 0.1BTC which is cheap. And big block rewards would give nice SCORE income.
4) And lastly after halving rewards would go down, thus again would make it unprofitable if low price. And there will be 20% dev fee on each block, which must be taken into account.

Thus would suggest as 25k as lowest sensible limit of SCORE MN.

[amishpancake]

As a big holder of course i would like to have MN price higher. But seriously 10k is just stupid.

This will lead to this being Arctic coin nr. 2 where noone will run MN.

Reason being:

1) Low profits of MN holders will hold back new MN, or plp getting into them. More MN-> less profits. Thus price won't increase because of lack of locked in coins and it's kinda of circle. So 10k MN will just seee Pump/dump spike during MN introduction where price will stablize on more or less same price as it was before.
2) Low costs is only interesting for plp who just want to get cheap into as many MN coins as possible running 1 or 2 VPS. Then if price increases they just dump their coins. Thus 10k would be profitable for plp looking to make cheap and quick profits out of MN coins, instead of plp who actually belive in SCORE or Tradev2. As these MN have to be profitable to cover VPS singlehandly, not by running dozen of different coins on same server.
3) Also SCORE price is continuing to slide down. And by Late August it can very well be below 100 sats, thus MN would barely cost 0.1BTC which is cheap. And big block rewards would give nice SCORE income.
4) And lastly after halving rewards would go down, thus again would make it unprofitable if low price. And there will be 20% dev fee on each block, which must be taken into account.

Thus would suggest as 25k as lowest sensible limit of SCORE MN.

Yeah, I agree with you. Minimum 25K. Maybe even 50K.

[peiratis]

http://masternodes.pro/
Look at  Crown or Pivx even ExclusiveCoin with 5000 masternode price is doing well.High ammount of coins for a masternode is a good thing only for big holders so they can make more money but is not good for the coin

[DejwidK]

Lol guys look at the price now! 100k for masternode at this price is nothing its still cheap.
Just accumulate at these prices man, dont buy when it goes to 1k,2k or 3k satoshi.
The aim of a MN is not that everyone can afford it, maybe not everyone will like this but thats a fact. Its an investment.
Everything under 100k for a SCORE MN will be for me disappointing..

[peiratis]

Lol guys look at the price now! 100k for masternode at this price is nothing its still cheap.
Just accumulate at these prices man, dont buy when it goes to 1k,2k or 3k satoshi.
The aim of a MN is not that everyone can afford it, maybe not everyone will like this but thats a fact. Its an investment.
Everything under 100k for a SCORE MN will be for me disappointing..

Tell me one coin except MUE that have 100k price for a masternode?

[kurbeks]

Lol guys look at the price now! 100k for masternode at this price is nothing its still cheap.
Just accumulate at these prices man, dont buy when it goes to 1k,2k or 3k satoshi.
The aim of a MN is not that everyone can afford it, maybe not everyone will like this but thats a fact. Its an investment.
Everything under 100k for a SCORE MN will be for me disappointing..

Tell me one coin except MUE that have 100k price for a masternode?

MUE MN shared can be bought at 10k BTW, just bit lower payouts and no voting rights.

[marksteven]

You guys have to think for future, if the scoreprice increasing, then 10k will be still affordable for most people. so , i still believe in 10k price for masternodes, because i dont see a reasonable argument to not have it at 10k.

[.LooTz.]

You guys have to think for future, if the scoreprice increasing, then 10k will be still affordable for most people. so , i still believe in 10k price for masternodes, because i dont see a reasonable argument to not have it at 10k.

sound like you made up your mind, Fuk masternodes, if you do not find another way to give this coin value then no one will care about score none the less its masternodes. You need to find another way to increase value because tempting people with cheap masternodes does nothing for me.

As a matter of fact if the masternodes are that cheap then their is no reason for me to hold so much as it does not stake and at this point is dead wood better invested in komodo, or waves, or anything more sturdy that actually have a plan for their technology and are working hard to create it.

25k is cheap as 5hit right now
150k is less than 1 btc. I only invest in things WORTH investing in...

[amishpancake]

You guys have to think for future, if the scoreprice increasing, then 10k will be still affordable for most people. so , i still believe in 10k price for masternodes, because i dont see a reasonable argument to not have it at 10k.

Well the reason is that 10K is to cheap. Nobody wants to invest in this coin if the ROI isnt good. With that price of VPS would propably exceed the income. So IMO the price should be min 25K. If you think the price will be to high in the future we could always implement MN shares.

[striker7334 2.0]

You guys have to think for future, if the scoreprice increasing, then 10k will be still affordable for most people. so , i still believe in 10k price for masternodes, because i dont see a reasonable argument to not have it at 10k.

I like 10k people will get butt hurt over it being too cheap but the low barrier of entry will work itself out when the market is snagging up SCORE for masternode's left and right especially with how cheap the price is now. I personally plan to host 4 nodes myself on a few PI's lying around. Just make the payout big enough for masternode holders and  SCORE's value in the marketplace will be backed by the masternodes alone leaving you free to take the coin in whatever direction you feel like it needs to go to continue to make it even more valuable. Masternodes are just the beginning who cares if everyone has one thats good for the network less centralization is always a bonus the reward may go down but I'm willing to bet the price per SCORE will certainly go up.