Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 08:32:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Project Development > Exchange transparency, or is this going too far?
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
« previous topic next topic »
  Print  
Author Topic: Exchange transparency, or is this going too far?  (Read 1221 times)
codro
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 08:13:34 PM
 #21
I would support this idea in concert with some sort of decentralized exchange.

MtGox can then issue MtGoxUSD colored coins, which get exchanged for BTC, and can be redeemed at MtGox later on by their new owner. MtGox would just be a broker, and so would the rest of the current exchanges. The decentralized exchange would handle the trade of colored coins for BTC, and work through some sort of publicly auditable blockchain.
1714854774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714854774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714854774
1714854774
Reply with quote  #2
1714854774
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714854774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714854774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714854774
1714854774
Reply with quote  #2
1714854774
Report to moderator
1714854774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714854774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714854774
1714854774
Reply with quote  #2
1714854774
Report to moderator
greBit (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 20, 2013, 05:28:16 PM
 #22
Quote from: JoelKatz on April 19, 2013, 06:48:38 PM
Quote from: greBit on April 19, 2013, 02:06:33 PM
I must be missing something. How are my transaction fees not helping support the infrastructure ... the more they earn the more hard disks they can install Smiley

Do the fees need to be increased?
Transaction fees only go to miners. Not only miners have to store the block chain.


How do the incentive structures scale when the whole world wants to get their transaction on the blockchain? Say in 10 years we need to perform 1 million transactions per day or something.

Will people still store all this for free?
Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006


View Profile
April 20, 2013, 06:01:11 PM
 #23
Quote from: codro on April 19, 2013, 08:13:34 PM
I would support this idea in concert with some sort of decentralized exchange.

MtGox can then issue MtGoxUSD colored coins, which get exchanged for BTC, and can be redeemed at MtGox later on by their new owner. MtGox would just be a broker, and so would the rest of the current exchanges. The decentralized exchange would handle the trade of colored coins for BTC, and work through some sort of publicly auditable blockchain.
Bitstamp already supports this, it is called ripple...
https://www.coinlend.org <-- automated lending at various exchanges.
https://www.bitfinex.com <-- Trade BTC for other currencies and vice versa.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Project Development > Exchange transparency, or is this going too far?
 « previous topic next topic »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!