AMD Ryzen hashrate?

[PovertyByte]

Monero performance update from Serve The Home:

"1x AMD Ryzen 7 1800X = 537H/s 
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700X = 516H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700 = 481H/s"


https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/

This performance is a stock . Ryzen easy go 4 ghz at air .

Usually

A silicon loser 1700 will fail at 4ghz

[1713496483]

1713496483

[1713496483]

1713496483

[1713496483]

1713496483

[1713496483]

1713496483

[1713496483]

1713496483

[1713496483]

1713496483

[giagge]

See this video :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEqRK_Ora9M

.

[Jdope]

Did anyone actually start mining with ryzen? Whats the hashrates on monero or zcash?

[giagge]

Did anyone actually start mining with ryzen? Whats the hashrates on monero or zcash?

I want same news .

[Xeon_Xeon]

Did anyone actually start mining with ryzen? Whats the hashrates on monero or zcash?

Did anyone actually start mining with ryzen? Whats the hashrates on monero or zcash?

I want same news .

Did you two even read any of the posts above?

[nicehash]

We did test the 1700X: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=148

[ComaWombat]

I got a bit moar of dem hashes out of a 1700X:

595 H/s @ 3.7GHz @ 1.2V:

https://i.imgur.com/TSzkeM2.png

650 H/s @ 4.0 GHz @ 1.42V:

https://i.imgur.com/DZnFMdu.png

Affinity in the config.txt set to even numbers of threads (0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14) and nothing else can be running in the background or the hashrate takes a big hit.

[Xeon_Xeon]

https://www.servethehome.com/monero-mining-benchmarks-cpu-mining-amd-ryzen-7-systems/

[Elder III]

I just ran the benchmark in the Nicehash miner and came up with 435.9 H/s - This is with a 1700X @ 4.0 Ghz and 2933Mhz DDR4. I did have some things running in the background, so that may have influenced it.

[giagge]

So I want to know, what the best configuration for ryzen in terms of watts? and what the best currency for this cpu and how miner.

[Ambros]

I just ran the benchmark in the Nicehash miner and came up with 435.9 H/s - This is with a 1700X @ 4.0 Ghz and 2933Mhz DDR4. I did have some things running in the background, so that may have influenced it.

Since you are one of the lucky ones that has a Ryzen yet, can you do done tests more?
Maybe try some other miners and report frequencies.I hope that some other miners will outperform nice hash

[giagge]

We did test the 1700X: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=148

Review a little too spartan. you can not deal with all the algorithms comparing them with Intel i7 7700k? .

[Elder III]

I just ran the benchmark in the Nicehash miner and came up with 435.9 H/s - This is with a 1700X @ 4.0 Ghz and 2933Mhz DDR4. I did have some things running in the background, so that may have influenced it.

Since you are one of the lucky ones that has a Ryzen yet, can you do done tests more?
Maybe try some other miners and report frequencies.I hope that some other miners will outperform nice hash

I installed and ran the latest MinerGate software, the results are below. Compared to the results from Nicehash it would appear that MinerGate isn't utilizing Ryzen very well. The one exception being AEON with a MUCH higher hashrate, but it crashed the PC within 30 seconds.

All with 15 Cores (16 cores made no difference other than making the system laggy)

AEON - ~560 H/s - Not Stable, crashes computer.
BCN - ~160 H/s
DSH - ~160 H/s
ETC - ~887 kH/s
ETH - ~887 kH/s
FCN - ~160 H/s
INF8 - ~160 H/s
MCN - ~160 H/s
QCN - ~160 H/s
XDN - ~160 H/s
XMR - ~160 H/s

XMR with 15 cores - ~160 H/s @ 63 watts
XMR with only 8 Cores - ~340 H/s @ 65 watts   
XMR with only 4 Cores - ~195 H/s @ 46 watts

Clearly something if off with the number of cores/threads not being used properly. The XMR results at 8 Cores, 340 H/s @ only 65 watts isn't too bad. With more optimized miners I could see the cheaper R5 series being an option to at least consider for mining down the road when motherboards are more available etc....

This was with a R7 1700X 4.0 Ghz @ 1.35 volts

If you have a different CPU miner that you would like me to test let me know and I might be able to benchmark it.

[joblo]

Can you do some testing with cpuminer-opt? The following algos are suggested:

Cryptonight: cache bound, threads = L3 cache MB / 2 MB, so 8 threads on 1700x. Already understood,
excellent performer.

Deep: compute bound and heavilly optimized for AES and AVX2, Comparing performance with Intel on
a thread and clock basis will give an indication of how well AVX2 was implemented. Should be able to
load all threads.

Lyra2z330: I/O bound, large array too big for cache. With only a 2 channel memory controller it likely won't
compete with Intel E series. Performance will likely peak with fewer than N threads.

It would also be good to confirm thread order. On Intel default affininity assigns one thread to each physical core before
using HT. Someone suggested Ryzen assigns threads diffferently when threads less than number of virtual cores.

[LoveCaptcha]

thanks for sharing it but aren't the opteron cpu better in price/hasharate

Yea but they are power hungry.

But you can buy a new socket G34 4 cpu motherboard for under $80.00 of course you would have to deal with non standard format and non standard power connectivity and every time I thought of it I quickly talked myself out of it.

The more standard boards are more expensive to the point its not worth it.

It's worth doing if you could get a deal on a decommissioned server for cheap.

But you can purchase a dual node dual cpu open compute socket 2011 Wiwynn server new in the box for under $200.00

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Wiwynn-SV7210-Two-Node-Open-Compute-Server-Dual-LGA-2011-/391296440423

All you need to do is buy 4 cheap E5-2600 V1 cpu's and some cheap ddr 3 ram and a SSD and 240 volt power source, will run Linux and windows 7 just fine.

The only reason I have have not bought several is I moving away from socket 2011 and moving to socket 2011-3.


EDIT: Every time I look at those open compute servers I am SO tempted........I must not buy.........must not........will power must have will power.....LOL

so is this still the best kinda options compared to using ryzen to mine with then?

[LoveCaptcha]

what cpu's would you all recommend with the 2011v1 board. taking into consideration power draw, mb, core count

[giagge]

So what is the best currency to ryzen now? and with what miner. thanks for those who want to explain.

[Elder III]

Can you do some testing with cpuminer-opt? The following algos are suggested:

Cryptonight: cache bound, threads = L3 cache MB / 2 MB, so 8 threads on 1700x. Already understood,
excellent performer.

Deep: compute bound and heavilly optimized for AES and AVX2, Comparing performance with Intel on
a thread and clock basis will give an indication of how well AVX2 was implemented. Should be able to
load all threads.

Lyra2z330: I/O bound, large array too big for cache. With only a 2 channel memory controller it likely won't
compete with Intel E series. Performance will likely peak with fewer than N threads.

It would also be good to confirm thread order. On Intel default affininity assigns one thread to each physical core before
using HT. Someone suggested Ryzen assigns threads diffferently when threads less than number of virtual cores.

I'm not sure if I understood everything you posted, but I will try to test some of those options when I have some extra time. I haven't even tried any CPU mining since the early days of Bitcoin, so I'm not at all up to date on it.

[Elder III]

So what is the best currency to ryzen now? and with what miner. thanks for those who want to explain.

Probably Monero (XMR), at least that is what I would probably do if I was looking to CPU mine regularly.

[QuintLeo]

I just ran the benchmark in the Nicehash miner and came up with 435.9 H/s - This is with a 1700X @ 4.0 Ghz and 2933Mhz DDR4. I did have some things running in the background, so that may have influenced it.

Since you are one of the lucky ones that has a Ryzen yet, can you do done tests more?
Maybe try some other miners and report frequencies.I hope that some other miners will outperform nice hash

I installed and ran the latest MinerGate software, the results are below. Compared to the results from Nicehash it would appear that MinerGate isn't utilizing Ryzen very well. The one exception being AEON with a MUCH higher hashrate, but it crashed the PC within 30 seconds.

All with 15 Cores (16 cores made no difference other than making the system laggy)

AEON - ~560 H/s - Not Stable, crashes computer.
BCN - ~160 H/s
DSH - ~160 H/s
ETC - ~887 kH/s
ETH - ~887 kH/s
FCN - ~160 H/s
INF8 - ~160 H/s
MCN - ~160 H/s
QCN - ~160 H/s
XDN - ~160 H/s
XMR - ~160 H/s

XMR with 15 cores - ~160 H/s @ 63 watts
XMR with only 8 Cores - ~340 H/s @ 65 watts   
XMR with only 4 Cores - ~195 H/s @ 46 watts

Clearly something if off with the number of cores/threads not being used properly. The XMR results at 8 Cores, 340 H/s @ only 65 watts isn't too bad. With more optimized miners I could see the cheaper R5 series being an option to at least consider for mining down the road when motherboards are more available etc....

This was with a R7 1700X 4.0 Ghz @ 1.35 volts

If you have a different CPU miner that you would like me to test let me know and I might be able to benchmark it.

 You DO realise that the R7 1700X is a *8 core* CPU, not a 16 core?

 Threads via hyperthreading are NOT additional cores, they are more about being able to split usage on a core to be able to do 2 low-utilization things at once on a core.


 A lot of software is MISidentifying the Ryzen 1700/1700X/1800X as 16 CORE cpus, because they mark the first time AMD has put Hyperthreading into a CPU.