DASH collapsing, AEON up!
Is the timing a coincidence?
Or is it because the much hyped 12.1 update was a massive failure making DASH worse than before? Are former masternode owners jumping ship and moving to AEON? Are they finally realizing the value of true privacy, dynamic block-sizes and security over wasting money on failed ATM plans and paying "major" exchanges for listings?
Did people notice that DASH (Evan) could not earn an invite to Satoshi roundtable this year after failing to impress in 2016? Meanwhile Monero had two developers in attendance.
Usually a "flawless" transition does not entail ugly, damaging quick fixes which the devs themselves characterize as "controversial" and only necessary "until we have a better solution."
Usually a "flawless" transition does not entail losing connectivity with standard modern internetworking protocols, resulting in ~$1.5 million dollars worth of nodes being rudely tossed out of the system with no say in the matter (and taking their diversity/diffusivity with them).
Masternodes should be allowed to annonce ipv4 addresses only from now
^That's what normal people would call a flaw in the transition.
I can't believe your response to the question of "Why didn't Masternodes hold a vote on banning IPv6?" is to throw out some red herring about Americans and illegals. Talk about hand waving!
WTF are you really that stupid? Or are you just that committed to white knighting for Even The Instaminer, to the point where you will defend his unilateral actions and consistently false pretensions about governance theater no matter how blatantly centralized, retrograde, arbitrary, and authoritarian they become?
Do you have any idea what a huge security issue it is for every Masternode to be tied to a static IPv4 address?
Obviously you do not, otherwise you'd have chosen to describe 12.1 with a more appropriate term than "flawless."
"Flawless" sounds like some Evan Can Do No Wrong cheerleading from a Kool-Aid drinking bagholder, not an honest critical appraisal respectful of all the facts.
Of course given Dash's MO is "Marketing Over Technology" I'm not surprised you prefer to paint the situation in rosy terms rather than address the reasons why Bitcoin would never in a million years kick its IPv6 nodes out, much less have the chutzpah to describe such a Pyrrhic "quick win" as "flawless."
Is it asking too much for Evan to stop breaking feature which Bitcoin devs worked hard to implement? If your name is Lukas_Jackson, the answer is "yes!"
The irony is stunning. 12.1 is being hyped as "Evolution" despite it breaking existing functionality and moving Dash back into the Bronze Age of networking.
IPv4 = tech from 1981
IPv6 = tech from 1999
What the diff? Glad you asked!
While increasing the pool of addresses is one of the most often-talked about benefit of IPv6, there are other important technological changes in IPv6 that will improve the IP protocol:
- No more NAT (Network Address Translation)
- Auto-configuration
- No more private address collisions
- Better multicast routing
- Simpler header format
- Simplified, more efficient routing
- True quality of service (QoS), also called "flow labeling"
- Built-in authentication and privacy support
- Flexible options and extensions
- Easier administration (say good-bye to DHCP)
