Bitcoin Forum
August 11, 2020, 03:56:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 [206] 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2587175 times)
btctalk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 112



View Profile WWW
December 04, 2012, 07:44:33 PM
 #4101


You can't merge mine bitcoin and litecoin.  That doesn't work.


So how is it possible to have a mining pool that supports LTC and BTC mining? it should be, on different ports Undecided
Run p2pool twice with different settings.

You will have one pool for BTC and one pool for LTC.  Not one pool with ports for both.

Thanks, yeah I end up doing so, I was just waiting for some results to see if it's working alright or not
but still I'm getting the ups and downs in local BTC Hash rate...

Persian Blockchain Consultation Group: http://shiryakhat.net
Super Bitcoiner Club http://superbitcoiner.com
Persian Bitcoin Community - http://btctalk.com - http://fb.com/IranBitcoin
1597161397
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597161397

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597161397
Reply with quote  #2

1597161397
Report to moderator
1597161397
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597161397

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597161397
Reply with quote  #2

1597161397
Report to moderator
1597161397
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597161397

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597161397
Reply with quote  #2

1597161397
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1597161397
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1597161397

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1597161397
Reply with quote  #2

1597161397
Report to moderator
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 04, 2012, 07:46:47 PM
 #4102


You can't merge mine bitcoin and litecoin.  That doesn't work.


So how is it possible to have a mining pool that supports LTC and BTC mining? it should be, on different ports Undecided
Run p2pool twice with different settings.

You will have one pool for BTC and one pool for LTC.  Not one pool with ports for both.

Thanks, yeah I end up doing so, I was just waiting for some results to see if it's working alright or not
but still I'm getting the ups and downs in local BTC Hash rate...

For some reasons there are always ups and downs in the hash rate.  If you look at the global rate, it seems to follow a sine curve.  I've seen it locally on p2pool, and on every pool I've used.  Maybe some day I'll understand why.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 04, 2012, 07:56:51 PM
 #4103

use the webpage

127.0.0.1:9332  and go to graphs. it should even out over time.
btctalk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 112



View Profile WWW
December 04, 2012, 08:21:47 PM
 #4104

thanks all

Persian Blockchain Consultation Group: http://shiryakhat.net
Super Bitcoiner Club http://superbitcoiner.com
Persian Bitcoin Community - http://btctalk.com - http://fb.com/IranBitcoin
BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2012, 04:43:42 AM
Last edit: December 05, 2012, 05:02:29 AM by BkkCoins
 #4105

I'm just trying out p2pool for first time.

I'm getting a lot of these:

Traceback (most recent call last):
Failure: twisted.python.failure.DefaultException: sharereply result: too long

Is that normal or is something wrong?

In cgminer it always say the pool is dead. But I'm entering apparently correct values.

netstat -lntp shows it's listening on 0.0.0.0 not 127.0.0.1


tiberiandusk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 575
Merit: 500


The North Remembers


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2012, 05:22:36 AM
 #4106

I'm just trying out p2pool for first time.

I'm getting a lot of these:

Traceback (most recent call last):
Failure: twisted.python.failure.DefaultException: sharereply result: too long

Is that normal or is something wrong?

In cgminer it always say the pool is dead. But I'm entering apparently correct values.

netstat -lntp shows it's listening on 0.0.0.0 not 127.0.0.1



9.3 fixed this problem. Scroll up.

Bitcoin Auction House http://www.BitBid.net BTC - 1EwfBVC6BwA6YeqcYZmm3htwykK3MStW6N | LTC - LdBpJJHj4WSAsUqaTbwyJQFiG1tVjo4Uys Don't get Goxed.
BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2012, 05:29:53 AM
Last edit: December 05, 2012, 05:57:58 AM by BkkCoins
 #4107

I'm just trying out p2pool for first time.

I'm getting a lot of these:

Traceback (most recent call last):
Failure: twisted.python.failure.DefaultException: sharereply result: too long

Is that normal or is something wrong?

In cgminer it always say the pool is dead. But I'm entering apparently correct values.

netstat -lntp shows it's listening on 0.0.0.0 not 127.0.0.1



9.3 fixed this problem. Scroll up.
Ah. Ok. I didn't read back much. I'll d/l and try 9.3 then. Thx.

edit: Done. That error is gone. But the pool still shows as Dead in cgminer.

Using,
host: http://127.0.0.1:9332
user: 15...address
pwd: xxx

It should work as the stats/graph interface shows up on 127.0.0.1:9332

edit2:
Or does it just always take a while after starting p2pool for it to be alive? I see it now shows up as alive in cgminer after about 10 minutes or so.

Now I'm getting this:

Code:
[2012-12-05 12:54:22] Rejected e26cbf8f.5ca9c8b1 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:29] Accepted 70721a13.01ba3366 GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:34] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:40] Accepted 5634174c.7bfe87fc GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:42] Accepted 80dff53a.bf5d8415 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:46] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:51] Accepted b2d828ba.45538286 GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:54] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:57] Accepted efb1033b.86eb6754 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:59] Accepted ec5af0bc.ca0a720d GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:55:05] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:55:05] Accepted bb40cf3f.b7e293bc GPU 2 pool 3
Normal for so many LP restarts? I'm probably getting quite high latencies due to my location. Maybe it's not worth me using p2pool with high latency? Just wondering.

sharky112065
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 383
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 05, 2012, 06:05:24 AM
 #4108

I'm just trying out p2pool for first time.

I'm getting a lot of these:

Traceback (most recent call last):
Failure: twisted.python.failure.DefaultException: sharereply result: too long

Is that normal or is something wrong?

In cgminer it always say the pool is dead. But I'm entering apparently correct values.

netstat -lntp shows it's listening on 0.0.0.0 not 127.0.0.1



9.3 fixed this problem. Scroll up.
Ah. Ok. I didn't read back much. I'll d/l and try 9.3 then. Thx.

edit: Done. That error is gone. But the pool still shows as Dead in cgminer.

Using,
host: http://127.0.0.1:9332
user: 15...address
pwd: xxx

It should work as the stats/graph interface shows up on 127.0.0.1:9332

edit2:
Or does it just always take a while after starting p2pool for it to be alive? I see it now shows up as alive in cgminer after about 10 minutes or so.

Now I'm getting this:

Code:
[2012-12-05 12:54:22] Rejected e26cbf8f.5ca9c8b1 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:29] Accepted 70721a13.01ba3366 GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:34] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:40] Accepted 5634174c.7bfe87fc GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:42] Accepted 80dff53a.bf5d8415 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:46] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:51] Accepted b2d828ba.45538286 GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:54] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:54:57] Accepted efb1033b.86eb6754 GPU 0 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:54:59] Accepted ec5af0bc.ca0a720d GPU 1 pool 3
 [2012-12-05 12:55:05] LONGPOLL from pool 3 requested work restart
 [2012-12-05 12:55:05] Accepted bb40cf3f.b7e293bc GPU 2 pool 3
Normal for so many LP restarts? I'm probably getting quite high latencies due to my location. Maybe it's not worth me using p2pool with high latency? Just wondering.

I noticed you have multiple pools setup. Are you using the failoveronly option for cgminer? Unless something has changed and I did not notice you cannot have cgminer process work from other pools at the same time as it processes work for P2pool (something about LP's coming too quickly).

Donations welcome: 12KaKtrK52iQjPdtsJq7fJ7smC32tXWbWr
BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2012, 06:19:00 AM
 #4109

I noticed you have multiple pools setup. Are you using the failoveronly option for cgminer? Unless something has changed and I did not notice you cannot have cgminer process work from other pools at the same time as it processes work for P2pool (something about LP's coming too quickly).
Yes, have Failover-only set True in conf.

This is my pool info display.
Code:
Queued work requests: 15
 Share submissions: 261
 Accepted shares: 247
 Rejected shares: 14
 Accepted difficulty shares: 247
 Rejected difficulty shares: 14
 Reject ratio: 5.4%
Seems like ok values considering I've heard rejects are usually higher on p2pool. It's still lower than the network reported value around 23%. I guess I'll let it run and figure out if it's working properly.

aTg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 05, 2012, 07:37:52 PM
Last edit: December 06, 2012, 02:44:32 AM by aTg
 #4110

Quote
Pool rate: 330GH/s (21% stale) Share difficulty: 577
Node uptime: 0.376 days Peers: 6 out, 1 in
Local rate: 39.1GH/s (62% DOA) Expected time to share: 0.0177 hours
Shares: 501 total (76 orphaned, 157 dead) Efficiency: 67.76%

I'm on version 9.3, which is going on?

Quote
Pool rate: 327GH/s (15% stale) Share difficulty: 634
Node uptime: 0.201 days Peers: 7 out, 2 in
Local rate: 637MH/s (6.7% DOA) Expected time to share: 1.19 hours
Shares: 4 total (0 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: 117.8%

EDIT:When i put less MH/s, rejected rates are more reasonable.
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1000


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2012, 11:23:11 PM
 #4111

What is UR mining rig? Also check GBT latency.

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
aTg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 06, 2012, 02:53:22 AM
 #4112

What is UR mining rig? Also check GBT latency.

I use FPGA/USB, the hardware is perfectly supported by p2pool in small quantities. What is GBT latency?
BkkCoins
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


firstbits:1MinerQ


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2012, 05:00:43 AM
 #4113

I noticed you have multiple pools setup. Are you using the failoveronly option for cgminer? Unless something has changed and I did not notice you cannot have cgminer process work from other pools at the same time as it processes work for P2pool (something about LP's coming too quickly).
Yes, have Failover-only set True in conf.

This is my pool info display.
Code:
Queued work requests: 15
 Share submissions: 261
 Accepted shares: 247
 Rejected shares: 14
 Accepted difficulty shares: 247
 Rejected difficulty shares: 14
 Reject ratio: 5.4%
Seems like ok values considering I've heard rejects are usually higher on p2pool. It's still lower than the network reported value around 23%. I guess I'll let it run and figure out if it's working properly.
I'm afraid I've given up on p2pool now. After a day of mining I had 5 shares of which 4 were either orphans or rejects. So that's about 75% loss? I simply can't afford to do mining like that with the current difficulty and electric costs. It was a nice idea but I'm going back to my regular pool where I actually get paid to mine. Maybe it's latency issues here but my info above seemed ok.

forrestv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 514


View Profile
December 06, 2012, 07:21:45 AM
 #4114

P2Pool release 9.4 tag: 9.4 hash: c95830cd6486b848c9201668720072485b2a8aed

Windows binary: http://u.forre.st/u/ahajjytb/p2pool_win32_9.4.zip
Source zipball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/9.4
Source tarball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/tarball/9.4

Changes:
* Fixed inefficient memory usage - Resident memory went from 736MB to 266MB for Diablo-D3

1J1zegkNSbwX4smvTdoHSanUfwvXFeuV23
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1000


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2012, 07:32:45 AM
 #4115

P2Pool release 9.4 tag: 9.4 hash: c95830cd6486b848c9201668720072485b2a8aed

Windows binary: http://u.forre.st/u/ahajjytb/p2pool_win32_9.4.zip
Source zipball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/9.4
Source tarball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/tarball/9.4

Changes:
* Fixed inefficient memory usage - Resident memory went from 736MB to 266MB for Diablo-D3
Yea, it is really nice Smiley 263MB res just after start on my 64bit VM Smiley Great job forrsetv!

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1000


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2012, 07:34:02 AM
 #4116

What is UR mining rig? Also check GBT latency.

I use FPGA/USB, the hardware is perfectly supported by p2pool in small quantities. What is GBT latency?
Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency
See your /static/graphs.html?Hour page and look on graph
Mine is around 0.2s

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
aTg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 06, 2012, 10:18:55 AM
Last edit: December 06, 2012, 10:40:53 AM by aTg
 #4117



As I can reduce latency? in another Internet connection, I have 0.5s, ADSL is the problem?
rav3n_pl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1361
Merit: 1000


Don`t panic! Organize!


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2012, 10:46:45 AM
 #4118

As I can reduce latency? in another Internet connection, I have 0.5s, ADSL is the problem?
On avg 10s longpool if GBT is ~3s you have fair chance to get work that is already stale :/
IMO it is your bitcoind lagging, try latest git https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
Check your bitcoind and p2pool server CPU usage, maybe it is chocking...

1Rav3nkMayCijuhzcYemMiPYsvcaiwHni  Bitcoin stuff on my OneDrive
My RPC CoinControl for any coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=929954
Some stuff on https://github.com/Rav3nPL/
aTg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 06, 2012, 11:25:16 AM
Last edit: December 06, 2012, 04:15:58 PM by aTg
 #4119

In the two PCs I have version 0.7.1 of bitcoind, one is build 0.7.1-precise1 this is what gives 4s latency over right now and the other is the build 0.7.1-oneiric1 works well but not I think the problem comes from the collection, I end the ideas ...
cabin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 606
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 06, 2012, 02:49:25 PM
 #4120

In the two PCs I have version 0.7.1 of bitcoind, one is build 0.7.1-precise1 this is what gives 4s latency over right now and the other is the build 0.7.1-oneiric1 works well but not I think the problem comes from the collection, I end the ideas ...

Try editing your bitcoin conf with the below settings. The reasoning behind them is with less connections and less transactions to process your bitcoind will respond faster. It did help a lot for me. Also I've noticed that anyone compiling their own bitcoin from git has a big advantage too since the new db system for the next bitcoin release is way faster. If you can't compile your own keep an eye out for a 0.8RC1 when it comes out.

Code:

maxconnections=10

#Maximum size, in bytes, of blocks you create:
blockmaxsize=50000

#How many bytes of the block should be dedicated to high-priority transactions,                                                                                                 
#included regardless of the fees they pay                                                                                                                                 
blockprioritysize=2000

#Minimum block size you want to create; block will be filled with free transactions                                                                                       
#until there are no more or the block reaches this size:                                                                                                                 
blockminsize=0

#Fee-per-kilobyte amount (in BTC) considered the same as "free"                                                                                                                   
#Be careful setting this: if you set it to zero then                                                                                                                     
#a transaction spammer can cheaply fill blocks using                                                                                                                     
#1-satoshi-fee transactions. It should be set above the real                                                                                                             
#cost to you of processing a transaction.                                                                                                                                 
mintxfee=0.0005
Pages: « 1 ... 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 [206] 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!