[1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool

[jtoomim]

"pypy run_p2pool.py" is sufficient, but you may want to consider adding "--fee 0 --address (your address here) --give-author 0" or some variant thereof.

Why displays the same thing several times? This is LTC, you source

You probably have several different miners on your node. The section of code that prints that line gets run once per share per user. It's supposed to squelch the output from users after the first, but for some reason it isn't. I'm not sure why it's printing that line multiple times, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. If you want me to take a look at your node to make sure it's running well, let me know your IP.

Edit: Just checked the source, and it doesn't squelch at all. Oops. I should probably fix that. Don't worry about it though, it's just harmless debugging output. If it bothers you, you can replace line 215 of p2pool/data.py with "if 0:" to get rid of the text.

[1713930969]

1713930969

[1713930969]

1713930969

[1713930969]

1713930969

[1713930969]

1713930969

[1713930969]

1713930969

[1713930969]

1713930969

[smoothrunnings]

Using a SHA ASIC miner with my pool. I take it I just have to put the sername:9332  and my bitcoin wallet id in for the user name right?

[smoothrunnings]

Is there a stat page on your p2pool addition?

How to I access it?

Thanks,


- Update - Found it.

[smoothrunnings]

Are there any good BTC front-ends for P2Pool?

Thanks

[uspeh6325]

Hi. Tell me, please. I set my antminer s9 on p2pool (stratum+tcp://p2pool.org:9332). the connection to the pool was good. in the Miner Dashboard I could see their statistics. But after 12 hours of work the pool in antminer died. and when in the opening of the Miner Dashboard appeared an error "Invalid Address! The bitcoin address you submitted (1DQrUQ2S9pbA58KxjtGEZ54RfXC49saZ6m) is not valid." . I tried again to reconfigure antminer s9, but the status of the pool "dead". change of address of the wallet did not help. why? what to do?

[crypto_curious]

Hi. Tell me, please. I set my antminer s9 on p2pool (stratum+tcp://p2pool.org:9332). the connection to the pool was good. in the Miner Dashboard I could see their statistics. But after 12 hours of work the pool in antminer died. and when in the opening of the Miner Dashboard appeared an error "Invalid Address! The bitcoin address you submitted (1DQrUQ2S9pbA58KxjtGEZ54RfXC49saZ6m) is not valid." . I tried again to reconfigure antminer s9, but the status of the pool "dead". change of address of the wallet did not help. why? what to do?

Don't mine on that server. Find yourself a jtoomim p2pool fork node and mine there.

[uspeh6325]

how are payouts from the p2pool? in what period of time payments?

[crypto_curious]

how are payouts from the p2pool? in what period of time payments?

Everytime there is a block found by p2pool, you get payment. Providing that you have shares found and accounted for in p2pool sharechain.

[jtoomim]

I pushed two changes to 1mb_segwit that change how pseudoshare difficulty is calculated for miners.

First, I fixed a bug for Litecoin that was limiting difficulty to about 15k. This resulted in excessive CPU and bandwidth usage on p2pool nodes that have more than about 10 GH/s. I fixed that bug, which means that Litecoin difficulties will be more reasonable (e.g. 226k on my node with 100 GH/s.

Second, I increased the target pseudoshare rate on all networks to 10 per second (from 1 per second, except for Litecoin's bug).

This should result in smoother hashrate graphs for all nets except Litecoin, at the expense of slightly higher CPU and bandwidth usage. For Litecoin, expect rougher hashrate graphs but substantially lower CPU and bandwidth usage.

If you're running my code, a git pull should grab the changes. Unless you're running a large Litecoin node, these changes are not likely to make a big difference for you, so feel free to skip this update.

[Tornado_of_Coins]

I have an S9 and tried to connect to several JT pools and it's not showing work at all, does it take a while to show connection?

This is the current one I tried : ml.toom.im:9332

EDIT: Ok, its connected took about 3-5minutes

[jtoomim]

I'm moving the rest of our L3+s onto p2pool. P2pool's LTC hashrate should now be around 500 GH/s, enough for 2-3 blocks per day on average.

[Kiefff]

Awesome work Jtoomim. I'm currently running your fork and enabled the 1% dev fee. Will the hash you put on the pool be staying with us?As in not rentals?

[jtoomim]

FYI, the dev fee does not go to me. It goes to forrestv.

Our LTC hashrate will probably be staying on p2pool as long as merged mining and multipool mining has a small or zero advantage over straight LTC mining.

[Kiefff]

Awesome. So I'm running your fork and seem to have some issues. Only 2 submitted shares this whole time with 8GH on my node. It seems that the diff for each is going everywhere? http://cyberdyne-mining.io:9327/static/

*edit* no longer using 1mb_segwit fork. Will test some more later

[Kiefff]

so back at it again this morning running 1mb_segwit fork. My miner are showing a diff of 4.07k and still no shares from any miners on my node. If you goto http://cyberdyne-mining.io:9327/static/UI/ you see can the differences in the share diff for each miner. Miners of same hashrate sometimes have crazy diff. Not getting any errors on my back end. Seemed yesterday I got 2 valid shares then after that nothing.

**edit**
seems I may have freaked out a bit  I guess the network is that much more difficulty with the added hash now? My node seems to be getting shares, staying in the 95-100% efficiency range so far running PYPY. I've also gathered a growing group of miners already on my node, they smelt the blocks with the newly added hashrate?  . My node is currently pushing ~13.9GH

http://cyberdyne-mining.io:9327/static/
http://cyberdyne-mining.io:9327/static/UI/ for those that like it fancy

[Kiefff]

I lied about no errors....also, adding ANY +diff number and my miner always shows Diff of 8.04M
Running on ubuntu server

Code:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/pypy2.7/dist-packages/Twisted-15.4.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 501, in _startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "/usr/local/lib/pypy2.7/dist-packages/Twisted-15.4.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 588, in _runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 256, in gotResult
    it(res2)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 233, in it
    res = gen.send(cur) # external code is run here
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 284, in _worker
    self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/expiring_dict.py", line 109, in <lambda>
    self._expire_loop = expire_loop = deferral.RobustLoopingCall(lambda: self_ref().expire())
exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'expire'

Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/pypy2.7/dist-packages/Twisted-15.4.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 501, in _startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "/usr/local/lib/pypy2.7/dist-packages/Twisted-15.4.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 588, in _runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 256, in gotResult
    it(res2)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 233, in it
    res = gen.send(cur) # external code is run here
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 284, in _worker
    self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
  File "/home/skynet/p2pool/p2pool/util/expiring_dict.py", line 109, in <lambda>
    self._expire_loop = expire_loop = deferral.RobustLoopingCall(lambda: self_ref().expire())
exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'expire'

[GabitKZ]

Hi !

I have S9

Is this correct for him ?

Pool 1: crypto.mine.nu:9334

Pool 2: low-doa.mine.nu:9332

Pool 3: 31.41.40.25:9332

Worker: BTC address from your wallet

[Kiefff]

Hi !

I have S9

Is this correct for him ?

Pool 1: crypto.mine.nu:9334

Pool 2: low-doa.mine.nu:9332

Pool 3: 31.41.40.25:9332

Worker: BTC address from your wallet

If those are the closest nodes to you, it all looks good.

[kano]

Hi !

I have S9

Is this correct for him ?

Pool 1: crypto.mine.nu:9334

Pool 2: low-doa.mine.nu:9332

Pool 3: 31.41.40.25:9332

Worker: BTC address from your wallet

You should point it at your own p2pool first - remember p2pool is supposed to be decentralised ... according to the thread title

[Kiefff]

http://cyberdyne-mining.io:9327/static/ <--rock solid, 1mb_Segwit fork running PYPY

Besides the invalid block this morning(im guessing invalid?), I just had someone dump 15GH+ alone on my LTC p2pool node. That puts me at ~29GH with everything looking smooth so far. Current efficiency at time of post = 101% with 83 total shares as of now. Now we just need the block train to come thru =] Again, well done Jtoomim.