Bitcoin Forum
April 16, 2024, 09:09:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 [364] 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2591608 times)
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


DARKNETMARKETS.COM


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2014, 11:23:47 PM
 #7261

DodgeCoin ? More garbage coins ...

Anyhow : time to update the 117T to 200T  on the topic Wink

On same topic .. is MultiPool using p2pool? There seems to be a lot of hash "coming/going" sporadically - but it also not translating into more blocks.

Oh .. and GREAT WORK on p2pool thanks forrestv!

Indeed, multipool is mining on p2pool. They have 0% fee, and planning to implement merged mining. Soon, this will be GREAT alternative to small miners, to mine on multipool instead of directly on p2pool node.

DARKNET MARKETS >> https://DARKNETMARKETS.COM
1713301751
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713301751

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713301751
Reply with quote  #2

1713301751
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713301751
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713301751

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713301751
Reply with quote  #2

1713301751
Report to moderator
1713301751
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713301751

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713301751
Reply with quote  #2

1713301751
Report to moderator
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
January 02, 2014, 04:48:50 AM
 #7262

Indeed, multipool is mining on p2pool. They have 0% fee, and planning to implement merged mining.

Multipool is no longer 0% fee:

Quote
A: Effective September 1, 2013, this site charges a 1.5% fee on all mined blocks. Through January 1, 2014, all SHA-256 pools are 0% fee.

NASTY POOL has a p2pool with 0% fee. Merged mining supports the pool.  No fancy web site though, just the basic p2pool graphs.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86854
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


DARKNETMARKETS.COM


View Profile WWW
January 02, 2014, 09:20:47 AM
 #7263

What pool? nasty pool it's a simple p2pool node. I have one too, look: http://lenny.dnsd.me:9332/ Should I call myself pool operator?

multipool.us is doing custom work - it enables small miners to have payouts again.

Also, multipool's BTC pool has 0% fee.
News from website:
Quote
Jan 01 7:36 PM PPC, TRC, FRC and ZET pool fees are now back at 1.5%.  BTC will remain at 0%.  NMC merged mining coming soon!


DARKNET MARKETS >> https://DARKNETMARKETS.COM
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
January 02, 2014, 09:31:18 AM
Last edit: January 02, 2014, 10:12:43 AM by smooth
 #7264

What pool? nasty pool it's a simple p2pool node. I have one too, look: http://lenny.dnsd.me:9332/ Should I call myself pool operator?

You could, although that carries some commitment to at least keep the node up all the time. If it is just your own personal node you don't need to do that.

Quote
multipool.us is doing custom work - it enables small miners to have payouts again.

Also, multipool's BTC pool has 0% fee.
News from website:
Quote
Jan 01 7:36 PM PPC, TRC, FRC and ZET pool fees are now back at 1.5%.  BTC will remain at 0%.  NMC merged mining coming soon!

Okay that is good news. Always nice to have more options, especially those supporting p2pool.
TierNolan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1083


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:13:30 PM
 #7265

I have a node running on a 20GB hard drive virtual machine.  I may have to update soon, once they blockchain exceeds that amount.

A (somewhat) antisocial solution would be a fake bitcoind node that generates empty blocks.

1LxbG5cKXzTwZg9mjL3gaRE835uNQEteWF
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 05:29:14 PM
 #7266

I have a node running on a 20GB hard drive virtual machine.  I may have to update soon, once they blockchain exceeds that amount.

A (somewhat) antisocial solution would be a fake bitcoind node that generates empty blocks.
only retarded miners would do this as they wouldnt get the nice fee for each tx Smiley

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
TierNolan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1083


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 08:14:05 PM
 #7267

only retarded miners would do this as they wouldnt get the nice fee for each tx Smiley

The fee represents around 0.5% of the total block value.  It isn't really that important.

1LxbG5cKXzTwZg9mjL3gaRE835uNQEteWF
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2014, 08:36:07 PM
 #7268

A (somewhat) antisocial solution would be a fake bitcoind node that generates empty blocks.
You don't need a "fake" bitcoind to make empty blocks. It's a simple setting in bitcoin.conf. Though if you don't have the bandwidth to propagate proper blocks, you'd be better off mining with a pool that can.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
TierNolan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1083


View Profile
January 02, 2014, 10:12:42 PM
 #7269

You don't need a "fake" bitcoind to make empty blocks. It's a simple setting in bitcoin.conf. Though if you don't have the bandwidth to propagate proper blocks, you'd be better off mining with a pool that can.

It was the disk space for block chain storage.  The "fake" bitcoind would simply build a blank block on the longest chain.

1LxbG5cKXzTwZg9mjL3gaRE835uNQEteWF
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
January 03, 2014, 01:12:05 AM
 #7270

A (somewhat) antisocial solution would be a fake bitcoind node that generates empty blocks.
You don't need a "fake" bitcoind to make empty blocks. It's a simple setting in bitcoin.conf. Though if you don't have the bandwidth to propagate proper blocks, you'd be better off mining with a pool that can.
no, you cant create coinbase with 0 payout with just making settings @ bitcoin.conf, you can limit txs. to create blocks worth 0 dtc, you need to change the src.

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 03, 2014, 01:22:40 AM
 #7271

no, you cant create coinbase with 0 payout with just making settings @ bitcoin.conf, you can limit txs. to create blocks worth 0 dtc, you need to change the src.
"Empty" meaning no transactions in the block. Obviously you can't take away the actual block reward without the block getting rejected by the network.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
nreal
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 932
Merit: 100


arcs-chain.com


View Profile
January 03, 2014, 06:23:31 AM
 #7272

A (somewhat) antisocial solution would be a fake bitcoind node that generates empty blocks.
You don't need a "fake" bitcoind to make empty blocks. It's a simple setting in bitcoin.conf. Though if you don't have the bandwidth to propagate proper blocks, you'd be better off mining with a pool that can.

Since december 21 only 1 dead share, zero orphans Wink. Nothing to do with network ! Cpu load 100% all the time because mining XPM.

Think again.

► ARCS ◄ ♦ ARCS - The New World Token (*Listed on KuCoin) ♦ ► ARCS ◄
───●●───●●───●●───●●───●●─[   Bounty Detective   ]─●●───●●───●●───●●───●●───
Website|Twitter|Medium|Telegram|Whitepaper
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
January 03, 2014, 08:17:41 AM
 #7273

no, you cant create coinbase with 0 payout with just making settings @ bitcoin.conf, you can limit txs. to create blocks worth 0 dtc, you need to change the src.
"Empty" meaning no transactions in the block. Obviously you can't take away the actual block reward without the block getting rejected by the network.
thats wrong, you can create a block with a coinbase worth 0 btc (but that would be stupid as shit...). aslong its not above the default value and not below 0 it will be accepted.

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
wlz2011
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 03, 2014, 10:14:34 AM
 #7274

如果不改变规则!
那么 未来20天我们可以看见P2POOL是如何自杀的。

Sorry, Google Translate.

If you do not change the rules!
The next 20 days we can see how P2POOL suicide! Smiley


HellDiverUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 501



View Profile
January 03, 2014, 06:48:32 PM
 #7275

So has p2pool been fixed?  Does it work with ASICs yet?

Or are we still in the "la-la-la-there-isn't-a-problem' running around phase, pointing fault at anyone else?
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 03, 2014, 08:08:21 PM
 #7276

So has p2pool been fixed?  Does it work with ASICs yet?

Or are we still in the "la-la-la-there-isn't-a-problem' running around phase, pointing fault at anyone else?
As far as I know, the only hardware that still has problems is KnC miners, but that might've been fixed. That one was most definitely a manufacturer problem.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
semaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 03, 2014, 09:01:04 PM
 #7277

So has p2pool been fixed?  Does it work with ASICs yet?

Or are we still in the "la-la-la-there-isn't-a-problem' running around phase, pointing fault at anyone else?
As far as I know, the only hardware that still has problems is KnC miners, but that might've been fixed. That one was most definitely a manufacturer problem.

knc hardware with firmware 0.99.1 works good on p2pool

HellDiverUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 501



View Profile
January 03, 2014, 11:15:55 PM
 #7278

So has p2pool been fixed?  Does it work with ASICs yet?

Or are we still in the "la-la-la-there-isn't-a-problem' running around phase, pointing fault at anyone else?
As far as I know, the only hardware that still has problems is KnC miners, but that might've been fixed. That one was most definitely a manufacturer problem.

ASICMiner Blades and Cubes were the ones I was thinking of specifically.  Because they didn't work for shit last time I tried, even through a proxy.
dellech
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 04, 2014, 01:44:52 AM
 #7279

So has p2pool been fixed?  Does it work with ASICs yet?

Or are we still in the "la-la-la-there-isn't-a-problem' running around phase, pointing fault at anyone else?
As far as I know, the only hardware that still has problems is KnC miners, but that might've been fixed. That one was most definitely a manufacturer problem.

knc hardware with firmware 0.99.1 works good on p2pool

my experience wit november Jupiters on p2pool is very good - but a bit confusing: p2pool always reports higher hash rates than cgminer  Huh  Grin
TechByPC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 04, 2014, 04:58:54 AM
 #7280


ASICMiner Blades and Cubes were the ones I was thinking of specifically.  Because they didn't work for shit last time I tried, even through a proxy.

I was not able to get the blades to work very well. I tested it against the latest P2Pool and my blades locally just the other day. The lowest DOA I saw was 25% but it was continuing to increase so I sent them back to a normal pool. If anyone has a solution for this I'd be glad to test it out.

Thanks.

Edit: I should say I have successfully run BFL, USB BLock Erupters, and a Chili on my own P2Pool node.
Pages: « 1 ... 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 [364] 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!