BUgcoin strikes back

[pereira4]

BU is buggy right now.  Growing pains.  They need more mature process.

Guess what -- I still prefer it to Core.  Who cares how robust Core is when they want to change Bitcoin into something that's not even p2p electronic cash anymore.

Dude you can't be honestly still saying this is a good idea, a fucking closed source patch on what is supposed to replace Bitcoin? You have to be kidding me.

It's like a religious cult at this stage. They will accept any old crap offered up now, on the premise of "it's just a bug". Imagine trusting the 20 billion dollar btc industry to this crap; crashes are the least of my worries.

Idiots like jonald_fyookball are too brainwashed at this point to be saved. He is accepting that developers release a closed source patch to save up for their coding incompetence. If Core devs attempted to do this nobody would trust them ever again.

Temporarily or not this is irrelevant, the point is, they have released closed source software, a capital sin in the crypto world. Good luck running that patch. The binaries are not even signed, and they somehow still fuck up and get their code leaked.

Anyone defending BU over Core without getting paid is objectively an idiot.

It's like a religious cult at this stage. They will accept any old crap offered up now, on the premise of "it's just a bug". Imagine trusting the 20 billion dollar btc industry to this crap; crashes are the least of my worries.

And the number of BU nodes is back to the about the same level showing yet again the type of person running this crap (that and all the VPSs owned by the same people inflating the numbers artificially.)

still wondering why antpool is supporting BU after all this, have perhaps some man from their mining farm working on BU, who is working on BU currently, i would like to know who are the dev behind that thing

call this a conspiracy but it could make sense, that someone that is working on the opponent project want to push it at all cost by showing pool support

This is the funny part, antpool don't even need to be running this BU crap to be signalling for it. i doubt they'd trust 100s of PH of mining operations to that crap.

This is the work of none other than Roger Vermin and his sea of VPS nodes. Even the people on /r/btc are downvoting BU devs now lol.

[felipehermanns]

Guys i m new. I posted that picture yesterday. So the nodes really suffered another attack or happened some kind of problem? Also i noticed today that the hashrate reduced almost 3% on unlimited.

Why ppl want to adopt this bugcoin?? I dont get...

[Kprawn]

Guys i m new. I posted that picture yesterday. So the nodes really suffered another attack or happened some kind of problem? Also i noticed today that the hashrate reduced almost 3% on unlimited.

Why ppl want to adopt this bugcoin?? I dont get...

Well, they are either too brainwashed to see the problem or they have some ulterior motive for doing this. I can see why some miners are supporting

this, because they might think that they would lose out on tx fees.... The main problem is the "politics" behind this... You have to make the decision if

you "trust" either of the sides of this battle. {Who will be the most capable to secure your coins}  Judge their code....

Luckily this will never be the end... there will always be "counter" proposals on the table.    

[Sundark]

BU is buggy right now.  Growing pains.  They need more mature process.

Guess what -- I still prefer it to Core.  Who cares how robust Core is when they want to change Bitcoin into something that's not even p2p electronic cash anymore.

Another week another BU BUG.

It is growing pains or maybe it is time to accept that their coding team is simply unfit for dealing with multibillion worth software upgrade?
And the nail to the coffin - BU code is no longer open sourced: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-unlimited-second-bug-sees-closed-source-code-release

[jonald_fyookball]

calm down guys... the source code was published this morning.
 

[Yogafan00000]

calm down guys... the source code was published this morning.
 

and what about next time?  Maybe it will take a week to get the source. And after that? A month, and then maybe never, and you are running proprietary close software because....

boiled like a frog who didn't pay attention to the temperature.

Jonny... it's time for you to get out of the BU boiling pot.

[xyzzy099]

https://twitter.com/CharlieShrem/status/844553701746446339

[AngryDwarf]

and what about next time?

It will be called "The Return of the BUg coin!"

[jonald_fyookball]

Jonny... it's time for you to get out of the BU boiling pot.

i dont hold allegiance but its got the most traction to break core's tyranny right now.
I also like the idea of removing the blocksize from the protocol rules.

[Yogafan00000]

Jonny... it's time for you to get out of the BU boiling pot.

i dont hold allegiance but its got the most traction to break core's tyranny right now.
I also like the idea of removing the blocksize from the protocol rules.

If you're truly devoted to your notion that "core's tyranny" must be broken, then you have only one option to you available right now:  sell everything and leave Bitcoin forever.

Because core IS Bitcoin.  Every dev, user, exchange, miner collectively decide what Bitcoin is, and today, very few are deciding that BU is Bitcoin.

[jonald_fyookball]

If you're truly devoted to your notion that "core's tyranny" must be broken, then you have only one option to you available right now:  sell everything and leave Bitcoin forever.
 

thank god you're here to do my thinking for me. 

[Carlton Banks]

thank god you're here to do my thinking for me. 

someone's gotta do it jonald

[NamedUser]

How are these people supposed to create a legitimate running hard fork!? If we fork I'm selling all of my BTU for BTC.

[epitome]

Jonny... it's time for you to get out of the BU boiling pot.

i dont hold allegiance but its got the most traction to break core's tyranny right now.
I also like the idea of removing the blocksize from the protocol rules.

I can understand your point that block size should be increased as there are more transactions right now and the core has to competent enough to increase according to the situation,but removing the block size entirely is not the solution and BU cannot be trusted to run a billion dollars worth of asset .

[felipehermanns]

Guys i m new. I posted that picture yesterday. So the nodes really suffered another attack or happened some kind of problem? Also i noticed today that the hashrate reduced almost 3% on unlimited.

Why ppl want to adopt this bugcoin?? I dont get...

Well, they are either too brainwashed to see the problem or they have some ulterior motive for doing this. I can see why some miners are supporting

this, because they might think that they would lose out on tx fees.... The main problem is the "politics" behind this... You have to make the decision if

you "trust" either of the sides of this battle. {Who will be the most capable to secure your coins}  Judge their code....

Luckily this will never be the end... there will always be "counter" proposals on the table.    

Well in my point of view, i am really an amateur on mining and dev stuff, but I can see almost everyone is supporting the Original BITCOIN..

I just don't get how people support BU if it is showing that they are amateurs playing with people money around, its like send your kid to disneyland with 20 billion dollars and say: hey my son you can do what you want with this money, i dont care, .......

I am trying to understand more and more about this BU thing and supporters becouse I have a lot of friends that have made investments in Bitcoin and they are like me, they don't understand what is going on.. And I don't want them selling their coins like a lot of people is doing right now becouse they are scared...

[Silberman]

It is impressive that this has happened once again, let them hard fork and end this soap opera now, lets see who survives and who comes begging for forgiveness.

[Wind_FURY]

calm down guys... the source code was published this morning.
 

That is good news. Let us hope for the future the network the BU developers do a good job. Whoever wins, wins and hopefully the community will come together again. The losing side should suck it
up and accept defeat'peacefully.

[Paashaas]

If i compare Core's code with BU then we shoud have Segwit asap. I dont trust BU dev they're not skillled enough.

I excpect more problems in the foreseeable future, kinda retarded from BU camp.

[jonald_fyookball]

. I dont trust BU dev they're not skillled enough.
 

and yet miners are choosing their software over Core anyway.  What does that tell you?

[Kakmakr]

. I dont trust BU dev they're not skillled enough.
 

and yet miners are choosing their software over Core anyway.  What does that tell you?

It tells us that miners puts their profits above the good of Bitcoin, which was not originally what Satoshi planned for this. He had hoped that the majority of miners would do the right thing, because they would realize that doing good, will protect the technology and the value of a bitcoin.

Unfortunately the centralization in mining cartels are bigger than what most of us anticipated, so the "bad" miners are more than the "good" miners at this moment. ^grrrrrrrr^