Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2020, 12:05:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 86% segwit support from users  (Read 893 times)
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Trusted Seller


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:00:00 PM
 #1



So a couple of chinese idiots with a lot of hashrate given by the chinese government in order to deploy the BUcoin trojan horse think their plan will work when literally nobody gives a fuck about the BUcoin software because it's a buggy mess, will release closed source patches, will ellect a president and secretary of bitcoin (LOL) and will base their scaling roadmap in a flawed concept (Emergent Consensus).
What can go wrong?


Telegram; @bitcointalkaccseller
100% First Deposit Bonus Instant Withdrawals Best Odds 10+ Sports Since 2014 No KYC Asked Play Now
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:15:47 PM
 #2

So a couple of chinese idiots with a lot of hashrate given by the chinese government in order to deploy the BUcoin trojan horse think their plan will work when literally nobody gives a fuck about the BUcoin software because it's a buggy mess,

proof that if a miner tries blocks over 1mb, WITHOUT consensus... its rejected and trashed in 3 seconds

Code:
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)

so that debunks everyones scripted FUD rhetoric of how dynamic miners have control..
3 seconds gone.

P.S dynamic implementations need NODE AND POOL CONSENSUS.
segwit are the ones that bypassed NODE consensus. and segwits Bip9 can drop its pool thrshold below 95%. oh and core can UASF ban hammer and change mining algo to get that threshold even lower..
its core with the deadlines and threats..

all while other open and diverse implementations have just run for the last 2 years with no deadlines no ACTUAL threats and just ltting the community have a free open choice.. take it or leave it

will ellect a president and secretary of bitcoin (LOL) and will base their scaling roadmap in a flawed concept (Emergent Consensus).
What can go wrong?

ADAM BACK CEO blockstream
Gmaxwell CTO blockstream moderator of technical discussion and (implied by obvious CTO) boss of cor devs
Luke Jr blockstream contractor moderator of other aspects.

core came into existance in 2014 and incorporated their lead company in 2014.. allowing 100 unpaid interns to kiss ass hoping for a scoop of the $70m and a glossy blockstream namebadge if they kiss ass

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Trusted Seller


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:17:33 PM
 #3

So a couple of chinese idiots with a lot of hashrate given by the chinese government in order to deploy the BUcoin trojan horse think their plan will work when literally nobody gives a fuck about the BUcoin software because it's a buggy mess,

proof that if a miner tries blocks over 1mb, WITHOUT consensus... its rejected and trashed in 3 seconds

Code:
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)

so that debunks everyones scripted FUD rhetoric of how dynamic miners have control..
3 seconds gone.

P.S dynamic implementations need NODE AND POOL CONSENSUS.
segwit are the ones that bypassed NODE consensus. and segwits Bip9 can drop its pool thrshold below 95%. oh and core can UASF ban hammer and change mining algo to get that threshold even lower..
its core with the deadlines and threats..

all while other open and diverse implementations have just run for the last 2 years with no deadlines no ACTUAL threats and just ltting the community have a free open choice.. take it or leave it

Quote
will ellect a president and secretary of bitcoin (LOL) and will base their scaling roadmap in a flawed concept (Emergent Consensus).
What can go wrong?

ADAM BACK CEO blockstream
Gmaxwell CTO blockstream
Gmaxwell moderator or technical discussion
Luke Jr moderator of other aspects.

core came into existance in 2014 and incorporated their lead company in 2014.. allowing 100 unpaid interns to kiss ass hoping for a scoop of the $70m and a glossy blockstream namebadge if they kiss ass



Blah blah blah. Same shit as always by this paid nerd. Get a life.

Facts remain:

1) BUcoin is shit software and no one supports it
2) 1)

Now go out for a walk, it's friday.

Telegram; @bitcointalkaccseller
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:20:02 PM
 #4

Blah blah blah. Same shit as always by this paid nerd. Get a life.

Facts remain:

1) BUcoin is shit software and no one supports it
2) 1)

Now go out for a walk, it's friday.

lol
there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Trusted Seller


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:26:15 PM
 #5

Blah blah blah. Same shit as always by this paid nerd. Get a life.

Facts remain:

1) BUcoin is shit software and no one supports it
2) 1)

Now go out for a walk, it's friday.

lol
there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?

Because BU has been the selected software-trojan horse by deep pocketed agencies and states to bribe the chinese mafia into mining it.

"President and secretary of bitcoin" lmao.

Chinese state-funded goon Jihan Wu, Bribed Ver and CIA agent Gavin Andresen want to obviously turn bitcoin into a political machine. Remember this?

http://coinjournal.net/gavin-andresen-mike-hearn-will-be-the-benevolent-dictator-of-bitcoinxt/


Same shit all over again. Too bad users will never compromise their holdings by supporting anything that isn't the reliable Core software, no matter how much they pay Jihan Wu to mine that trash.

Telegram; @bitcointalkaccseller
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:29:57 PM
 #6

you think Jihan is the threat.
lets put the shoe on the other foot.

without consensus. this is what would happen to a 1mb+ block maybe jihan produces without pool and node consensus.
even he knows to not waste 10mins of electric for 3 second reject
Code:
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)

you have been sold into a script that holds no value of truth or no value of a scanerio that would work.

maybe spend more time understanding how bitcoin works, to defend bitcoins decentralisation.
then you wont be defending one brand incorporated and now wanting a centralised TIER network.

segwit is the threat.
read code, not reddit scripts.. it will enlighten you

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
manselr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Trusted Seller


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:41:10 PM
Last edit: March 24, 2017, 03:38:25 PM by manselr
 #7

you think Jihan is the threat.
lets put the shoe on the other foot.

without consensus. this is what would happen to a 1mb+ block maybe jihan produces without pool and node consensus.
even he knows to not waste 10mins of electric for 3 second reject
Code:
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)

you have been sold into a script that holds no value of truth or no value of a scanerio that would work.

maybe spend more time understanding how bitcoin works, to defend bitcoins decentralisation.
then you wont be defending one brand incorporated and now wanting a centralised TIER network.

segwit is the threat.
read code, not reddit scripts.. it will enlighten you

You are on record shilling BUcoin which is based upon a "Economic Consensus" concept which doesn't work and you should know it if you knew how to read code. You would also not run software that keeps getting bundled with exploits to the point incompetent developers had to resort to closed source patching.

Stop trying to sound smart. Smart people are on github not on bitcointalk 24/7 giving lessons about what is or isn't great code. Segwit has been peer reviewed by every expert on the field, it remains objectively the best step forward. EC has been peer reviewed by every expert on the field, it remains dogshit. You should stop thinking you are special and start outsourcing to people that actually knows how things work instead of thinking every expert on the field (including neutral people like Andreas) which all agree on segwit being the best, being part of some sort of conspiracy or they being all idiots and franky1 being the number 1 coder in the game, when all you have to show is posting all day on a forum and 0 code. Give me a break.

Telegram; @bitcointalkaccseller
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:51:11 PM
Last edit: March 24, 2017, 03:04:50 PM by franky1
 #8

You are on record shilling BUcoin which is based upon a "Economic Consensus" concept which doesn't work and you should know it if you knew how to read code. You would also not run software that keeps getting bundled with exploits to the point incompetent developers had to resort to closed source patching.

Stop trying to sound smart. Smart people are on github not on bitcointalk 24/7 giving lessons about what is or isn't great code. Segwit has been peer reviewed by expert on the field, it remains objectively the best step forward.

goodluck moving them 46mill UTXO to segwit keys to get your segwit promises
oh malicious users wont move over to segwit keys. so forget ever getting rid of malleability, sigop and databloat spam.

though looking at the dates of the spam, its obvious who is causing the spam to try selling their proposals
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-size?timespan=1year
june/july - CSV
october onwards -segwit

oh and which 'team' removed reactive fee's (which drop in low demand) and replaced with average fee's to keep it up even in low demand times - core
oh and which 'team' removed priority and thinks that bankers 'just pay more' economics is better then coding some actual rules - core
oh and which 'team' made the biggest fork drama in the past - core 0.7-0.8
oh and which 'team' has all the snobby centralist ban hammers and coin splitter and mining destroying ideas - core

if you think the activation of segwit is the 'fix' keep learning

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
xskl0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 260


Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 02:55:53 PM
 #9

28% of the miners signalling Segwit, new record

BUY / SELL bitcoins  --->  https://bit2me.com/?r=ryOV8xZNb
Darkbot
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 03:31:44 PM
 #10

you think Jihan is the threat.
lets put the shoe on the other foot.

without consensus. this is what would happen to a 1mb+ block maybe jihan produces without pool and node consensus.
even he knows to not waste 10mins of electric for 3 second reject
Code:
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)

you have been sold into a script that holds no value of truth or no value of a scanerio that would work.

maybe spend more time understanding how bitcoin works, to defend bitcoins decentralisation.
then you wont be defending one brand incorporated and now wanting a centralised TIER network.

segwit is the threat.
read code, not reddit scripts.. it will enlighten you

You are on record shilling BUcoin which is based upon a "Economic Consensus" concept which doesn't work and you should know it if you knew how to read code. You would also not run software that keeps getting bundled with exploits to the point incompetent developers had to resort to closed source patching.

Stop trying to sound smart. Smart people are on github not on bitcointalk 24/7 giving lessons about what is or isn't great code. Segwit has been peer reviewed by expert on the field, it remains objectively the best step forward. EC has been peer reviewed by every expert on the field, it remains dogshit. You should stop thinking you are special and start outsourcing to people that actually knows how things work instead of thinking every expert on the field (including neutral people like Andreas) which all agree on segwit being the best, being part of some sort of conspiracy or they being all idiots and franky1 being the number 1 coder in the game, when all you have to show is posting all day on a forum and 0 code. Give me a break.

Well said Manselr! +1 This uber shill Franky1 needs to troll this BS at Github, he wont do that he knows he will get facerolled all over the place.
Vaskiy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1006


KawBet.com - Anonymous Bitcoin Casino & Sportsbook


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 04:06:52 PM
 #11

Yeah segwit seems to get more support from the miners over the days to come. At the same now the price decline has been making people fear a lot. Now the decline in price has go beyond limit than expected by the users being low than $1000.
K128kevin2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 24, 2017, 04:49:02 PM
 #12

there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?
I'm not against more implementations of Bitcoin. I'm just against people shoving their favorite, consensus breaking implementation flavor of the month down my throat.
kiklo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 25, 2017, 04:46:10 AM
 #13

Segwit = DeadWIT,

They will never achieve 95%.

BTU on the other hand can achieve activation with only 55% , only ~15% more to go.  Cheesy


 Cool
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
March 25, 2017, 04:51:44 AM
 #14

you're all Fing stupid, STFU and incress the block size and implement some type of segwit.

Seriously BURN any core dev that isn't for both Win-Win upgrades.

              ███
             █████
            ███████
           █████████
          ███████████
         █████████████
        ███████ ███████
       ███████   ███████
      ███████     ███████
     ███████       ███████
    ███████         ███████
   ███████           ███████
  ███████             ███████
 █████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
.
M!RACLE TELE
BRINGING MAGIC
TO THE TELECOM INDUSTRY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
40% Biweekly Rewards
▬▬▬   Calls at €0.2   ▬▬▬
Traffic from €0.01 worldwide

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ██         ██     
        ▀▌     ▐▀       
       ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄      
     ▄█████████████     
   ▄█████████████████▄   
  ██████▄██████▄██████  
 ▐█████████████████████▌
  ██████▀███████▀██████ 
  █████   █████   █████  
  █████████████████████  
  █████████████████    
    ███████████████    
 ▀██▄ ████████████  ▄██▀
      ▀██▀   ▀██▀   
       ▄█       █▄
ANN
Lightpaper
Bounty
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 25, 2017, 04:54:23 AM
 #15

Because core(blockstream) has been the selected software-trojan horse by deep pocketed agencies and states to bribe the chinese mafia into mining it.

FTFY

blockstream CEO CTO..
BTCC, bitfury ..
lol follow the money.. DCG



I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1631



View Profile
March 25, 2017, 04:55:57 AM
 #16

there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?
I'm not against more implementations of Bitcoin. I'm just against people shoving their favorite, consensus breaking implementation flavor of the month down my throat.

the only one bypassing consensus is core. they intentionally and publicly said they prefer giving only the pools the vote.. bypassing the nodes

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Kevin77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057



View Profile
March 25, 2017, 12:25:02 PM
 #17

there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?
I'm not against more implementations of Bitcoin. I'm just against people shoving their favorite, consensus breaking implementation flavor of the month down my throat.
I don’t get why people go against Segwit I mean a lot think that implementing it into the bitcoin core is a beneficial change, rolling it out is the best way to move forward it may decrease the chances of coin split, but it is clearer from a code perspective, it may be risky for other alt coin like Lite coin because they have a smaller community that the bitcoin.
naughty1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 25, 2017, 01:08:31 PM
 #18

This is a good news, a great thing for bitcoin. If segwit is accepted, it will bring a lot of advantages to bitcoin, and bitcoin can grow strongly. However, 86% is not enough, segwit needs 95% people agree, it is a very high rate, so it is very difficult. I do not know why people are against segwit, some people choose BU. BU is like an altcoin, and it should not appear, because bitcoin is a core coin, it's not altcoin. They made the wrong idea.
Xester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 543



View Profile
March 25, 2017, 02:07:30 PM
 #19



So a couple of chinese idiots with a lot of hashrate given by the chinese government in order to deploy the BUcoin trojan horse think their plan will work when literally nobody gives a fuck about the BUcoin software because it's a buggy mess, will release closed source patches, will ellect a president and secretary of bitcoin (LOL) and will base their scaling roadmap in a flawed concept (Emergent Consensus).
What can go wrong?



Segwit has many supporters as of this day with good promotion coming from its supporters and with is less risky feature compared to bitcoin unlimitehd who is susceptible to bugs. This just means that segwit is less risky compared to bu and is more promising. With Bitcoin core supporting segwit, it will attract more users and gain more attention than BU.
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1068


View Profile
March 25, 2017, 02:42:10 PM
 #20

Blah blah blah. Same shit as always by this paid nerd. Get a life.

Facts remain:

1) BUcoin is shit software and no one supports it
2) 1)

Now go out for a walk, it's friday.

lol
there are more implementations than just BU, so why fear BU?

We do not fear BU, but rather the code and developers behind it... Franky, if you cannot see the problem with that, I truly feel sorry for you. You

make some good points, but BU dev team is a joke. { within a few weeks, they have dropped the ball several times } The Blockstream group are

not just focused on Bitcoin.. their mandate go further than that... Their first priority seems to be BTC, but the "solutions" they are working on,

can be used on other Alt coins too. All companies have a organizational structure ... even Bitcoin. Gavin was the Lead developer for a long while,

after Satoshi left the scene.

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!