Please help me understand the no border ideology

[arielman]

When I hear for the first time an unlimited society, I immediately think of the disadvantages, although of course there are some benefits.

I'm not saying that it is not good to have freedom in the circulation of people, goods, but there are no margins, it is very dangerous to lose any trace of uniqueness. The homogeneity is good to the extent that I believe that good intercultural communication is needed, but it must be kept specific.

I think what is happening now, that we are encouraged to have no borders in anything is a much more concerted thing. Homogeneity is very easy to control, while the specificity will always be rejected.

[Masha Sha]

Isn't it a trap to foster a one world gov? Then when this gov follow a wrong policy (think nazi bad) there will 0 escape! As most are leftists, could they imagine trump president of the world gov?

[ladadadiweliketoparty]

Isn't it a trap to foster a one world gov? Then when this gov follow a wrong policy (think nazi bad) there will 0 escape! As most are leftists, could they imagine trump president of the world gov?

Yeah but they would have many many safety nets set in place so that cant happen. You wouldnt want one country to have too much power because if they go rogue you are all screwed but I think we have generally gone

away from world domination world wars for the last time. As long as you had peaceful nations that had to agree with a violent act you will be fine (have Canada, Denmark, Sweden on the board and see if things happen).

[Masha Sha]

Isn't it a trap to foster a one world gov? Then when this gov follow a wrong policy (think nazi bad) there will 0 escape! As most are leftists, could they imagine trump president of the world gov?

Yeah but they would have many many safety nets set in place so that cant happen. You wouldnt want one country to have too much power because if they go rogue you are all screwed but I think we have generally gone

away from world domination world wars for the last time. As long as you had peaceful nations that had to agree with a violent act you will be fine (have Canada, Denmark, Sweden on the board and see if things happen).

Safety net? If i understand you well those globalists are so smart that they would design a system with safety net? You don't find your statement completly idiotic? Look they attempt to conquer china, russia amd the usa... it is not because most europeans politicians and big business are corrupts and dishonnest  to the core that real patriots elsewhere will let themselves be enslaved for a few bribes...

The most peaceful nation on earth is the usa!

[BADecker]

Over the years when the Soviet Union still existed, there were many Soviet Russian moles that were sent to the United States. When they saw the freedom here, they loved it so much that they defected.

Around 1990, the Soviet Russia government collapsed into what is the more-or-less free trade operation that they have today.

The point is, let the people from the other nations come. Then, when the governments of the other nations see what draws people, they will change, or they will lose their people and have nobody to support them. In fact, if they re-design their governments like Soviet Russia did in 1990, and make their governments better than the United States, people will move back. Then it will be the time of the States to change and become better.

However, as these people come, let ALL Americans pick up their guns to make sure that the foreigners harm nobody.

[BADecker]

From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1093806.msg24086652#msg24086652:

A Muslim ban is only another way to keep us from having need for our guns, personally. It's simply another form of gun control.

A Muslim Ban Is Logical, Moral, Even Libertarian

So what if Moderate Muslims assure us Saipov was acting out-of-faith. That's irrelevant to the irreversible outcomes.

It's a distraction to claim, as The Moderates do, that the Jihadi is misinterpreting Islam, and that we must all do battle for the real Islam, a thing as elusive as bigfoot or the unicorn. Fact: A Muslim's actions, be they in accordance with the real Islam or not—sanctioned theologically or not—could be deadly.

Consider:

Proposition 1: The faith of all Muslims is Islam.
Proposition 2: Islam teaches and sanctions some disturbing things like Jihad against the infidel.
Proposition 3: Some Muslims, practitioners of Islam, will be prone to act on teachings that are indisputably part of Islam.

Read more at http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/a-muslim-ban-is-logical-moral-even-libertarian/.

[Oxyartes]

We need a lot of borders. I like borders.
I keeps me safe from all that collectivists and statist crap.

[Masha Sha]

Over the years when the Soviet Union still existed, there were many Soviet Russian moles that were sent to the United States. When they saw the freedom here, they loved it so much that they defected.

Around 1990, the Soviet Russia government collapsed into what is the more-or-less free trade operation that they have today.

The point is, let the people from the other nations come. Then, when the governments of the other nations see what draws people, they will change, or they will lose their people and have nobody to support them. In fact, if they re-design their governments like Soviet Russia did in 1990, and make their governments better than the United States, people will move back. Then it will be the time of the States to change and become better.

However, as these people come, let ALL Americans pick up their guns to make sure that the foreigners harm nobody.

One of your best post ever!



Even pavel dogs would have run toward it!

For russia to improve looking at colorado and oregon would help.... guess in which aspect?