Bitcoin Forum
December 17, 2017, 02:44:08 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Whom do you support BU or SegWit  (Voting closed: April 15, 2017, 12:38:49 PM)
Bitcoin Unlimited - 19 (32.8%)
SegWit - 39 (67.2%)
Total Voters: 58

Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Unlimited v/s SegWit  (Read 5819 times)
Luke Fox
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
April 17, 2017, 06:27:39 AM
 #41

Here is one of the good article which shows difference between SegWit and BU

https://medium.com/@opinderpreet/bitcoin-scaling-issue-what-it-means-for-common-man-and-how-they-can-escape-from-it-5ada1a6900b7
1513478648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513478648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513478648
Reply with quote  #2

1513478648
Report to moderator
1513478648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513478648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513478648
Reply with quote  #2

1513478648
Report to moderator
1513478648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513478648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513478648
Reply with quote  #2

1513478648
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513478648
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513478648

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513478648
Reply with quote  #2

1513478648
Report to moderator
fuckitall
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168



View Profile
April 17, 2017, 08:34:47 AM
 #42

segwit is a better option to go for....atleast the adoption of segwit won't bring any "Coin Split" kind of situation...and yeah it will also be helpful in solving the issues of "transaction malleability" the so called "bITCOIN bUG"

OnPlace Inc.
WEBSITE | BECOME AN INVESTOR OF PRIVATE COMPANIES BY USING OPL TOKENS | BITCOINTALK
puremage111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


★★ Eristica★★ ICO


View Profile
April 17, 2017, 04:58:01 PM
 #43

is the blockchain already splitted?

As i can see the BTU Coins in coinmarketcap





 ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄               ▄▄         
 ▀█████████████   ██████████▄      █████     ▄██████████▄  ███████████████  █████████████     ▄█████████████▄           ▄██▄         
  ▀█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▌     █████    ▐█████▀████▀   ▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀   ▄███████▀▀▀▀██████▄        ▄████▄       
   ▀█████▄               █████     █████    █████   ▀▀          █████           █████      ▄█████▀        ▀██▀        ▄██████▄       
    ▀█████▄             ▄█████     █████    ▐██████▄▄           █████           █████      █████                     ▄████████▄     
      ██████      ██████████▀      █████     ▀█████████▄        █████           █████     ▐█████                    ▄████▀▀████▄     
    ▄█████▀       ▀▀██████▀        █████        ▀▀███████▄      █████           █████      █████                   ▄████▀  ▀████▄   
   ▄█████▀           ▀█████▄       █████     ▄█▄    ▀█████      █████           █████      ▀█████▄        ▄██▄    ▄████▀    ▀████▄   
  ▄█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▀█████▄     █████   ▄█████▄▄▄▄█████      █████       ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄▄   ▀███████▄▄▄▄███████  ▄████▀   ▄▄▄█████▄ 
 ▄█████████████          ▀█████▄   █████    ▀▀███████████       █████       █████████████     ▀██████████████▀  ▄████▀    █████████▄
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀         ▀▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀




▬▬▬ANN▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬WP▬▬▬
.CHALLENGES ON SMART CONTRACTS.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ICO STARTS 7th DEC, 2017▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬







                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀



       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████




                      ▄▄████
                ▄▄▄████████▌
          ▄▄▄███████▀▄█████
     ▄▄█████████▀▀ ▄██████▌
▄▄███████████▀  ▄█████████
 ▀▀▀█████▀    ▄██████████▌
       ██   █████████████
        █▄ █████████████▌
        ▐█▄███▀▀████████
         ███▀    ▀▀████▌
                    ▀▀█




▄                ▄▄
████▄▄          ██████▄▄
████████▌     ▄███████████
████████▌█   ████████████▄
████████▌██▄▀██████████▀▄█
████████▌████▀████████ ███
████████▌█████▄█████▀▄████
████████▌ ▀▀███▄▀██▀██████
████████▌      ▀▀  ███████
  ▀█████▌          ▀▀█████
      ▀▀▌              ▀▀█
achow101
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


17kKQppUsngUiByDsce4JXoZEjjpvX9bpR


View Profile WWW
April 17, 2017, 05:02:54 PM
 #44

is the blockchain already splitted?

As i can see the BTU Coins in coinmarketcap
No. No fork has happened yet. The BTU coins you see are not actual coins but rather promises of future BTU coins after a BU hard fork.

puremage111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


★★ Eristica★★ ICO


View Profile
April 17, 2017, 05:05:20 PM
 #45

is the blockchain already splitted?

As i can see the BTU Coins in coinmarketcap
No. No fork has happened yet. The BTU coins you see are not actual coins but rather promises of future BTU coins after a BU hard fork.

I see. So both segwit and btu fork is not active yet. Thanks for the information

Anyhow regarding on either we will have btc or btu, is there a particular date where a decision will be made?

If yes, who made the decision on whether we will be going for btc, btu or even both?

Thanks





 ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄               ▄▄         
 ▀█████████████   ██████████▄      █████     ▄██████████▄  ███████████████  █████████████     ▄█████████████▄           ▄██▄         
  ▀█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▌     █████    ▐█████▀████▀   ▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀   ▄███████▀▀▀▀██████▄        ▄████▄       
   ▀█████▄               █████     █████    █████   ▀▀          █████           █████      ▄█████▀        ▀██▀        ▄██████▄       
    ▀█████▄             ▄█████     █████    ▐██████▄▄           █████           █████      █████                     ▄████████▄     
      ██████      ██████████▀      █████     ▀█████████▄        █████           █████     ▐█████                    ▄████▀▀████▄     
    ▄█████▀       ▀▀██████▀        █████        ▀▀███████▄      █████           █████      █████                   ▄████▀  ▀████▄   
   ▄█████▀           ▀█████▄       █████     ▄█▄    ▀█████      █████           █████      ▀█████▄        ▄██▄    ▄████▀    ▀████▄   
  ▄█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▀█████▄     █████   ▄█████▄▄▄▄█████      █████       ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄▄   ▀███████▄▄▄▄███████  ▄████▀   ▄▄▄█████▄ 
 ▄█████████████          ▀█████▄   █████    ▀▀███████████       █████       █████████████     ▀██████████████▀  ▄████▀    █████████▄
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀         ▀▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀




▬▬▬ANN▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬WP▬▬▬
.CHALLENGES ON SMART CONTRACTS.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ICO STARTS 7th DEC, 2017▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬







                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀



       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████




                      ▄▄████
                ▄▄▄████████▌
          ▄▄▄███████▀▄█████
     ▄▄█████████▀▀ ▄██████▌
▄▄███████████▀  ▄█████████
 ▀▀▀█████▀    ▄██████████▌
       ██   █████████████
        █▄ █████████████▌
        ▐█▄███▀▀████████
         ███▀    ▀▀████▌
                    ▀▀█




▄                ▄▄
████▄▄          ██████▄▄
████████▌     ▄███████████
████████▌█   ████████████▄
████████▌██▄▀██████████▀▄█
████████▌████▀████████ ███
████████▌█████▄█████▀▄████
████████▌ ▀▀███▄▀██▀██████
████████▌      ▀▀  ███████
  ▀█████▌          ▀▀█████
      ▀▀▌              ▀▀█
achow101
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


17kKQppUsngUiByDsce4JXoZEjjpvX9bpR


View Profile WWW
April 17, 2017, 05:10:35 PM
 #46

I see. So both segwit and btu fork is not active yet. Thanks for the information

Anyhow regarding on either we will have btc or btu, is there a particular date where a decision will be made?

If yes, who made the decision on whether we will be going for btc, btu or even both?

Thanks
No, there is no entity or central group of people that decides whether we use one proposal or another. The closest thing we have to that are miners, but the miners are not a cohesive group of people. There is no date or deadline for one proposal to activate.

cryptoanarchist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106



View Profile
April 17, 2017, 06:38:55 PM
 #47


SegWit is bound to fail. Bitcoin is what it is today because people want freedom from banks. That cat is out of the bag and no matter what Blockstream/Core/AXA/Henri de Castries/Bilderberg do, short of rounding us all up, people will use the software that allows them pure p2p transactions on-chain. And as long as there are people who want that, there will be people who mine that way.

Right now, there are easily enough miners to start mining bigger blocks. If we forked to bigger blocks today it would kill Core-allied miners because they would take forever to mine a 1MB block, and it would get worse as smaller SW miners jumped ship. Meanwhile, big block miners would lose hashing power, but could mine bigger blocks to compensate.

I think the only reason they're waiting now is for a smoother transition process for everyone.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!