Bitcoin Forum
January 21, 2018, 05:18:14 PM *
News: Electrum users must upgrade to 3.0.5 if they haven't already. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Do you like SegWit2MB?
Love it - 4 (17.4%)
Like it - 7 (30.4%)
Dislike it - 5 (21.7%)
Hate it - 4 (17.4%)
Indifferent - 3 (13%)
Total Voters: 23

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: SegWit2MB The Forking Compromise  (Read 1318 times)
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 03:10:10 AM
 #21

SegWit 2MB

There we go, much better.  Wink


Agree.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1516555094
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516555094

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516555094
Reply with quote  #2

1516555094
Report to moderator
1516555094
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516555094

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516555094
Reply with quote  #2

1516555094
Report to moderator
aarturka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:04:59 AM
 #22

No we already have a better solution - softfork Segwit.
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:10:24 AM
 #23

I hate it, this crazy 4MB block weight doubled to 8MB effective blocksize just doubles the shittness of segwit IMO. I want malleability fix + EC HF, thats it, thats all.

Yeah i feel you...but i would accept it because right now Bitcoin is getting slaughtered in terms of usability.  And a hard fork would be good to good to shake the development up.


Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:30:09 AM
 #24

I hate it, this crazy 4MB block weight doubled to 8MB effective blocksize just doubles the shittness of segwit IMO. I want malleability fix + EC HF, thats it, thats all.

Yeah i feel you...but i would accept it because right now Bitcoin is getting slaughtered in terms of usability.  And a hard fork would be good to good to shake the development up.



I usually have a question for people who want SegWit.  How many transactions do you have per day? The answer is always the same "zero" ... maybe once a month. Currency vs. Commodity. 
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:31:22 AM
 #25

No we already have a better solution - softfork Segwit.

How is it different than Ripple of 2004? Aside from the fact that it has Bitcoin under it?
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:37:43 AM
 #26

I hate it, this crazy 4MB block weight doubled to 8MB effective blocksize just doubles the shittness of segwit IMO. I want malleability fix + EC HF, thats it, thats all.

Yeah i feel you...but i would accept it because right now Bitcoin is getting slaughtered in terms of usability.  And a hard fork would be good to good to shake the development up.



I usually have a question for people who want SegWit.  How many transactions do you have per day? The answer is always the same "zero" ... maybe once a month. Currency vs. Commodity.  

I don't want segwit.  i would much rather have bigger blocks.   And I use bitcoin many times a week.

Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
May 14, 2017, 04:52:47 AM
 #27

I use bitcoin many times a week.

Yup.  Me, too.  It was 3-8 times daily. Now, it's zero.  In fact, I used my bank for the first time in a long time, for an internet purchase, today because I didn't want to add $6-8 to purchase a tree.

I don't want segwit.

IMO, that's because you use bitcoin.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!