Why do you victimize signature participants, dear SONM TEAM?
If you made a rearrangement on your ICO dynamics, you also make it for bounty campaign as well.
1 ETH used to be 606 SONM....
Now 1 ETH is 2840 SONM...
And the amount of SONM signature participants will get is still the same!
This means participants will earn 75% lower bounty reward.
Is this fair? Of course, no. The team should fix this problem. Are you guys aware of this?
606 and 2840. Thats a huge difference. I hope they reward their bounty hunters. Every ICO has fixed price per ETH not changed. Look at Bancor, it was still the same. Anyway, I hope this campaign gets over on 16 June 2017.
Btw, there is 3300 ETH earmarked for bounties, marketing and advisors. How they plan to distribute this
So why did SONM team suddenly made changes in the middle of the ICO stage? If 1 ETH can buy 606 SONM token since the start, it should stay that way even when price spikes. It wouldn't be fair for the investors during the time when they buy SONM and only got 606 tokens.
No idea, but all I can say is the blogging bounties are very low compared to the rest of the bounty distribution pool and that is a bad decision IMO.
Blogging bounties are the best way to reach the public outside of bitcointalk, and not only are the rewards low but the requirements are quite stiff...
On top of it. Now the value is essentially cut in half... I mean 80,000 Allocated Somn is now ~ 28 ETH to be split between users who spend hours researching, writing, editing, and then posting about the SOMN project.
700 unique words focused on SONM is actually quite a lot... how many Blogs can one make with this requirement?
And honestly why would someone invest their time marketing for beans when other projects exist?
Even though I sound upset/mad about the rewards, I still appreciate the opportunity to become involved in the beginning of this project. I plan to invest, I also like to promote/market the Crowdfunds I get into and these bounty rewards are a means of lowing my investment buy-in point.
I really suggest that these rewards are rethought...
