Where are you 'Iamnotback'?

[statdude]

anyone communicated with him?

[1714060749]

1714060749

[1714060749]

1714060749

[1714060749]

1714060749

[1714060749]

1714060749

[European Central Bank]

He's been sending me pms. I assume they're not directly addressed to me as I have zero technical knowledge.

[iTradeChips]

He's been sending me pms. I assume they're not directly addressed to me as I have zero technical knowledge.

i miss the guy. what is he up to these days? how about that much-awaited BitNet project of his? I did get some PMs from him too the past few weeks because I am one of those who followed his predictions on LTC. I hope he is well these days and return here because many people love reading his posts

[statdude]

He's been sending me pms. I assume they're not directly addressed to me as I have zero technical knowledge.

i miss the guy. what is he up to these days? how about that much-awaited BitNet project of his? I did get some PMs from him too the past few weeks because I am one of those who followed his predictions on LTC. I hope he is well these days and return here because many people love reading his posts

What are his predictions on LTC? That's the main reason i'm trying to reach him. please pm

[Last of the V8s]

He's been sending me pms. I assume they're not directly addressed to me as I have zero technical knowledge.

i miss the guy. what is he up to these days? how about that much-awaited BitNet project of his? I did get some PMs from him too the past few weeks because I am one of those who followed his predictions on LTC. I hope he is well these days and return here because many people love reading his posts

What are his predictions on LTC? That's the main reason i'm trying to reach him. please pm

quite active on pms, also quite ill. nothing recent re ltc afaik sorry
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=991868;sa=showPosts something something smartphones

[dwgscale11]

AnonyMint is active, and has some interesting things to say

https://steemit.com/money/@anonymint/re-blockchainttmft-re-anonymint-re-frankswi-re-anonymint-get-ready-for-a-world-currency-20170726t181729199z

[wiked1]

How is he these days?Any new threads??

[theheolyn]

How is he these days?Any new threads??

His health has much improved, he's busy working, you may find some hints about that on his GitHub account, and his last (very interesting) blogs threads on Steemit (some of which have been quoted above)! He'll probably be less active on blogging and more on coding for a while as of now.

[kennyP]

How is he these days?Any new threads??

His health has much improved, he's busy working, you may find some hints about that on his GitHub account, and his last (very interesting) blogs threads on Steemit (some of which have been quoted above)! He'll probably be less active on blogging and more on coding for a while as of now.

Anonymint's analysis is getting even better lately, you can tell his health is improving, it's a shame he was banned from this forum just at the time when new crypto users need access to quality information and opinions.

Another great thought provoking article,

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/is-monero-s-or-all-anonymity-broken

[CRED.me]

He was singled out by gangsters who have competing altcoin projects because they didn’t like his analysis which pointed out the flaws in their projects. Let’s see if he attempts to ban those who make criticisms of his project or if he addresses criticisms rationally and factually, admitting any lapses or errors. And singled out by some of the mods who don’t like a person who is confident. Also he was attempting to cross-link from the numerous duplicate threads on similar topics, in order to help readers gain some coherency of issues. The link above to Meta contains all the details for any readers who want to judge for themselves. Reviewing the link to Meta above, you were offended by his very profitable analysis about SegWit, which is presumably why you started attacking him personally (rather than debating the facts about SegWit, BCH, etc). You’re focused on his personality traits (and frankly picking on a man who was incredibly ill with Tuberculosis and MRI-confirmed cysts all over his liver, spleen, and kidney causing delirium and massive fatigue and so I hope you’re proud of your statements about his lack of productivity), not on his technical arguments and capabilities. I hope that works out as well for you, as his capabilities have worked out for him. The proof is in the pudding Sir.

(note as for the picking on a man who he was gravely ill, then telling him “despite the fact he's a grown man responsible for his own actions”, that’s not very masculine. If you’re really AnonyMint’s elder, then you shouldn’t be talking smack, because much elder than him is when men decline significantly in all athletic metrics. I mean you don’t see Lebron James talking smack and then not showing up face-to-face to test his masculinity. It’s analogous to not being very masculine to pick on crippled kids instead of other men who are at your competitive level. IOW, grow up and stop the feminine bitching/trolling from behind the safety of the Internet. As @r0ach explained, that is what females do is run away and hide while the men fight to death to see which man can go impregnate her. Men talk for analyzing and to do important actions.)

The forum has some “know-it-alls” who are flippantly offended by expertise, without first doing their own research to confirm their often erroneous, presumptuous flippant judgments. And gangsters who for example use a person’s chronic illness(es) to attack a person’s reputation, expertise, and skill level. Whatever.

In any case, the point remains there will be no direct communication here because of that outcome. Let it rest, can’t you? If we could, we would close this thread, because its underhanded to ban someone then continue a derogatory thread where he can no longer defend himself.

AnonyMint is not the victim. He is the victor. I’m just responding to @d5000 about why there will not be official updates on this subforum where a certain mod runs the show.

And congratulations for yet again managing to destroy productivity by inciting a necessarily long-winded, detailed rebuttal. You’re so expert at that. Which is yet another reason to not have official communications here where the moderation and curation features are not sufficiently sophisticated and decentralized (i.e. a self-moderated thread is not objective, but an unmoderated thread has no curation, and that is why AnonyMint proposed a better alternative in Meta which he is now implementing). In a decentralized moderation/curation paradigm, I would simply mark your uselessly inflammatory/truculent post as unproductive and then everyone that trusts my curation decisions would not by default see your post. They could still turn off the filter if they wanted to see all the noise and check to make sure they still trust my curation decisions. And no one would be required to choose me as their curation filter. And then the math/algorithm for making those choices automatic. There are 100s of more good ideas like that in AnonyMint’s brain.

[Viper1]

He was singled out by gangsters who have competing altcoin projects because they didn’t like his analysis which pointed out the flaws in their projects. Let’s see if he attempts to ban those who make criticisms of his project or if he addresses criticisms rationally and factually, admitting any lapses or errors. And singled out by some of the mods who don’t like a person who is confident. Also he was attempting to cross-link from the numerous duplicate threads on similar topics, in order to help readers gain some coherency of issues. The link above to Meta contains all the details for any readers who want to judge for themselves. Reviewing the link to Meta above, you were offended by his very profitable analysis about SegWit, which is presumably why you started attacking him personally (rather than debating the facts about SegWit, BCH, etc). You’re focused on his personality traits (and frankly picking on a man who was incredibly ill with Tuberculosis and MRI-confirmed cysts all over his liver, spleen, and kidney causing delirium and massive fatigue and so I hope you’re proud of your statements about his lack of productivity), not on his technical arguments and capabilities. I hope that works out as well for you, as his capabilities have worked out for him. The proof is in the pudding Sir.

(note as for the picking on a man who he was gravely ill, then telling him “despite the fact he's a grown man responsible for his own actions”, that’s not very masculine. If you’re really AnonyMint’s elder, then you shouldn’t be talking smack, because much elder than him is when men decline significantly in all athletic metrics. I mean you don’t see Lebron James talking smack and then not showing up face-to-face to test his masculinity. It’s analogous to not being very masculine to pick on crippled kids instead of other men who are at your competitive level. IOW, grow up and stop the feminine bitching/trolling from behind the safety of the Internet. As @r0ach explained, that is what females do is run away and hide while the men fight to death to see which man can go impregnate her. Men talk for analyzing and to do important actions.)

The forum has some “know-it-alls” who are flippantly offended by expertise, without first doing their own research to confirm their often erroneous, presumptuous flippant judgments. And gangsters who for example use a person’s chronic illness(es) to attack a person’s reputation, expertise, and skill level. Whatever.

In any case, the point remains there will be no direct communication here because of that outcome. Let it rest, can’t you? If we could, we would close this thread, because its underhanded to ban someone then continue a derogatory thread where he can no longer defend himself.

AnonyMint is not the victim. He is the victor. I’m just responding to @d5000 about why there will not be official updates on this subforum where a certain mod runs the show.

And congratulations for yet again managing to destroy productivity by inciting a necessarily long-winded, detailed rebuttal. You’re so expert at that. Which is yet another reason to not have official communications here where the moderation and curation features are not sufficiently sophisticated and decentralized (i.e. a self-moderated thread is not objective, but an unmoderated thread has no curation, and that is why AnonyMint proposed a better alternative in Meta which he is now implementing). In a decentralized moderation/curation paradigm, I would simply mark your uselessly inflammatory/truculent post as unproductive and then everyone that trusts my curation decisions would not by default see your post. They could still turn off the filter if they wanted to see all the noise and check to make sure they still trust my curation decisions. And no one would be required to choose me as their curation filter. And then the math/algorithm for making those choices automatic. There are 100s of more good ideas like that in AnonyMint’s brain.

Lol. After reading some of "your' posts it's clear you're trying to avoid your ban again. Good luck that with.

[mprep]

He was singled out by gangsters who have competing altcoin projects because they didn’t like his analysis which pointed out the flaws in their projects. Let’s see if he attempts to ban those who make criticisms of his project or if he addresses criticisms rationally and factually, admitting any lapses or errors. And singled out by some of the mods who don’t like a person who is confident. Also he was attempting to cross-link from the numerous duplicate threads on similar topics, in order to help readers gain some coherency of issues. The link above to Meta contains all the details for any readers who want to judge for themselves. Reviewing the link to Meta above, you were offended by his very profitable analysis about SegWit, which is presumably why you started attacking him personally (rather than debating the facts about SegWit, BCH, etc). You’re focused on his personality traits (and frankly picking on a man who was incredibly ill with Tuberculosis and MRI-confirmed cysts all over his liver, spleen, and kidney causing delirium and massive fatigue and so I hope you’re proud of your statements about his lack of productivity), not on his technical arguments and capabilities. I hope that works out as well for you, as his capabilities have worked out for him. The proof is in the pudding Sir.

(note as for the picking on a man who he was gravely ill, then telling him “despite the fact he's a grown man responsible for his own actions”, that’s not very masculine. If you’re really AnonyMint’s elder, then you shouldn’t be talking smack, because much elder than him is when men decline significantly in all athletic metrics. I mean you don’t see Lebron James talking smack and then not showing up face-to-face to test his masculinity. It’s analogous to not being very masculine to pick on crippled kids instead of other men who are at your competitive level. IOW, grow up and stop the feminine bitching/trolling from behind the safety of the Internet. As @r0ach explained, that is what females do is run away and hide while the men fight to death to see which man can go impregnate her. Men talk for analyzing and to do important actions.)

The forum has some “know-it-alls” who are flippantly offended by expertise, without first doing their own research to confirm their often erroneous, presumptuous flippant judgments. And gangsters who for example use a person’s chronic illness(es) to attack a person’s reputation, expertise, and skill level. Whatever.

In any case, the point remains there will be no direct communication here because of that outcome. Let it rest, can’t you? If we could, we would close this thread, because its underhanded to ban someone then continue a derogatory thread where he can no longer defend himself.

AnonyMint is not the victim. He is the victor. I’m just responding to @d5000 about why there will not be official updates on this subforum where a certain mod runs the show.

And congratulations for yet again managing to destroy productivity by inciting a necessarily long-winded, detailed rebuttal. You’re so expert at that. Which is yet another reason to not have official communications here where the moderation and curation features are not sufficiently sophisticated and decentralized (i.e. a self-moderated thread is not objective, but an unmoderated thread has no curation, and that is why AnonyMint proposed a better alternative in Meta which he is now implementing). In a decentralized moderation/curation paradigm, I would simply mark your uselessly inflammatory/truculent post as unproductive and then everyone that trusts my curation decisions would not by default see your post. They could still turn off the filter if they wanted to see all the noise and check to make sure they still trust my curation decisions. And no one would be required to choose me as their curation filter. And then the math/algorithm for making those choices automatic. There are 100s of more good ideas like that in AnonyMint’s brain.

Lol. After reading some of "your' posts it's clear you're trying to avoid your ban again. Good luck that with.

I already banned his new alt for repeated ban evasion. Despite the fact that on multiple occasions he has stated that he will never ever post on this wretched forum again, he continues to create new accounts, attempting to circumvent his ban while spitting out long winded, masturbatory rants. He's so addicted to attention that can't hold back.


If you're reading anonymint, how about you stop deepthroating yourself so hard and stick to what you promised - never coming back here again and working on your own projects.

[Traxo]

I already banned his new alt

however, you can't ban a hacker, lol.

[Traxo]

anunymint got banned (again). It seems this was his 2nd acc. Dude was evading his ban lol. I wonder what was the reason for his 1st ban...

Was it plagiarism?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1887077.msg18861383#msg18861383

Excessive multi posting followed by excessive ban evasion in that case. Probably the same now.

What the fuck is wrong with forum..its a cesspit of shit posters and third world bounty whore posters. But when a glimmer of intelligent discussion comes from Anonymint aka Shelby Moore he gets deleted. I dont care what he did or who he pissed off. He is probably the last chance this forum holds any relevance into the next stage of crypto. Geeez wept. Whats wrong with you mods?


For the sake of the crypto community let the guy share discuss and argue his points. Ffs

Time to make a new forum don’t you think?

We need a forum that runs on a blockchain and nobody can delete anything. With decentralized moderation, meaning each of us separately can choose which mods we trust to filter content for each of us independent from each other.

It is ridiculous that we in crypto use a CORRUPT, PERMISSIONED, CENTRALIZED forum just like LN is intended to be.

It is so stupid to invest effort into what becomes a booty for CENTRALIZED, CORRUPT mods to steal.

It might be because of the lies and misinformation they were spreading.

CENTRALIZED determination of what is misinformation is the antithesis of our entire decentralized crypto movement.
Bitcointalk is no longer congruent with our movement.
It has become some echo chamber for selling CENTRALIZED, PERMISSIONED, BOOTY calls.

Every post from @anunymint apparently was deleted. The thread is now very difficult to understand because a significant portion of the discussion is missing.

 

Although @anunymint is somewhat harsh and used a bitter language, I've to acknowledge his contribution as being helpful.

Banning users is cruelty but removing their posts? It is slutter.

I got this pm from @mpremp (the supreme leader) regarding my posts being deleted because of quoting @anunymint  

Believe it? He has removed my posts because I've quoted @anunymint. I mean what is it? A devious recursive slutter algorithm, run by a bot?

I'm shocked and disappointed, bitcointalk is not the right place for such malicious behaviors, I'll stop posting in here for a while.

Not sure why - I'd love to explain anything and repost my replies as needed.

Because btctalk management is petty beyond belief. Banning is one thing, but deleting posts is a whole other order of extremism reserved for the most petulant (and deleting RESPONSES!). Especially in thoughtful discussions.

[infofront]

It's time to unban him.

[criptix]

It's time to unban him.

Signed.


Shelby completely stopped posting for several months and accepted his ban until recently.

Imho it is time to unban and let him post here again.


We probaly can all agree that 99% of his posts are top notch content wise and it would be a shame for the whole board to lose him as a community member.


Also I think that he would not mass multipost everywhere again.

[mprep]

Anonymint's still banned. Any posts made while one of your accounts is banned is considered ban evasion. If a user gets banned, creates a new account and continues posting (a.k.a. ban evading), I will ban his account and in most cases wipe any posts made during the ban. While wiping over a dozen pages of posts may have been difficult in the past, I've since written up a few scripts to assist me in this task. As for the replies, again, in most cases if a post a user was replying to was deleted, said reply would either be deleted or edited to remove the now deleted content.

Since the guy seems to have an issue with following his own promise(s) of leaving the forum forever, this might give him a reason to work on whatever project he's developing instead of pathetically crawling back to the forum he so despises and continuing to stroke his ego and bark at anyone he disagrees with. If he has changed his mind about the forum and it's rules, he's free to stop ban evading and instead use his newest alt to contact theymos and try to appeal his ban.

[Last of the V8s]

mprep follows the rules when it suits him^ and breaks them also when it suits him - see his trust.
Inconsistent, shoddy and disingenuous behaviour.

edit/add: here's a link to shelby's recent output in this august space https://web.archive.org/web/20180712225710/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2189580;sa=showPosts

[Traxo]

Anonymint's still banned.
While wiping over a dozen pages of posts may have been difficult in the past, I've since written up a few scripts to assist me in this task. As for the replies, again, in most cases if a post a user was replying to was deleted, said reply would either be deleted or edited to remove the now deleted content.

you realize that running those scripts has probably done more damage to others than to him, right?

They participated in valuable discussions.
And you decide to delete their posts as well? It's even worse than useless because it destroys value.

Perhaps you could try and write some useful scripts in the future?

Any posts made while one of your accounts is banned is considered ban evasion. If a user gets banned, creates a new account and continues posting (a.k.a. ban evading), I will ban his account and in most cases wipe any posts made during the ban.

Besides, you can't really ban him anyway.

[mprep]

Anonymint's still banned.
While wiping over a dozen pages of posts may have been difficult in the past, I've since written up a few scripts to assist me in this task. As for the replies, again, in most cases if a post a user was replying to was deleted, said reply would either be deleted or edited to remove the now deleted content.

you realize that running those scripts has probably done more damage to others than to him, right?

They participated in valuable discussions.
And you decide to delete their posts as well? It's even worse than useless because it destroys value.

Perhaps you could try and write some useful scripts in the future?

Any posts made while one of your accounts is banned is considered ban evasion. If a user gets banned, creates a new account and continues posting (a.k.a. ban evading), I will ban his account and in most cases wipe any posts made during the ban.

Besides, you can't really ban him anyway.

The discussions with Anonymint's alts were never meant to take place as per the forum's rules. As for the replies, I've already outlined why they were deleted. If they make sense on their own, the users are free to fetch them from the deletion PMs, edit them and repost them. As for not being able to stop him, I'll quote what I've said previously:

Try to stop me if you can.   You can't.

When it comes to this forum, we'll sure as hell try.

mprep follows the rules when it suits him^ and breaks them also when it suits him - see his trust.
Inconsistent, shoddy and disingenuous behaviour.

edit/add: here's a link to shelby's recent output in this august space https://web.archive.org/web/20180712225710/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2189580;sa=showPosts

What forum rules have I broken? As for the auction extension, you are free to discuss that where it's on-topic - the split thread linked in the Trust feedback. I and many others have expressed their position on the situation so nothing's stopping you from doing the same.