Kim is less likely to solve the problem peacefully.

[pthnmj]

I am only saying this: Why? Why now? Why not 10 years ago but now? If you read what i said, you'll understand why. They need it, that's why.

USA don't like Iranians and Chinese as much as they don't like Koreans. But they can't attack them. For now. Why? Because they heff nooo powaaa

Now because NK is on the verge of nuclear power and the ability to deploy it.. They just threatened to nuke Australia..

USA heff tha powaaa don't kid yourself..

The ones I pity the most are the NK citizens eating grass and bark.. Liberating them is also a great motivator in my mind..
Unlike the middle east the IQ mean of NK is capable of supporting democracy and running a decent government..

So USA have to act as a world police and punish NK because they threatened Australia? Is this the angle you are taking?

What's Australia's opinion on the subject? Did they ask for help from USA? Are they in danger?

You are talking out of your ass and you have no fucking answers. This is a freak show and we have to watch it on CNN.

Yes the USA has to be the world police.

Why? Because the powers in Europe just sat back and watched while Hitler massacred and took countries. The Russians were no better, they join him. Someone has to protect the world from psychopaths. The USA seems to be the only one with reason.

Yes, they are Police. Remember Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Someone has to protect from terror by becoming the biggest terrorist itself.

[1714175403]

1714175403

[Spoderman]

I am only saying this: Why? Why now? Why not 10 years ago but now? If you read what i said, you'll understand why. They need it, that's why.

USA don't like Iranians and Chinese as much as they don't like Koreans. But they can't attack them. For now. Why? Because they heff nooo powaaa

Now because NK is on the verge of nuclear power and the ability to deploy it.. They just threatened to nuke Australia..

USA heff tha powaaa don't kid yourself..

The ones I pity the most are the NK citizens eating grass and bark.. Liberating them is also a great motivator in my mind..
Unlike the middle east the IQ mean of NK is capable of supporting democracy and running a decent government..

So USA have to act as a world police and punish NK because they threatened Australia? Is this the angle you are taking?

What's Australia's opinion on the subject? Did they ask for help from USA? Are they in danger?

You are talking out of your ass and you have no fucking answers. This is a freak show and we have to watch it on CNN.

Yes the USA has to be the world police.

Why? Because the powers in Europe just sat back and watched while Hitler massacred and took countries. The Russians were no better, they join him. Someone has to protect the world from psychopaths. The USA seems to be the only one with reason.

Yes, they are Police. Remember Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Someone has to protect from terror by becoming the biggest terrorist itself.

Yes I do.

Dresden was firebombed and rightfully so. The German people voted Hitler into power so they are responsible for his atrocities as well. The rest of the German cities should have met the same fate. Its only fair, the Germans destroyed most of the Europe's and Russian cities along with many of the residents. The Germans were the aggressors so they need to pay.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, yes the stubborn and fanatical Japs needed a wake up call (YOUR DEFEATED SURRENDER NOW). I would have dropped those nukes on larger cities but I guess the American president was being kind. He did save millions of lives by doing so, both Japs and Americans so I think the nuking of their cities is their own fault. They were the aggressors so they need to pay.

[Forester618]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

[Sithara007]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

I can't agree with you 100%. After the war, only the Germans and the Japanese were asked to pay the repatriations. There is a reason for that. The world war 2 was started by these two nations. The Americans and the Russians also committed a lot of crimes, but they argued that they were just defending against the German/Jap aggression.

[mindrust]

If Nazi's won the world war that spider freak would be sucking Hitler's ballz right now. According to his logic, USA is a saint and Japans&Germans&Russians&Iranians and every other nation out there are evil.

USA did the most terrible act in whole human history (nukes) yet he still finds USA rightful for their actions. Japan was winning against USA, that's why USA went mad and nuked them. They are the dirty bitches of the mankind. They have no honor. They hit below the belt because there wasn't another choice for them to survive. Some may argue that there is no honor in war at all, but then why are they crying like bitchez for Syria having chemical weapons? Why did they invade Iraq for having nukes? (there weren't any) They say it was unethicalll! Yeaa

If you think other countries don't see this and you must be stupid. Russia sees this, Iran does. NK does. And with the slightest threat USA makes to them; they will be nuking the shit out of USA. Because they know it now; If they don't, USA will. Because there are no fucking rules. USA was weak and broke the rules once, now there isn't any.

Hitler looks like a peaceful guy compared to what USA is. Because he knew how to lose like a man. USA don't.

[darkangel11]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

I can't agree with you 100%. After the war, only the Germans and the Japanese were asked to pay the repatriations. There is a reason for that. The world war 2 was started by these two nations. The Americans and the Russians also committed a lot of crimes, but they argued that they were just defending against the German/Jap aggression.

The Russians were so defensive that they attacked Poland along with the Germans and didn't even bother to declare war, they just crossed the border and started shooting. I bet the Poles were like: "Look it's our Russian friends coming to help us against the Nazis!"
There weren't many accusations against the Russians, because they had huge losses and really struggled to push the Germans back, but it was due to circumstances not their own choice. Stalin's choice was to start a war along with Hitler and divide Europe. If they weren't attacked and haven't lost so many people defending against a superior army, they wouldn't end up taking Berlin.

[Lancusters]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

I can't agree with you 100%. After the war, only the Germans and the Japanese were asked to pay the repatriations. There is a reason for that. The world war 2 was started by these two nations. The Americans and the Russians also committed a lot of crimes, but they argued that they were just defending against the German/Jap aggression.

The Russians were so defensive that they attacked Poland along with the Germans and didn't even bother to declare war, they just crossed the border and started shooting. I bet the Poles were like: "Look it's our Russian friends coming to help us against the Nazis!"
There weren't many accusations against the Russians, because they had huge losses and really struggled to push the Germans back, but it was due to circumstances not their own choice. Stalin's choice was to start a war along with Hitler and divide Europe. If they weren't attacked and haven't lost so many people defending against a superior army, they wouldn't end up taking Berlin.

The worst thing that times have changed, and no Russian. Putin now wants to divide the world into three. Russia, USA and China. In WWII the Russians could not win against Germans if not for lend-lease.

[Sithara007]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

I can't agree with you 100%. After the war, only the Germans and the Japanese were asked to pay the repatriations. There is a reason for that. The world war 2 was started by these two nations. The Americans and the Russians also committed a lot of crimes, but they argued that they were just defending against the German/Jap aggression.

The Russians were so defensive that they attacked Poland along with the Germans and didn't even bother to declare war, they just crossed the border and started shooting. I bet the Poles were like: "Look it's our Russian friends coming to help us against the Nazis!"
There weren't many accusations against the Russians, because they had huge losses and really struggled to push the Germans back, but it was due to circumstances not their own choice. Stalin's choice was to start a war along with Hitler and divide Europe. If they weren't attacked and haven't lost so many people defending against a superior army, they wouldn't end up taking Berlin.

After the war, the Russians forced the Nazis to cede their eastern territories to Poland. If the USSR wanted, then they could have annexed these areas. Rather than doing that, they gifted these territories to Poland (Posen, Westpreußen, Ostpreußen, Ostpommern, Neumark, Oberschlesien, and Niederschlesien). If you are so bitter about the Russians, then please return these territories to Germany.

[Beparanf]

There will be no peace unless kim will die. Because he is the only terror to the world peace. He is crazy to develop nuclear missile that will reach the America. This way of thinking is not good on world peace and needs immediate  precaution to stop this idiot dictator. China must do something.

[SimmonenY]

There will be no peace unless kim will die. Because he is the only terror to the world peace. He is crazy to develop nuclear missile that will reach the America. This way of thinking is not good on world peace and needs immediate  precaution to stop this idiot dictator. China must do something.

Unfortunately, Kim is not the only terror to the world. There's still ISIS. And I think killing Kim will only make it worse and push NK to war, those fanatics will want to avenge their leader-god.

[darkangel11]

I agree with your logic, but with some reservations. In addressing who is right and who is wrong is always the winning side has the advantage. During world war 2 the Russians destroyed not fewer cities than the Germans. They just won and they are not judged. If the US would have lost the war they would be tried for the use of the atomic bomb. The world recognizes only force.

I can't agree with you 100%. After the war, only the Germans and the Japanese were asked to pay the repatriations. There is a reason for that. The world war 2 was started by these two nations. The Americans and the Russians also committed a lot of crimes, but they argued that they were just defending against the German/Jap aggression.

The Russians were so defensive that they attacked Poland along with the Germans and didn't even bother to declare war, they just crossed the border and started shooting. I bet the Poles were like: "Look it's our Russian friends coming to help us against the Nazis!"
There weren't many accusations against the Russians, because they had huge losses and really struggled to push the Germans back, but it was due to circumstances not their own choice. Stalin's choice was to start a war along with Hitler and divide Europe. If they weren't attacked and haven't lost so many people defending against a superior army, they wouldn't end up taking Berlin.

After the war, the Russians forced the Nazis to cede their eastern territories to Poland. If the USSR wanted, then they could have annexed these areas. Rather than doing that, they gifted these territories to Poland (Posen, Westpreußen, Ostpreußen, Ostpommern, Neumark, Oberschlesien, and Niederschlesien). If you are so bitter about the Russians, then please return these territories to Germany.

How nice of them. Stalin wasn't dumb, he saw repeated armed uprisings against the Germans on Polish lands and knew it was better to create a puppet communist government, that will serve Russia, instead of trying to annex the lands and have to struggle with guerilla fighters. He also took some precautions and murdered Polish military, political, and church leaders in Katyn. I think the whole world should be bitter about them instead of giving full responsibility for the war to the Nazis.

[Forester618]

I do believe that the Russians were responsible for the beginning of the second world war together with Germany. Just Stalin, escaped trial because he was a winner, and as you know the winners are not judged.