The thing about self-moderated threads is that you need to trust the OP of the self-moderated thread to not censor posts critical of them and/or their viewpoint(s). There are a number of people (including some who have posted in this thread) who should not be trusted in this regard (this does not count scammers who create self moderated threads in the marketplace section in order to censor warnings about them.
I have the same quandary with respect to the United States. I was born here and have spent a lot of time here however after my run in with the whole policing for profit "justice" system our family has often contemplated just leaving. Instead, we all actively speak out against the abuses of power and, it appears, some progress is being slowly made (I have three talks scheduled this month).
OT - I think there is a good chance that there is a very good chance that civil forfeiture will either look very different (in a good way) or will not exist in the somewhat near future. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recent
wrote a very critical opinion against civil forfeiture regarding a case that the Supreme Court declined to hear on procedural grounds, and the Supreme Court
ruled in
Nelson v. Colorado in a way that may hinder civil forfeiture in the future. Also both parties appear to be generally against civil forfeiture, so legislative action in regards to curtailing civil forfeiture in the future may not be all that unrealistic (there are actually a couple of bills pending, although they are in very early stages, and it is very hard to tell if they have any real chances of actually becoming law).